At 05:44 PM 2/22/2004 -0500 Jon Gabriel wrote:
Lawyers and high legal fees are
required for both wills and durable powers of attorney when gay partnerships
are involved.
I have no doubt that there are difficulties in assigning these rights
through the current legal processes, indeed I
Julia Thompson wrote:
Actually, in all seriousness, what are the percentages of left-handed
people and right-handed people on the list? And ambidexterous?
Back of the envelope calculation:
Approx 200 out of 6 billion is 0.03% for each of your categories.
I'm curious. Anyone have a
-Original Message-
From: Ronn!Blankenship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 10:44 AM
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion'
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marriage [sic] Amendment)
At 01:28 AM 2/22/04, Mike Lee wrote:
Nerd from Hell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ronn!Blankenship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 10:44 AM
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion'
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marriage [sic] Amendment)
At 01:28 AM 2/22/04, Mike
At 02:38 PM 2/21/2004 -0700 Michael Harney wrote:
See, one of the same judges that shot it down on what you call a
technicality said that the plantiffs (the people seeking to stop the
marriages) would probably win on their merrits.
This isn't a case of judicial activism using symantics to strike
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Ticia wrote:
Monogamous, bi, married, expecting first baby in June...
How can someone be monogamous _and_ bi? Bi implies
that you have at least two partners! :-)
Alberto Monteiro the nitpicker
No it doesn't. It means you are attracted to and *could* form relationships
Nerd from Hell confessed:
If I can get one for being a pure Left-handed person...
Any other lefties out there?
No, there aren't. You're the last one. Thank God.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 01:28 AM 2/22/04, Mike Lee wrote:
Nerd from Hell confessed:
If I can get one for being a pure Left-handed person...
Any other lefties out there?
No, there aren't. You're the last one. Thank God.
And as soon as we hunt him down and kill him, the list will be free of his
sinister influence
At 10:21 PM 2/21/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 10:04 PM 2/21/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
Robert Seeberger wrote:
Someone called for an electrician?
xponent
House Calls Maru
rob
Yeah, you know anything about installing a heat light in a bathroom?
Yes.
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:28 AM 2/22/04, Mike Lee wrote:
Nerd from Hell confessed:
If I can get one for being a pure Left-handed person...
Any other lefties out there?
No, there aren't. You're the last one. Thank God.
And as soon as we hunt him down and kill him, the list
On 22 Feb 2004, at 2:17 am, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:06:18PM +, Richard
Baker wrote:
And I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, *SHOCKED*,
*SHOCKED!!!* that Erik didn't
write this! ...or did he?
Too easy.
Erik Reuter
Julia Thompson wrote:
Actually, in all seriousness, what are the percentages of left-handed
people and right-handed people on the list? And ambidexterous?
I'm curious. Anyone have a good method for getting the data?
I'm ambi (of course)
Ticia ',:)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average?
(was RE: FederalMarraige[sic]Amendment)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 07:48:22 -0500
At 11:15 AM 2
At 02:34 PM 2/20/2004 -0800 Dave Land wrote:
John,
I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San
Francisco. It's been nice having something to cheer about while watching
the local newscast. :-D
I presume by the smiley that you aren't serious.
Surely that kind
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 02:34 PM 2/20/2004 -0800 Dave Land wrote:
John,
I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved
San
Francisco. It's been nice having something to cheer about while
watching
the local newscast. :-D
I presume by the
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 02:34 PM 2/20/2004 -0800 Dave Land wrote:
John,
I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that
saved San
Francisco. It's been nice having something to cheer about while
watching
the local newscast. :-D
I presume by the
The Fool said:
And I must say that I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, I tell you, to find none
of
Brin-L's reisdent left-wingers criticzing this absurdity, and in
fact, several of them praising it.
And I must say that I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, I tell you, to find none
of Brin-L's reisdent
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:06:18PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
And I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, *SHOCKED*, *SHOCKED!!!* that Erik didn't
write this! ...or did he?
Too easy.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:06:18PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
And I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, *SHOCKED*, *SHOCKED!!!* that Erik didn't
write this! ...or did he?
Too easy.
And I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, *SHOCKED*, *SHOCKED!!!* that Erik didn't
respond in this thread with
Michael Harney wrote:
This isn't a case of judicial activism using symantics to strike down
something they disagree with, it is clearly a wrongly worded order, and is
something that the judges *cannot* order. I would *never* want a wrongly
worded order to be issued in court, as all court
On 22 Feb 2004, at 1:49 am, Julia Thompson wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:06:18PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
And I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, *SHOCKED*, *SHOCKED!!!* that Erik didn't
write this! ...or did he?
