At 12:49 PM 11/8/02, John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 06:57 PM 11/3/2002 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:
>> What I am
>> saying is that it sounds awfully arrogant when an amateur claims to have
>> the One True Answer ("this *is* how " -- notice the emphasis on
>> the word "is") and then add that the professiona
At 06:57 PM 11/3/2002 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:
>> What I am
>> saying is that it sounds awfully arrogant when an amateur claims to have
>> the One True Answer ("this *is* how " -- notice the emphasis on
>> the word "is") and then add that the professionals "haven't figured it out
>> yet".
>>
>> He
At 18:57 03-11-2002 -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
> I am not dismissing the work Giorgis put into studying the UN. What I
> am saying is that it sounds awfully arrogant when an amateur claims to
> have the One True Answer ("this *is* how " -- notice the
> emphasis on the word "is") and then add that
Jim Sharkey [mailto:templar569@;excite.com] wrote:
>>>hehehe, should I ever find myself sudenly diabetic or something,
>>>I'll drop you a line.
and later:
>In that case,
>New Jersey is not all that far from you after all!
It isn't far, but I'll turn around and hassle my own mother in law
rat
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
>Jim wrote:
>>hehehe, should I ever find myself sudenly diabetic or something,
>>I'll drop you a line.
>>Are you willing to take a trans-Atlantic flight though? :)
>
>Hmm, maybe not. But then again, Thanksgiving is a North American
>holiday so I'm guessing you're
De : Horn, John [mailto:JHorn@;healthlink.com]
> As Jim said earlier, wouldn't that make it next to impossible to get
> anything done on the UNSC? I can't imagine almost any even remotely
> controversial proposal not being vetoed by one of that group?
That's the way the UN is now. Everyone wants
Jim wrote:
>>>Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 08:58 , Jim Sharkey a écrit :
>>>No, but my wife does. Every year on the day before Thanksgiving,
>>>she and her father spend the evening making about a jillion
>>>chocolate chip cookies for the holidays. The best part is that I
>>>get to sit next t
- Original Message -
From: "J. van Baardwijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: UN Security Council Reform Re: Just for the record
> At 10:32 02-11-2002 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
>
>
At 03:47 PM 11/3/2002 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
>As Jim said earlier, wouldn't that make it next to impossible to get
>anything done on the UNSC? I can't imagine almost any even remotely
>controversial proposal not being vetoed by one of that group?
There is a bit of game theory involved. Obvious
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
>>Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 08:58 , Jim Sharkey a écrit :
>>No, but my wife does. Every year on the day before Thanksgiving,
>>she and her father spend the evening making about a jillion
>>chocolate chip cookies for the holidays. The best part is that I
>>get
> From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:jxg9@;po.cwru.edu]
>
> At 02:07 PM 11/1/2002 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
> >Would all of these permanent members have a veto? If not,
> which ones would?
>
> Virtually every country under consideration for a permanent
> UNSC seat in
> the future has stated that they
In a message dated 11/3/2002 7:07:50 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Sorry, William, but you tried *waay* too hard for this one. Gonna
have to ding you for it. ;-)
>>
Well I did say "tries"
I'll go back to trying to win the Eatin' an Arrow contest.
Wi
At 07:58 AM 11/3/02, Jim Sharkey wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
>>
>Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to
>make a really good chocolate chip cookie?
No, but my wife does. Every year on the day before Thanksgiving, she and
her father spend the evening making about a jillio
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:39:18AM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
> given a few recipes by someone whose grandparents had a bakery. If I
> still have that paper, I could give you a good recipe.
>
> Tell me if I ought to look.
Yes! Never turn down a good chocolate chip cookie recipe!
--
"Erik Re
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 12:00 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to
make a
really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 11:39 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
I might
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
>
> > Erik Reuter wrote:
> >> Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to make a
> >> really good chocolate chip cookie?
>
> > Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 11:39 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
> > I might have a good recipe. I made a bunch of cookie
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to make a
really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 11:39 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
I might have a good recipe. I made a bunch of cookies for fellow
dorm-mates around final exam time one y
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to
make a really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 08:58 , Jim Sharkey a écrit :
No, but my wife does. Every year on the day before Thanksgiving, she
and her father spend the
evening makin
Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:41:57PM -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
> > At 04:28 AM 11/2/02, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
> >
> > >Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
> >
> >
> > Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
> >
>
> Do you have any idea how
William Taylor wrote:
> "Judy, Judy,---"
>
> Thipht.
>
> "Jud---"
>
> Swith..THUNK!
>
> "Argh."
>
> Do you have any idea how arrow Grant this post tries to sound?
>
Sorry, William, but you tried *waay* too hard for this one. Gonna have to
ding you for it. ;-)
Erik Reuter wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:41:57PM -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
>>At 04:28 AM 11/2/02, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
>>>Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
>>
>>Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
>>
>Do you have any idea howudo you h
In a message dated 11/2/2002 10:17:43 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
>Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
>>
"Judy, Judy,---"
Thipht.
"Jud---"
Swith..THUNK!
"Argh."
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:41:57PM -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
> At 04:28 AM 11/2/02, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
>
> >Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
>
>
> Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
>
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how
At 09:38 PM 10/31/02, Ritu Ko wrote:
GCU Still Sleepy
GSV Is 9am Too Early To Call It A Day And Go Back To Bed?
"Sunrise is Nature's way of telling you it's bedtime."
--Ronn! :)
I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--D
At 04:28 AM 11/2/02, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
--Ronn! :)
I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournel
At 10:32 02-11-2002 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
You're awfully dismissive of something someone's put a lot of time and
energy into.
