Dear castor users and developers,
Due to Intalio's office move, the Exolab Server's will be off-line on
Wednesday starting approx around 8:30 AM pacific time and should be back up
sometime in the afternoon pacific time.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
The Castor Team
--
Title: Marshalling with a mapping file
Hi Jerome,I am not sure yet if this one is a bug or
an enhancement request. Can you please post a code sample that demonstrates the
problem and log it in bugzilla (bugzilla.exolab.org)?
Thanks,Arnaud
This message is intended only for the use of the Addr
Hi Prajkata,
It sounds like a bug: prefixes shouldn't be lost. Could you
open a bugzilla for it with a small test case that demonstrates your
problem?
Could you also please check that you are using the latest
version of Castor?
Thanks,Arnaud
This message is intended only for the use of th
Re: [castor-dev] List of string attributes
>
>
> Yes i tried all combinations in the mapping file. But i get
> it in the output below. Or in some other unwanted output.
>
> Thanks
>
> Quoting Arnaud Blandin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > Hi Ana
Hi Andy,
Could you please give us a use case of what you are trying to do?
The binding file allows you to set up a prefix/suffix for all classes
generated:
MySuffix
I hope that helps,
Arnaud
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee an
Hi Anand,
Have you tried to use a mapping file to set the output format?
Thanks,
Arnaud
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain
information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended
recipient, dissemination of this communication is pr
Hi Robert,
Have you tried the CVS version of Castor?
Arnaud
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain
information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended
recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited. If you have
received
Title: Message
Hi
Paul,
The
source generator not saving the prefix in version 0.9.5.2. One way to generate
the correct prefix is to add a namespace mapping declaration in the
Marshaller.
However I am afraid we might face a bug since Castor is not even
declaring the namespace for XLink.
Ca
Hi,
As Rhett said, the way to go is to file an enhancement request. Please
note that the feature you are requesting is currently under development
via the Binding File.
Indeed you will have the ability to choose the name of java members
generated for enumeration values.
Arnaud
This message is
Hi Fredo,
What is the version of Castor you are using?
Arnaud
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may
contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not
the intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is
prohibited. If you have receive
Title: Message
Hi
Harald,
It sounds definitely like a bug.
Have you tried against the CVS version which contains some fixes for
SAX2ANY?
If you still experience a problem with the CVS version then I advise you
to file a bug in bugzilla.
Sorry for the inconvenience,Arnaud
This message is
Title: Message
Hi
Stefan,
There
is a current enhancement request to keep the order of apparition of the string
elements; you can even find a patch submitted by a castor user in our bugzilla
system.
We
plan to implement it in the near future,
Hope
that helps,Arnaud
-Original M
Hi,
The XML Serializer is used to output the XML. What you need to do is to
configure your own XML Serializer and pass it to the Marshaller.
You should find examples in the archive.
I hope this helps,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Narayan, Anand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
Hi Jakub,
Implementing the tag is pretty straight forward but
unfortunately I never found time to work on it this year. Here is what
needs to be done:
- Use the new Binding file object model which contain the Javadoc
element: I have it as well with a slighlty modified schema to include
the enumr
Hi Jakub,
Implementing the tag is pretty straight forward but
unfortunately I never found time to work on it this year. Here is what
needs to be done:
- Use the new Binding file object model which contain the Javadoc
element: I have it as well with a slighlty modified schema to include
the enum
I wonder if the XML Schema is really invalid. I didn't find anything in
the spec on "Valid Element XML Schema representation" that would make
the declaration invalid.
The type definition is defined as:
"The type definition corresponding to the or
element information item in the [children], if e
Hi Ron,
It is currently not possible, would have an example of what you'd like
to do?
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Corcuera,Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] Can the Source Code Generator create
Hi Elias,
Very good job! I've included a reference to your article on our
presentation section. It should be published soon on the web-site.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Elias Torres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
Hi Olivier,
> - In my XML schema I have more fields than in my object (see
> the "reservation" object and xml schema for details). Can I
> specify in the mapping file that I want castor to create
> those fields during the marshalling process ?