Too easy.
And I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, *SHOCKED*, *SHOCKED!!!* that
--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:06:18PM +, Richard
Baker wrote:
And I am *shocked*, SHOCKED, *SHOCKED*,
*SHOCKED!!!* that Erik didn't
write this! ...or did he?
Too easy.
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
My theory has always been that
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we
average?(wasRE: Hate_Amendment)
On 22 Feb 2004, at 1:49 am, Julia
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
My theory has always been that The Fool is Howard
Dean, actually...
And the boy-I'm-glad-I-wasn't-drinking-anything-when-I-read-that-post
award for the evening goes to Gautam.
Julia
___
At 10:04 PM 2/21/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 10:04 PM 2/21/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
Robert Seeberger wrote:
Someone called for an electrician?
xponent
House Calls Maru
rob
Yeah, you know anything about installing a heat light in a bathroom?
Yes. *Don't* put the switch next to the light
At 11:28 AM 2/19/04, Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marriage[sic]Amendment)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:38:08 -0600
At 06
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
No more! I found the magic word that I had to utter!
The spell is
glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST);
Whoops! I never even thought of that!
That turns in the Z-buffer functionality that allows OpenGL to
actually hide the parts of objects that are behind other objects.
At 01:53 PM 2/19/04, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snippage
I didn't really think anyone was keeping a chart,
but... me, I'm poly, transgendered, sapiosexual,
with no children - fit THAT into your categories,
Debbi ^_^
blinks
opens mouth
closes mouth
shakes
Robert Seeberger wrote:
As Dan touched upon in an earlier post, intimacy
seems often to be confused with sexuality, which
seems to be one of the memes that we as a society
inherited from the Puritan world-view.
Only in AmericaG
FWIW, also in Brazil. Intimacy among women is socially
At 01:57 PM 2/18/2004 -0500 Jon Gabriel wrote:
I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San
Francisco. It's been nice having something to cheer about while watching
the local newscast. :-D
I presume by the smiley that you aren't serious.
Surely that kind of
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 01:57 PM 2/18/2004 -0500 Jon Gabriel wrote:
I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved
San
Francisco. It's been nice having something to cheer about while
watching
the local newscast. :-D
I presume by the smiley
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was
RE: FederalMarraige[sic]Amendment)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:29:04 -0500
At 01:57 PM 2/18
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we average?
(wasRE: Hate_Amendment)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:00:52 -0600
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:17:57AM -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Surely the kind of judicial ruling that let Treasonous Iran-Contra
Conspirator Poindexter go free is not good for a free society.
Surely such baiting and trolling attacks would be better launched
Surely such baiting and trolling attacks would be
better launched in
private.
Not for him, since he has an agenda and will use as
many opportunities as he can to push it forward, no
matter the relevance.
Damon.
=
Damon
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Semicolon Saved San Francisco RE: BRin-L - are we
average?(wasRE: Hate_Amendment)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:24:23 -0500
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:17:57AM
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This
was a relevant counter-example
Actually, it was irrelevant Erik. I asked whether a particular
judicial ruling is good for a free society, and he brought up a
judicial ruling that is over a decade old, without ever
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 06:44:56PM -, iaamoac wrote:
Actually, it was irrelevant Erik.
Hardly. It is a similar problem, but you treat it doesn't seem to offend
you, since it doesn't hamper your efforts to coerce others to follow
your whims.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Seeberger wrote:
snip
My personal experience tells me that 40-60% of
women I have dated were
Bi (to varying degrees) and I would suspect the
numbers are similar for men.
Male homosexuality
John,
I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San
Francisco. It's been nice having something to cheer about while watching
the local newscast. :-D
I presume by the smiley that you aren't serious.
Surely that kind of judicial ruling is not good for a free
- Original Message -
From: Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Federal
Marraige[sic]Amendment)
From: ritu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Seeberger wrote
At 06:13 PM 2/18/04, William T Goodall wrote:
On 18 Feb 2004, at 9:57 pm, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote:
I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved
San Francisco. What about it?
Nope. Haven't heard about it here.
Heard about it
I suspect that pure heterosexuals may not even be a majority.
I'm in that 10% minority :) Can I get a disabled sticker for that?
If I can get one for being a pure Left-handed person...
Any other lefties out there?
Nerd From Hell
___
Chad,
I'm in that 10% minority :) Can I get a disabled sticker for that?
