It should be in the group pane, the second group, called Web.
Christiaan
On 6 Nov 2007, at 10:17 AM, Bertolt Meyer wrote:
Hi,
after having read so much about the new scholar scraping I downloaded
the recent nightly. Unfortunately, I am too blind to find the feature.
Where do I find the
On 6 Nov 2007, at 4:58 PM, Adam M.Goldstein wrote:
On Nov 5, 2007, at 11:48 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Nov 5, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Adam M.Goldstein wrote:
The following search won't bring up new references when I move to
the
second page of search results in google scholar:
It finds as much data as is available an as we know about. So if it
does not fill in much it simply does not find more. It can be that it
is data we don't know about, but more probable is that the data is
not well formed or is simply not available.
Christiaan
On 6 Nov 2007, at 6:15 PM,
I'm pretty sure the second link does not contain DC, and I don't get
an alert when I load it in the Web Import. Perhaps the target has
changed.
Christiaan
On 6 Nov 2007, at 7:01 PM, jiho wrote:
On 2007-November-06 , at 18:33 , Christiaan Hofman wrote:
It finds as much data
On 11/8/07, Christiaan Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Nov 2007, at 7:23 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Nov 7, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Andy Green wrote:
So is this something that ADS should/could fix? Admittedly, I know
very little about how this works, but it seems from
Also no problems from me on Tiger. +1 from me for 1.3.11.
Christiaan
On 8 Nov 2007, at 12:37 PM, Alex Hamann wrote:
Am 08.11.2007 um 07:53 schrieb Simon Spiegel:
On 08.11.2007, at 07:27, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
Back to the root of this thread, I uploaded a replacement nightly
build for 7
I've also seen that. It seems they block you when you're doing too
many searches under some conditions. I wonder what those conditions
are, so we could correct it. Perhaps they require some kind of HTTP
headers, like originating application info?
Christiaan
On 9 Nov 2007, at 10:52 AM,
links to relative or absolute depending
on the preference setting.
Hendrik
On 9-Nov-07, at 11:16 AM, Christiaan Hofman cmhofman-at-gmail.com |
Sourceforge| wrote:
On 9 Nov 2007, at 7:44 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Friday, November 09, 2007, at 10:33AM, Mark Eli Kalderon
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 9 Nov 2007, at 11:00 PM, Hendrik wrote:
On 9-Nov-07, at 12:54 PM, Christiaan Hofman cmhofman-at-gmail.com |
Sourceforge| wrote:
On 9 Nov 2007, at 9:26 PM, Hendrik wrote:
To get all entries changed from absolute to relative paths take
these
steps:
1) Change the auto-file
On 14 Nov 2007, at 6:43 PM, Alexander H. Montgomery wrote:
A few hiccups:
*The web bookmarks only seem to be available when Web is active in
the left pane; they should probably be universally available.
Just implemented that, the web group will be selected when it isn't
already.
*With
On 15 Nov 2007, at 6:40 PM, Alexander H. Montgomery wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Wednesday, November 14, 2007, at 09:44AM, Alexander H.
Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*With searches, it's clear what can and can't be searched. With Web,
it's not
On 16 Nov 2007, at 2:17 PM, Matthias Damm wrote:
Am 11.11.2007 um 04:57 schrieb Adam R. Maxwell:
This build makes much more sense to me, since the Web group is now
functional. It seems perfectly stable to me too.
I guess the bookmarks stuff needs more testing, based on Christiaan's
On 16 Nov 2007, at 4:23 PM, François Briatte wrote:
Trivial request:
Is the Command-R shortcut in use at the moment? I use Reveal linked
file a lot and would feel that it could get a shortcut, Cmmd-R, as in
other programs (such as iTunes).
The linked file actions will be deprecated soon.
On 18 Nov 2007, at 7:22 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007, at 1:50 AM, Alex Hamann wrote:
Are you gonna call for a new vote or is this question still open?
Just asking, as this thread has grown in another direction.
Indeed...I can't find any votes in this thread, in spite of the
Are you using today's nightly? Because I should have fixed that
yesterday.
Christiaan
On 18 Nov 2007, at 9:38 PM, Alex Hamann wrote:
I'd vote for the release but I still have issues with google scholar
web group searches
I use the bookmark to go to google.scholar:
the settings are set to
Just checked scholar.google.de with the latest source, and it now
works fine. Note that you can also switch to .com version by choosing
the Google Scholar in English link.
