Re: [Bacula-users] Backup Method with Multiple Media Types - AIT2 Issue

2006-11-09 Thread Alan To
Many Thanks Robert - I'm running tests with the Linux Sony TapeTool now. Reading the Sony documentation, I notice that it tells me to use /dev/sg2 (after a cat /proc/scsi/scsi command). With tar, btape and bacula (including configurations) I have been using /dev/nst0! Would that be where my

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with accentuation in windows

2006-11-09 Thread Jaime Ventura
Hello Diego. This is a problem which had already been discussed. I had the same problem and as far as i understood the problem is that bacula handles UTF-8 only. That will be fixed later on. If you change you bacula-dir.conf encoding to UTF-8 and rewrite all the accentuated

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape access speed with LTO3

2006-11-09 Thread Carlos Cristóbal Sabroe Yde
The top speed I've achieved with an IBM 3581 L38 was around 30 MB/s on a test (btest). With bacula, local disk (sata): JobId: 1384 Job:srv-backup.2006-10-27_22.05.07 Backup Level: Full Client: srv-backup

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape access speed with LTO3

2006-11-09 Thread John Drescher
On 11/9/06, Carlos Cristóbal Sabroe Yde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The top speed I've achieved with an IBM 3581 L38 was around 30 MB/s on a test(btest).Have you tried a test of the raw tape speed? When I first got mt lto-2 library I did a few tests like the following time dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/nst0

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup Method with Multiple Media Types - AIT2 Issue

2006-11-09 Thread Alan To
Hi Again All Ignore that last question; tar, bacula and btape all don't like /dev/sg2! Anyway, while the Sony TapeTool happily checks/tests and read/write tapes, using tar/bacula/bconsole etc. still give me the error (this is via bconsole's label command): Connecting to Storage

Re: [Bacula-users] reloading components' configuration

2006-11-09 Thread Silver Salonen
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 21:59, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, On 11/7/2006 1:31 PM, Silver Salonen wrote: On Tuesday 07 November 2006 14:28, Dan Langille wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 at 14:17, Silver Salonen wrote: Hi. I'm a little concerned here about the fact that it's not possible to

Re: [Bacula-users] maximum concurrent jobs for a job

2006-11-09 Thread Silver Salonen
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 21:44, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, On 10/11/2006 1:31 PM, Silver Salonen wrote: Hi. I'm testing Bacula 1.38.9 on Gentoo 2006.1 and I'm a little confused here. What I would like to achieve is to be able to run a job concurrently with the same job's

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape access speed with LTO3

2006-11-09 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, John Drescher wrote: Have you tried a test of the raw tape speed? When I first got mt lto-2 library I did a few tests like the following time dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/nst0 bs=1G count=10 and I got around 35MB/s. Try if=/dev/zero and if=/dev/random AB

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape access speed with LTO3

2006-11-09 Thread Philippe Michel
From: Adam Huffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] What sort of backup speed should I expect when using Bacula with an LTO3 library? I'm seeing nothing like the advertised 60-80MB/s. The tape drive speed is not the bottleneck, then. The number of files saved (or, seen from another point, their

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-mysql rpm error? buildcentos4 hostname?

2006-11-09 Thread Alex Chekholko
On Nov 7, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Paul Cubbage wrote: When I install using bacula-mysql-1.38.11-3i386.rpm bacula-mtx-1.38.11-3i386.rpm the config files all have buildcentos4 as the hostname and the address = name That hostname string is nowhere on my system before I install the rpms but it

[Bacula-users] Update: Re: Rescue cd create/make problem

2006-11-09 Thread Don MacArthur
1. The 'nix restore process is working. My process is as discussed earlier, install a base system with bacula and restore everything except - /sys /proc *and* /boot. I learned quite a bit about getting the drive configuration right, but I successfully restored a working RH server. 2. I'm

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape access speed with LTO3

2006-11-09 Thread John Drescher
On 11/9/06, Alan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, John Drescher wrote: Have you tried a test of the raw tape speed? When I first got mt lto-2 library I did a few tests like the following time dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/nst0 bs=1G count=10 and I got around 35MB/s.Try if=/dev/zero and

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Rescue - Solaris 10 - getdiskinfo errors - error on route command

2006-11-09 Thread Alex Chekholko
On Nov 8, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Attila Fülöp wrote: A Think Tank wrote: I am trying to go though the rescue procedures / preparation for Solaris, SunOS 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240, as directed by the documentation. I have a couple of errors with the command

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula under Windows 2003 64 bit.

2006-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 06:09, Troy Daniels wrote: Greetings, We are looking at introducing 6 new Windows 2003 Enterprise 64 Servers into our business in the not too distant future. As the rest of the servers (Mostly Redhat EL3 with a few FreeBSD boxes and a couple of 32 bit Windows

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula under Windows 2003 64 bit.

