Greetings,
Sorry if this is somewhat off-topic for the general discussion.
Just want to share my personal experience - may be it'll help someone as it
helping me now.
In the process of preparing for the LAB I'm everyday reading a lot of
content from the Web, CCO, different blogs, groups, etc...
A
Hi All,
I've started my move and so far moved successfully, one Unity 5 and CCM 5
but I've to move my IPCC Servers also (version 5) and IP's are changed now.
I've moved Unity and CCM and tested with New IP Changes works fine but I'm
not sure on IPCC Move, what needs to be done on IPCC Servers, CCM
Hi All,
Since V3 requires CCM 7.0 and its linux based, how much knowledge of linux
should one need before hand? Also, will they be integrating with Domain
controller and Exchange which is MS based?
Thanks,
Ash
___
For more information regarding industry
Hi Ashfaaq,
You dont have to know linux at all. you can call this as CUCM appliance.
Its nothing to do with Linux. very simple.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Ashfaaq Poonawala <
ashfaaq.poonaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Since V3 requires CCM 7.0 and its linux based, how much knowledge
IPCC must be co-located on the same LAN (simplicity. Read the IPCC SRND for
full details, I think 45MB would be enough) as the CTI server it connectes to.
SO move the IPCC and reconfig if necessary to connect it to the CCM that moved.
From: Arun Kumar [arunv...@
Hi Michael,
Can you please provide me any link what re-configuration I need to do in
IPCC to make the setup successful.
Thanks
Arun
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Michael Ciarfello
wrote:
> IPCC must be co-located on the same LAN (simplicity. Read the IPCC SRND
> for full details, I think
Dear All
I am looking for the good Cisco document for the +Dialing support in the
cucm7.X
Can please send me the link,
Regards
Pandi
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
ZERO. root is disabled and when you SSH to the appliance you are only
presented with a Cisco specific menu tree.
I also work with Broadsoft's Broadworks SIP server and it's a
nightmare compared to CCM. Very "do it yourself" - makes CCM look
like peanuts..
On Sep 23, 2009, at 6:11 AM, Ash
Okay, my question is not really out of the modules, just a question about a
real world scenario. I'm preparing to increase the size of our VoIP network
and am aware of the principle differences between the ISRs. Our remote sites
will have subscribers, so SRST is not really an issue, and the ISRs a
What is the difference between these 2 scenarios:
mls qos map policed-dscp 24 to 8
police 32000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
police 32000 8000 exceed-action set-dscp-transmit 8
Would both of these take the excess SCCP traffic (assuming you have your ACLs
or maps correct) down to DS
Hello all, :-)
Does anyone sell all the electronic devices (routers, switches, interfaces
cards,..) of CCIE Voice lab version 3? If so, pls, let me know.
Many thanks in advance.
Oscar de la Peña___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE
Just remembered, the ISRs have different port speeds on their Ethernet
interfaces. The 2811 is FastEthernet while the 3825 (for example) has a Gig
ethernet port.
So, my question would be if G711 is being used and bandwidth requirement at
the default sampling rate is 80 kbps; how many voice stream
Guys do you know if you can cluster the unity connection over the wan
for failover?
Is it supported?
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Yes and yes
-Original Message-
From: Cristobal Priego
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 2:17 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity connection v7
Guys do you know if you can cluster the unity connection over the wan
for failover?
Is it supported?
Earlier I began a thread regarding choosing the right ISR for an
implementation if all it's doing is terminating PRIs and not routing data
vlan traffic. The different ISRs have different interfaces, so I started to
wonder exactly how many voice streams could be processed throug a given
interface a
I spoke to the proctor in Brussels today and he said that they were using
the time to replace the R&S racks during that week. Not enough space for the
old and the new. He wasn¹t sure about the rest of the world but it¹s
possible that they could be doing it too.
Mick
On 23/09/2009 06:15, "DEC" wr
You don't need to know linux at all.
_
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ashfaaq
Poonawala
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 6:11 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM7
Hi All,
hi,
when I run the wizard, after done, it said " VM Port Wizard operation was out
of synch, please start over"
I start still same thing
any suggestion, what wrong and should i do ?
tks
___
For more information regarding industry lead
Yes I was in Brussels today.
The lab is fair and doable if you¹ve done the studying.