The XML you copied below is not an XML Schema but
Hi Daniel,
Many so called XML Schema validators are buggy when it comes to deal
with restriction and extension. As stated in the XML Schema
specification:
Schema Representation Constraint: Complex Type Definition Representation
OK
"2 If the alternative is chosen, the type definition
.resolved.
Title: Message
Just a
quick note: one item on my to-do list is to generate automatically the sources
for schemas specified in or .
This
feature will be available via the binding
file.Arnaud
-Original Message-From: Ostermueller,
Erik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,
Hi Michel,
The configuration mechanism is located mostly in
org.exolab.castor.util.Configuration.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Michel Bertrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Problems with Cast
Hi Tim,
The documentation explains why. Even if it is old it is relevant:
The element method tends to describe the XML instance of the XML Schema
you are generating sources for whereas the type method tries to
represent the structure outlined in the XML Schema.
Since the role of the data-binding
Hi Robert,
Castor is using the Apache XML Serializer to output XML. You can
configure it to output the XML you want (indent, etc...).
However you can plug other serializers to use the one that best suit
your needs.
The API to configure the Serializer is in the Marshaller class.
Hope that helps,
Hi,
> I agree with the original poster...I would prefer to have all of the
> castorbuilder.properties (and by extension probably the
> castor.properties) be available on the command line. But even on the
> short term castorbuilder.properties does not get read like
> castor.properties.
A sol
Hi Tina,
In your example the complexType name is null indeed even though the
complexType itself is not null:
If I understood correcly you are interested in retrieving the name of
the b
Hi Tyna,
I've just tried the example with the CVS version of Castor and it is
working fine for me. Can you please post the code you are using?
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Tina Manoharan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 3:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
Hi Klas,
Sorry for the late reply and many thanks for the patch.
Could you please enter the patch in the bugzilla system
(bugzilla.exolab.org) to ensure that we don't lose track of it and it is
added to our to-do list?
Arnaud
---
If you
Hi Wade,
Could you please post the XML schema and the XML that you use to
demonstrate the problem?
To help you track down the issue, you can turn debug on. It will give
you (very!) little information on what is going on.
>From the error description, it seems that a sanity check is missing.
Thanks
Hi Wade,
Have you tried against the latest CVS version? A few weeks ago a bug has
been fixed regarding the use of mixed content.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
Hi Tim,
You should check out the documentation:
http://www.castor.org/SourceGeneratorUser.pdf
It is rather old I confess but it should contain some answers to your
questions.
Cheers,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Leeuw van der, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, Jul
Hi Bruno,
The best is to send the code you use to instantiate your object to the
list.
According to your schema the element is mandatory so I sum up your
problem:
- when creating the object by hand and try to marshal you have an
exception
- when castor is unmarshalling the object and then marsha
toryJ2 from a schema that defines
the required xml.
What do you mean by 'In the Source Generator Castor has the necessary
logic to prevent empty element from being outputted'?
Thanks,
Mark
-----Original Message-
From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 12
Title: Message
Hi
Mark,
What do you call a segment? Are
you using default introspection, mapping file or Source Generator?
In the Source Generator Castor has the necessary logic to prevent empty
element from being outputted.
Thanks,Arnaud
-Original Message-From: Mark Goodwin
Hi Daniel,
Can you please open a bugzilla for this problem and attach a diff of the
java files of your patch against the ent code base?
TIA,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Armbrust, Daniel C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your contribution, can you please enter in bugzilla at
bugzilla.exolab.org to ensure it is reviewed?
Regards,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Cota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-de
Hi Zia,
Which validator are you using to ensure
your schema is W3C compliant? This issue has been discussed in the past in the
castor-dev list. Please search the archive for a proper pointer to the XML
schema spec but I think Castor is right: you cannot restrict a restriction.