Christiaan
On Nov 18, 2007 9:53 PM, Christiaan Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you using today's nightly? Because I
bookmarks; but I don't have those. How do I get to them?
-Adam G.
On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:20 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
That's how google works, it redirects to your local google. When you
change to the English version or explicitly choose .com using the
link, it should remember that in your
Safari probably does not immediately save the bookmarks to disk.
Christiaan
On 23 Nov 2007, at 6:03 PM, Derick Fay wrote:
When viewing a citation View File Safari Recent Downloads
doesn't seem to refresh.
I just downloaded a file (from jstor) using Safari, right-click -
Download Linked
That's because there is no reliable way to know what the encoding of
a file is.
Christiaan
On 23 Nov 2007, at 5:54 PM, Derick Fay wrote:
I changed the encoding from ASCII to UTF-8 on the document that I
have set to open at startup in BibDesk.
Now whenever I start BibDesk I get the
of the download folder method,
since Leopard now has a blessed download folder to be used for all
apps. Any major objections?
--
adam
On Nov 23, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
Safari probably does not immediately save the bookmarks to disk.
Christiaan
On 23 Nov 2007, at 6:03
Note that simply adding braces around the title is usually not a good
idea. Capitalization should be determined by the bibtex style, and
this prevents the bibtex style from touching it. I have some scripts
on the Wiki that allows you to protect only some known words (like
names and
There are easier ways to find this word. Just edit a normal field
before you search. The problem is that editing in one of the 3 text
fields does not update the search index, so you find find it unless
you somehow force updating the search index for this item (by editing
a normal field or
On 4 Dec 2007, at 3:28 PM, James Harrison wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007, at 5:24 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
With which part do you have trouble, writing the template or
installing it in BibdDesk? For the latter both the Help and the Wiki
have some step by step instructions. For writing, have you
On 13 Dec 2007, at 9:38 AM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
Is there any way to un-link a child crossref from its parent
without losing
the inherited information? If I delete the crossref key, all the
linked
information disappears.
no, that's what crossref does.
I need to move a group of
On 13 Dec 2007, at 11:16 PM, Jan Michael wrote:
Hi BibTex Users,
I'd like to have a special format for my citation keys. I tried
with custom styles but couldn't manage to get the desired format.
Example:
Bibliography: M. McCracken, A. Maxwell, J. Howison, M. Routley, S.
Spiegel, S.
, at 01:57PM, Christiaan Hofman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm actually not sure if we should do it. The URL could just as
well
(more often?) be the URL of some paper for an article.
It could be, but I think that scenario is less likely when
you're dropping a
non-file: URL on the main window
The MARC they send is not valid. The first 24 characters of MARC are
determined to some extent by the syntax and we use them to recognize
it as MARC. You could perhaps petition the libraries to send valid
MARC (though that probbaly won't work).
Christiaan
On 14 Dec 2007, at 2:04 PM,
add this supported, considering it's a
deprecated format.
Christiaan
Am 14.12.2007 um 16:18 schrieb Christiaan Hofman:
The MARC they send is not valid. The first 24 characters of MARC are
determined to some extent by the syntax and we use them to recognize
it as MARC. You could perhaps
No, because there is no logical way to distinguish two initials put
together and a single first name. I always have believed medical
sciences have made a stupid mistake using such weird name formats.
Christiaan
On 17 Dec 2007, at 3:18 PM, Tobias Witting wrote:
Hello,
I hope this is not a
On 20 Dec 2007, at 7:54 AM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
On 20.12.2007, at 02:24, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
Hi all,
I have a developer and user question: are there any showstopper bugs
or missing features we need to fix before releasing 1.3.13?I
think
most of the work is done, but there are
On 20 Dec 2007, at 5:10 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
On 20.12.2007, at 16:39, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
This doesn't seem to be a problem of the file, but of my setup. I
get
a crash, and the crash reporter says Importer asked to handle
unknown
UTI edu.ucs.cs. mmccrack.bibdesk.bib whenever I
On 20 Dec 2007, at 6:30 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Thursday, December 20, 2007, at 08:31AM, Christiaan Hofman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Dec 2007, at 4:58 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007, at 5:11 AM, James Harrison wrote:
Also, Simon raised the minor issue
On 20 Dec 2007, at 8:41 PM, Alexander H. Montgomery wrote:
On 2007-12-20, at 2:20 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
Database Migrate Files, a new assistant to migrate file and URL
fields to the new file icon interface. It has some options like
removing the original fields. Note
On 21 Dec 2007, at 7:18 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007, at 12:52 PM, James Harrison wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
The current master-detail view is really handy, so it's hard to
replace that with the file view; I mainly use the table columns for
On 20 Dec 2007, at 8:53 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Thursday, December 20, 2007, at 11:42AM, Alexander H.
Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-12-20, at 2:20 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
Database Migrate Files, a new assistant to migrate file and URL
fields to the new file
On 21 Dec 2007, at 10:15 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2007, at 11:59AM, Michael McCracken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 21, 2007 10:47 AM, Alexander H. Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think that the current setup is probably optimal; for those who
wish
On 22 Dec 2007, at 6:26 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Dec 22, 2007, at 5:34 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On 21 Dec 2007, at 10:15 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2007, at 11:59AM, Michael McCracken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 21, 2007 10:47 AM, Alexander H
On 26 Dec 2007, at 8:31 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Dec 22, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
I also thought of an alternative. We could make both panes
customizable, something like the following choices:
Side pane:
- Files
- Details (template)
- Abstract (?)
- Notes
Yes, there was a bug in the URL scripting accessor. Apparently nobody
uses it anyway, as it has gone unnoticed for a long time. That's
good, as it will is deprecated in the next release.
Christiaan
On 29 Dec 2007, at 5:44 AM, Derick Fay wrote:
I'm trying to add a publication using Tiger
This is not an issue, and if it were an issue it'd be a bibtex issue,
not a BibDesk's. A proceedings item does not have an author field (in
the standard bibtex styles.) Compare the type info in the Advanced
Defaults preferences.
Christiaan
On 29 Dec 2007, at 2:42 PM, Patrick Celka wrote:
On 29 Dec 2007, at 2:58 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
On 28.12.2007, at 00:44, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
I think we've fixed the bugs reported by nightly build testers
(thanks!), so I'd like to get a release out soon. Any
showstoppers or
other things that really need to be resolved?
A small
On 29 Dec 2007, at 5:37 PM, P Kishor wrote:
I frequently file books and committee reports (those published by the
National Academy Press are a good example) where there is no author
but there are editors. Since my BD generates cite_keys as %a1_%Y_u2,
the %a part goes unfilled in the
On 30 Dec 2007, at 9:21 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
On 30.12.2007, at 00:11, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007, at 2:52 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
Do I understand correctly, that there will no longer be the file
icon in the
column view?
Yes.
This would be a major loss of
On Dec 30, 2007 9:33 PM, Christiaan Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Dec 2007, at 9:21 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
On 30.12.2007, at 00:11, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007, at 2:52 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
Do I understand correctly, that there will no longer be the file
On 30 Dec 2007, at 10:44 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
On 30.12.2007, at 21:33, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On 30 Dec 2007, at 9:21 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
That shouldn't happen. Does it remain a question mark when you reopen
the detail editor, and in the main window?
Yes. It also happens
On Dec 30, 2007 11:23 PM, Christiaan Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Dec 2007, at 11:14 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
On 30.12.2007, at 22:59, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On 30 Dec 2007, at 10:44 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
On 30.12.2007, at 21:33, Christiaan Hofman wrote
On 31 Dec 2007, at 4:31 PM, James Harrison wrote:
On Dec 30, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Dec 30, 2007, at 9:42 AM, James Harrison wrote:
I have an author-date version of CiteInPages (http://
jhh.med.virginia.edu/main/CiteInPages
)...
I'm looking for a standard
do my best to handle what's needed for an
author-date version of CiteInPages in the script.
On Dec 31, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
...
A problem of sorting support in templates is that it is 'static': you
have to hard code the possible sortings, there is no way to pass
Not necessarily. Automatic conversion does not always take place.
E.g. if the item was already converted before, any new local file
field will not be automatically converted. The file migration dialog
still converts those items. Also it may be necessary after an import.
Also the file
And did you do latex + bibdesk + latex + latex?
