On 2011-04-22 04:39 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> Oh, I see, you want to have a general record category and then filter on
> that category. Don't call it "export-class" though. It's just "class"
> or "category" I think. That should be trivial and we can even offer
> completion based on the catego
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:01:09 -0400 Sam Steingold wrote:
>> * Ted Zlatanov [2011-04-21 13:21:42 -0500]:
TZ> I didn't think timestamp was updated every time you see a message from
TZ> someone, just when the record is modified. This one would explicitly
TZ> say "I saw a message from you on -
> * Ted Zlatanov [2011-04-21 13:21:42 -0500]:
>
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:32:37 -0500 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>
> TZ> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:22:32 -0400 Sam Steingold wrote:
* Ted Zlatanov [2011-04-11 15:52:06 -0500]:
With Gnus at least, we could have a last-seen field that's updat
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:32:37 -0500 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
TZ> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:22:32 -0400 Sam Steingold wrote:
>>> * Ted Zlatanov [2011-04-11 15:52:06 -0500]:
>>>
>>> With Gnus at least, we could have a last-seen field that's updated
>>> whenever you see a message from that person.
Sam>
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler verbalised:
> On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
>> (Actually I went further and had it work for each message *for each
>> function*, so if you put it on the hook a dozen times it still only got
>> called once. But this is a useless and arguably confusing side-effect of
>
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
> (Actually I went further and had it work for each message *for each
> function*, so if you put it on the hook a dozen times it still only got
> called once. But this is a useless and arguably confusing side-effect of
> the behaviour I really wanted. If you only want
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler spake thusly:
> On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
>> We could do the same job with a new hook which is called only once per
>> record, no matter how many times it is spotted by a given call to
>> bbdb-update-records, or with a new guarantee that the bbdb-notice-hook
>> w
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
> We could do the same job with a new hook which is called only once per
> record, no matter how many times it is spotted by a given call to
> bbdb-update-records, or with a new guarantee that the bbdb-notice-hook
> would only fire once per record per call to bbdb-upda
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler stated:
> On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
>> >> (I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if
>> >> it doesn't.)
>> >
>> > I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB.
>>
>> It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't
>>
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
> >> (I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if
> >> it doesn't.)
> >
> > I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB.
>
> It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't
> broken I'd be astonished. :)
If possible, I'd l
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this:
> On Mon Apr 11 2011 Nix wrote:
>> (I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if
>> it doesn't.)
>
> I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB.
It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't
broken I'd be ast
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Nix wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this:
> > - Finally, I fixed various bugs and improved the documentation.
>
> I just noticed that BBDB development has restarted. Unfortunately
> BBDB 3.0 has removed a good few features, including one I definitely
> rely on: bbdb
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:00:43 +0200 Didier Verna wrote:
dvl> "Roland Winkler" wrote:
>> First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been
>> transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should now
>> use
dvl> For those of us who had write access to the old repo, is
"Roland Winkler" wrote:
> First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been
> transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should now
> use
For those of us who had write access to the old repo, is that still
the case ?
> What are the changes in the latest code?
> * Roland Winkler [2011-04-13 09:54:15 -0500]:
>
>> On a similar note, I tried the new bbdb (from git) today and it does not
>> look ready for prime time yet. Specifically, in gnus, when the address
>> is marked with "*" (i.e., bbdb knows about it), *bbdb* buffer is not
>> displayed; and when I h
> * Roland Winkler [2011-04-13 10:00:04 -0500]:
>
> On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
>> here is an addition:
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bbdb.user:1689
>>
>> From: Sam Steingold
>> Subject: Make "John" an alternate for "John Doe"? (y or n)
>> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bbdb.u
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
> here is an addition:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bbdb.user:1689
>
> From: Sam Steingold
> Subject: Make "John" an alternate for "John Doe"? (y or n)
> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bbdb.user
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:37:35 -0400 (5 years, 38 wee
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
> you might consider putting the todo list into the git repo
It'll come soon.
> On a similar note, I tried the new bbdb (from git) today and it does not
> look ready for prime time yet. Specifically, in gnus, when the address
> is marked with "*" (i.e., bbd
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:22:32 -0400 Sam Steingold wrote:
>> * Ted Zlatanov [2011-04-11 15:52:06 -0500]:
>>
>> With Gnus at least, we could have a last-seen field that's updated
>> whenever you see a message from that person.