Than
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 3:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Mixed types and Castor
>
> Version 0.9.5 - should be current, correct?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
lty?
>
>
> Hi Arnaud:
>
> thanks for your replay
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2003 5:50 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Generated equa
Hi Daniel,
Which version of Castor are you using? I confirm that Castor should
support mixed types.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Armbrust, Daniel C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] Mixed types and Cas
Hi Matthew,
Can you send us a small as possible test case that demonstrates the
problem?
Thanks,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Keenan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] Validation exception : Exp
Hi Dean,
The aim of the Source Generator is to generate beans that follow the
Java Beans conventions.
In section 8.3.2 of the Java Beans specification, you can find the
following:
"This is method may be provided instead of a
get method, or it may be provided in addition to a
get method.
In
Hi Rhett,
Thanks a lot for your contribution; I will make sure I review ASAP
(coming weeks :( ).
Thanks again for keeping Castor a living project,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Rhett Sutphin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi John,
Thanks for your mail, I will take the opportunity to clarify the
behavior of Castor since it seems to be a frequently experienced
problem:
When generating source for an element, Castor will check the
targetNamespace of that element and then it will associate a java
package to the corresp
ance doc, locate the
corresponding
> > java package in the binding file and then unmarshall the data.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Erik
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 02, 200
Hi Erik and Lisa,
I've slightly modified the behavior of the element and I hope
it will fit your needs.
The element allows you to define a mapping between a package
name and a schemaLocation. The schema location is a URI that identifies
your XML Schema.
You have several options:
1- using the ab
Hi Emmanuel,
You might be interested in setting up your own Serializer to configure
it the way you want.
Take a look at org.exolab.castor.util.Configuration and
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9793 for more
information.
Hope that helps,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> Fr
Hi Fred,
I guess you want to map "Items" to a collection. Then you might have to
use the attribute 'collection' on member binding. The Binding File
currently allows you to choose from a set of supported collection
(array, vector, ...).
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Jambukeswar
Hi Chris,
You should definitely upgrade to the latest distribution of Castor
available (I think it is 0.9.4.3). It contains a major refactoring of
the Source Generator.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Bridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 6:24 PM
> T
Hi Chris,
Which version of Castor are you using?
Thanks,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Bridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] Anybody had problems with the "default"
attribute in
> element dec
Hi Jasmin,
Castor is right since you are trying to instantiate a Model group
Definition (not a Content Model Group). This might come from a bad
naming convention from us:
ModelGroup represents a Model Group Definition (group)
Group represents a Content Model Group (sequence, choice, all)
You jus
Hi Jasmin,
Unfortunately we have no written documentation on the Schema Object
Model...only the API. It's planned to include a written documentation.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Jasmin Wason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Franck,
Reviewing Erik's patch and committing it to the CVS is really on my
to-do list for a long time now. I simply never found the time to do it.
It's not only a matter of reviewing and committing since I would like to
refactor a bit the enumeration handling in the Source Generator in order
t
Hi Daniel,
It could be great if you could isolate the problems sending a small
schema and a small piece of code that demonstrates the problem...even
better if you write a CTF test case, it will be easier for us to debug
it.
>From the information below I can't really help you: min/maxLength are
wor
Hi Daniel,
What to you mean by auto-map? Is it relative to the XML side? If so I
strongly advise you to use the Introspector that predates the mapping
file.
Castor doesn't require at all the mapping file to marshall/unmarshall
your objects, the mapping file is only needed when your object model
Hi Lars,
You might want to take a look at:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9793
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Lars Klose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] impossible to marshal XML w
Hi Arnaud user,
For Castor XML it will depend of your object model and I guess this is
true also for Castor JDO. I mean that you will need in your java object
to use Wrapper Object (java.lang.Integer) instead of primitive types
(int).