I am not dismissing the work Giorgis put into studying the UN. What I am
saying is that it sounds awfully arrogant when an amateur claims to have
the One True A
At 02:45 PM 11/2/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
>Well, there are two ways you can go with the Indianapolis vs. Baltimore
>thing:
>
>1) Once Cleveland got a new Browns team, the Ravens were a natural
>rival. So the thing to do is put Baltimore in the same division as the
>Browns.
>
>2) Or you c
At 10:32 AM 11/2/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
>No, this is a "kid" who just got back from volunteering at a Model UN
>conference, who has spent a lot of the past few years thinking about the
>UN, and who probably understands about 10 times as much about it as any
>of the rest of us here, yourse
"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> At 01:20 PM 11/2/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
> >Did you successfully predict which AFC team went over to the NFC? (Just
> >curious.) Or was your prediction not as detailed as that?
>
> Yup, I made my prediction on the day that Houston was awarded the expansion
At 01:20 PM 11/2/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
>Did you successfully predict which AFC team went over to the NFC? (Just
>curious.) Or was your prediction not as detailed as that?
Yup, I made my prediction on the day that Houston was awarded the expansion
franchise. The only error in my pred
"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> At 09:02 PM 11/2/2002 +0530 Ritu Ko wrote:
> >J. van Baardwijk wrote:
> >
> >> Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds? Do you
> >> really believe
> >> that you are so intellectually superior to others that you
> >> can see things
> >> coming that trained pr
At 09:02 PM 11/2/2002 +0530 Ritu Ko wrote:
>J. van Baardwijk wrote:
>
>> Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds? Do you
>> really believe
>> that you are so intellectually superior to others that you
>> can see things
>> coming that trained professionals with years of relevant
>> e
"J. van Baardwijk" wrote:
>
> At 20:09 31-10-2002 -0500, John Giorgis wrote:
>
> >So, there you have it. That *is* how UNSC reform will end up - only the
> >professionals haven't figured it out yet.
>
> Given the absence of smileys, I take it that the above is to be taken
> seriously.
>
> Wel
J. van Baardwijk wrote:
> Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds? Do you
> really believe
> that you are so intellectually superior to others that you
> can see things
> coming that trained professionals with years of relevant
> experience would miss?
>
> Puh-lease!
Puh-lease!
At 20:09 31-10-2002 -0500, John Giorgis wrote:
So, there you have it. That *is* how UNSC reform will end up - only the
professionals haven't figured it out yet.
Given the absence of smileys, I take it that the above is to be taken
seriously.
Well, in that case: sheesh, you really are arroga
At 02:07 PM 11/1/2002 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
>Would all of these permanent members have a veto? If not, which ones would?
Virtually every country under consideration for a permanent UNSC seat in
the future has stated that they would decline the permanent seat if it did
not carry the same rights
At 03:21 PM 11/1/2002 -0500 Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
>And if they do, could we hope for a toned down veto where a veto could
>not be used if all of the other permament members agree on a motion?
Not a chance. The veto powers have veto power over all UNSC reforms (by
virtue of having veto powe
At 03:10 PM 11/1/2002 -0500 Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
>Indeed it is, although I think that the Arabs' importance
>is a bit overdone. I would rather see a permanent member be
>from black Africa which is a sizable portion of the world
>population. South Africa is better respected on the
>contin
Horn, John wrote:
>>From: Jim Sharkey [mailto:templar569@;excite.com]
>>
>>John D. Giorgis posited:
>>
>>>A UNSC made up of America, Russia, China, India, the EU, Mexico,
>>>and Egypt as permanent members, and another 18 countries rotating
>>>in and out.
>>
>>This is a pretty interesting idea Jo
> John D. Giorgis posited:
>
> >A UNSC made up of America, Russia, China, India, the EU, Mexico,
> >and Egypt as permanent members, and another 18 countries rotating
> >in and out.
> De : Horn, John [mailto:JHorn@;healthlink.com]
> Would all of these permanent members have a veto? If not, whic
> From: Jim Sharkey [mailto:templar569@;excite.com]
>
> John D. Giorgis posited:
>
> >A UNSC made up of America, Russia, China, India, the EU, Mexico,
> >and Egypt as permanent members, and another 18 countries rotating
> >in and out.
>
> This is a pretty interesting idea John. It sounds fair
John D. Giorgis posited:
>> A UNSC made up of America, Russia, China, India, the EU, Mexico,
>> and Egypt as permanent members, and another 18 countries rotating
>> in and out.
De : Jim Sharkey [mailto:templar569@;excite.com]
> This is a pretty interesting idea John. It sounds fair and
> reas
Julia Thompson wrote:
> > Ritu
> > GCU Still Sleepy
> > GSV Is 9am Too Early To Call It A Day And Go Back To Bed?
>
> No, but 10AM is a perfectly acceptable hour to begin a nap. :)
Okay. I can survive these 35 minutes just by making sure all the
children, dogs and puppies are involved in a *lo
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:50 PM
Subject: Aside Re: UN Security Council Reform Re: Just for the record
> Ritu Ko wrote:
>
> > Ritu
> > GCU Still Slee
Ritu Ko wrote:
> Ritu
> GCU Still Sleepy
> GSV Is 9am Too Early To Call It A Day And Go Back To Bed?
No, but 10AM is a perfectly acceptable hour to begin a nap. :)
Julia
trying to gauge when to haul someone upstairs, plunk him into pajamas
and start the just-before-bed routine -- proba
John D. Giorgis wrote:
> Once this happens, it then becomes possible to envision
> expanding the UNSC
> to 25 members or so, with 7-8 of them as permanent members
> (pending whether
> the UK joins the EU seat.)
How long a time frame are you envisioning here?
> India is basically a done deal
46 matches
Mail list logo