My personal experience was that I ran out of time and don¹t expect to be
successful on this occasion. I could blame the lack of labs and training
materials but that would be a cop out! When I did my R&S I used th
IPCC SRND. 4.5, but it hasn't changed. See page 3.1 for the IPCC / CTI
requirement.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_4_5/srnd/crs4.5srnd.pdf
Other than that, change the JTAPI and RMJTapi groups so that the primary CTI
server ponts to the CCM
Each ISR router is supposed to only be able to handle X number of PRIs (not
physical, more CPU / resource load wise.) I would work with your Cisco AM to
have them help you detemine what the limits and loading are.
I can't find what documents discussed it. I know I came across a third-party
tes
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/requirements/7xcucsysreqs.html#wp151508
Connection Cluster Requirements When the Servers Are in Separate Buildings or
Sites
Depending on the number of voice messaging ports on each Connection server, the
path of connectivity must have
I had no idea there was a PRI limit. I was thinking, potentially, I may
need to terminate 8 PRIs on a 2811 but in truth I'm planning on having 3
2811 for redundancy and spread the span against all three. Plenty of ports
between them.
I guess my question was also whether the 2811 can handle this
I try to simulate this and yes you are correct on the BR2 phone when the calls
goes out from HQ GW instead of showing the full E.164 it shows only 7 D on the
BR2 phone.
This is not correct from a end user experience.
I tried couple of thing but couldn't get it correct when using the
Globalised/
You have a separate TEHO translation pattern for your globalization,
correct? You shouldn't need to modify your route patterns to account for
TEHO, it should be addressed via the XLation Pattern.
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@
Yes I do have separate TEHO translation pattern. But the problem is when the
call goes out via HQ it matches the existing called party transformation on the
gateway and hence display 7 Digits on the BR2 phone as called number.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@
Both methods looks same to me, but I generally do option 1 as recommended in
SRND and ipexpert labs
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Damisch
Sent: Thursday, 24 September 2009 2:20 AM
To:
Agreed. And I'm not positive, but I don't believe you'll see the
set-dscp-transmit option on a 3750 unless it is a Metro E class switch.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Aamir Panjwani <
aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote:
> Both methods looks same to me, but I generally do option 1 as recommen
The winner is Chris Parker who gave me the clarification:
The policed-dscp wil only remark packets that already had dscp 24 to dscp 8.
The second one will remark all traffic to 8 if it exceeds the policed rate.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Brett [brett.sal...@gmail.com]
I was watching gateway video in new voice VOD today, Mark Snow mentioned
that Ben Ng at networkers has publicly said that new voice lab will test
FULL pri which means we can now use "ccm-manger config server" commands
for mgcp gateway.
Does anyone still think we shouldn't use ccm-manager config
I've used this document in the past for sizing purposes:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps259/product_data_sheet0900aecd8057f2e0.pdf
mike
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Nara Shikamaru wrote:
> I had no idea there was a PRI limit. I was thinking, potentially, I may
> need
I think the main reason to do it is to keep you from having to
constantly do a "no mgcp" and then "mgcp" any time you make a change
to the gateway in ccm.
On Sep 23, 2009, at 10:28 PM, Aamir Panjwani wrote:
I was watching gateway video in new voice VOD today, Mark Snow
mentioned that Ben N
The other got ya is the number of PVDM slots. The 2811 has 2 of them
on the mainboard. Depending on what codec you will use, faxing etc,
you may need more DSPs that you can put on the board. Even with G711,
I think you'll need 3 PVDM2 64's to run 8 PRIs. You'll need double
that to do G729 o
Since the router is originating all the rtp packets, I think it boils
down to the pps the router can process switch. If each call is 50 pps
(20 ms sample) and the 2811 can do about 3000 pps process switched or
about 60 calls.
So maybe 3 PRIs?
On Sep 23, 2009, at 8:26 PM, Michael Ciarfello
Mike Deal is the man for coming up with that link. It ends up being 70 calls
which is just short of 3 PRI's. Your number is right on. I don't think 3 PRIs
will be a problem. Most of the time the router will (hopefuly) not be 100% PRI
utilized.
2821 is usually only a LITTLE bit more expensiv
But no mgcp / mgcp IS faster than waiting for the reset button to do it's
thing. If we are counting seconds, that is.
Good information though.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chris Parker
[cpar..
Brett, you are spot on!
I have just checked on 3750 “set-dscp-transmit” option is just not there! You
can only choose “policed-dscp-transmit” or “drop”
From: Brett [mailto:brett.sal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 24 September 2009 12:04 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: Kevin Damisch; Niza
37 matches
Mail list logo