In the SourceGenerator, you can activate the option to generate
bruary 26, 2003 10:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Parsing exception of a xsd:Time
>
> Hi, Arnaud and John,
>
> I modified the code as John mentioned, but I still have the same
problem
> unfortunalely.
>
> Damien
>
> Le mar 25/02/200
Hi Venu,
We are currently working on a feature to disable namespace processing in
the marshalling framework.
However it seems that you generated the classes from an XML Schema and I
am not sure you really want the targetNamespace of that XML Schema to be
"http://castor.exolab.org";. Try to change
Hi,
Can you please send the XML Schema so that we can reproduce the NPE?
Thanks,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Beseda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] Union base type
>
> I use Castor's Sche
Hi John,
Your fix is ok, I committed it in CVS.
Thanks for providing it.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: John Weir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 11:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Parsing exception of a xsd:Time
>
> Damien / Kei
Hi Damien,
Thanks for the bugzilla, we will make sure to fix the issue when time
allows it.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Damien GAUTIER-DE-LAHAUT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Parsing excepti
Hi,
Make sure the descriptors generated by Castor are compiled and in your
classpath.
Hope that helps,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Liheng Qiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] an attribute in xsd,
Hi Claude,
Thanks very much for your patch, I would suggest to put the review of
your patch on the right track that you open a bugzilla item
(http://bugzilla.exolab.org) and attach the diff -u of the modified
classes. It's actually not that evident to review the full class you
modified since we ne
Actually Castor has a tool to create an XML schema from an XML file. It
is not perfect of course but it does a very good job in most of the
cases.
Please take a look at
org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.util.XMLInstance2Schema and let us know how
it works for you.
Thanks,
Arnaud
> -Original Messa
Hi Dean,
I thought I included such an example in the documentation I wrote for
the Source Generator (the pdf one available online, the latest revision
is dated from July 2001 but it still presents the functionalities of the
Source Generator.).
If it is not in the doc, I will update it.
Thanks,
A
Hi Serg,
This bug is listed in our bugzilla and will be closed very soon
http://bugzilla.exolab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1207
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Serg Maslyukov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-d
Title: Binding file tag does not work.
Hi Brett,
Sorry for the inconvenience, this problem
should now be fixed in the CVS.
Thanks for reporting the problem,
Arnaud
-Original Message-
From: Brett Ramdeen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003
8:
Hi,
The binding file is only available from version 0.9.4.2 and you can find
some documentation online:
http://www.castor.org/sourcegen.html#Binding-File
You can pass your binding file via the command line by using the
'-binding-file' option or via the API using the setBinding method.
Does it
Hi Brian,
Can you please post your code and XML. Also are you using the CVS
version?
Thanks,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Dillon (ext. 944) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] AbstractMethod
Hi Suraj,
You can configure the Marshaller to include the schema location by using
the Marshaller#setNoNamespaceSchemaLocation method.
Hope that helps,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Suraj Berwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROT
Hi Andreas,
This bug is already listed in bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.exolab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Sorry for the inconvenience,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas M. Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 4:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
Hi Dean,
This should be fixed in the CVS
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Dean Hiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] Keith-quick fix-mastertestsuite failing
because...
>
> Hi Keith,
> Please fi
Hi Pete,
Are you sure that the descriptors file generated are compiled and in the
weblogic classpath?
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Pete Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:56 AM
> To: 'Arnaud Blandin'
> Subject: C
Hi,
This problem is fixed, thanks for reporting it.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] dead link on website
>
> FYI,
>
> On this page
>
> http://casto
get back to my day job.
>
> --Erik
>
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 9:04 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [cast
>
> Any suggestions? My test case is attached to this bug:
> http://bugzilla.exolab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Erik
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Mo
Hi Erik,
Have you tried to use the '-printStack' option on the CTF?
It should work with the latest CVS.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] compiler error
; Alan
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 17 January 2003 16:42
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [castor-dev] SourceGen - ClassCast Exception -
> > builder.FieldInfo bug?
