Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

Hi Vinay, I tried the same and got it worked with same configuration. I am facing another problem now. I have AAR configured too. with ip rsvp bandwidth 88 , AAR is invoking after 3 calls. But if I increase the rsvp b/w AAR is not triggering. Just getting "Not enough bandwidth". Any pointer

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

Hi Shrini, Did the testing, worked for me, you need to check the Maximum number of call and Busy Trigger on the line on which you are dialling. Warm Regards, Vinay Kumar From: "Shrini" To: "'Naoufal Kerboute'" , Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN Cc: Date: 05/01/2011 12:36 PM Subject: RE: [O

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

Hi Vinay, Thanks for quick response. Actually I am making 4 calls from HQ to BR1 and 5th call I am making from BR1 phone, since I do not have any RP to dial HQ phone. I was getting the error. You saved my time :-) Thanks again Shrini _ From: Vinay Kumar6 [mailto:vinayjaisw...@in.ib

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Edit Srst mode autoprovision all

Hi Experts, I have one query about behaviour of srst mode autoprovision all. How does the process work ? As far as I understood the first time there's a CUCM fault the phone registers to the CME and provides itself the configuration to the CME. At this point if we edit the configuration of the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] srst mode auto provision all

today i got it work fine, not sure what i wrong in Proctorlab other day. On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:45 PM, George Goglidze wrote: > does the config appear at any point? > > try restarting the router first, and then try to register phone to srst > again. > do the phone ever register with srst? > >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] srst mode auto provision all

hi G, wondering, what is benefit of using auto prov all for srst ? is there something that srst none and dn can not do ? tks On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:21 AM, donny f wrote: > today i got it work fine, not sure what i wrong in Proctorlab other day. > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Geo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] srst mode auto provision all

Hi, I agree, that "srst auto provision none" would be a better solution. Unfortunatetly, AFAIR, there is a bug in the CUCME software version tested in the lab. ephone and ephone-dn templates not always work with "srst auto provision none". I dont' remember details, but this prevented you from conf

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC call handler with mailbox shared between 2 users

Hello, In vol2 lab10 there is following scenario: configure CUC with a call handler, which should play prompt and take messages. Two CUC users should be able to manage these messages and get MWI notifications. PG skips this requirement. I configured distribution list with 2 users and selected it

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC call handler with mailbox shared between 2 users

Hi Miron - would a new user/mailbox with alternate extensions and mwi notification set for the two required users fulfil requirements? hth Brian Sent from my iPad On 1 May 2011, at 11:42, Miron Kobelski wrote: > Hello, > > In vol2 lab10 there is following scenario: configure CUC with a cal

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 srr queue input vs. output?

Hi, I'm studying QoS on 3750 switch. I'm always confused with SRR input and output queuing. I know there are two input queues and four output queues. When do we use input queuing? When do we use output queuing? Thanks! Michael ___ For more informat

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] srst mode auto provision all

Hi Miron, You mean with 12.4(20)T2 we privacy will not transferred from ephone template ? and we need to add ephone 1 , privacy off. Thanks Shrini _ From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Miron Kobelski Sent: Sunday, M

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN debug message

I'm doing a lab and I'm getting an isdn message that I've never seen before when I try to make an inbound call to my HQ site. Here's the message Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN debug message

Is this a h323 gw ? It is difficult to check whether the GW is registered properly or not call manager. Try checking h323 interface commands and bind address. failed call is clearing in the second higlighed message. what does sh isdn stat shows ? _ From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN debug message

You were right I figured it out just now. A really stupid mistake. On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Shrini wrote: > Is this a h323 gw ? It is difficult to check whether the GW is registered > properly or not call manager. Try checking h323 interface commands and bind > address. failed call is c

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC call handler with mailbox shared between 2 users

Hi Brian, If you define just one user with alternative extension, then you will never get notification (MWI) on alternative extension. Which from what I understand would violate requirements. Moron, I think I would go for the same approach as you did, distribution list. This is the easiest one

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 srr queue input vs. output?

Hi Michael, Is the question about real life scenario? Normally queueing towards internal queue ring is not that important in real life, depending how much traffic you got coming into the switch. Internal ring speed if I remember correctly is 32gbps, which means say you have 48 100mbps ports,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN debug message

For h323 pstn gateway you only need the h323 VoIP bind command. The other h323 VoIP commands are for gatekeeper reg. -- On May 1, 2011, at 17:17, Chevy wrote: > You were right I figured it out just now. A really stupid mistake. > > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Shrini wrote: > Is this a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN debug message

Check your config, ISDN issue signalling, I believe for this issue, if config good, track with debug cch323 h225 debug ip tcp transactions at the beginning of the failure there should be an iec message that might help, use show voice iec and that number to get more details. On Sun, May 1, 2011

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP BR1 registeration problem

Try reloading the router. -- On May 1, 2011, at 17:43, "Ahmed Ellboudy" wrote: > Dear All , > > I am facing a problem to register br1 as MGCP on the CUCM > > The problem is when I use the T1 as H323 is working normally but when I need > to use it as MGCP there is a problem in q921 > > As

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP BR1 registration problem

Still did not solve it . Any idea? Thanks, Ahmed Ellboudy | CCNP, CCVP. Networking Team Leader Raya IT - Professional Networking Services Mobile: +20100770837 Tel : +20238276000 Ext. 2338 Fax : +20238372930 Email : ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP BR1 registration problem

My Fren, Your PSTN rtr, the isdn port that connected to your BR1 site, "isdn emulate-network" are missing from serial interface 0/1/0:23. regards Shingei On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Ahmed Ellboudy wrote: > Still did not solve it . > > Any idea? > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Ahmed Ellboudy | C

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP BR1 registration problem

Check the framing and the linecode should be the same as your PSTN router. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ahmed Ellboudy Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 5:05 AM To: CCIE Voice Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [O

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP BR1 registration problem

You have configured Interface 0/1/0 in router while in CUCM you have configured as 0/0/0. Make changes in CUCM. Warm Regards, Vinay Kumar From: "Ahmed Ellboudy" To: "CCIE Voice" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: 05/02/2011 06:51 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP BR1 registr