On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Way to go Japan and USA. Good solid football. Japan never gave up and
> because of it they can call themselves World Cup champions.
>
> USA can certainly hold their heads high though. They played well and had
> more action in front of goal, unfor
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> if anyone has an invite laying around, I admit I am curious enough to bite.
>
> I tried so hard to be cool and aloof, but I am now failing.
>
Quitter.
~|
Order the
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> They put toxins in the plants via genetic engineering. Helps the
> plants fight disease and predators. What they don't tell you is that
> the toxins affect you, too. They might claim that whatever the toxin
> is doesn't affect humans. That
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
> Steve Jobs is a hero, just ignore the fact that he outsourced
> his manufacturing to slave labor in China so you could pay $700 for an
> iPad that some poor woman finished before she jumped off the roof of
> her building to her death. Nice jo
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> When there is specific evidence of lying, hiding the truth, deliberate
> attempts to engineer toxic substances into the product...yeah, that's
> culpability.
Deliberate attempts to engineer toxic substances into the product? This is
new
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> We could go for billboards and a campaign of shame instead...
>
> http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20059263-10391704.html
>
>
Mehif the kid and his parents don't mind the shame, go for it.
It's better than telling fattie he
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Gotta half disagree with you there, G. I do agree that there is a
> pussification of the American parent but it is without a doubt also
> the fault of food corporations and their lapdogs at the FDA and Ag
> departement. They've conspired
Ro-Munn's been on a hyperbole kick for a few months now..
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> That's an unnecessarily inflammatory subject line, Rob. The article
> isn't about the government saying they may come for your kids, it's
> about a jerk at Harvard saying that
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> or that kids are obese because of the crap foods they eat, and they
> eat those crap foods because that is what food corporations tell them
> to eat and tell their parents to buy for their kids with endless
> advertising on television. thir
Would this be a case of "wall street" layoffsand not necessarily "main
street" layoffs?
Again, i never really understood the difference between wall street and main
street, since what happens there affects what happens here, and visa
versabut whatever.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Je
Congrats, gramps!
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> So my daughter is in the hospital having her baby. My first grandson. Im
> pretty stoked. Wish I were not in hell (read Afghanistan) so I could be
> there. But I will get to see him in December when I come home on vacati
:50 PM, PT wrote:
>
> hahaha well at least he is getting the important things ... unless he
> was saying "no, eat poop." =-/
>
> On 7/12/2011 10:16 AM, G Money wrote:
> >
> > Yesterday while changing my son's diaper, he said "no eat poop"
Yesterday while changing my son's diaper, he said "no eat poop".
Not quite George Washington, but i was proud nonetheless :)
(He's 2)
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> My kiddo is 4.5 and while we really try and limit her time in front of
> a screen, she obviously has
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
>
> yeah!
>
> boobies!!!
>
> there were 44 bouncing around the pitch!!
>
Hope Solo.
yum.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-A
I've already forgotten it...what the hell were we talking about?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> ...and I think it will. ;)
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:34 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Medic wrote:
&g
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Sure. I never debated that point so it's easy for me to concede it.
>
Well...you DID say it would be quickly forgotten by everyone except American
soccer fans :)
~|
Order the
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Medic wrote:
> Fair enough then. I retract my opinion that your fervor over this was
> nationalism.
>
It's ok...like i said, i'm used to it...and don't mind it. Americans can
bea predictable bunch :)
Now theni've conceded your point, that the goal in an
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> There you go. More concerned with "the story" than the actual sport.
>
Yes, actually, in a way. If a story or an event can transcend the
sport.that's impressive to me. I mean, why be a sports fan if you can't
appreciate "the story"???
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> No, my entire argument (if you can call it that) was based on Scott saying
> (paraphrase) that if all goals were as good as this one, and there were
> more
> of them, he'd watch football.
I didn't catch scott saying that. Doesn't make much sens
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Context matters AND it's a pretty standard goal. No either/or. It's both.
>
Weird.
You must be fun to watch sports with:
"No, Mr. Michaels, I do not believe in miracleswhat else is on?"
~~~
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Please point me to where I said context didn't matter. Perhaps I'll just
> bow
> out and you can have this conversation with yourself as it seems you are
> bound, bent and determined to dictate my argument for me.
> Again, I will say, that it may
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> I think the argument has morphed from the original post. I'm not the only
> one who described it as standard fare. I thought we were discussing whether
> this was a great goal. Sinclair's goal from the free, O'Reilly's goal,
> Marta's goal... al
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Hmm. I guess we're having different discussions then. You want to discuss
> the warm fuzzy and good "story" that comes from a last minute goal, I'm
> discussing the goal itself. And your comparison to a home run is invalid. A
> home run is a hom
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> >
> > A routine, 122 minute, header
>
>
> I don't see what 122 minutes has anything to do with it. But watch a half
> dozen Man U games in a season and you'll see your fair share of 94th minute
> goals.
