ah yes... i forgot to check adjustperm view...
but... ids generated in both views are the same
(controller_action_roleid), strange thing is that only two actions
are not visible add and adjustperm
i added in meantime two controllers with standard crud actions and
both of them have action add
Sorry for the late comeback...
I didn't want to break all the old links, so I left the parsing
algorithm as it is. I was able to reduce the lines of code thanks to
some more efficient features in 1.2 anyway, so that's alright. :o)
There's one thing I wonder about though. The URLs used in
I've written this behavior which I typically use for file uploads.
It's short and pretty easy to use, maybe you'll find it useful. You
can set the directory in which the file should be saved by setting the
option destination.
If you attact the behavior like this,
Bob, Dan,
Thanks very much that's great!!
I'll work through them both now.
Really appreciate it.
Alex
On 20 Aug, 08:06, Dan Soendergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've written this behavior which I typically use for file uploads.
It's short and pretty easy to use, maybe you'll find it
Try it like this:
$params = array(
// ...
'fields' = array('State.id', 'State.name', 'State.id')
// ...
);
$result = array_values($this-State-find('list', $params));
On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Josoroma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the following piece of code:
function
Hi
1. The log line you get shows clearly that it's an Apache issue. The
message obviously says that you must enable FollowSymLinks in your
httpd.conf so that mod_rewrite works (see here :
https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/1700)... you must put Options
FollowSymLinks in your httpd.conf (there may
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:07 AM, clemos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
1. The log line you get shows clearly that it's an Apache issue. The
message obviously says that you must enable FollowSymLinks in your
httpd.conf so that mod_rewrite works (see here :
This has been driving me nuts for a few hours now and I cant figure
out what I am doing wrong. I am on Cake 1.2rc2
I am doing a $this-requestAction('controller/action/idnum') but I get
redirected to that action instead of getting any return values. I have
done it before without problems (or so I
Hi all
Does someone know what is this :
http://cake--php.blogspot.com/
I suggest that we try to stop that, because our emails are exposed to
spam harvesters, and because it's totally nonsense.
Googlegroups are fine, Nabble is fine (though I find it already quite
parasite...),
but this blogger
http://cake--php.blogspot.com/2008/08/blogger-mirror-of-cakephp-list.html
hehe
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:19 PM, clemos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Does someone know what is this :
http://cake--php.blogspot.com/
I suggest that we try to stop that, because our emails are exposed to
spam
@Tarique
I am not arguing the value of bakery - you missed the point :D
Well, in all fairness, I imagine Alkemann already knows about search
engines but he would still like to publish his work on the Bakery. I
believe that is the main point here.
I propose we should think of how we can use
Hopefully these aren't lame questions. Believe me, I've spent lots of
time reading every tutorial I can find and lots of threads on this
group. I still have a few questions though.
1. Many of the implementations of user groups in ACL have a UserGroup
model (User belongsTo UserGroup), which is
var $hasMany = 'Bid';
I could be wrong here, but I *think* that this has to be an array,
even if there's only one item in it. As in:
var $hasMany = array(
'Bid' = array(
'className' = 'Bid'
)
);
Does updating that help at all?
Zoe.
Hey folks,
if you haven't heard about the CakePHP workshop in Raleigh yet, here
is your chance to grab one of the last seats. In 2 days Garrett
Woodworth, Nate Abele, Felix Geisendörfer and Tim Koschützki will
teach you everything you need to know to bake great CakePHP
applications. On top of
Does this mean that 1.2 still can't filter a result set by a related
model over habtm?
I've been trying to filter my Links by Category to no avail today.
Link habtm Category
Category habtm Link
$this-set('links', $this-paginate('Link', array('Category.id'=$this-
data['Link']['category_id'])));
Hello everyone,
I am using CakePHP to build an application that will run on en
existing database. The problem I am facing is simple, I have products
table and let's say it is like this: id, name, supplier
Some stupid programmer (yes I am angry to him) didn't created the
table with supplier_id.
2008/8/20 bitkidoku [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
I am using CakePHP to build an application that will run on en
existing database. The problem I am facing is simple, I have products
table and let's say it is like this: id, name, supplier
Some stupid programmer (yes I am angry to him)
2008/8/20 Amit Badkas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/8/20 bitkidoku [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
I am using CakePHP to build an application that will run on en
existing database. The problem I am facing is simple, I have products
table and let's say it is like this: id, name, supplier
Oh, I just got here to reply my own question, and there are two
answers already. Thanks for the answer!