Sam> Are you suggesting a last-seen field in addition to creation-dat
> * Nix [2011-04-11 22:32:19 +0100]:
>
> I just noticed that BBDB development has restarted. Unfortunately
> BBDB 3.0 has removed a good few features, including one I definitely
> rely on: bbdb-canonicalize-net-hook, which is crucial to keep your
> database clean in the face of the large number of
> * Ted Zlatanov [2011-04-11 15:52:06 -0500]:
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:18:18 -0400 Sam Steingold wrote:
>
> Sam> I started using bbdb about 15 years ago and I accumulated a fairly large
> Sam> .bbdb file. Some records there are not relevant to me all that much (a
> Sam> coworker from 10 years
On 11 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this:
> - Finally, I fixed various bugs and improved the documentation.
I just noticed that BBDB development has restarted. Unfortunately
BBDB 3.0 has removed a good few features, including one I definitely
rely on: bbdb-canonicalize-net-hook, which is crucial t
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:18:18 -0400 Sam Steingold wrote:
Sam> I started using bbdb about 15 years ago and I accumulated a fairly large
Sam> .bbdb file. Some records there are not relevant to me all that much (a
Sam> coworker from 10 years ago), so, on one hand, I do not want to remove
Sam> the r
> * Roland Winkler [2011-04-11 11:37:53 -0500]:
>
> I've put this on my todo list!
here is an addition:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bbdb.user:1689
From: Sam Steingold
Subject: Make "John" an alternate for "John Doe"? (y or n)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bbdb.user
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17
> * Roland Winkler [2011-04-11 11:49:49 -0500]:
>
> I'll think about this! It's on my list of feature requests for bbdb.
Thanks! you might consider putting the todo list into the git repo
(together with relevant references to the discussion on gmane).
On a similar note, I tried the new bbdb (fro
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
> I started using bbdb about 15 years ago and I accumulated a fairly large
> .bbdb file. Some records there are not relevant to me all that much (a
> coworker from 10 years ago), so, on one hand, I do not want to remove
> the record (or its parts, like addre
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> RW> I just submitted a new set of changes for BBDB.
> RW> First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been
> RW> transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should
> RW> now use
>
> RW> git clone git://git.savannah.nongnu.org/bb
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
> > * Roland Winkler [2011-04-11 10:04:28 -0500]:
> >
> > Thanks for the report, though I am surprised: with my GNU Emacs 23.3.1
> > browse-url-url-at-point is anyway an autoloaded function. Which
> > version of emacs are you using?
>
> bzr tip; just boots
> * Roland Winkler [2011-04-10 21:09:37 -0500]:
>
> - I added support for anniversaries. My original idea was to do
> something very sophisticated based on note handlers. But this
> turned out to be too complicated to make it a robust scheme
> (Sorry guys, if anybody was looking forward to
> * Roland Winkler [2011-04-11 10:04:28 -0500]:
>
> Thanks for the report, though I am surprised: with my GNU Emacs 23.3.1
> browse-url-url-at-point is anyway an autoloaded function. Which
> version of emacs are you using?
bzr tip; just bootstrapped.
also, is there a guide for upgrading my sett
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:09:37 -0500 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
RW> I just submitted a new set of changes for BBDB.
RW> First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been
RW> transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should
RW> now use
RW> git clone git://git.savannah.no
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
> small compilation warning fix:
>
> diff --git a/lisp/bbdb-com.el b/lisp/bbdb-com.el
> index 3c23b2b..d50be0a 100644
> --- a/lisp/bbdb-com.el
> +++ b/lisp/bbdb-com.el
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> (require 'mailabbrev)
>
> (eval-and-compile
> + (autoload 'brow
small compilation warning fix:
diff --git a/lisp/bbdb-com.el b/lisp/bbdb-com.el
index 3c23b2b..d50be0a 100644
--- a/lisp/bbdb-com.el
+++ b/lisp/bbdb-com.el
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
(require 'mailabbrev)
(eval-and-compile
+ (autoload 'browse-url-url-at-point "browse-url")
(autoload 'build-mail-ali
I just submitted a new set of changes for BBDB.
First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been
transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should
now use
git clone git://git.savannah.nongnu.org/bbdb.git
I am most grateful to Ted Zlatanov and Barak Pearlmutter who
a
34 matches
Mail list logo
