Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with Qualstar TLS-4210 autochanger

2006-01-12 Thread Ralf Gross
Hi, Arno Lehmann schrieb: > On 1/11/2006 5:30 PM, Ralf Gross wrote: > >[snip] > >Device status: > >Archive "FileStorage" is not open or does not exist. > >Archive "Autochanger" is not open or does not exist. > > > > > >I think this is not what I should see at this point. > > Hmm. I'm never reall

[Bacula-users] Backup on different tapes from library

2006-01-12 Thread Christoph Jahn
Hi, dear fellow bacula users, I wondered if its possible to enable bacula to simply create the backup on the tape which is inserted in the streamer? I have 6 tapes here and i'm not able to change them every day. The tapes are registered in bacula tape library. Could to tell me how to realize thi

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: btape w/HP Utltrium-1 drives (part 2)

2006-01-12 Thread Michael Scherer
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Chris Hunter wrote: So the dust has settled; there were two problems: i) incompatible SCSI card w/mainboard (tyan s2460) ii) bad LTO drive I now have one LTO-1 drive working in my autochanger (Dell pv128t) with an adaptec 39160 pci-x card. I ran tar to tape at speeds ~1MB/

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Drives

2006-01-12 Thread redhat admin
Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hello, > > On 1/11/2006 12:03 PM, redhat admin wrote: > >> I've searched the users mailing list archive and not found an answer, >> I've seen many people ask a similar question to no avail. I'm now going >> to post here to see if you guys can help. > > > Sure, we can _always

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with Qualstar TLS-4210 autochanger

2006-01-12 Thread Ralf Gross
Ralf Gross schrieb: > Ah, the manual ;) I've to admit that I missed that part. BTW: where > can I find the user manual for bacula 1.36.3? After fighting with the > bacula-sd config for a hour, I noticed that the autochanger part has > changed since 1.36.3 and I used the 1.38.3 manual to build my >

[Bacula-users] Segmentation violation after tape gets full

2006-01-12 Thread Timo Neuvonen
Below is the end of log of Bacula 1.38.3 (release, not beta), running on up-to-date FC4 with mysql 4. Tape drive is Exabyte VXA-2. This happened after the tape got full, and job was supposed to be cancelled nicely after Max Wait Time, but something went wrong. Director conf had these timeouts: M

[Bacula-users] Restore to a different filedeamon

2006-01-12 Thread Florian Kieling
Hi folks, bacula is running in our network in a test-mode without problems. Also the restore run's without problems. But I've a question: How can I restore a backup to another filedeamon? Bye Florian --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Sp

RE: [Bacula-users] Restore to a different filedeamon

2006-01-12 Thread Masopust, Christian
hi florian, yes, that's possible, i already did this several times. christian > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Florian Kieling > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:56 AM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Bac

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore to a different filedeamon

2006-01-12 Thread Florian Kieling
Hi Christian, how must i configure bacula, that i can backup to another filedeamon? or where is an documantion to this in the net? florian > yes, that's possible, i already did this several times. >> But I've a question: How can I restore a backup to another filedeamon?

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation violation after tape gets full

2006-01-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 12 January 2006 11:54, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > Below is the end of log of Bacula 1.38.3 (release, not beta), running on > up-to-date FC4 with mysql 4. Tape drive is Exabyte VXA-2. > > This happened after the tape got full, and job was supposed to be cancelled > nicely after Max Wait Time

RE: [Bacula-users] Restore to a different filedeamon

2006-01-12 Thread Masopust, Christian
just a moment now would you like to backup or to restore (as in your fist mail) to a differend filedaemon? if it's restore, you simply change the client when running the restore-command from console. christian > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula does not recycling a volume

2006-01-12 Thread Daniel Betschart
Hello, if you search the list archives, you will probably find many threads with similar problems. Yes, I have seen this, but no one with exactly my problem. I assume that Bacula does have soe good reason to not reuse the volumes you want it to use. Usually, and we can't verify this withou

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Drives

2006-01-12 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 1/12/2006 10:33 AM, redhat admin wrote: Arno Lehmann wrote: On 1/11/2006 12:03 PM, redhat admin wrote: ... Pointer: Mailing list archive, Jan 29 2005, Mario Wolff, Subject: Using multiple tapedrives as autochanger! and at least one folluwup to that mail. Remember: Untested, and thi

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup on different tapes from library

2006-01-12 Thread Phil Stracchino
Christoph Jahn wrote: > Hi, dear fellow bacula users, > > I wondered if its possible to enable bacula to simply create the > backup on the tape which is inserted in the streamer? > > I have 6 tapes here and i'm not able to change them every day. > The tapes are registered in bacula tape library.

