Pluto-inflicted? (was: Re: to Jane Sherry)

2003-01-30 Thread Peace Beours
From: "Garuda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:02:46 +1300 Re: to Jane SherryYes Moon Venus Saturn Pluto is the next few days Power issues, control, emotional sensitivity, bottom lines are challenged all this week. Any persecutor, victim, saviour issues should be on display.

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-29 Thread James Hedley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bdnow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:30 AM Subject: Re: to Jane Sherry > Dear Happy Biodynamic specialists, > > I really do wish you luck in trying to promote/use/educate bd methods > divorced from spirituality and t

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-28 Thread Garuda
Title: Re: to Jane Sherry Yes Moon Venus Saturn Pluto is the next few days Power issues, control, emotional sensitivity, bottom lines are challenged all this week. Any persecutor, victim, saviour issues should be on display. Relationship hidden or delayed, cum denied matters all come to a

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-28 Thread Cheryl Kemp
Phone /Fax : 02 6657 5322 Home: 02 6657 5306 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.biodynamics.net.au - Original Message - From: "Jane Sherry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bdnow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:30 AM Subject: Re: to Jane Sherry > Dear Happy Biodynamic specialists,

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-28 Thread Moen Creek
Title: Re: to Jane Sherry In my option all of this just the finger points to the Moon and that's BDNow Folks In Love * Light Markess OH ya Kristo writes the midwestern's view of this: Tuesday 1/28/03 The Sagittarian MOON Conjuncts PLUTO (in his Coniunctio to VENUS, and their Opp

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-28 Thread Jane Sherry
Thanks Christo! > From: "Christo van Staden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 07:25:56 +0200 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: to Jane Sherry > > Jane > I find your posts useful and informative, and

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-28 Thread Christo van Staden
Jane I find your posts useful and informative, and not unrelated to the concerns of Biodynamics. I would surely miss this contribution if you were to stop. Any community need someone to bring in some news from the "outside" - this email community is no different. And I have a Third World telephone

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-28 Thread Prkrjake
Jane, Lately, I am tentatively noticing and striving to make distinctions regarding communication styles. I think this could be ( but  not as literal as main stream definition mind you) a gender thing. No offense or defense intended fellas, because I am very straightforward in my style, and temprem

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-28 Thread S&J Koontz
Please, how can my e-mail address be taken off of your listings?     Sam Koontz  - Original Message - From: Essie Hull To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:12 PM Subject: Re: to Jane Sherry Will is really remarkable in his paternalistic, rude

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-27 Thread Liz Davis
on 28/1/03 1:09 PM, Lloyd Charles at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > John Buckley wrote> > .> No need to be divisive here. I can't believe that hitting the delete > key takes "hours". > If you don't like it, skip/delete it. I, for one, > want the option. I'm here to learn, not > >> argue. > Jus

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-27 Thread Essie Hull
Will is really remarkable in his paternalistic, rude, hostile and most unimaginative remarks. Gil is an expert at the indirect putdown. Interesting that no one ever complains about crass or sexist posts. Interesting that no one ever blinks an eye when members share their daily number of hard

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-27 Thread Christiane . Jaeger
Well said, John. Christiane [EMAIL PROTECTED]@envirolink.org on 28/01/2003 12:32:21 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: to Jane Sherry Everyone has a valid point, so then what?  Jane's point about the

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-27 Thread Lloyd Charles
John Buckley wrote> .> No need to be divisive here. I can't believe that hitting the delete key takes "hours". > If you don't like it, skip/delete it. I, for one, want the option. I'm here to learn, not > > argue. Just another 'lurker' John Buckley Mountains Western NC I agree with John - I

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-27 Thread John Buckley
the option.  I'm here to learn, not argue.   Just another 'lurker' John Buckley Mountains Western NC     - Original Message - From: Jane Sherry To: Bdnow Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:30 PM Subject: Re: to Jane Sherry Dear Happy Biodynamic specialists, I really do

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-27 Thread Gil Robertson
Thank you Jane, Last time I dared to mention that I did not understand why, in the face if Allan's stand on short emails, he allowed your seemingly endless, non original postings, he threatened to unsub me. So this time he may do just that. I do not understand why you think that an interest in BD

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-27 Thread Gil Robertson
I'm with you, Will. I am quite capable of finding all the information I require, without having it chosen for me. I actually sit on this list in the hope of gleaning some information on Biodynamics. Jane could you post your material to another list, such as the "Not BD Now" list. It would sa

Re: to Jane Sherry

2003-01-27 Thread Jane Sherry
but I do have other things going on in my life, and for now, I am over and out. Call me a lurker. Jane Sherry > From: Will Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:00:34 -0600 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: to Jane She

to Jane Sherry

2003-01-27 Thread Will Winter
> this stuff, which > mostly comes by way of my ex-journalist-husband-who-reads-everything's- > mailing list. If you can't tell, he reads really fast!!! IS YOUR REFERRAL SERVICE *OPTIONAL* ON THIS SITE? HOW MUCH WOULD I HAVE TO PAY YOU TO MAKE IT STOP! JEEZ!!! WGW