Re: A good scripting language for busybox?

Why do you need a scripting language in the busybox project? Cannot you just generate the platform with things like a small subset of python using Yocto or something similar? On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Pavel Aronsky wrote: > Apologies for maybe a wild or

Re: Current git HEAD busybox segfaults on some applets

Perhaps you could provide the backtrace and strace outputs? On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Laurent Bercot wrote: > On 15/09/2016 13:55, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > >> Works for me... >> > > I can reproducibly segfault when wgetting a page twice (i.e. the file > already

Re: two small bugs in the shell

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Ron Yorston wrote: > >and the same applies to echo > > Busybox echo follows GNU conventions for escape handling rather than > POSIX. Is that a good thing ? ___ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net

Re: adduser: add -k [was: Re: [OE-core] Post USERADD_PARAM action]

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:37:13PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: Hi, is it possible to do some post action after useradd_param is executed? I would like to modify the created user's home directory

Re: mailing list messages

Well, this happened to me with another mailing list. I would suggest to change your credentials to start with. It looks suspicious. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:40 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wednesday 22 April 2015 14:38:44 you wrote: Was your email over quota or perhaps the mail

Re: Tar/gzip Commands: Busybox vs. GNU (error: Invalid magic)

Dear Simon Chen, This is very poor problem explanation, I am afraid. Please read this: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Best Regards, L. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Chen, Simon (N-DCR SYSTEM HOUSE) simon.c...@lmco.com wrote: Hi, I am working on an embedded OS called

Re: RFD: Rework/extending functionality of mdev

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Harald Becker ra...@gmx.de wrote: On 11.03.2015 16:21, Laurent Bercot wrote: I don't understand that binary choice... You can work on your own project without forking Busybox. You can use both Busybox and your own project on your systems. Busybox is a set of

Re: RFD: Rework/extending functionality of mdev

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Harald Becker ra...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Laszlo ! So why don't you write such a binary wrapping busybox then and other things? I think KISS principle still ought to be alive these days. Not to mention, Denys already cannot cope with the maintenance the way that

Re: ntpd daemon

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Isaac Dunham ibid...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:05:06PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote: Better, thanks, but the documentation would still not mention the case of abort. On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Isaac Dunham ibid...@gmail.com wrote: How

Re: ntpd daemon

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Isaac Dunham ibid...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:05:06PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote: Better, thanks, but the documentation would still not mention the case of abort. On Tuesday

Re: ntpd daemon

Better, thanks, but the documentation would still not mention the case of abort. On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Isaac Dunham ibid...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:58:12PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue

Re: ntpd daemon

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

Denys, any feedback about this bugfix? On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: From b03ad793d1188148953fa280dda672229b9a6524 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laszlo Papp laszlo.p...@polatis.com Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:20:58 + Subject: [PATCH] Delete the user from

Re: ntpd daemon

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Either way, since I have spent a couple of hours before realizing it, I think it would be beneficial to briefly extend documentation. It may sound

Re: ntpd daemon

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Hi, when I run the daemon with the following option, does it still accept the PEER parameter properly to function as a client as well as server? -l

ntpd daemon

Hi, when I run the daemon with the following option, does it still accept the PEER parameter properly to function as a client as well as server? -l Run as server on port 123 The code is bit too complex, so I could not yet get my head around to it. The reason why I am asking this because I

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

From b03ad793d1188148953fa280dda672229b9a6524 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laszlo Papp laszlo.p...@polatis.com Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:20:58 + Subject: [PATCH] Delete the user from all the groups for user deletion --- libbb/update_passwd.c | 57

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Actually, the locking and swapping logic would be common anyway which already resides in update_passwd, so if that reusable component is not moved to a separate function to be reused, we could use put our conditional magic

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Actually, the locking and swapping logic would be common anyway which already resides in update_passwd, so if that reusable component is not moved to a separate

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: I thought about this, too, when writing the patch, but I rejected it because it is not simpler, in fact more complex, it is also not the right layer for the change. In addition, it would also be somewhat slower to execute. Just

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:34 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2015 17:16:56 you wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:54 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2015 16:37:59 you

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

the patch as is for now in my local fork anyhow. Any (non-stylistic) feedback is welcome. commit 22a7da560af82c33ca9334039522e9a03aab29b3 Author: Laszlo Papp laszlo.p...@polatis.com Date: Wed Feb 18 15:20:58 2015 + Delete the user from all the groups for user deletion diff --git

