On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 02:09:28 -0800 (PST)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As we move forward in the code reorganization, I would like to remove
> some of the precompiler cruft.
>
> Which brings me to the following questions:
>
> a) are there any OS/2 people out there using bla
On Monday 21 January 2002 08:39, it is widely held that Alexander Volovics
wrote:
> What has always surprised me with blackbox is that the 'toolbar' has
> no functionality to speak of: you can switch workspaces, see the time
> and see which window has the focus.
>
> If you do have a toolbar why n
Let's put the toolbar in the slit and the slit in the toolbar, so we can
be cool and have the first doubly-recursive FEATURE, as opposed to the lame,
traditional acronyms. Yah?
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:53:47AM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 04:30:54PM -0600, Jamin W.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 04:30:54PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 14:19, Robin Jury wrote:
> > b) I always use the slit. The toolbar however, I ignore. How about any
> > functionality that people want from the toolbar be put in the slit, and that
> > can be placed wherever
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 04:30:54PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 14:19, Robin Jury wrote:
> > b) I always use the slit. The toolbar however, I ignore. How about any
> > functionality that people want from the toolbar be put in the slit, and that> >
>can be placed whereve
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 16:36, Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
> > In short, I'm for the removal of the Toolbar and functionality moved to
> > the Slit.
>
> As long as one not would be stuck with anything unwanted in the slit.
Certainly not. I didn't intend to imply that anyone would be forced, to
h
* Jamin W. Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jan 21. 2002 23:32]:
> On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 14:19, Robin Jury wrote:
> > b) I always use the slit. The toolbar however, I ignore. How about any
> > functionality that people want from the toolbar be put in the slit, and that
> > can be placed wherever? Does
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 14:19, Robin Jury wrote:
> b) I always use the slit. The toolbar however, I ignore. How about any
> functionality that people want from the toolbar be put in the slit, and that
> can be placed wherever? Does anybody feel any strong need to have both at
> the same time?
I lik
I've been trying to stay out of this mess since I've contributed
precious little to the project so far (my estimate puts it at 0 lines of
contributed and about 50 lines of code that should never see the light
of day) but I really have to jump in here.
> b) I always use the slit. The toolbar howev
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Moynes
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 January 2002 9:28 a.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Comments desired regarding possible upcoming changes
>
>
> * Robin Jury ([EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 09:19:07 at 09:19:07AM +1300, Robin Jury wrote:
>
> b) I always use the slit. The toolbar however, I ignore. How about any
> functionality that people want from the toolbar be put in the slit, and that
> can be placed wherever? Does anybody feel any strong need to have both a
* Robin Jury ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> For my vote,
>
> a) clean the code. Of the three people in the world still using OS/2, I
> doubt any are using blackbox.
Your ignorance is brilliant. I am certain that you probably are an
indirect user of OS/2 without even realising it.
--
Copyleft (c)
anybody feel any strong need to have both at
the same time?
cheers
Robin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> Sent: Monday, 21 January 2002 11:09 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 13:33:26 at 01:33:26PM -0500, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The reason I want to remove the compile time option is because working around
> > all of the
> >
> > #ifdef SLIT or BLAH
> >
> > in the code is just annoying.
>
> Tr
Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Um. I may be completely confused (quite possible--probability rather
> > high considering nobody else has thought of this), but isn't this
> > already possible by using the slit in a horizontal manner and docking
> > the mentioned apps? It seems to m
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I want to remove the compile time option is because working around
> all of the
>
> #ifdef SLIT or BLAH
>
> in the code is just annoying.
True. I actually do believe that the best way would be to remove those
and instead offer the
On 21-Jan-2002 Derek Cunningham wrote:
> On Mon, Jan21,02 09:15, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> I am not found of the icon on toolbar idea. It turns the toolbar into more
>> of a
>> panel and well, there are already plenty of those.
>>
>> As for the battery load idea, I like it and have considere
On Mon, Jan21,02 09:15, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> I am not found of the icon on toolbar idea. It turns the toolbar into more of a
> panel and well, there are already plenty of those.
>
> As for the battery load idea, I like it and have considered it know and then
> before I became the blackbo
On 21-Jan-2002 Jan Schaumann wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> a) are there any OS/2 people out there using blackbox. I would like to
>> remove
>> the OS/2 cruft if possible.
>
> Never having used OS/2, I don't care either way, but it's an almost
> philosphical quest
On 21-Jan-2002 Markus Ottenbacher wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> b) the slit is currently a compile time option which I think is a little
>> silly.
>> How many of you actually compile with the slit turned off? How many of
>> those
>> would care if the slit was still in the code, but onl
>
> What has always surprised me with blackbox is that the 'toolbar' has
> no functionality to speak of: you can switch workspaces, see the time
> and see which window has the focus.
>
The toolbar is one of the things that makes blackbox unique. I like the very
minimal and resource friendly cl
Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Toolbar I only use for the date's advanced capabilities (strftime)
> > over bbdate. If the Toolbar could be a compile-time option[1], I'd leave
> > it out and adjust bbdate to support strftime and construct my own
> > Toolbar-lookalike fr
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 10:41, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > a) are there any OS/2 people out there using blackbox. I would like to remove
> > the OS/2 cruft if possible.
>
> Never having used OS/2, I don't care either way, but it's an almost
> philo
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) are there any OS/2 people out there using blackbox. I would like to remove
> the OS/2 cruft if possible.
Never having used OS/2, I don't care either way, but it's an almost
philosphical question: should support for any Operating System be
dro
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> b) the slit is currently a compile time option which I think is a little silly.
> How many of you actually compile with the slit turned off? How many of those
> would care if the slit was still in the code, but only active if an app was
> actually in it? In other wo
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:09:28AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> As we move forward in the code reorganization, I would like to remove some of
> the precompiler cruft.
> Which brings me to the following questions:
> a) are there any OS/2 people out there using blackbox. I would like to
In message: Comments desired regarding possible upcoming changes
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
on 21/01/2002 (Mon 02:09) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> a) are there any OS/2 people out there using blackbox. I would like
> to remove the OS/2 cruft if possible.
Nope, but if I were,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 02:09:28 -0800 (PST)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) are there any OS/2 people out there using blackbox. I would like to remove
> the OS/2 cruft if possible.
Never tried it. And from what I heard, I never want to.
Happy with Linux.
> b) the slit is c
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 02:09:28 -0800 (PST)
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > a) are there any OS/2 people out there using blackbox. I would like
> > to remove the OS/2 cruft if possible.
No, thanks.
>
> > b) the slit is currently a compile time option which I think is a
>
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 02:09:28 -0800 (PST)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As we move forward in the code reorganization, I would like to
> remove some of the precompiler cruft.
>
> Which brings me to the following questions:
>
> a) are there any OS/2 people out there using black
As we move forward in the code reorganization, I would like to remove some of
the precompiler cruft.
Which brings me to the following questions:
a) are there any OS/2 people out there using blackbox. I would like to remove
the OS/2 cruft if possible.
b) the slit is currently a compile time opt
31 matches
Mail list logo