Christiaan
On 2 Jan 2008, at 9:49 PM, Ian Thompson wrote:
Thank you for the quick response! I have used LaTeX for a while,
but am new to BibTeX and BibDesk. I have been trying to get a
BibTeX example to work--here is the .tex file:
On 3 Jan 2008, at 2:51 PM, James Harrison wrote:
There are a number of fields for various types of publications, such
as editor and publisher, that are not listed as attributes of the
publication object in BibDesk's Applescript dictionary. Are values in
these fields accessible by
On 3 Jan 2008, at 8:16 PM, Ian Thompson wrote:
I had BibDesk working for a little while. Now, all of my old
sources work, but whenever I try to add a new source and reference
it I get this error in the console:
Warning--I didn't find a database entry for kurosawa
The database entry
:
Warning--entry type for kurosawa1 isn't style-file defined
On Jan 3, 2008 2:49 PM, Christiaan Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3 Jan 2008, at 8:16 PM, Ian Thompson wrote:
I had BibDesk working for a little while. Now, all of my old
sources work, but whenever I try to add a new source and reference
On Jan 3, 2008 9:51 PM, Niels Kobschaetzki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 9:48 PM, Christiaan Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3 Jan 2008, at 9:11 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Thursday, January 03, 2008, at 12:08PM, Niels Kobschaetzki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On 4 Jan 2008, at 9:41 PM, Alexander H. Montgomery wrote:
On 2008-01-04, at 12:33 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
snip
The 'authors' are actually editors but that's how it came from
the Library search. If I move them to the editor field and
create a 'child' of one of the chapters, it fills in
On 4 Jan 2008, at 9:08 PM, Alexander H. Montgomery wrote:
Two questions:
1)Does the Orphaned Files feature use the new aliases now, or the old
local-url fields?
2)The Orphaned Files currently will list files within folders even if
the folder isn't orphaned itself (i.e., a publication links
On 4 Jan 2008, at 11:14 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
On 1/4/08 1:41 PM, Alexander H. Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-01-04, at 12:33 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
snip
The 'authors' are actually editors but that's how it came from
the Library
search. If I move them to the editor
That's a general AppleScript problem with rich text. AppleScript does
not have a primitive rich text type. Rich text is declared as type
text, so whenever you evaluated it (e.g. by assigning it to a
variable) it is converted to just text. So you can only use it as
rich text as a reference.
TextEdit does it wrong on Tiger). That bug often gets
AppleScript confused (and AppleScript is easily confused).
Christiaan
On 5 Jan 2008, at 3:08 PM, James Harrison wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:03 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
That's a general AppleScript problem with rich text. AppleScript does
/AppleScriptKit.sdef,
so I can see if they've finally fixed that in Leopard.
Christiaan
On Jan 5, 2008 3:54 PM, Christiaan Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right, AppleScript does not seem to recognize it as rich text.
That's strange, as we definitely return rich text and we also declare
On 5 Jan 2008, at 9:08 PM, James Harrison wrote:
Moving the script menu choices internal to BibDesk below the user
scripts from the Scripts folder is a nice touch in 1.3.13. How about
also adding a menu divider between the two sets of menu choices, to
help distinguish them?
Jim Harrison
On 7 Jan 2008, at 5:00 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
On 1/4/08 4:10 PM, Christiaan Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes sense. Thanks. But then why does the child item copy both
title and
booktitle? The title will always need to be replaced by the child's
specific
title--at least this has
On Jan 7, 2008 6:51 PM, Niels Kobschaetzki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 5:31 PM, Adam R. Maxwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Jason Davies wrote:
Makes sense. Thanks. But then why does the child item copy both
title
and booktitle? The title
On 8 Jan 2008, at 5:35 AM, Alexander H. Montgomery wrote:
Actually, it's not about *visual* differentiation (which I can do),
but differentiation that can, say, be discerned by an AppleScript or a
Smart Folder. (For the record, 4938 refs, 3119 single files, and 304
1 file).
For example, I
On 11 Jan 2008, at 6:46 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Friday, January 11, 2008, at 09:29AM, Christiaan Hofman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Jan 2008, at 5:35 AM, Alexander H. Montgomery wrote:
Actually, it's not about *visual* differentiation (which I can do),
but differentiation
I don't know why, but it may be related to the new file layout. This
is also reflected in the AppleScript support. E.g. 'local file' and
'remote URL' are now deprecated, and they refer now to the first
linked file and URL from the new file layout rather than the Local-
Url and Url fields.