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:00 AM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2015 09:14:42 you wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Laszlo

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

Author: Laszlo Papp laszlo.p...@polatis.com Date: Wed Feb 18 15:20:58 2015 + Delete the user from all the groups for user deletion diff --git a/libbb/update_passwd.c b/libbb/update_passwd.c index a30af6f..42998a9 100644 --- a/libbb/update_passwd.c +++ b/libbb/update_passwd.c @@ -62,6

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:00 AM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2015 09:14:42 you wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: I thought about this, too, when writing

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:08 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2015 15:13:21 you wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:00 AM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2015 09:14:42

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

22a7da560af82c33ca9334039522e9a03aab29b3 Author: Laszlo Papp laszlo.p...@polatis.com Date: Wed Feb 18 15:20:58 2015 + Delete the user from all the groups for user deletion diff --git a/libbb/update_passwd.c b/libbb/update_passwd.c index a30af6f..42998a9 100644 --- a/libbb

Bug in the deluser applet

Hi, 1) busybox addgroup user 2) busybox adduser -G user testuser1 3) busybox adduser -G user testuser2 4) busybox deluser testuser1 5) grep user /etc/passwd /etc/group ... /etc/passwd:testuser2:x:1010:1007:Linux User,,,:/home/testuser2:/bin/bash ... /etc/group:user:x:1007:testuser,testuser2

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Hi, 1) busybox addgroup user 2) busybox adduser -G user testuser1 3) busybox adduser -G user testuser2 4) busybox deluser testuser1 5) grep user /etc/passwd /etc/group ... /etc/passwd:testuser2:x:1010:1007:Linux User

Re: Bug in the deluser applet

WARNING: this is pseudo code. Do not use it as is. It makes my /etc/group empty after the run, but it ought to show the concept I am thinking of. As indicated, the implementation has some bug currently. Any feedback is welcome. commit d7075bb9195a65d11b43f516112f5b0134cbc62a Author: Laszlo Papp

Changing the primary group

Hi, I am looking for something like usermod -g on desktop. Is it possible to achieve this feature? There are workarounds like adding a group and then removing the previous, etc, but it is suboptimal. Cheers, L. ___ busybox mailing list

Re: Changing the primary group

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:38 PM, walter harms wha...@bfs.de wrote: Am 17.02.2015 12:59, schrieb Laszlo Papp: Hi, I am looking for something like usermod -g on desktop. Is it possible to achieve this feature? I have no idea why you need usermod -g (i assume adding a group) i use vi /etc

Re: Deluser: deleting the home folder

On Thursday, February 5, 2015, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: I think

Re: Deluser: deleting the home folder

I think it is bad idea to only allow this operation when long options are enabled. Long options and this functionality are two separate things in my book. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org

Re: Deluser: deleting the home folder

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: I think it is bad idea to only allow this operation when long options are enabled. Long options and this functionality are two separate things in my

Re: Can OpenWrt code be used?

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:27 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Sunday 18 January 2015 20:30:53 m...@grounded.net wrote: I have been looking for a way to add curl and mtr into BusyBox for windows but cannot find anything anywhere. Was wondering if someone might know if those tools from

Re: [PATCH] malloced getpw/grxxx functions for bb

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:38 AM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Friday 02 January 2015 21:04:04 you wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:19 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: after putting more work at this malloced libpwdgrp functions I think they now are pretty robust, with no

Re: custom snmpset coding not working-giving-error

Please stop sending these messages to this mailing list. This is _not_ an SNMP mailing list. If you need programming help, go to trainings or other sites, like Stack Overflow. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Akhilesh kumar 95aku...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all i am writing my own implementation

Re: Integrate snmp to busybox

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Akhilesh kumar 95aku...@gmail.com wrote: ok correct i got it. if i have my file system ,kernel and the busybox already on my board, and i want snmp support on my board but without reflashing anything(kernel/filesystem/bootloader). Is it possible. I thought i

Re: Integrate snmp to busybox

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:39 PM, b...@blacknet.de wrote: Hi Akhilesh, i want to integrate snmp(simple network management) protocol with busybox. Can anyone suggest me how to proceed or steps required. could you elaborate on why you want to do this, and what functionality you want to

Re: `busyboxvi` is not working like before

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Laurent Bercot ska-dietl...@skarnet.org wrote: Le 19/10/2014 15:22, walter harms a écrit : I would vote for a busybox-next (or what you call it). A branch that easly fold back into the main but contains all the recent patches. That may be desirable indeed.