If I can get one for being a pure Left-handed person...
Any other lefties out there?
Actually, I'm ambi. Or maybe just ambi-curious.
Dave
David M.
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marriage[sic]Amendment)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:38:08 -0600
At 06:13 PM 2/18/04, William T Goodall wrote
Straight, married, kids, moderate. I think that last one makes me a freak around
here... ;-)
Jim
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
___
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:14 PM 2/18/04, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
In order to be average some need to be on either side of that
average. I tend to think that we average out, but only with a big
standard deviation over all the values, so that either side up to the
outer limits of
- Original Message -
From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marriage[sic]Amendment)
I may be a deviate, but am definitely
Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snippage
I didn't really think anyone was keeping a chart,
but... me, I'm poly, transgendered, sapiosexual,
with no children - fit THAT into your categories,
Debbi ^_^
blinks
opens mouth
closes mouth
shakes head
Umm, I think it's safe to say that
In a message dated 2/19/2004 12:55:02 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And just what is sapiosexual? wicked grin Only
has sex with wise persons? Only has sex with humans?
...with the self-aware?
Debbi
who seems quite boring in comparison
Only has sex with
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE:
FederalMarraige[sic]Amendment)
In a message dated 2/19/2004
--- Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I asked the question to begin with, I didn't
really think I'd end up posting something like this,
but what the hell?
snip
Seriously though.. I'm genetically male (XY, as far
as I know) but have struggled with gender identity
my entire
Ritu wrote:
And who would 'pure' heterosexuals be? People who find homo-sexuality
repulsive?
No, 'pure' heterosexuals are those that do not have any attaction
to people of the same sex _and_ that have attaction to people
of the opposite sex.
Alberto Monteiro
Robert Seeberger wrote:
I think the weirdest post so far was when Alberto revealed that he has
polygonorrhea.
No more! I found the magic word that I had to utter!
The spell is
glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST);
Alberto Monteiro
___
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Robert Seeberger wrote:
I think the weirdest post so far was when Alberto revealed that he has
polygonorrhea.
No more! I found the magic word that I had to utter!
The spell is
glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST);
Alberto Monteiro
What level mage are you, now,
Jeffrey Miller wrote:
I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I don't talk much about my
life, but many people seem to be (happily) married with kids (but then, I
tend to think the whole world is like that ^_^)
I may qualify as the most pervert Brin-ler: almost 20 year _monogamy_
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Jeffrey Miller wrote:
I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I don't talk much about my
life, but many people seem to be (happily) married with kids (but then, I
tend to think the whole world is like that ^_^)
I may qualify as the most pervert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 04:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Totally Gay: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE:
Federal Marrai ge [sic] Amendment)
Are we
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Gabriel
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 07:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marraige [sic]Amendment)
Are we as a population representative
When I asked the question to begin with, I didn't really think I'd end up posting
something like this, but what the hell?
--- Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a
chart,
I'll guess ~ 95%, since I'm allowing that if I'd
grown
up
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE:
FederalMarraige[sic]Amendment)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:25:21 -0600
Miller, Jeffrey wrote:
I really AM curious
Julia Thompson wrote:
Miller, Jeffrey wrote:
I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I don't talk much
about my life, but many people seem to be (happily) married with kids
(but then, I tend to think the whole world is like that ^_^)
Monogamous, hetero, married, kids.
Monogamous, bi,
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marraige[sic]Amendment)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:59:25 -0800
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
In order to be average some need to be on either side of that average. I
tend to think that we average out, but only with a big standard
deviation over all the values, so that either side up to the outer
limits of the spectrum are represented. ;o)
Sonja :o)
xGCU: One man and one little man.
Ticia wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
Miller, Jeffrey wrote:
I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I don't talk much
about my life, but many people seem to be (happily) married with kids
(but then, I tend to think the whole world is like that ^_^)
Monogamous, hetero,
At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote:
I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San
Francisco. What about it?
Nope. Haven't heard about it here.
Won't Even Make The Usual Observation About Assuming Maru
-- Ronn! :)
Ticia wrote:
Monogamous, bi, married, expecting first baby in June...
Sounds kinda difficult to be monogamous and bi - I guess one is who you
are and one is what you do.