On 11 Jan 2008, at 7:14 PM, Derick Fay wrote:
Is there any possibility in a future version of caching the index of
the content of related files so it doesn't need to be recreated each
time?
df
This has been discussed before on this list. a problem is that
BibDesk does not have a single
On 13 Jan 2008, at 9:25 PM, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008 9:21 PM, Christiaan Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Jan 2008, at 7:14 PM, Derick Fay wrote:
Is there any possibility in a future version of caching the index of
the content of related files so it doesn't need
On 13 Jan 2008, at 9:29 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On 11 Jan 2008, at 7:14 PM, Derick Fay wrote:
Is there any possibility in a future version of caching the index of
the content of related files so it doesn't need to be recreated
On 13 Jan 2008, at 9:43 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On 13 Jan 2008, at 9:29 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On 11 Jan 2008, at 7:14 PM, Derick Fay wrote:
Is there any possibility
On 13 Jan 2008, at 10:57 PM, Holger Frauenrath wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 1:30 PM, Christopher MacMinn wrote:
Hey folks -
I just installed BibDesk version 1.3.13, and it's giving me a hard
time about the local file format I've been
On 13 Jan 2008, at 11:17 PM, Christopher MacMinn wrote:
I use the cite key as the local file name, so my custom file format
string was simply %f{Cite Key}... but now 1.3.13 says that this is
invalid because Format for local file requires a unique specifier.
I'm fairly certain that cite keys
On 14 Jan 2008, at 4:53 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Derick Fay wrote:
If you right-click on a group, whether it's smart or static, the
option in the context menu is Remove Smart Group.
Changed to Remove Group in the next nightly. We probably changed
the title
On 15 Jan 2008, at 11:14 AM, Daniel Becker wrote:
hallo list,
after moving to the new framework for local files (which I like a
lot), I have a lot of duplicate entries for local files and remote
urls like this one:
Local-Url:
~/My/Path/downloads/CizekHardleWeron2005
Url:
Yes, use a negative number for the number of authors to include (as
in %a-1).
I'm personally glad I'm from a field where people appreciate the
person who does the work rather than the one who happens to have
prof before his name ;-)
Christiaan
On 15 Jan 2008, at 4:54 PM, Holger Frauenrath
On 15 Jan 2008, at 5:55 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Tuesday, January 15, 2008, at 08:34AM, Holger Frauenrath
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some background: If I am not mistaken the autofile feature is
supposed to help you keep order in your linked files by automatically
naming them
On 15 Jan 2008, at 6:13 PM, Holger Frauenrath wrote:
Hi Adam,
If your files are already in the correct location as a matter of
course, you may want to disable part of AutoFile (uncheck File
papers automatically). Then you can drag-and-drop the PDF onto
the reference from SciFinder, and
On 16 Jan 2008, at 10:04 AM, Holger Frauenrath wrote:
Hi Adam, Christiaan
Ewww, automount. Last I worked with that was on Linux, and I had
to set up NIS at the same time; I never tried adding non-Linux
systems into the mix, though. Are you using NIS as well? (not
that it should
You're right, somehow the code for this has magically disappeared.
Christiaan
On 18 Jan 2008, at 4:47 PM, Holger Frauenrath wrote:
Hi Christiaan,
somehow your suggestion on how to obtain a cite key with the last
author's name does not work for me (I meanwhile also found the syntax
in the
Thanks for noting. It will be fixed in the next nightly.
Christiaan
On 18 Jan 2008, at 7:11 PM, Silke Schneider wrote:
Same here: autofiled files end with .
Silke
Von: Jan Anderssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: For general discussion about using BibDesk
On 19 Jan 2008, at 4:10 PM, James Harrison wrote:
Just a quick query...are Skim notes accessible via Applescript as a
field or attribute of publication? They are accessible via templates
(which can be used within a script), but I don't see a reference in
the AS dictionary specifically to
on the next line. I
could imagine the header line also getting some type of file
designator, but that doesn't appear to be implemented yet (unless
there's a check for multiple attached files before the designator
appears--I didn't test that).
Jim
On Jan 19, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Christiaan
On Jan 19, 2008 5:15 PM, Christiaan Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In templates they're appended separated by an empty line. We could
make them accessible also for the linked file objects, so you could
add a collection tag for the local files and combine them as you like.
Just realized
Have you tried delete?