Re: `busyboxvi` is not working like before

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Laurent Bercot ska-dietl...@skarnet.org wrote: Why? If Denis does not have time for the project, then we cannot really blame him. On the other hand, if a fork could work better with someone standing up, why not? Forking a project divides resources and

Re: [RFC] malloced getpw/grxxx functions for bb

Sad to see your monologue. :-( For my money, it is not that bad, so it would be nice to get a feedback from the ultimate maintainer. As far as I can see it is a very serious hazard in busybox that you are trying to address following my initial email. On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:24 PM, tito

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

Isaac, I honestly took my time to address your concerns, but I have never received any feedback. Please ... ? Cheers, L. On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Isaac

Re: [PATCH v2] Ntpd config file support

How about ... for instance merging this thing ... ? On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Isaac Dunham ibid...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: On Saturday 22 March 2014 23:46, Isaac Dunham wrote: On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 08:40:48PM +0100, Harald

Re: [RFC] malloced getpw/grxxx functions for bb

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:13 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Friday 31 October 2014 19:40:56 you wrote: Sad to see your monologue. :-( For my money, it is not that bad, so it would be nice to get a feedback from the ultimate maintainer. As far as I can see it is a very serious hazard

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Natanael Copa nc...@alpinelinux.org wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:37:00 +0200 Natanael Copa nc...@alpinelinux.org wrote: I never sent those patches upstream because I don't think this is the correct fix. For Alpine Linux the correct fix was to use the libc

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Isaac Dunham ibid...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:51:00PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: You completely miss the point. The whole point of the thread is not about writing down one personal preference and done. The applets will be still inconsistent

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Isaac Dunham ibid...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:51:00PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: You completely miss the point. The whole point of the thread is not about writing down one

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Natanael Copa n...@tanael.org wrote: Den 21. aug. 2014 kl. 08:42 skrev Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Natanael Copa nc...@alpinelinux.org wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:37:00 +0200 Natanael Copa nc...@alpinelinux.org wrote: I

Re: [RFC] malloced getpw/grxxx/_r functions for bb

How do you prove that your rewrite from scratch is robust? On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:50 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Tuesday 05 August 2014 20:16:04 Denys Vlasenko wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: sudo busybox adduser

Re: [RFC] malloced getpw/grxxx/_r functions for bb

defines what you are trying to achieve. Ciao, Tito That's why I post it to the On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:50 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Tuesday 05 August 2014 20:16:04 Denys Vlasenko wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: sudo busybox adduser

Re: [PATCH 1/3] testsuite: warning when bash is not in use.

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Natanael Copa nc...@alpinelinux.org wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:11:10 -0300 Guilherme Maciel Ferreira guilherme.maciel.ferre...@gmail.com wrote: The test suite scripts fail with Bad substitution error when using a shell other than Bash. This patch adds

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:45 AM, walter harms wha...@bfs.de wrote: Am 17.08.2014 11:22, schrieb Denys Vlasenko: On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:11 PM, lp...@archlinux.us wrote: Applets are defining the help display text on their own, and it is different for different applets. I don't

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:07 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Monday 18 August 2014 10:50:18 Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:45 AM, walter harms wha...@bfs.de wrote: Am 17.08.2014 11:22, schrieb Denys Vlasenko: On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:11 PM, lp

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:07 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Monday 18 August 2014 10:50:18 Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:45 AM, walter harms wha...@bfs.de wrote: Am 17.08.2014 11:22

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:42 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Monday 18 August 2014 14:11:48 you wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:07 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Monday 18 August 2014 10:50:18 Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:45 AM, walter harms wha

Re: [PATCH] taskset: support more than 64 cores

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Matthieu Ternisien d'Ouville matthieu@6wind.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Isaac Dunham ibid...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:35:46PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski

Re: [PATCH 1/2] vi: avoid spurious error if no filename is provided

Do you know under which circumstances it happens? Is this a regression or does it require some special environment? (I cannot reproduce it here with v1.20.2) On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Ron Yorston r...@tigress.co.uk wrote: Since commit 32afd3a (vi: some simplifications) starting vi