On Aug 20, 3:12 pm, Amit Badkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/20 Amit Badkas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/8/20 bitkidoku [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
I am using CakePHP to build
What about using 'list' instead of 'all', it is failing:
$this-Production-find('list', array('fields' = 'DISTINCT
supplier'));
CakePHP is trying to fetch Product.id as well. Is this a feature or a
bug? :)
On Aug 20, 3:12 pm, Amit Badkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/20 Amit Badkas [EMAIL
Hi eleven10,
This table has P (bid_session_id, user_id). If I remove that and add an id
field as PK,
things start working. However, since I am not interested in using this
join model directly, I shouldn't have to do this ... as far as I
understand from the manual and other cake
I dont think it works for HABTM relations also for the reason
that it might be unsafe to do so. By deleting all related records, you
might also be deleting records which are referenced to by other
entries in the join table.
On Aug 20, 4:03 am, Marcello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it does not
Not sure if I made sense in my previous post, but basically this is a
case in which, if you're in a situation where you need to delete
dependent records in an HABTM relationship. you might need to
think if the relationship should be an HABTM one at all... or if a
simpler hasMany would do the
Update:
The problem I was having seem to have something to do with Auth after
all.
I have not figured out how or why but trashing some session data and
starting over again fixed it for me. Now requestAction actually
requests instead of redirecting.
Strange. I have not been able to replicate the
the main reason for using habtm is because address table is shared
among the whole system
clients use them, sellers, and so on
and a client can have ANY NUMBER of addresses
the same for seller
so i cant put a foreign key in any of the two tables
thats why i must use HABTM
On 20 ago, 10:50,
It's a feature, find('list') is usually done to build options for a
select box.
On Aug 20, 8:39 am, bitkidoku [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about using 'list' instead of 'all', it is failing:
$this-Production-find('list', array('fields' = 'DISTINCT
supplier'));
CakePHP is trying to fetch
The example in the manual is a little misleading. It assumes a
belongsTo relationship between Post and Author (i.e. Post belongsTo
Author).
In that case a JOIN will be performed (remember, JOINs are only done
for hasOne and belongsTo).
I think the confusion is that it also mentions a hasMany
Nope, your can not use composite keys with cakephp, you have to have
an ID (or a field that you use as the primary, auto-incrementing id) -
search the group for more background on this.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I thought joiner tables for HABTM
relationships were the exception to
What code specifically did you look at?
On Aug 8, 9:23 am, lightglitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solved it by looking to model test cases code.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post
Hi
I started to write tests, but fails at the begining.
I created model, fixture and sample test case:
http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1606012040
But when I trigger such test I get only such error:
Fatal error: Call to a member function trigger() on a non-object in D:
PS: Things _do_ work if I specify the fields explicitly ... I was
mistakenly using find('list', array('bid_session_id','user_id'))
instead of find('list', array('fields' =
array('bid_session_id','user_id'))) ... [well, Model::find() does have
the signature find($conditions = null, $fields =
I tried your suggestion, no changes ...
However, var $hasMany = 'Bid' also works ... as the output from
pr($this-User-hasMany) in UsersController shows:
Array
(
[Bid] = Array
(
[className] = Bid
[foreignKey] = user_id
[conditions] =
I propose we should think of how we can use the Bakery to become our
ultimate resource for articles. I have a couple of simple ideas and
if anyone is also interested, I'll start a thread about this topic so
we can give positive feedback, ideas and encouragement to the Bakery
developers
Hi Jon,
Nope, your can not use composite keys with cakephp, you have to have
an ID (or a field that you use as the primary, auto-incrementing id) -
search the group for more background on this.
I was under the impression that habtm join tables don't need to have a
separate 'id' PK if you're
Why dont you just do it in the way it was supposed to be? By adding
referential integrity to the database.
For example:
FOREIGN KEY (tablename_id) REFERENCES tablename ON DELETE CASCADE
On Aug 20, 8:50 am, Dave J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if I made sense in my previous post, but
Why don't you just do it the way its suppossed to be? By adding
referential integrity to the database. For example:
CREATE TABLE / ALTER TABLE ...
...
FOREIGN KEY (foreignTableName_id) REFERENCES foreignTableName ON
DELETE CASCADE;
On Aug 20, 9:21 am, Marcello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the main
Sounds like a plan
you da man
3
On Aug 19, 4:48 pm, Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing something similar. If you look towards the bottom of that
link there is a section about prefixes. So your routes look like
Router::connect('/wow/:controller/:action');
What I'm doing is in the
So it seems most implementations of active record I've used have NOT
had a way to do this, so I guess I'm hoping Cake is above the curve
here...
