Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi Justin. I'm releasing 6.3 today and I ran the test links on
the 6.3 branch and I've noticed that the ImageMagick tarball on
the 6.3 repo does not sync with the book or the SVN branch.
Could you update the ImageMagick tarball in the 6.3 repo to the
-10 version?
On Sun, August 17, 2008 6:13 am, Randy McMurchy wrote:
There should be a new bootscripts tarball (20080816).
Ok, just uploaded this one in both 6.3 and svn.
I'm really indifferent on this. Bruce says we have plenty of room on
Anduin, so if you've got room on your server it's fine with me to
Randy McMurchy wrote:
This is a message for Justin, and FYI for everyone else.
Justin, if you could, please update the master BLFS SVN repo with
the files noted in the recent -book messages. There will be a new
version of the bootscripts tomorrow after tonight's rendering.
Done! I
Randy McMurchy wrote:
I was hoping to hear from Justin about the repo situation. I've
emailed him, as has Bruce, and this message is cc'd to him. I'm
sure we'll hear from him soon. I don't want to release the SVN
branch for changes as Justin my need current SVN to do the
package syncing (he
On Tue, April 1, 2008 6:44 am, Ken Moffat wrote:
Gnucash should be sorted now, sorry about that. Not sure what you
mean about cups-1.2.12 - was I supposed to upload it to somewhere ? Both
the links in the book (easysw.com) seem to work for me.
Cool, thanks. I swear that cups 1.2.12 was not
Randy McMurchy wrote:
There is already a script that parses the XML and gets all the
package tarballs. Creating md5sums from them would probably be
trivial.
Check the Makefile in trunk, you'll find it. I think that is what
you were looking for. Justin used it, or a modified version of it
to
Randy McMurchy wrote:
I've realized that there are a few other minor details required.
Justin's help is critical.
1) Justin needs to create and populate a 6.2.0 version on the master
package server. I'll use this for all the rc-1 versions as well. It
may mean duplicate updates for Justin for
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Yes, 6.2.0 would be great. We'll use this for all the release
candidate versions, then when the final release is done, it
simply takes a one-time make-sure that all the packages are
there and we're done. Version 6.2.1 will take an entire new
directory, as we won't want
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/30/07 11:30 CST:
I say use anduin for a static version that will keep the book working.
Agreed, however, it appears there is another issue now. 4 days ago the
ISO Codes package was updated in the book, yet Anduin has still not
Hi guys,
BLFS looks busy! Anyways, got back from a short vacation and just
finished updates there. Looks good, only a few things missing or that I
couldn't find:
1. firefox and thunderbird 1.5.0.9 patches aren't available at the
URL's in the book:
M.Canales.es wrote:
Committed in r6393 an LFS-like stylesheet to create a wget-list file. To
generate it, run make wget-list.
That is awesome, exactly what I needed. Thanks. It works well and the
only files missing from it are weirdos (bdb's patch-4.4.20.1 type,
krb5-1.5-signed.tar) and
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Going off-topic to Justin:
I'm updating the BLFS website and I see that many, many of the
mirrors are not current any longer. Any chance you could send a
subtle little message to the maintainers of those sites to get
their rsync daemon running again (rsync on the LFS
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Does anyone know the procedure how Anduin syncs up the package sources
to what is specified in the SVN version of BLFS?
This is done on the osuosl.org server, for packages. I just ran the
upgrade script on it to make sure the changes are copied live. The repo
is up
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Thanks for the timely and very courteous response. You manner is
impeccable. :-)
I noticed that the GNOME-2.14.3 packages have not been updated
(This encompasses many, many packages). Perhaps these are the only
packages that you've missed, and I've totally misconstrued
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Inside of an hour on a Friday night (here in America anyway),
and there's several messages about the issue and an underway
effort to get stuff squared away!
Sweet! LFS mirror rsync is finally working again. Bruce fixed in
probably 30 minutes what I've been emailing
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
The only reason why I said svn is that if we move trac, we have to move
svn (from all that I currently know.) Trac, if using the browser
feature, which we do, relies on a local subversion repository.
For trac, all it really needs are the repo files and swig python
Thomas Ulrich Nockmann wrote:
the md5sum of tetex-texmf-3.0.tar.gz as stated on
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/pst/typesetting.html#tetex
seems to be wrong.
See links -dump \
http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX/3.0/distrib/CHECKSUMS\
| grep tetex-texmf-3.0.tar.gz
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
/usr/lib/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o): In function `dlfcn_load':
dso_dlfcn.c:(.text+0x63): undefined reference to `dlopen'
dso_dlfcn.c:(.text+0xc5): undefined reference to `dlclose'
dso_dlfcn.c:(.text+0xf4): undefined reference to `dlerror'
/usr/lib/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o): In
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1644
Perl Modules MD5SUM Failure
Justin, You are assigned to this ticket. What's the status? Can we
close it?
