On 11/8/06, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's NOT debatable. There are no WMDs. IT's not being debated anymore
> BECAUSE it's not debatable.
Colin Powell said Iraq had 500 mustard shells that were missing. We
found them buried in the desert. Even though we were looking for much
more,
Hi all,
I just want to let you know that Frameworks Conference topics are
posted.
You can see details via http://www.frameworksconference.com
OÄuz Demirkapı
TeraTech Inc. | Senior Developer
405 East Gude Dr Suite 207, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
Voice: +1 (301) 42
that say what wasn't?
On 11/8/06, Jeff Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok... I know. Find me cites that say it wasn't... And I'll decide which
> pieces of liberal drivel to discredit myself.
>
> ;-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, Novemb
> Lawrence wrote:
> BC 4.6 %, Manitoba 4.2 % and Saskatchewan 3.9% As of November 7 2006.
>
And isn't being unemployed in Canada WAY better then in the US? I
mean don't you get all those free services: medical care, education,
etc?
~~~
>Hussein did support terrorism, there were training camps in Iraq, and he did
>give money to various groups that were targeting the Israelis.
Hussein did give money to Palestinian terrorists. However those terrorists
camps were in the northern areas controlled by the US. Ansar al-Islam was an
A
Ok... I know. Find me cites that say it wasn't... And I'll decide which
pieces of liberal drivel to discredit myself.
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 6:36 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Dems git r done
um. I am not going
>The unemployment rate is Canada in 6.2 and 4.4 in the US
>
>http://www.statcan.ca/english/Subjects/Labour/LFS/lfs-en.htm
>
>
>On 11/8/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
BC 4.6 %, Manitoba 4.2 % and Saskatchewan 3.9% As of November 7 2006.
http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/061103/d
or a $70 million dollar 14-mile fence?
On 11/8/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >yeah I realized that later when I wasn't around the computer any more.
> >True. It was an misapplication of world war 1 technology to world war
> >2. I still think it's irrelevant to the present discussion
>yeah I realized that later when I wasn't around the computer any more.
>True. It was an misapplication of world war 1 technology to world war
>2. I still think it's irrelevant to the present discussion, unless you
>want to talk about expensive, ineffective boondoggles.
>
You mean like that 300 mi
lemme know... I have a plan b
On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought we were going by first name. But if Zappa is acceptable, I
> do have a zappa, actually...
>
> On 11/8/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Get creative.
> > Zappa.
> >
> > On 11/8/06, Charlie Griefer
I thought we were going by first name. But if Zappa is acceptable, I
do have a zappa, actually...
On 11/8/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Get creative.
> Zappa.
>
> On 11/8/06, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/8/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
Get creative.
Zappa.
On 11/8/06, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/8/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Norah Jones
> > Split Enz
>
> i'd say ZZ-Top, but it'd be a lie. I have no Z's :\
>
> --
> Charlie Griefer
>
> =
On 11/8/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Norah Jones
> Split Enz
i'd say ZZ-Top, but it'd be a lie. I have no Z's :\
--
Charlie Griefer
"...All the world shall be your enemy, Prince w
On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Norah Jones
Split Enz
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
time
patricia madrid now ahead by 500 votes -- that one's been back and
forth all day
On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> whoa CNN just called Virginia for the Democrats. Yay.
>
> Dana
>
> On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hmmm I guess I just don't understand why you would w
whoa CNN just called Virginia for the Democrats. Yay.
Dana
On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmmm I guess I just don't understand why you would want one?
>
> On 11/8/06, Sandra Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Read the link, Apparently one of the precincts is right in the middle o
hmmm I guess I just don't understand why you would want one?
On 11/8/06, Sandra Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Read the link, Apparently one of the precincts is right in the middle of the
> St. James River (unless fish are now eligible to vote?)
>
>
> Sandra Clark
> ===
um. I am not going to bother discrediting the weekly standard, as it
does that well on its own. The fas link is to congressional remarks
that parrot the administration's position. And CFR... I googled and
found this:
As the council prepares to celebrate its eighty-fifth anniversary, it
enjoys a re
Read the link, Apparently one of the precincts is right in the middle of the
St. James River (unless fish are now eligible to vote?)