I'd like the general ability to do N record inserts (and updates)
without doing N database calls. Essentially, I want something of the
form:
INSERT
Is this possible with a HABTM? I have two types of tables and one
notes table that can be used for multiple tables.
ie:
quotes (
id
customer_id
due_date
note_group_id
created_date
created_by
)
items(
id
item_num
desc
price
note_group_id
)
notes (
id
note_group_id
note
created_date
created_by
use saveAll() to store multiple records
On Aug 20, 12:55 pm, seth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it seems most implementations of active record I've used have NOT
had a way to do this, so I guess I'm hoping Cake is above the curve
here...
I'd like the general ability to do N record inserts
Wait sorry. Is generic() some built in feature?
I don't quite get it o_O.
On Aug 19, 4:48 pm, Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing something similar. If you look towards the bottom of that
link there is a section about prefixes. So your routes look like
Hi amitava,
Nope, your can not use composite keys with cakephp, you have to have
an ID (or a field that you use as the primary, auto-incrementing id) -
search the group for more background on this.
I was under the impression that habtm join tables don't need to have a
separate 'id' PK if
thanks for your detailed help
I tried the following for a specific directory im not as you say using
user directories i guess from your description...
Directory /www/fb00/
Options Indexes Includes FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride All
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
/Directory
I took
I would do it like this:
Router::connect('/:cat/sells', array('controller' = 'sells', 'action'
= 'index'), array('cat' = 'wow|uo'));
Now you can access:
domain.com/wow/sells
domain.com/uo/sells
in your controller's action you can check $this-params['cat'] which
will contain either wow or uo.
i will try this. it seems like the exact soln. i was looking for. ill
let you know how ti goes! :)
On Aug 20, 3:14 pm, biesbjerg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would do it like this:
Router::connect('/:cat/sells', array('controller' = 'sells', 'action'
= 'index'), array('cat' = 'wow|uo'));
Now
i will try this. it seems like the exact soln. i was looking for. ill
let you know how ti goes! :)
On Aug 20, 3:14 pm, biesbjerg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would do it like this:
Router::connect('/:cat/sells', array('controller' = 'sells', 'action'
= 'index'), array('cat' = 'wow|uo'));
Now
Hi Klaus,
Try $this-requestAction(array('controller'='repairs',
'action'='getData'), array('pass' = array(0)));
On 18 Aug., 11:11, Klaus Schwarzkopf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i use the requestAction funktion with a parameter. The value of the
parameter is 0.
My cake version is
Hi
What error do you get exactly ?
What happens when you point your browser to http://localhost/ ?
Clément
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:12 PM, www.landed.at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for your detailed help
I tried the following for a specific directory im not as you say using
im a little new to referential integrity in the database directly,
could you enligthen me?
i got 5 tables
Clients AddressClient Addresses
Sellers AddressSeller
what i need is, when i delete a client or a seller, it should also
delete his addresses, BUT when i delete a address the client or
That will only work if your database engine supports foreign key
constraints, such as MySQL InnoDB. The default MySQL MyISAM engine
does not support any type of referential integrity; you can set the
FOREIGN KEY/REFERENCES attributes, but they will be ignored.
Other database implementations may
GOT IT TO WORK BUT IS IT SECURE ?
I placed
Options +FollowSymLinks
in the .htaccess file in the root of my cake install ! but why does
this work, and should I use it like this...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Index your aco table on alias ...
On Aug 19, 1:15 am, Marcus J. Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus J. Ertl schrieb:
Hi again! I'm afraid, this is poor application design on my side too. :-(
OK, I took a look into this! It was bad design on my side! :-(
I've startet with more then 60
Right, but how many inserts does this perform? And does the auto-
magic know to use the Exam's newly created id?
-seth
On Aug 20, 10:36 am, teknoid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
use saveAll() to store multiple records
On Aug 20, 12:55 pm, seth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it seems most
Weird.
The Options parameter is better explained here (especially the + stuff):
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#options
Your httpd.conf file may contain several encapsuled Directories that
have options which interfere with the other (not sure if this sentence
is clear, but it's
Right, but how many inserts does this perform?
- As many inserts as required
And does the auto-magic know to use the Exam's newly created id?
- Yes
On Aug 20, 5:37 pm, seth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, but how many inserts does this perform? And does the auto-
magic know to use the
Right, but how many inserts does this perform?
- As many inserts as required
Yes, but my whole point is that if you are inserting 1000 questions,
this could be done in 2 interests or 1001... Is cake currently smart
enough to do it in 2?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
On Aug 18, 8:43 am, Jon Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
a far easier solution to the problem would be to store an interger for
the status, you could assign things like so:
0 - unpaid/unprocessed
1 - paid/processed
2 - dispatched
3 - refunded
Before I finally discovered that there
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:51 PM, seth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, but how many inserts does this perform?