>
becaus that is the CONTEXT i'm talking
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Casey Dougall <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> Boby Who?
>
I'll pretend you didn't say that...
> We have a new stat - Derek Jeter hits a home run for his 3,000 hit, and the
> first Yankee to hit 3,000.
>
Only the second player in history to hit a
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Take it out of the context of cheering for your country and it becomes just
> another goal squeaked in before the end of full time. Happens weekly.
> It may mean more to you being an American, but for the rest of the world
> it's just a routine
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> It was a pretty solid goal to be sure. Nothing to really write home though,
> pretty standard fare.
Puhleeze.
I think you are missing the point, Medic. It's not just the goal itself, but
when and how and in what context it occurred. Baseball p
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Thanks.
>
> The porn reference is to protect our children from porn. That's already a
> law.
>
>
Bachmann's intent was probably to draw on the emotional appeal that slavery
has on people to make them think "wow, if something was better during
slaver
Sam's right on this one.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> It's stating how disastrous slavery was and it's impact to this date.
> Meaning it's highlighting the acceleration of the destruction of the
> family circuit starting from it's main culprit.
>
> It does not, as Gel suggest,
I'm a sucker for a well executed flash mob.i love all of these videos.
The hallelujah chorus in the mall is still the best.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> yeah, how dare they make those people smile ;)
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> >
> > Damn happine
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
>
> http://www.baratunde.com/blog/2011/7/8/michelle-bachmann-is-running-for-president-on-a-pro-slavery.html
>
> "Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet
> sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raise
Fraid so.
It should be noted that the common denominator in every thread that ends
like this.is you.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Nice. So we've reached this part of the thread?
>
> .
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, G Money wrote:
>
I type words, you read them, and come out with a completely different
understanding of them than the rest of the english speaking world.
*shrug*
Have a great weekend.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Wow dude, I thought you were one of the reasonable ones.
>
> So he's hating on
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> That's funny, and here I am trying to figure out how an intelligent
> person would not learn from his mistake.
>
I could think Obama has been a terrible president, and still think him a
better option than Bachmann.
~~~
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I thought that's what you were claiming, that as an intelligent person
> he would certainly choose Obama.
>
Over Bachmann, yes.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> The irony of claiming an intelligent person would vote for Obama after
> more than two years of proof he's not a good choice.
>
I thought intelligent people could and did vote for George W. Bush. Same for
Barack Obama, Al Gore, John Kerry and John
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> If it's Bachman verus Obama, I'll vote for Bachmann.
>
You would seriously vote for Bachman over Obama?
I can't even wrap my mind around that.
Jerry, i know you have a conservative bentbut you are highly
intelligent. Are you serious
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You can but be aware it's called pre-judging AKA prejudice.
>
Wait a minuteall opinions can't be considered prejudice!
ARe you telling me you have NEVER in all your life formed an opinion on a
person you have never met based only on what you h
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> She never expected your support. I never expected you to support a
> Republican.
>
Oooh...nice try. Partisans are stuck with their usual barbsthis is a
classic one. Never mind that, as an independent, I have supported many
Republicans.
> We'r
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> But you stated she was a fundie and then stated you were sure she
> believed the earth was 6000 years old. Now you're complaining because
> you have to back it up?
>
>
Nope, just saying it's difficult to prove or disprove my hypothesis...that's
all.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> She didn't say to stop teaching evolution, she said why not add origins to
> it.
>
yes, a stance that is utter bullshit, and exactly what I disapprove of.
This is not hearsay or an attack...this is me not supporting her for exactly
the right reaso
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> It's not that I'm defending her, it's that I'm asking you folks to
> back up you attacks.
>
Which i am doing with her own quotes.
Unfortunately the "age of the earth" isn't a very common topic with
presidential hopefuls.so not finding that one
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> No, this is about origins but we know how you feel about religion so hate
> away.
>
I was talking about evolutionand i was right.
not sure what you are talking about re: origins.
I have yet to find anything about whether she is a New Earther,
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:42 PM, G Money wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
>>
>> I cannot say for sure, but it certainly would not surprise me if she did.
>>
>
> I bet she does.
>
> I'm sure she's an evolution den
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I cannot say for sure, but it certainly would not surprise me if she did.
>
I bet she does.
I'm sure she's an evolution denier as well.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Ant
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Point is she is no more a fundamentalist than Obama is.
>
Do you really believe that? Really, truly, and honestly...that when it comes
to religious fundamentalism, Barack Obama and Michell Bachmann are the
same?\
> Obama has on several occasions
It's ironic, and I oughta know, but I'm just head over feet because, judging
from this picture, I'm pretty sure that Casey Anthony is Alanis Morrissette.