Sandra Clark
==
http://www.shayna.com
Training in Cascading Style Sheets and Accessibility
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mai
http://www.cfr.org/publication/9513/
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/011/990ieqmb.a
sp
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.a
sp
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1991_cr/h910112-terror.htm
-Original Message-
From: Rick Roo
Nick McClure wrote:
> Hussein did support terrorism, there were training camps in Iraq, and he did
> give money to various groups that were targeting the Israelis.
I'd like to see a valid cite on that, because everything I'd heard said
that there weren't terrorist training cells in Iraq... at le
Sam wrote:
>
>> - that Iraq had no WMDs
> Debatable - beat to death
It's NOT debatable. There are no WMDs. IT's not being debated anymore
BECAUSE it's not debatable.
>> - that Iraq did *NOT* play a part in 9/11
> Nobody ever said they did
Many of the Bush cronies implied that Iraq was involv
> RoMunn wrote:
> win votes in congress at the cost of american lives in iraq? i certainly
> hope not.
>
Their secret plan is this: Baker-Hamilton. Turns out that's Bush's
plan too. Otherwise why would he install Bob Gates?
~|
true story though a bit old -- that was several months ago. What I
thought was stupid is that the officers were put on leave until they
could pass a urinalysis. Isleta pueblo is a tiny little place that
probably doesn't have more than a few cops (Las Lunas would be the
nearest drive through for in
> Sam wrote:
> I think Baker and Gates will have opposite approaches to the war.
>
Well, apparently you're wrong because they've already put out ideas
that are unanimous to the group. And those ideas are very
Murtha-esque.
If the Dems are smart they'll sit back and wait for Baker-Hamilton,
let M
read your own comments.you are still assuming that the dems have a plan that
doesn't suck. they didn't have to run on a plan to win. does that mean they
have some secret killer plan that they withheld from the public in order to
win votes in congress at the cost of american lives in iraq? i certai
ah is that what that means. I suspected he was saying the current
regime was not extreme enough for him when he said there had not been
any partisanship in Washington for the past few years.
On 11/8/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RINO's (Republicans in name only)
>
>
> On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMA
RINO's (Republicans in name only)
On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just looking at the Rush Limbaugh site. He says he didn't like
> the Repubicans anyway
>
> On 11/8/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > RoMunn wrote:
> > > You are putting way too much faith in a Dem
I think Baker and Gates will have opposite approaches to the war.
On 11/8/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Democrats will run behind the Baker-Hamilton plan which,
> SURPRISE!! calls BOB GATES a member! Does that name sound familiar?
> He's SecDef nominee!
>
~~
I was just looking at the Rush Limbaugh site. He says he didn't like
the Repubicans anyway
On 11/8/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > RoMunn wrote:
> > You are putting way too much faith in a Democratic Party that has been
> > totally devoid of real ideas in this arena for years.
>
> T
It was
1.) Spending
2.) Corruption
3.) Iraq
On 11/8/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where are you getting THAT from? The Republicans lost for 3 reasons:
>
> 1.) Iraq
> 2.) Iraq
> 3.) Iraq
>
> If anything the Republican platform was reinforced since the winning
> dems ran as Republic
On 11/8/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > Okinawa would be surrender. Not going to happen.
>
> Every week! (you say something and I have no idea what you're talking about)
Do you even pay attention to your own comments?
You said they're going with Murtha's plan. His pla
> RoMunn wrote:
> You are putting way too much faith in a Democratic Party that has been
> totally devoid of real ideas in this arena for years.
THEY DIDN'T NEED TO RUN ON ANYTHING!
Let me restate that for clarity: The President's policy sucked so bad
that between the choice of the anything else
> RoMunn wrote:
> Republicans who will have to spend at least the next
> couple of years in the wilderness wondering what they stand for.
>
Where are you getting THAT from? The Republicans lost for 3 reasons:
1.) Iraq
2.) Iraq
3.) Iraq
If anything the Republican platform was reinforced since th
> Sam wrote:
> Okinawa would be surrender. Not going to happen.
