Hi, check this topic:
http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg16572.html
hth
From: wormh...@sch.hu
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 20:24:30 +0200
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cannot dial from MVA
Gents,
I have an issue with MVA. MVA
Hi, the bandwith assigned to a location affects incoming and outgoing call
to/from this location, this is way is only valid for a hub and spoke topology
(all the calls go throw the hub). If your topology is not hub and spoke you
should use rsvp wich match one to one locations (you specify
Good explanations, Angel and Marty.
In the Proctor Guide, I noticed that the CUCM GUI configuration for the
gateways did not specify custom locations. For example, the MGCP
gateway for BR1 was configured for Hub_none. My only explanation is
that the wording implied phones not gateways -
Here's some official Cisco verbiage to add to our conversation (and for
future users who search the archives)
Setting 96 kbps to the BR1 location limits the maximum number of inbound
_and outbound_ calls to four G.729 calls.
_CUCM SRND_
Each device is in location Hub_None by default.
For last night's lab, I was using the following dial-peer for
international calls on BR2:
dial-peer voice 20 pots
translation-profile outgoing TenDigitANI
destination-pattern 900T
port 0/0/0:15
prefix 00
The calls went out just find. However, when placing an international
call from
Hi Matthew:
If you set br1 device pool and hub-none loc at gw settings and this device
pool has location br1, in this case, dp general configuration will overwrite gw
specific configuration, hub-none location is an exception to the general rule.
Check the first 3 paragraphs of this
Thank you for the link however my case is different a bit.
Finally I could step over by looking sdi traces in depth: H.323 gw put '+1' at
the begining of the ANI to be in E.164 format but the RD was defined without
that. The behaviour was strange to me since Mobile Connect works as expected so
Mobile Connect use the original ANI received from the H.323 GW without using
Incoming Calling Party Settings at gw level to match RD?
Yes, I can confirm that - just saw that on Vik's video yesterday and ran some
tests myself - I was having problems with the ANI being different on different
Hi, start with this :)
http://pushkarbhatkoti.wordpress.com/category/cue-voicemail-vpim-networking-cue-to-unity-in-10-minutes/
http://www.brainbump.net/2009/04/easy-approach-for-configuring-and-setting-up-cisco-unity-express/#more-503
Hello All,
I was downsized from a major financial institution in 2009 after 20 years as
a programmer and VP. I always wanted to get into the networking field and
used this opportunity to pursue it. I started from the ground up getting my
CCENT and CCNA. I recently completed my CCNP by
Steve - If you're looking to earn your CCIE, and you have already
completed the NP - it would naturally make sense to bypass the VP
right now and tackle the RS Written (you should have most of the
knowledge). The RS would probably be the fastest and easiest with
your background. You can
Steve,
It also depends on which one you feel that you enjoy the most. Between the
CCNP and CCVP which have you enjoyed the most so far? I would then pick the
one you enjoy the most to follow.
Regards,
Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 RS, Security, and SP
Technical Instructor - IPexpert,
Hello,
I know that each cluster can have only one PUB ,my question is : in the
scenario tha ACME company has two single Cluster one in NY and the other in
LA ,both have one PUB and one SUB, the two site have 10 MB Point to Point,
in the event that LA servers burn down, would it be possible have
I am looking for the best approach to building a VMWare server for running
CUCM, UCCX and UC. I have an IBM 3650 M2 with lots of CPU, Memory and
drive space. \
What is the best OS and VMWare application to use as my foundation? Once
that is built, what is the best way to get the installation
in order for you to do that all the servers must be members of the same
cluster. so on the callmanager group you can point your phones to the server
that you want. . the phones can have up to 3 redundant servers.
other than that SRST is your only potion
2010/5/19 Mav nihil...@gmail.com
Hello,
SRST is your best bet. It is not possible to merge both East and West site
into a single cluster b/c Cisco requires max. round trip delay between two
CUCM servers with in a cluster to be less than 40ms.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Mav nihil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I know that
16 matches
Mail list logo