All i really want is confirmation.
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2011/7/7/1310053842555/Casey-Anthony-007.jpg
~~~
I forgot to ask: can I repost this in another list i'm on to spur some
conversation?
I'll leave your name out of it of course.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> So here in Afghanistan it is the squad leader that does all of the same
> things that a platoon leader does in I
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> So here in Afghanistan it is the squad leader that does all of the same
> things that a platoon leader does in Iraq. I lead the shurah's (meetings
> between us and village elders, local police and ANA), I manage the projects
> that we pay fo
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> So your against voting for religious people.
RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISTS.
Sam, please do not add, change or remove words when quoting or replying to
me. I said religious fundamentalistspeople who read passages in the
Bible and quote them verbat
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> You call such a vague statement perfect?
>
> To me it sounds like he said he refuses to support a Republican.
>
No, he refuses to support a religious fundamentalistand so do i.
~
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Judah McAuley
> wrote:
> > But then again, all
> > the other fundamentalist views are why I wouldn't vote for her anyway,
> > so the particulars of this one area are largely moot for me.
>
And that's all there is to it.
perfectly said.
~
That's interesting stuff.
Question: How much would I be willing to pay for particular freedoms,
including paying for other people's freedom?
Just because not having a law may cost me a few extra cents in tax dollars
as an American citizen, doesn't necessarily mean I should support the law.
Espec
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> No..The point is that the costs of all the bashed skulls would be a drain.
> The one instance of butt/private bits scraping would not be enough to be
> considered a drain because it was a one off whereas th
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> > But WarGames?
>
> Yeah, something about that 300 baud phone cradle modem just can't be
> replicated in any modern day equivalent that's anywhere near as cool.
>
One part of that movie I always loved as a kid was when Broderick's
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:39 AM, G Money wrote:
> > I read somewhere that they are remaking that movie.
> >
> > *sigh*
>
> Again? They did once already. Terrible, terrible, terrible remake.
>
t
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> >
> > "The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?" -
> > WOPR
> >
>
> Later. Let's play Global Thermonuclear War
>
I read somewhere that they are remaking that movie.
*sigh*
~
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> It is sad that while the world is being destroyed, a few are lying and
> conniving to make a few more bucks.
>
>
The world is not being destroyedjust our short time on it.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> So, anyone actually think this will be the windfall CA says it will be?
>
>
well.$317 - $152 = $165.
So that would be $165 million in additional revenue...though it's probably
much more than that, since all of those companies cert
Precursor to a Canadian invasion of the continental United States?
I, for one, welcome our beaver overlords, eh?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Larry and Dana returning at the same time, both with a vengeance.
>
> Coincidence?
>
> Discuss.
>
>
> .
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Thomas could be raping little girls and you would find a way to whitewash
> it
> and make it seem like his shit don't stink.
>
Oh the same could be said of you and any democrat or liberal who has ever
be
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Hey now, Winnipeg has my...mother in law. Nevermind.
>
> Still, I've met some fine looking women at hockey matches in Portland.
> Just sayin.
>
>
There are few things hotter than a chick in jeans, a sports jersey (hockey,
football, any sp
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:50 AM, G Money wrote:
> > Because guys in Atlanta are too busy nailing hot chicks to attend a
> hockey
> > game.
>
> and there's that.
>
Speaking of sex and sports.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
> then why pray tell you couldn't keep an NHL team? Not man enough?
>
> Within 4 hours of being on sale the former Atlanta Thrashers (now the
> Winnipeg Jets) had sold over 14,000 season tickets. Last year Atlanta
> couldn't even sell 1000 se
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> I guess. Just like a battered wife willingly married the abusive husband
> right?
>
> Here's an example of how Walmart operates.
>
> Walmart and ABC nursery sign a contract to provide potted plants. Best day
> of ABC's life! Break out the champag
I
just want him to give a shit when he's supposed to be on the bench
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Only if eccentric is a synonym for pervert.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:57 PM, G Money wrote:
> >
> > Clarence Thomas and ANYONE would b
Clarence Thomas and ANYONE would be an odd pairinghe is such awhat's
the nicest word I cant think of to describe him...eccentric.
Anyway, thankfully a bit of common sense won out here.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Court overturns ban on video game sales
Yeah, weird.
Why can't those idiots get together and protect everyone, all the time?
OR...better yet.just leave us all alone :)
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> And the conservative agenda stops at birth.
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:27 P
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> The backers of this law claim to want to protect the rights of the
> child, which would fit with the liberal agenda.