>
Every week! (you say something and I have no idea what you're talking about)
If you're commenting on Bush, this lose means AT BEST he's a failure,
at worst he's a disaster. Here are the possibilities:
1.) Iraq improves due to th
You are putting way too much faith in a Democratic Party that has been
totally devoid of real ideas in this arena for years. You are assuming the
Democrats have a plan and that their plan is more competent than anything
the Republicans have fielded. Let's see it.
The only plans I have heard from D
well Pelosi is talking about civility and fairness, which sounds
great. I hope she keeps to that. I really don't want it to look like
they are saying "it's us now so f-- you." On the other hand, a lot of
recent legislation needs to be re-thunk, starting with the incredibly
dangerous military commis
Okinawa would be surrender. Not going to happen.
On 11/8/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is President fighting to stay relevant. He had to send a message
> to the American people that he'd heard them and that he was changing.
> And he had to stay in the press.
>
> The Dems ran
I disagree, I am looking at it from an analyst's perspective. If they had
failed to re-take either chamber, it would be a signal that Republicans had
indeed created a permanent majority of sorts in Congress, and the Dems would
have to be asking themselves what they could stand for that people would
> gMoney wrote:
> While I think he should have fired him months, maybe years ago, I find it
> hard to believe that he fired him at all. Knowing the way these cronies
> operate, I imagine it was one of those "mutual decisions".
>
This is President fighting to stay relevant. He had to send a messag
Rummy offered to resign twice in the past and Bush told him to stay. He
should have just gone regardless of what Bush wanted, but that says to me
that Rummy really wanted to stay before and the offers of resignation were
just pro forma. Does that mean Bush fired him this time? Who knows.
On 11/8/0
don't know a thing about gates. I want to say that anyone would be
better but you never know. It does look like one of those mutual
things though
On 11/8/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bush is going to appoint Robert M. Gates as the replacement.
>
> > -Original Message-
they made it a referendum on the war. Inappropriately in my opinion.
Yes, he voted for the war, which was a bad idea... but you have to
look at the big picture. Control of the house is a better idea than
infighting.
On 11/8/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lieberman's win is absolutely fan
how can you have a pricinct with no voters?
On 11/8/06, Sandra Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More on this.
>
> The precinct in Isle of Wight is truly the only precinct in the state that
> hasn't reported, however, the results are also showing that 2 precincts in
> James City County are not re
so it's really an N?
Norah Jones
On 11/8/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know. I just didn't want to deal with an "N" at that point. I should
> have ended on Heaven 17 and let someone else fill in the next one.
> Shucks. Too late.
>
> (Maybe the hip kids call them 7dust?)
>
> On
I hope they'll get around to reaffiming constitutional protections.
On 11/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i posted this on another board..
>
>
> What I hope will happen:
> Both sides will realize that the American people are sick of partisan
> politcs, the moderates will overw
Bush would ;)
On 11/8/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bush said he planned it last week
>
> On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i can't imagine that the election had nothing to do with it. On the
> > other hand, if he were operating for the good of the party, he should
> > have do
yeah I realized that later when I wasn't around the computer any more.
True. It was an misapplication of world war 1 technology to world war
2. I still think it's irrelevant to the present discussion, unless you
want to talk about expensive, ineffective boondoggles.
On 11/8/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL
Bush said he planned it last week
On 11/8/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i can't imagine that the election had nothing to do with it. On the
> other hand, if he were operating for the good of the party, he should
> have done it weeks ago. For the good of the country, months ago. I
> think h
i can't imagine that the election had nothing to do with it. On the
other hand, if he were operating for the good of the party, he should
have done it weeks ago. For the good of the country, months ago. I
think he probably fell on his sword to make it look like Bush is
responsive
On 11/8/06, G Mon
not sure... local rules may vary. The Green Party asked for a recount
in the last election and went to court when they were told they had to
pay for it, which they couldn't. They eventually won on appeal, though
not before the voting machine memories were erased. Ironically, the
person who said the
been offline...
sex pistols
On 11/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, I would color this "eclectic"
>
> German thrash metal (Sodom) to Edie Brickell
>
> nice
>
> Scott A. Stewart
> REAC/PASS-IT
> (202)-475-8875
>
>
>
>
> "Jerry Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 11/07/2006 11:21
Why arent you guys training him to go outside?