I am surprised at the number of bi members - I had always thought it to
be purely the stuff of letters to Penthouse. It
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Gabriel
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE:
FederalMarraige[sic]Amendment)
I assume you've been watching
At 02:14 PM 2/18/04, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
In order to be average some need to be on either side of that average. I
tend to think that we average out, but only with a big standard deviation
over all the values, so that either side up to the outer limits of the
spectrum are
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE:
FederalMarraige[sic]Amendment)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:11:14 -0800
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:03 AM
Subject: Well, that thread wandered from where I thought it would (RE:
BRin-L -are we average?...)
When I asked the question to begin
- Original Message -
From: Russell Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marraige[sic]Amendment)
Ticia wrote:
Monogamous, bi, married, expecting first
On 18 Feb 2004, at 9:57 pm, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote:
I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved
San Francisco. What about it?
Nope. Haven't heard about it here.
Heard about it here. ; should have been or :)
--
William T
Ticia wrote:
Monogamous, bi, married, expecting first baby in June...
How can someone be monogamous _and_ bi? Bi implies
that you have at least two partners! :-)
Alberto Monteiro the nitpicker
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 19 Feb 2004, at 12:08 am, Robert Seeberger wrote:
I suspect that pure heterosexuals may not even be a majority.
I'm in that 10% minority :) Can I get a disabled sticker for that?
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog :
At 11:46 AM 2/18/2004, you wrote:
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: FederalMarraige[sic]Amendment)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:25:21 -0600
Miller, Jeffrey
Robert Seeberger wrote:
One thing you have to remember about Bisexuals.
They can blend into any crowd.
Remain hidden as long as they like.
And only attract notice if they want to be noticed.
My personal experience tells me that 40-60% of women I have dated were
Bi (to varying degrees) and
- Original Message -
From: ritu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:09 PM
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Federal
Marraige[sic]Amendment)
Robert Seeberger wrote:
One thing you have to remember about
From: ritu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Seeberger wrote:
One thing you have to remember about Bisexuals.
They can blend into any crowd.
Remain hidden as long as they like.
And only attract notice if they want to be noticed.
My personal experience tells me that 40-60% of women I have
Jeffrey Miller asked:
Are we as a population representative in terms of sexuality
distribution? Does Brin-L have any openly GLBT members (excepting
myself, of course)?
*raises hand way back in the corner*
Right here. Bi.
Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) I believe that human sexuality is non-linear. While there are
certainly a great many people who are very firmly homosexual or
heterosexual, there just as surely exists some subset of people who
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:35 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marraige [sic]Amendment)
Jeffrey Miller asked
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Harney
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:33 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marraige [sic]Amendment)
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL
Top-post -- Of **course** we're not average! We're
clearly all _above average_! ;D
Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I
don't talk much about my life, but many people seem
to be (happily) married with kids (but then, I tend
to think
- Original Message -
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige
[sic]Amendment)
Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a chart
--- Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a
chart,
I'll guess ~ 95%, since I'm allowing that if I'd
grown
up in a radically different society I might not be
100%), single yet looking, 2 children-in-fur, 3
surrogate children-on-the-hoof...
Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a
chart,
I'll guess ~ 95%, since I'm allowing that if I'd
grown
up in a radically different society I might not be
100%), single yet looking, 2 children-in-fur,
Miller, Jeffrey wrote:
I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I don't talk much
about my life, but many people seem to be (happily) married with kids
(but then, I tend to think the whole world is like that ^_^)
Monogamous, hetero, married, kids.
Insane.
(I'm told it gets easier
Monogamous, hetero, married, kids.
Me too! Except changed married to engaged, and kids to
none...
Insane.
That too (but in a different way...bwahahahaha!)
Damon.
=
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem,
In a message dated 2/17/2004 6:21:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Monogamous, hetero, married, kids.
monogamous hetero married kids (I have kids my kids aren't married at least
not the last time I looked)
___
Are we as a population representative in terms of sexuality
distribution? Does Brin-L have any openly GLBT members
(excepting myself, of course)?
Na... I expect we are less representative that the general populace.
Frankly, Sci-fi is a bit too Gay, so to speak, for the cool hipster
At 06:04 PM 2/17/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we as a population representative in terms of sexuality
distribution? Does Brin-L have any openly GLBT members
(excepting myself, of course)?
Na... I expect we are less representative that the general populace.
Frankly, Sci-fi is a bit too
At 06:04 PM 2/17/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now if I ask what GLBT stands for,
Garlic, lettuce, bacon, and tomato.
-- Ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
In a message dated 2/17/2004 5:06:19 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now if I ask what GLBT stands for, does that make me curious bi?
Gimli - Legolas Buddies in Tolkein?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]
Amendment)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:25:23 -0800
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1
96 matches
Mail list logo