Re: [PATCH 1/2] vi: avoid spurious error if no filename is provided

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Ron Yorston r...@tigress.co.uk wrote: Laszlo Papp wrote: Do you know under which circumstances it happens? Is this a regression or does it require some special environment? (I cannot reproduce it here with v1.20.2) It's a regression on the master branch

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Denys, this fix was sent two weeks ago? Why have you not applied it until there is a better fix (if any)? This is still broken and results

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Denys, this fix was sent two weeks ago? Why have you not applied it until

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

wrote: On Monday 18 August 2014 10:50:18 Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:45 AM, walter harms wha...@bfs.de wrote: Am 17.08.2014 11:22, schrieb Denys Vlasenko: On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:11 PM, lp...@archlinux.us wrote

Re: Re: Re: missing format string in applets/usage_pod.c

, 2014 6:45 AM *To:* Laszlo Papp *Cc:* wald...@gmx.de; busybox *Subject:* Re: Re: Re: missing format string in applets/usage_pod.c its the same with bionic libc (arm) printf(test) is ok but not printf(buf) with char buf[] = test; printf(%s, buf) is ok 2014-08-14 15:29 GMT+02:00

Re: [PATCH] taskset: support more than 64 cores

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Cathey, Jim jcat...@ciena.com wrote: Embedded != consumer electronics. Indeed. Our products use Busybox, and with some of them it's not impossible to push the per-unit price into seven figures (USD). They are flash-based, not disk-based, and file space

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Natanael Copa nc...@alpinelinux.org wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:37:46 +0200 Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Denys, this fix was sent two weeks ago? Why have you not applied

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:11 PM, lp...@archlinux.us wrote: Applets are defining the help display text on their own, and it is different for different applets. I don't see any obvious way to make it easier

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: sudo busybox adduser

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:54 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wednesday 13 August 2014 12:13:10 Laszlo Papp wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:11 PM, lp...@archlinux.us wrote: Applets are defining the help display text on their own, and it is different for different applets. Also, it will be difficult to change at many

Re: Re: Re: missing format string in applets/usage_pod.c

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:58:56PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:15:50PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014

Re: Re: Re: missing format string in applets/usage_pod.c

Sorry, the list was left out at some point due to my mistake ... See below. On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:04 PM, wald...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Laszlo, Cannot reproduce with -Wall -Wpedantic -Wextra. Did you notice: applets

Re: Re: Re: missing format string in applets/usage_pod.c

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Tanguy Pruvot tanguy.pru...@gmail.com wrote: its the same with bionic libc (arm) printf(test) is ok but not printf(buf) with char buf[] = test; printf(%s, buf) is ok Yeah, I guess it is about personal preference. I personally do not like the extended code

Re: Re: Re: Re: missing format string in applets/usage_pod.c

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:36 PM, wald...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Laszlo, Yeah, I guess it is about personal preference. I personally do not like the extended code just to make some smart option silent. ... Based on your arguing it seems that you have NEVER heard about format string exploits

Re: Re: Re: missing format string in applets/usage_pod.c

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:28:51PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Tanguy Pruvot tanguy.pru...@gmail.com wrote: its the same with bionic libc (arm) printf(test) is ok but not printf(buf

Re: Re: Re: missing format string in applets/usage_pod.c

0m0.047s sys 0m0.007s Printf: real0m2.811s user0m0.097s sys 0m0.020s On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:28:51PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Thu, Aug 14

Fix the addgroup help output

commit 55d6582d88470078cef09f52d1bc3c9c3f7fca6a Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Wed Aug 13 09:48:08 2014 +0100 Fix the addgroup help output Since the applet has two options, it is quite misleading to only mention one in the usage example. It should either use OPTIONS

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, walter harms wha...@bfs.de wrote: Am 13.08.2014 10:52, schrieb Laszlo Papp: commit 55d6582d88470078cef09f52d1bc3c9c3f7fca6a Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Wed Aug 13 09:48:08 2014 +0100 Fix the addgroup help output Since the applet has

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: commit 55d6582d88470078cef09f52d1bc3c9c3f7fca6a Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Wed Aug 13 09:48:08 2014 +0100 Fix the addgroup help output Since the applet has two options, it is quite misleading to only