##| -Original Message-
##| From: Greg Morphis
##|
##| Those are all good tips.. I started the crate training, he's taking
##| that pretty okay. However I have tried 3 times today to get
##| him to go
##| on the pad and he refuses.
~
Bush is going to appoint Robert M. Gates as the replacement.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 4:10 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Dems git r done
>
> rumsfeld resigned! No further information just now
>
Hussein did support terrorism, there were training camps in Iraq, and he did
give money to various groups that were targeting the Israelis.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:45 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Dems g
My bet is Murtha will be the speaker, not Pelosi. If the Dems want to win in
two years, they batter not pick Pelosi
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:38 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Dems git r done
>
> Rush made an in
rumsfeld resigned! No further information just now
On 11/8/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/8/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The good news is that we'll see change in Iraq. I've heard the new
> > slogan is "Truth, Accountability, Progress". We'll see. That being
He doesn't need support from Congress. The Dems already said they would fund
the thing, so for next two years the President can continue to do what he
wants with the War.
This election didn't change the Constitution, just the people in the chairs.
Who now have two years to make a change in an area
Those are all good tips.. I started the crate training, he's taking
that pretty okay. However I have tried 3 times today to get him to go
on the pad and he refuses. I've even changed pads, thinking maybe the
other one was defective. If he doesnt go on the pad, I cannot
positively reinforce it. I ha
apostrophes do the same thing
On 11/8/06, Brian Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> In the CSharp(pound) vs. Java thread, there appears to be a bug with the
> forum when posting thru the web interface.
>
> The thread started off as Cpound vs Java,
> One fellow replied via the web, an
Wait and see what happens the next two years.
You do realize Rangel will chair the House Ways and Means Committee?
Here come the taxes.
On 11/8/06, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And Bush was too far left fiscally for my tastes in 2004. I guess that I am
> very conservative fiscally
Sure am. Sustaining here too. After I read Boortz's book, I had to
support the cause. I also want to see an end to our "international welfare"
program where we support all of these nations that hate us. If the House of
Saud and the Wahhibi really wants us out, who are we to argue. Phuk the
I don't believe that. Most republicans believe and support the fight.
It's too important to throw away.
On 11/8/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Plus we're talking about the entire Congress. America has spoken:
> they want change in Iraq. If the Dems are smart they'll take the
> Baker
On 11/8/06, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam wrote:
> > Why would they lie like that?
>
> The real question is.. why did they lie like they DID, rather than
> telling the TRUTH:
You said: "We know Ira doesn't..."
Nobody knew so they would have been lies.
> - that Iraq had no WMDs
Debat
Russel Madere wrote:
> And Bush was too far left fiscally for my tastes in 2004. I guess that I am
> very conservative fiscally. I personally will throw a party when the IRS is
> abolished. Put it on your calendars, one month to the day after the IRS is
> abolished, come to Louisiana for one
We did something similar with MacGregor, he'll almost do it on command
now. We're having to housebreak Finnegan, because he was a stray.
His bad habits are rubbing off somewhat on Mac...
Our dogs sleep with us, We only crate when we're not at home.
Thank god for our carpet cleaners
Scott A. St
And Bush was too far left fiscally for my tastes in 2004. I guess that I am
very conservative fiscally. I personally will throw a party when the IRS is
abolished. Put it on your calendars, one month to the day after the IRS is
abolished, come to Louisiana for one hell of a bash. Beer, booze
Sam wrote:
> Why would they lie like that?
The real question is.. why did they lie like they DID, rather than
telling the TRUTH:
- that Iraq had no WMDs
- that Iraq did *NOT* play a part in 9/11
- that Hussein did *NOT* support terrorism
- that Iraq was *NOT* an imminent threat.
These are know
Rush made an interesting point today.