> >
>
Hi Alan,
This bug should have been fixed in the CVS.
Let us know if it works ok for you.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Holland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 4:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] SourceGen - ClassCast Exception -
Hi Dean,
First thanks for all the efforts you are putting to help us building a
solid framework. As Keith told you; I've just got back from my vacation,
is there still any issue pending?
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Dean Hiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 10,
Hi John,
The binding file will definitely be part of the next release; it is
already in the CVS for some weeks.
I've also put some documentation in the CVS that will appear in the Web
Site with the next release.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Weir, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
Hi Brian,
I am unable to reproduce the error reported using the CVS version.
Can you confirm the latest CVS works for you?
Arnaud
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Field-Elliot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 5:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [castor-dev]
Hi,
I am not sure about whether or not we should change the Castor
marshalling code to pass in a different character to the serializer.
The serializer shouldn't be able to produce the NULL character so I
guess the correct behavior will be to have the Serializer to throw an
exception when trying to
Hi Simon,
You can use the 'type' method for generating the classes. For more
information, please take a look at:
http://www.castor.org/sourcegen.html#Class-Creation/Mapping
Bear in mind that castor generates Java classes to represent the
hierarchy defined in your XML Schema so if you have defined
Hi Keith,
If you generated your sources using Castor Source Generator then you
DON'T need a mapping file. Just make sure the descriptors classes are
compiled and in your classpath.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Koski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 20
Hi Tim,
Thanks for reporting the problem, it was not deliberate.
It is now fixed in the CVS.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] AppInfo entries not writ
Hi Jiantao,
The feature you are requested will be part of the customization
available for enumeration in the binding file. Currently the binding
file doesn't support enumeration customization. However it is on the
to-do list.
Sorry for the inconvenience,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Hi Emmanuel,
Thanks for the submission; we'll try to make a review ASAP.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 1:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] [patch] java.util.Iterator support for Castor
X
t; 1.0//EN" "http://castor.explab.org/mapping.dtd";>
>
>
> A mapping file for our Address Book
application
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Hi,
Try to replace the capital 'C' by 'c' in the definition of the DTD
systemID in your mapping file.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilango J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 10:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] null objects
>
> H
Hi Stefano,
This issue is already fixed in the CVS version of Castor.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Crosta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [castor-dev] xml-core-dsig schema binding problem...
>
>
IL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:11 PM
> To: Arnaud Blandin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Question concerning Unsigned data type
>
> Hello Arnaud,
>
> my experience is completely different. I have been working with
several XML
> S
Hi Alexei,
Can you please post the code you are using to set the mapping and
marshall your objects?
Arnaud
-Original Message-
From: Oleksiy Mishchenko
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Marshaling heterog
Hi Annette,
Adding support for the unsigned* datatypes is on our to-do list for
quite sometime now. The mapping that will probably provide is the
following:
unsignedLong ---> nothing
unsignedInt ---> long
unsignedShort ---> int
unsignedByte ---> byte
I am not in favor of providing a default
Hi Brian,
I can reproduce your problem: it is linked to the handling of
ENUMERATION in the SourceGenerator. Since the Enumeration binding
feature is not yet implemented, no revision has been made to the code to
handle differently ENUMERATION.
Currently when using ENUMERATION, no matter in which sc
Hi Brian,
A fix is now available in the CVS. Let me know if it is ok with you.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 10:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] SourceGener
Hi Brian,
The patch has not yet been reviewed and a fix is not yet in the CVS.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Goetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] SourceGenerator -- package mapping wi
Hi Brian,
This is a bug in the implementation, see
http://bugzilla.exolab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 for more information.
Sorry for any inconvenience,
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Goetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTE
Hi Dean,
There is little support for Union, I would advise you first to take a
look at the builder.SourceFactory class and builder.TypeConversion to
see how it is handled in the SourceGenerator.
Arnaud
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On
> Behalf
1 - 100 of 393 matches
Mail list logo