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore to a different filedeamon

2006-01-12 Thread Phil Stracchino
Florian Kieling wrote: > Hi folks, > bacula is running in our network in a test-mode without problems. > Also the restore run's without problems. > But I've a question: How can I restore a backup to another filedeamon? 'restore', go through the options, and one of the last things it will ask you i

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup on different tapes from library

2006-01-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 12 January 2006 15:04, Phil Stracchino wrote: > Christoph Jahn wrote: > > Hi, dear fellow bacula users, > > > > I wondered if its possible to enable bacula to simply create the > > backup on the tape which is inserted in the streamer? > > > > I have 6 tapes here and i'm not able to chan

[Bacula-users] Directory Seg Fault

2006-01-12 Thread Benjamin Menking
I was backing up a directory that was approximately 5GB.  The backup got about 2.5GB of the data and seg faulted.  Is this the right place to post these kind of messages?  I've included the daemon message and the traceback: --- 11-Jan 23:52 ensim-dir: ABORTING due to ERROR in sql_create.c:662

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore to a different filedeamon

2006-01-12 Thread Florian Kieling
>> bacula is running in our network in a test-mode without problems. >> Also the restore run's without problems. >> But I've a question: How can I restore a backup to another filedeamon? >> > > 'restore', go through the options, and one of the last things it will > ask you is which client (i.

[Bacula-users] Database errors

2006-01-12 Thread Danie Theron
Hi , I did a dbcheck to clean up some orphaned jobs etc , now after backups I get the following errors : 12-Jan 11:34 venus-dir: mailx3.2006-01-11_21.05.07 Fatal error: sql_update.c:118 Update problem: affected_rows=0 12-Jan 11:34 venus-dir: mailx3.2006-01-11_21.05.07 Warning: Error updating

Re: [Bacula-users] Directory Seg Fault

2006-01-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hmmm -- ugly. I wonder why all of a sudden we have a huge wave of users running into problems from the same code that was implemented at least two years ago -- some strange synchrony working here ?? This looks like it is yet another manifestation of the MaxRunTime code timing out the job a

Re: [Bacula-users] Directory Seg Fault

2006-01-12 Thread Benjamin Menking
What is interesting to me is that MaxRunTime and MaxWaitTime are not declared in any of the config files (that I could find).  Are there some default values set for those settings if they are not specified? I would assume that a value of 0 for either of those options will be defined as no limi

Re: [Bacula-users] Directory Seg Fault

2006-01-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
I may have been wrong in assuming that it was the watchdog that canceled the job, but the basic problem is that you had a mutex failure. That normally only would occur if Bacula's internal memory is trashed, or you have a hardware problem. If the problem persists, you should consider doing a t

[Bacula-users] Bacula BETA 1.38.4-20060112 released

2006-01-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I have released the tar source file for Bacula BETA 1.38.4-20060112 to the Source Forge bacula-beta section. I have made the following changes since the 09Jan06 beta release: Changes to 1.38.4 BETA since beta 09Jan06: - The main changes are to the Director and the Storage daemon

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: btape w/HP Utltrium-1 drives (part 2)

2006-01-12 Thread Chris Hunter
I am using LVDSE cables (the really, really tiny connectors), that was the card that fit. No problems with the kernel (2.6.9-22.0.1.EL SMP) and the adaptec card. Of course, I had no kernel messages about the lsi 53c1010_66, card and it didn't work. On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Michael Scherer wrote:

[Bacula-users] Re: autochanger "slots" command broken -- bad config ? (Chris Hunter)

2006-01-12 Thread Chris Hunter
Hi Arno, Thanks for the reply. I copied a "fresh" copy of the mtx-changer script from the source and it works now. I uncommented an echo line which was causing it to fail. On the subject of mtx-changer script, in the bacula release manual located here: http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Autocha

[Bacula-users] Re: Time for a Bacula book?

2006-01-12 Thread Arthur Emerson III
Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nevertheless, I would like to find someone to undertake this > project, preferrably with the kinds of skills mentioned by John. > For my part, I can work on finding a publisher, contribute a good > amount of the work and provide authorization to use any

[Bacula-users] updated debian packages?