Christiaan
On 19 Jan 2008, at 4:41 PM, Derick Fay wrote:
Would it be possible / is there a way to unlink a file from a
publication record? Once a file's been added, dragging it out
creates an alias to it. The only option in the context menu is Move
to Trash, which
To offer an alternative of writing rich templated text, which Apple
so kindly broke somewhere along the line, you can now use the
'export' command to write templated (rich) text to the clipboard.
Just use 'clipboard' instead of the file argument. it will be
available in the next nightly
On 20 Jan 2008, at 9:12 AM, Jeremy Van Cleve wrote:
In previous versions of BibDesk, I have used the Will Auto File and
Did
Auto File script hooks to run an applescript that abbreviated the
journal name in publication so that Auto File could use the
abbreviated
name when naming the
On 21 Jan 2008, at 8:53 PM, Derick Fay wrote:
Here was my original problem:
I created a static group bowdoin paper
I then created a smart group with criteria
Match all of the following conditions:
Group contains bowdoin
Keywords contains to read
This should contain a dozen or so
On 21 Jan 2008, at 11:22 PM, Sampsa Samila wrote:
Is it possible to write an AppleScript / has someone written an
AppleScript to take BibDesk keywords and write them as Spotlight
comments in the linked files? I'm using BibDesk to manage my
references and associated PDFs as well as DEVONthink
Yes, that would be difficult. There are some serious problems with
making groups scriptable.
Christiaan
On 22 Jan 2008, at 4:16 AM, James Harrison wrote:
Would it be difficult to add a script hook for moving publications to
a static group, where the called script could receive (or have
On 22 Jan 2008, at 1:08 PM, Tobias wrote:
Hi,
in the past I had smart groups searching for the occurrence of pdf
in local URL to quickly display the entries which need downloading/
adding of pdfs.
How would I have to do this with the new local file handling?
Searching for the Field
On 22 Jan 2008, at 7:14 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
Votes on 1.3.14?
We need to get a release out soon, if for no other reason than to
avoid more duplicate bug reports.
File Content searching has had a pretty extensive rewrite, so please
test that (all of you who asked for persistent index
a BD2 test project where we even expanded on the
field group idea). Both static and field groups have their own merits.
Christiaan
On 22/01/2008, at 7:37 AM, James Harrison wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
Match all of the following conditions:
Group contains
Some of you may have experienced missing file extensions for linked
files that were auto-filed after the last release. we are sorry this
happened, and will fix it very soon in a new release, or you can try
a recent nightly build where this problem has been fixed. in many
cases this may not
I have updated my AppleScripts for download of bibliography info from
the ArXiv, to be compatible with the latest changes in linked file
URL support. The updated scripts can be downloaded through the Wiki.
Christiaan
-
All default templates included in BibDesk don't have this problem.
The rules are clearly explained on the Wiki and in the Help. Returns
right after a collection tag and a condition tag are not exported
(either for the open and close tag). So if you place such a tag on a
single line (which
On 25 Jan 2008, at 2:27 PM, nicolas nicolas wrote:
1- I would like to know how to sort the publications by person with
a counter of the number of publications by person.
That's far too complex a criterium. It's even hard for me to
understand what this means, let alone a dumb program. So
This is certain;y no RIS (RIS has 2-letter field tags at the
beginning of the lines). It doesn't look like anything BibDesk can
read. My guess is that they took some kind of RIS and replaced the
tags by human readable names.
Christiaan
On 26 Jan 2008, at 3:02 AM, Adam M.Goldstein wrote:
On 26 Jan 2008, at 5:06 PM, Jens v. P. wrote:
Hi all,
I've just updated to version 1.3.14 (and 1.3.13 formerly). The new
quicklook is really nice!
But now I' m a little bit confused since some things don't work the
way they used to. I have activated autofile with the following
format
On 27 Jan 2008, at 2:54 PM, Jens v. P. wrote:
Christian,
Am 26.01.2008 um 17:20 schrieb Christiaan Hofman:
Are you sure you're talking about 1.3.14? This was a bug in 1.3.13
that was fixed in the last release. Note that you can rename files
in Finder now, and BibDesk will notice
On 27 Jan 2008, at 10:33 PM, Rolf Schmolling wrote:
Hello!
I noticed sth. peculiar: I wanted to check how well any Skim-
highlights would show up in Preview (none…) and tried to open the
respective attached pdf-file in BibDesk (the new pane) via ctrl.-click
and chosing Preview.
101 - 200 of 1750 matches
Mail list logo