He said the Democrats that won were picked by Pelosi and campaigned as
conservatives and or moderates while Pelosi and Reid went into hiding
for the last two weeks.
Now we have an extremely liberal leadership running both houses and
the new freshmen will have
Why would they lie like that?
On 11/8/06, Rick Root wrote:
> If GWB and his crew said "We know Ira doesn't have WMD, and they weren't
> involved in 9/11 and Hussein doesn't support terrorism, but we'd like to
> take over their country anyway and instill a democracy"... I wonder if
> Leiberman (or
> Rick wrote:
> I think it's not that black and white.
> Leiberman doesn't support a specified time line for pulling out.
>
Plus we're talking about the entire Congress. America has spoken:
they want change in Iraq. If the Dems are smart they'll take the
Baker proposal, get Pentagon buy in, and
I agree with thuse of one word for "potty time"
I used "go potties" for the igs and it works. When I first housetrained
Spike, I stood outside for however long it took until she did something.
We didn't play, I wouldn't pet her, or pay any attention to her other
than to keep telling her to go pott
Sam wrote:
> Plus Lieberman supports the War
I think it's not that black and white.
Leiberman doesn't support a specified time line for pulling out.
I don't think Leiberman supports the way the American people and
congress were duped into GOING to war.
If GWB and his crew said "We know Ira doe
G Money wrote:
> Lieberman's win is absolutely fantastic. Dem's hate me cuz i'm too
> conservative, Repubs hate me because i'm too liberal...guess what? I'm like
> 60% of the population which prefers common sense over party lines...so you
> can both phukk off.
>
> And he goes out and wins, just li
Plus Lieberman supports the War
On 11/8/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Won't happen. Even when dems were in the minority and knew they could pass a
> "no" vote without suffering any repurcussions, bills to fund the war always
> passed with huge majorities.
>
> Now that they are in the
On 11/8/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Then again given that Congress has the power of the purse, they can defund
> any appropriations going towards the forces in Iraq.
>
Won't happen. Even when dems were in the minority and knew they could pass a
"no" vote without suffering any re
>Ok after a long time I've finally made it back to the community. Anyways,
>I've been developing in C# (Desktop) lately I wonder what your outlook is
>for Java and C#. Which would you focus on for the next few years?
I'm not sure what the general consensus is, but here at ATCC we've made the
deci
Which they said they wouldn't do.
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Then again given that Congress has the power of the purse, they can defund
> any appropriations going towards the forces in Iraq.
~~~
Hi Mike,
In the CSharp(pound) vs. Java thread, there appears to be a bug with the forum
when posting thru the web interface.
The thread started off as Cpound vs Java,
One fellow replied via the web, and it became Cpoundpound vs. Java
I replied and it became Cpoundpoundpoundpound vs. Java
Just t
More on this.
The precinct in Isle of Wight is truly the only precinct in the state that
hasn't reported, however, the results are also showing that 2 precincts in
James City County are not reporting, even though they have.
These two precincts are what are being called "Ghost Precincts". They
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Because Congress now has investigative and subpoena power as well
>> "political capital". Worst case scenario, if the President resists,
>> they impeach him.
>
>OK, so they impeach him, then what, they don't have th
Ah, ok! I looked at these before. Sorry, didn't make the connection.
He's absolutely adorable!
Greg Morphis wrote:
> He's a Jack Russel Terrier named Loki..
> pictures are here..
> http://www.worldindisorder.com/loki/loki_1_11-04-2006.jpg
> http://www.worldindisorder.com/loki/loki_2_11-04-2006.
> RoMunn wrote:
> not going to happen. nancy pelosi will be the leader. murtha can plan
> whatever he wants, but bush runs the military
Iraq policy has already changed with the resignation of Rummy. Well
to the new Iraq policy!
~~~
LBUQUERQUE, New Mexico (AP) -- Two police officers sued Burger King
Corp., claiming they were served hamburgers that had been sprinkled
with marijuana.
The lawsuit says Mark Landavazo and Henry Gabaldon, officers for the
Isleta Pueblo tribal police, were in uniform and riding in a marked
patrol ca
Lieberman's win is absolutely fantastic. Dem's hate me cuz i'm too
conservative, Repubs hate me because i'm too liberal...guess what? I'm like
60% of the population which prefers common sense over party lines...so you
can both phukk off.