- As many inserts as required
Yes, but my whole point is that if you are inserting 1000 questions,
this could be done in 2 interests or 1001... Is cake currently smart
enough
AFAIK, the syntax you are proposing is MySQL (or at least DB vendor)
specific.
So, it won't be supported by cake.
And do you really insert 1001 rows?
On Aug 20, 5:51 pm, seth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, but how many inserts does this perform?
- As many inserts as required
Yes, but
Hi lauren,
Before I finally discovered that there were replies to my
question :)I did end up going with a similar solution in order to
avoid hackiness.
Which actually brings me to another question:
Should the following work?:
Account has many Purchase
Purchase belongs to Account
Yeah that was my plan, and how I have executed it.
Seems to be working well, especially with Containable there to really
target exactly what I want returned.
Add to that the caching engine and I reckon this is gonna be a nice
little bridge between my site and my forums.
If by any chance anyone
Hi Lauren,
I meant 'Purchase' not Payment!
$this-Account-Behaviors-attach('Containable');
$account = $this-Account-find('first', array(
'conditions'=array('Account.id' = $account_id),
'contain'=array(
'Purchase'=array('conditions'=array(
francky06l schrieb:
Hi!
Index your aco table on alias ...
I have allready done this! The results from the last mail are with this
index!
Bye
Tiggr
Indizes on acos: Name Typ KardinalitätFeld
PRIMARY PRIMARY 433 id
alias_index INDEX 36 alias
Hi!
There are some bugs with prefix routing and pagination. For short: It
doesn't work for other prefix routes then the admin prefix.
I found a patch for this at the bug tracker (#5115), but it didn't
worked for me.
I've played a bit with router php and the patch, and got a version, that
work's
Im using innoDB already
and i've also explained my need to use HABTM in this case, i didnt
find any better solution because i needed to shared the tables.
i think i will open a ticket
but still i need a solution, even if its provisory
On 20 ago, 18:24, Joel Perras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That
class Photocomment extends AppModel {
var $name = 'Photocomment';
var $belongsTo = array('Photo' =
array('className' = 'Photo',
'conditions' = '',
You could simply delete the records manually, i.e. store the foreign
key of the record, delete the record, then use the foreign key to
delete the join entry and/or the associated record on the other end of
the HABTM relation.
I don't think there exists a cleaner way, but if anyone else knows,
On Aug 20, 6:14 pm, Jon Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there's no 'magic' method called 'unpaid', there's only:
Yes, I know. :)
I overrode the find() method in my Purchase model similar to what Nate
Abele suggests in http://c7y.phparch.com/c/entry/1/art,mvc_and_cake
public function
Hi all ;
I am a newbie who tries to understand the basics for now . The thing
is suppose that I want to build a web app which has multiple user
types . Like premium member regular member admin etc . Which isthe
best method to authenticate users ? ACL or the Auth component . I am
aboutto solve
Thank you both. I decided to try installing Cake on my ISP instead of
running it on my own PC. They asked me to send in photo ID before
they'd let me use the system services I'd need to complete the
install. Not very reassuring.
So, I tried installing CodeIgniter and had it up 15 minutes after I
Right, i forgot to tell you that. I prefer to let the RDBMS handle
this, instead of having to write more code in the app. But changing
from MyISAM to InnoDB can have its drawbacks.
Anyway, Marcello I can see by looking at your model that you pretend
to have both client and seller addresses in
I think the manual sums it up pretty nicely:
Realize that ACL is not the same as authentication. ACL is what
happens after a user has been authenticated. Although the two are
usually used in concert, it's important to realize the difference
between knowing who someone is (authentication) and
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:03 PM, villas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@Tarique
I am not arguing the value of bakery - you missed the point :D
Well, in all fairness, I imagine Alkemann already knows about search
engines but he would still like to publish his work on the Bakery. I
believe
I need single login functionality across multiple sites. For this I
implemented the following code:-
if(isset($this-params['pass']['0']) $this-params['pass']
['0']=='sid'){
$db = ConnectionManager::getDataSource('default');
$sql = SELECT data FROM cake_sessions s WHERE s.id = '.
Thanks for the response. I see that more clearly now.
However, I still have the same problem even when doing a find() from
the other model..
that is:
GamePlayer belongsTo Game
in my controller:...
$cond = array(conditions=array(GamePlayer.user_id=1,
Game.status=1));
75 matches
Mail list logo