Re: Fix the addgroup help output

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:54 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wednesday 13 August 2014 12:13:10 Laszlo Papp wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: commit 55d6582d88470078cef09f52d1bc3c9c3f7fca6a Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Wed

Re: [PATCH] taskset: support more than 64 cores

I wonder about the use case for this feature? I mean busybox is meant for small systems in general, and =64 cores are not that small embedded systems, at least not yet, yeah? On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Matthieu Ternisien d'Ouville matthieu@6wind.com wrote: This patch adds support of

Re: [PATCH] taskset: support more than 64 cores

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote: Hi, On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:25:04PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: I wonder about the use case for this feature? I mean busybox is meant for small systems in general, and =64 cores are not that small embedded

Re: [PATCH] taskset: support more than 64 cores

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote: Hi, On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:27:12PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: Show me one typical embedded system that is high-volume and has more than 64 cores. Even the full-fledged iphone tablets are not there and even

Re: [PATCH] taskset: support more than 64 cores

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote: Hi, On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:35:46PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: Not quite sure what you are trying to achieve, but you wrote embedded systems _word-by-word_, and I asked for one typical example with more than

Re: [PATCH] taskset: support more than 64 cores

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote: Hi, On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:19:34PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: Right, so you cannot bring up any valid and real use case for this, or do not want despite the explicit clarification request, I take it. I do

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

is loaded. Use the file command. (gdb) On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:40 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Monday 04 August 2014 19:06:39 Laszlo Papp wrote: Hi, sudo busybox adduser

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

Here is my tested fix without being to debug the busybox code, so only code reading and understanding were my friends: commit 9610650b6ce2a4c1904f78a2dcdb47cad3d2e3d1 Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Tue Aug 5 11:42:24 2014 +0100 Allow 256 bytes long usernames as per Unix standards

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

is my tested fix without being to debug the busybox code, so only code reading and understanding were my friends: commit 9610650b6ce2a4c1904f78a2dcdb47cad3d2e3d1 Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Tue Aug 5 11:42:24 2014 +0100 Allow 256 bytes long usernames as per Unix

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

9610650b6ce2a4c1904f78a2dcdb47cad3d2e3d1 Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Tue Aug 5 11:42:24 2014 +0100 Allow 256 bytes long usernames as per Unix standards (usually) diff --git a/libpwdgrp/pwd_grp.c b/libpwdgrp/pwd_grp.c index 2060d78..368c252 100644 --- a/libpwdgrp

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

: Here is my tested fix without being to debug the busybox code, so only code reading and understanding were my friends: commit 9610650b6ce2a4c1904f78a2dcdb47cad3d2e3d1 Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Tue Aug 5 11:42:24 2014 +0100 Allow

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:47:53 you wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:42 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:27:57 you

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Tuesday 05 August 2014 15:21:49 you wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:47

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Tuesday 05 August 2014 15:21:49 you wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

commit 980965767ef3ace983746ee25e92665b87d16755 Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Tue Aug 5 11:42:24 2014 +0100 Allow 256 bytes long usernames as per Unix standards (usually) diff --git a/libpwdgrp/pwd_grp.c b/libpwdgrp/pwd_grp.c index 2060d78..9e4424f 100644 --- a/libpwdgrp

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

scripts and console, let alone user interfaces like small touch screen. Although, that is probably an entirely UI design area... On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: commit 980965767ef3ace983746ee25e92665b87d16755 Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Tue Aug 5

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

it will be / only in case the home dir does not exist at login time as the login program does chdir to the home That is what the linked page also says, yes. dir else you would be locked out of a broken system (damaged partition mounted to /home, /root folder corrupted on main file

Re: adduser/passwd: too long username

, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: commit 980965767ef3ace983746ee25e92665b87d16755 Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org Date: Tue Aug 5 11:42:24 2014 +0100 Allow 256 bytes long usernames as per Unix standards (usually) diff --git a/libpwdgrp/pwd_grp.c b/libpwdgrp/pwd_grp.c

adduser/passwd: too long username

Hi, sudo busybox adduser f passwd: unknown user f Yet,

Re: Deluser: deleting the home folder

Denys, could you please provide feedback here? 1) Do you appreciate the feature? 2) If yes, which option would you like to see for it? On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: This patch was sent to the mailing list two weeks ago without further comment from

  1   2   >