And he goes out and wins, just like he knew he would.
Aweso
He looks like a stuffed animal!
Adorable. Check out those puppy claws...and i know he's got some dagger like
puppy teeth to go along with them. I remember bleeding quite alot while
training/playing with my puppy. All part of the fun :)
On 11/8/06, Greg Morphis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> He's
Yep, unless Leiberman decides not to honor his promise to caucus with the
dems
Sandra Clark
==
http://www.shayna.com
Training in Cascading Style Sheets and Accessibility
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08
He's a Jack Russel Terrier named Loki..
pictures are here..
http://www.worldindisorder.com/loki/loki_1_11-04-2006.jpg
http://www.worldindisorder.com/loki/loki_2_11-04-2006.jpg
http://www.worldindisorder.com/loki/loki_3_11-04-2006.jpg
http://www.worldindisorder.com/loki/loki_4_11-04-2006.jpg <- our
While I think he should have fired him months, maybe years ago, I find it
hard to believe that he fired him at all. Knowing the way these cronies
operate, I imagine it was one of those "mutual decisions".
On 11/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Post is saying that Bush fir
Which gives the Dems Congress en-toto, correct?
On 11/8/06, Sandra Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> There is one precinct still out in VA. In Isle of Wight County.
>
> With 92.31% of Precincts counted in that county, the following
>
> Allen - 6,984 Votes 57.26%
> Webb - 5,050 Votes 41.40
>
On 11/8/06, Robyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oh, and about the biting... sounds like what you're doing is great!
> I've also found that when my puppy wanted to nip, gently but firmly
> grabbing her muzzle, giving it a little (gentle but firm) shake and
> saying no bite, *then* presenting the to
Woops correction the 161 votes are going toward Allen (but that still
doesn't help since he is just under 7,300 votes shy at this moment
Sandra Clark
==
http://www.shayna.com
Training in Cascading Style Sheets and Accessibility
-Original Message-
From: Sandr
Linky?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 1:51 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Drudge reporting Rumsfeld to re-sign
>
> The Post is saying that Bush fired him..
>
> Post article
>
> Scott A. Stewart
> REAC/P
There is one precinct still out in VA. In Isle of Wight County.
With 92.31% of Precincts counted in that county, the following
Allen - 6,984 Votes 57.26%
Webb - 5,050 Votes 41.40
Extrapolating based on those percentage points shows:
Allen receiving - 7566 Votes total (582 extra Votes) Webb r
>From what I've read, you can get special roasters from $50 on up, or
you can use an air type popcorn popper, or a ceramic dish in the oven,
but the one that intrigues me is one that uses your outdoor grill and
a rotisserie cage to do it.
On 11/8/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
Check out http://www.devexpress.com
Awesome set of tools.
I would specifically suggest their package that includes all their controls
(.net) for Win/Web form apps. Called DXperience Enterprise:
http://www.devexpress.com/Products/NET/DXperienceEnt/Index.xml
Not affiliated, just a satisfied custome
The Post is saying that Bush fired him..
Post article
Scott A. Stewart
REAC/PASS-IT
(202)-475-8875
"William Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/08/2006 01:40 PM
Please respond to cf-community
To: CF-Community
cc: (bcc: Scott A. Stewart/REAC/HHQ/HUD)
Subject:
> Anyone on the list enough of a coffee snob to roast their own beans?
> I'm thinking of uping my snobbery and starting this, but I'm not sure
> how much of a pain it is
I don't as I am happy with the local coffee company I get my espresso
beans from, but this is intriguing...
how shall you r
What kind of dog? Any pics for us?? It's no fair that we get to talk
about the puppy and not see it!
Tony wrote:
> oh, he is "the dog whisperer"
>
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitti
> The best part about this story was that she told him she was dumping him via
> a text message to his Blackberry while he was filming an interview. Ouch!
> Talk about a kick in the nuts!
How deliciously trashy!
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be un
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