Hi Bruce,
I replied to the ticket with the name change of the md5sums file, and
re-assigned it to blfs-book since
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Thanks Justin. Right now the BLFS 6.1 links doesn't resolve. That's
OK. The SVN version does not have a link to the md5sums file.
Doh, I misread it as for svn and not 6.1. Well, for 6.1, I can do it if
you guys want. I would need to add a Perl_Modules directory, and it
Hi guys,
Ok, svn version packages are all up and all in their original format.
Some packages are still doubled with both bz2 and gz in conglomeration,
but mostly because some files haven't been updated since BLFS 6.1. I'll
start clearing up some of those packages, but transitioning 6.1
Hi BLFS Devs,
I am working on converting the BLFS FTP repo from the previous bzip2 if
at all possible to the new original package format standard. I am
finished up to Chapter 13 as of tonight. One thing I wanted to mention:
md5sums and sha1sums of the original-format perl modules are
Justin R. Knierim wrote:
Thanks for the message DJ. I have replaced the old wget files with the
ones from the link above. I will work on the Xorg packages themselves
now, as well as blfs package upgrades from today.
Ok, all Xorg 7.0 files and BLFS packages as of now are updated
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Yes, I have been looking at the link and the kernel, but there are
questions that I haven't been able to answer yet. If using a pcmcia
card, are there other packages needed beyond the drivers in the kernel?
What has to be done, if anything, with regard to hotplug?
For my
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Is there a URL that will do a (or the equivalent) round-robin or
chooses the best mirror for the specific geographic location the
requester is in?
That is indeed a problem. I am afraid we don't have a good solution at
the moment. If you or anyone has a good idea on
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/08/06 22:26 CST:
I think we need to host the smaller tarball ourselves and tell the users
where we got it. Then we tell them about the make -f Makefile.cvs so
they can do it themselves if they get a different version directly from
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Please, hold off for right now. I want to make sure that everything
(including kdemultimedia) works as expected. You can see my last
message for the method to create a tarball, however, I'll let you
know when we should do it (you'll also see the book updated!).
Ok,
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Unfortunately, the method that XOrg has come up with sucks. 200 separate CMMI
packages is not reasonable. They need to package them up similar to KDE's
packages. They make Gnome look like a small task.
Yeah, you are right, it is unreasonable. Does anyone know if each
DJ Lucas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] shadow-4.0.13]# find man -name Makefile -exec sed -i
'/groups/d'
find: missing argument to `-exec'
Isn't that suppost to be:
find man -name Makefile -exec sed -i '/groups/d' {} \;
or something?
Justin
--
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
The build system of the official LiveCDs are (and have been since it has
been a project) publicly available.
Where?
http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=livecd
A hint about how to make a bootable CD is what I had in mind. Perhaps I
assumed too much.
/livecd/download.html
At the time this announcement was sent, not all mirrors have synced.
--
Justin R. Knierim
lfs at lfs dash matrix dot net
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
1.1.4 doesn't seem to be available.
It is still available on the blfs ftp mirrors:
http://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/blfs/6.1/o/OOo_1.1.4_source.tar.bz2
http://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/blfs/6.1/o/OOo_1.1.4_source.tar.bz2.md5sum
Or any mirror on
Filip Bartmann wrote:
Why isn,t one package with other packages in tar archive(as package
lfs-packages.tar) for BLFS?
The reasons I can think of:
1. No one builds every single package, so downloading a tarball would
waste bandwidth.
2. The tarball would be almost 2GB in size for the SVN
Chris Staub wrote:
Also, that would likely be a multi-gigabyte-size tar file.
Yeah, it wouldn't be pretty. The packages wouldn't compress more than
they already are bzip2'ed, so the sizes would be around:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /srv/ftp/pub/BLFS]$ du -sch *
4.0K5.1
1.5G6.0
1.5G6.1
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Also, to address Justin's comment, my vision of this page is that it is
for the more casual user--the one that only looks at the stable release
and wants to see a summary of changes in one place.
I see, well if the users use it, then good. Maybe I am not a
normal/casual
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 08/11/05 12:35 CST:
Subject says it all.
That's odd. Bruce just emailed last night (to this list) that it had
been fixed.
rsync: send_files failed to open
BLFS/6.1/D-E/docbook-xsl-1.68.1.tar.bz2 (in ftp): Permission denied (13)
. The ENV_TZ, ENV_HZ, ENV_SUPATH, QMAIL_DIR, MAIL_DIR and MAIL_FILE
variables are commented out in login.defs. The messages only occur with
'su'. Login, etc works without any messages. I am still searching for
a solution.
--
Justin R. Knierim
lfs at lfs dash matrix dot net
--
http
37 matches
Mail list logo