2006-11-09 Thread Robert Nelson
Actually the Path name limit in version 1.39.x and above is 32767. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern Sibbald Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:18 AM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Troy Daniels Subject: Re: [Bacula-users]

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with BaculaSD

2006-11-09 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matti Jormakka wrote: That the connection was refused seems significant. At least on a Centos4 system with a default firewall configured, ports that are not explicitely permitted are rejected. You don't say what OS you are

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape access speed with LTO3

2006-11-09 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Huffman wrote: Is the data compressable? A mixture - some already compressed, some images, some XML data etc. The library and the disks are on the same fibre channel fabric, so I wouldn't expect that to be a bottleneck. I'm using

Re: [Bacula-users] Server Crash on SLES 10

2006-11-09 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There are detailed explanations on the list if you look back sufficiently far about which kernels have this problem and which do not. I suggest you take a look and see if you might be affected. Thomas Traeger wrote: Hello list, Tonight we

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape access speed with LTO3

2006-11-09 Thread Don MacArthur
I have a 7-disk raid fibre attached and a lto3 scsi attached to my sd, and I get the same throughput for both. I run 10 jobs (two from each client) to each store concurrently. I don't think the medium or the connection are the holdup. My network throughput at that time varies around 750 mbps.

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape access speed with LTO3

2006-11-09 Thread John Drescher
On 11/9/06, Don MacArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a 7-disk raid fibre attached and a lto3 scsi attached to my sd,and I get the same throughput for both.I run 10 jobs (two from eachclient) to each store concurrently. Both what? What backup speeds are you getting?Thanks,John

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape access speed with LTO3

2006-11-09 Thread John Drescher
On 11/9/06, Don MacArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The jobs are written to both the raid and the tape at almost identicalspeeds.I don't know what my total throughput is,but the transfer rate for each job is about 1.5mbps to 3mbps.For a few minutes after reading this I was very confused about that

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape access speed with LTO3

2006-11-09 Thread Don MacArthur
As a reminder, the director/sd/database system is supporting 20 concurrent jobs, 10 to tape and 10 to raid. It's a 2-cpu hp dl380 G4, 3.4GHz cpus and 3.5Gb ram. On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 17:29 -0500, John Drescher wrote: On 11/9/06, Don MacArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The jobs are

Re: [Bacula-users] reloading components' configuration

2006-11-09 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 11/9/2006 3:56 PM, Silver Salonen wrote: On Tuesday 07 November 2006 21:59, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, On 11/7/2006 1:31 PM, Silver Salonen wrote: On Tuesday 07 November 2006 14:28, Dan Langille wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 at 14:17, Silver Salonen wrote: Hi. I'm a little concerned here

Re: [Bacula-users] Is Bacula for me: Videography business backups

2006-11-09 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 11/9/2006 1:55 AM, Bill Moran wrote: On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:49:30 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Currently, the windows FD is running stable and reliable IMO. Unfortunately, I have some problems with VSS backups (windows' name for volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-09 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 11/9/2006 7:25 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote: I've gotten this one... I'd love to know what it is too. :) Dat's an error ;-) Jake Goerzen wrote: What does it mean when this happens? and is there a way to fix it? 07-Nov 08:40 adam-dir: Start Backup JobId 369,

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Have some trouble with Bacula

2006-11-09 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 11/2/2006 10:42 AM, Zemchikhin V.M. wrote: Hi. I don't receive any answers. Please, help! I didn't even receive your mail until now :-) Hi, bacula-users. When backuping I receive this messages in console: 31-Oct 11:08 xxx-dir: xxx Warning: sql_create.c:663 More than one

Re: [Bacula-users] archiving / filesets

2006-11-09 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 11/3/2006 8:13 PM, mike castleman wrote: Hi, We are trying to use bacula for archiving data which is important but rarely accessed. I'm wondering if there is a way to specify in the console which files we would like sent to tape without going into the director configuration file and

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula under Windows 2003 64 bit.

2006-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 09 November 2006 20:37, Robert Nelson wrote: Actually the Path name limit in version 1.39.x and above is 32767. OK, noted -- thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern Sibbald Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:18

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula status

2006-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 16 October 2006 17:26, Josh Fisher wrote: Kern Sibbald wrote: 1. I have requested help setting up more community participation in testing, bug fixing, and builds of more platforms such as Solaris, FreeBSD, ... This is to ensure that all important platforms are supported

Re: [Bacula-users] (no subject)

2006-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Arno, Thanks for your comments. Please see below for my responses: On Saturday 04 November 2006 22:42, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, On 11/4/2006 1:46 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, 1 November 2006 This contents of this email is for discussion on

Re: [Bacula-users] File Table entries not pruned

2006-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 23:00, Christoph Haas wrote: On Wednesday 25 October 2006 22:52, Martin Simmons wrote: On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:04:27 +0200, Christoph Haas said: On Wednesday 25 October 2006 15:15, Wolfgang Powisch (privat) wrote: My Setup: bacula-1.38.8

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple backups for a client

2006-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 30 October 2006 15:23, le dahut wrote: Hello, How can I avoid Bacula launching a second backup while the first one isn't finished ? This phenomenon occurred last WE with summer/winter time switching, a backup was scheduled for 2:00 am and wasn't finished at 3:00 am so when the

Re: [Bacula-users] File Daemon Encryption Maturity

2006-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 12:58, Mathew Brown wrote: Hi, I'd read several times that the FD encryption feature was not yet stable but this was several months ago. Would you now consider it stable enough for use in production environments? Thanks for your help. It is ready

Re: [Bacula-users] differential backups not reqiered?

2006-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 03 November 2006 11:27, Jaap Stolk wrote: On 11/3/06, Jaap Stolk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering if i could do without the differential backups altogether ? (in reply to my own post) I did some more reading and found that the differential backup only looks at the file