2006-01-12 Thread Ralf Gross
Hi, I'm running bacula on a debian sarge system. The current debian bacula version is 1.36.3-1, even in unstable. Are there any more recent backports for bacula (I didn't find anything more recent on www.apt-get.org)? I don't want to build bacula from source, but as I'm just starting to set up t

[Bacula-users] bacula configure script

2006-01-12 Thread Dimitri Puzin
Hi all, when configuring bacula sources like $ ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bacula/binaries ... then I'd expect the man directory to be set to ${prefix}/man, however it defaults to /usr/share/man. Is that wanted behavior? Regards, -Dimitri -

Re: [Bacula-users] updated debian packages?

2006-01-12 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Ralf Gross wrote: Hi, I'm running bacula on a debian sarge system. The current debian bacula version is 1.36.3-1, even in unstable. Are there any more recent backports for bacula (I didn't find anything more recent on www.apt-get.org)? I don't want to build bacula from source, but as I'm just s

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula configure script

2006-01-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 12 January 2006 18:37, Dimitri Puzin wrote: > Hi all, > > when configuring bacula sources like > $ ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bacula/binaries ... > then I'd expect the man directory to be set to ${prefix}/man, however it > defaults to /usr/share/man. Is that wanted behavior? Yes, th

[Bacula-users] Bacula query 9: strange result

2006-01-12 Thread Jari Fredriksson
bconsole query: 9: List Volumes to Restore All Files I have a critical server, which has 3 distinct jobs 1. One for the Linux System 2. One for the Samba data which is serves 3. One for backing up the MySQL bacula database is has for bacula. The job #3 is a full backup every night, for the dum

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula query 9: strange result

2006-01-12 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Jari Fredriksson wrote: bconsole query: 9: List Volumes to Restore All Files I have a critical server, which has 3 distinct jobs 1. One for the Linux System 2. One for the Samba data which is serves 3. One for backing up the MySQL bacula database is has for bacula. The job #3 is a full backup

RE: [Bacula-users] Re: Time for a Bacula book?

2006-01-12 Thread Ray Pengelly
>Athur Emerson wrote: > > > From reading their proposal submission guidelines, it would > appear that a book on Bacula would be something that O'Reilly > would entertain. > > http://www.oreilly.com/oreilly/author/intro.html > > I didn't read the above in detail, but did notice that they > wan

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula configure script

2006-01-12 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:17:07 +0100, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Kern> On Thursday 12 January 2006 18:37, Dimitri Puzin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> when configuring bacula sources like >> $ ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bacula/binaries ... >> then I'd expect the man direct

[Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Time for a Bacula book?

2006-01-12 Thread Andrew Ford
I thought I'd better raise my hand here. As you know I hacked away at the Bacula documentation back in September but have been rather quiet since (I have been rushed off my feet with consultancy, preparing company accounts, and selling rights to a cookery book we published and hacking on latex

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Time for a Bacula book?

2006-01-12 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 1/12/2006 10:25 PM, Andrew Ford wrote: I thought I'd better raise my hand here. As you know I hacked away at the Bacula documentation back in September but have been rather quiet since (I have been rushed off my feet with consultancy, preparing company accounts, and selling rights to a

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Time for a Bacula book?

2006-01-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 12 January 2006 23:09, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Andrew Ford wrote: > > Maybe what is needed is a separate documentation mailing list to > > gather together the interested parties and then to draw up a > > strategy for the documentation as a sub-project. I'll comment

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Time for a Bacula book?

2006-01-12 Thread Andrew Ford
Kern Sibbald wrote: On Thursday 12 January 2006 23:09, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Andrew Ford wrote: Maybe what is needed is a separate documentation mailing list to gather together the interested parties and then to draw up a strategy for the documentation as a sub-proj

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Time for a Bacula book?

2006-01-12 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Andrew Ford wrote: Kern Sibbald wrote: I appreciate your interest, but as you will soon learn, I'm not a fan of DocBook [] I'll echo Kern's thoughts on DocBook. [] My LaTeX experience is minimal, and I don't intend to be a DocBook apologist, so I can't really

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Time for a Bacula book?

2006-01-12 Thread Roberto Alsina
El Jueves, 12 de Enero de 2006 20:57, Paul Heinlein escribió: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Andrew Ford wrote: > > Kern Sibbald wrote: > >> I appreciate your interest, but as you will soon learn, I'm not a > >> fan of DocBook [] > > > > I'll echo Kern's thoughts on DocBook. [] > > My LaTeX experie

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Time for a Bacula book?

2006-01-12 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 1/13/2006 12:57 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Andrew Ford wrote: Kern Sibbald wrote: ... My LaTeX experience is minimal, and I don't intend to be a DocBook apologist, so I can't really comment on your experiences. I've found DocBook, esp. in conjunction with the XSL st