[Bacula-users] python support

2007-10-26 Thread Rich
i've recompiled bacula 2.2.5 with python. configure output claims it is enabled : Python support: yes but even starting director with -f -d90 doesn't produce any messages - manual claims that a message should be printed : 09-Jun 15:14 bacula-dir: ERROR in pythonlib.c:131 Could not i

Re: [Bacula-users] python support

2007-10-26 Thread Rich
On 2007.10.26. 14:04, Rich wrote: > i've recompiled bacula 2.2.5 with python. configure output claims it is > enabled : > Python support: yes > > but even starting director with -f -d90 doesn't produce any messages - > manual claims that a message should be printed : > > 09-Jun 15:1

Re: [Bacula-users] python support

2007-10-27 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 26.10.2007 16:56,, Rich wrote:: > On 2007.10.26. 14:04, Rich wrote: >> i've recompiled bacula 2.2.5 with python. configure output claims it is >> enabled : >> Python support: yes >> >> but even starting director with -f -d90 doesn't produce any messages - >> manual claims that a

Re: [Bacula-users] python support

2007-10-29 Thread Rich
On 2007.10.27. 17:27, Arno Lehmann wrote: ... >> 2. if "Scripts Directory" is specified in director configuration file, >> director can't be stopped with ctrl+c, when run in foreground; > > I don't know if this qualifies as a bug - because, in normal > circumstances, you should only run the DIR

Re: [Bacula-users] python support

2007-10-29 Thread Rich
On 2007.10.29. 19:09, Rich wrote: ... >> import datetime > > and this is where it breaks. > just adding that line to the script prevents director from starting at all : > > Fatal Python error: Interpreter not initialized (version mismatch?) > Kaboom! bacula-dir, backup_1-dir got signal 6 - IOT tr

Re: [Bacula-users] python support

2007-10-29 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 29.10.2007 18:09,, Rich wrote:: > On 2007.10.27. 17:27, Arno Lehmann wrote: > ... >>> 2. if "Scripts Directory" is specified in director configuration file, >>> director can't be stopped with ctrl+c, when run in foreground; >> I don't know if this qualifies as a bug - because, in normal >> c

Re: [Bacula-users] python support

2007-10-30 Thread Rich
On 2007.10.29. 23:38, Arno Lehmann wrote: ... >>> import datetime >> and this is where it breaks. >> just adding that line to the script prevents director from starting at all : >> >> Fatal Python error: Interpreter not initialized (version mismatch?) > > That looks like a python problem... or som

[Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-10-31 Thread Rich
see http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=998 "After version 2.2.x Python will no longer be support -- there are an insufficient number of users." which kinda worries me a bit. what about "Label Format" directive ? if python was supposed to replace it, but is being removed itself... will this dire

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-10-31 Thread Michael Short
I plan to make use of this feature within the next few months... This is really disturbing news. -Michael On Oct 31, 2007 12:28 PM, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > see > http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=998 > > "After version 2.2.x Python will no longer be support -- there are an > insuffici

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-10-31 Thread Steen
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 20:49:30 Michael Short wrote: > I plan to make use of this feature within the next few months... > > This is really disturbing news. > > -Michael > > On Oct 31, 2007 12:28 PM, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > see > > http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=998 > > > > "Af

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-01 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 31.10.2007 18:28,, Rich wrote:: > see > http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=998 > > "After version 2.2.x Python will no longer be support -- there are an > insufficient number of users." Oops... I missed that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! > which kinda worries me a bit. > what ab

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-01 Thread Dep, Khushil (GE Money)
07 01:01 To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal On Wednesday 31 October 2007 20:49:30 Michael Short wrote: > I plan to make use of this feature within the next few months... > > This is really disturbing news. > > -Michael > >

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El jue, 01-11-2007 a las 10:12 +0100, Arno Lehmann escribió: > Hi, > > 31.10.2007 18:28,, Rich wrote:: > > see > > http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=998 > > > > "After version 2.2.x Python will no longer be support -- there are an > > insufficient number of users." > > Oops... I missed that.

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-03 Thread Dan Langille
On 3 Nov 2007 at 19:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > El jue, 01-11-2007 a las 10:12 +0100, Arno Lehmann escribió: > > > Hi, > > > > 31.10.2007 18:28,, Rich wrote:: > > > see > > > http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=998 > > > > > > "After version 2.2.x Python will no longer be support -- there are

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-04 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 03.11.2007 20:32,, Dan Langille wrote:: > On 3 Nov 2007 at 19:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> El jue, 01-11-2007 a las 10:12 +0100, Arno Lehmann escribió: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> 31.10.2007 18:28,, Rich wrote:: see http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=998 "After version 2.2.x P

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-05 Thread Rich
you probably wanted to send this to list ;) On 2007.11.05. 13:01, Marek Simon wrote: > I think some scripting support is good for various hacking and unusual > solutions, but I think python is kind of "exotical" language. Very few > users know it, very few projects is written in it and on univer

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, I'm sending this to the list - I suppose you wanted it to go there, too. 05.11.2007 10:58,, Rich wrote:: > On 2007.11.04. 23:02, Arno Lehmann wrote: > ... >> True. But chances might be better to find such a person if python was >> left in... if we had it in Bacula (as long as possible - Bacu

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 05 November 2007 13:12, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sending this to the list - I suppose you wanted it to go there, too. > > 05.11.2007 10:58,, Rich wrote:: > > On 2007.11.04. 23:02, Arno Lehmann wrote: > > ... > > > >> True. But chances might be better to find such a person if pyth

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-06 Thread Ben Beuchler
On 10/31/07, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > see > http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=998 > > "After version 2.2.x Python will no longer be support -- there are an > insufficient number of users." Oy vey! I am even as we speak working on implementing some Python code to handle volume labeling!

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-06 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, 06.11.2007 20:44,, Kern Sibbald wrote:: Thanks for clarifying this. > On Monday 05 November 2007 13:12, Arno Lehmann wrote: ... True. But chances might be better to find such a person if python was left in... if we had it in Bacula (as long as possible - Bacula core develop

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-07 Thread Flak Magnet
I'm not a developer, and have only started to try to teach myself programming (slow going given my time-constraints and other demands on my time) so my $.02 is probably worth $.002 after the exchange-rate, but while reading this thread I thought that it would be "neat" if a bacula API were devel

Re: [Bacula-users] python support removal

2007-11-17 Thread Steen
On Monday 05 November 2007 12:14:51 Rich wrote: > you probably wanted to send this to list ;) > > On 2007.11.05. 13:01, Marek Simon wrote: > > I think some scripting support is good for various hacking and unusual > > solutions, but I think python is kind of "exotical" language. Designed to be eas

[Bacula-users] Python support and FreeBSD port

2009-02-05 Thread Victor Zvodin
I am currently struggling with enabling python scripting for Bacula director (2.4.4 port) installed on my FreeBSD system. Neither make config interface nor makefile itself gives any indication whether python is enabled, so my only indication is 'Python interpreter restarted.' message when running p