Apparently the liberal agenda for protecting children starts at birth :)
(throw some gasoline on the fire and watch it burn
me 3...though you'd think if we, or someone else (Israel?) wanted to smoke
these guys for helping the Iranians, they could have done it without killing
other innocents along with them :/
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> yeah that thought crossed my mind too
>
> On Thu, Jun 23,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> Americans really do not deserve their Constitution.
>
Before I bring the fury...can you clarify exactly what you meant by this
statement?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthol
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I guess it depends on what you wanted to get out of afghanistan. I don't
> really care about the people there, or the government or infrastructure or
> any of that crap"
>
> So, why don't you tell us how you really feel?
>
I always do.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:38 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> We gave up vietnam.
>
> Ask some retired cidg or mike force guys.
>
> Were giving up afghanistan.
>
I guess it depends on what you wanted to get out of afghanistan. I don't
really care about the people there, or the government or infrastru
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> >
> > Old people are fucking up our environment.
> >
>
> Yeah... because somehow the pulp and paper industry is worse for the
> environment then the microchip manufacturing industry. It's the young
> people, with an outlook on life that everythi
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Sam wrote:
> > Ha, sounds like you ate too many happy meals.
> >
> > The country is in horrible shape unless you believe what queen bimbo
> says:
>
> Bad shape because of eating too many happy meals..
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> No...but it's a pretty safe and accurate response to a comment from the
> right since if it doesn't get approved first by the reichsfurhers, it just
> isn't true according to the wingnuts.
>
No, it's not.
No doubt.
My days of bitching about MS ended when I began using Visual Studio on a
regular basis. Amazing product.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> I find that it is the opposite. I think you just like to bitch about MS.
>
> -Orig
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> No, the US will still be here in 8 years. It might be even similar to what
> it is today. However, he's putting the foundation in to fundamentally
> change
> the country. So, it 20 years, who knows how it will look.
>
Yeah yeahthat'
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> I can actually support this. With McCain, it would have been the same
> blueprint as Obama at a quarter of the speed. At least Obama's speed in
> destroying the country has made some people aware of the problem and they
> are interested
So..the earth's weather is too complex for science to make accurate
judgements or predictions.but the Sunthat's a different story! We
should consider what scientists have to say about the Earth's climate to be
bunk, but we should absolutely believe what they are telling us about the
Su
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:39 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
> If nothing else, it bears the marks of another article in the future
> titled, "Cold War - Part 2"
>
Or we could just stay calm, cool and collected for a change, and NOT allow
fear to dictate the next 50 years of our foreign policy.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> No, it isn't true. Quite the opposite, in fact, if you are talking
> about large multinational corporations. As corporate income has risen
> sharply amongst large corporations, individual income and government
> revenues have fallen and our
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Matthew Small wrote:
>
> There's no "rewrite" of Windows. You have to consider that Windows is an
> *enormous* codebase that likely could not be rewritten in three years, nor
> would I want it to be rewritten.
>
> This code, as much as it is maligned, has been te
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> RIAA == stupid and evil
> Obama == a lot of corporatist water carrying
>
> Said so in 2008, still true in 2011. Sad.
>
Is it possible to elect a president who is not corporation-friendly? I mean,
if you don't have at least some big corpo
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "You want to fire every politician who has lied"
>
> Well, actually . . . . I do. Maybe even worse . . .
>
So you replace this batch of liars with a new batch. What's the point?
~
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I really think that sending pictures through twitter shouldn't be seen as
> a
> politically indictable offence."
>
> What about lying?
>
You want to fire every politician who has lied
~~~
Anyone else having fun strumming Google today?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-commu
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> What's your best supposed-to-be-clean Weiner headline???
>
Disgusted Democrats Letting Weiner Shrivel
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/disgusted_democrats_letting_weiner_jNNxkDD2KkpvRcrlurIUbI
~~
Good for them.
One thing I don't quite understand, early in the article is says they do it
for "love and money". I get the love part...but where does the money part
come in?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43085435/ns/today-today_health/
>
>
Nintendo just rulez.
I can't even count the number of hours of simple fun Mario and crew have
brought me. Simple, yet complex and fun gamesfrom the NES right on up
through the Wii.
Nintendo is the single greatest gaming system ever...and no one else is even
close.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:0
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Michael Grant wrote:
> >
> > + lots
> >
>
> I gotta go with G-Money. It's all good.
>
Oh it's not good...its just not as apocalyptic as many would have us
believe.
Be wary when someone tells you
Did you see Breitbart on the today show this morning, Judah?
He has a different version of events. He says he was swarmed when he walked
into the press conference, and was urged to go up to the microphone by the
gaggle of reporters who wanted to ask him questions.
he's a slimy sort though (this
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> No, I read all lawsuits asking for punitive damages. Frivolous ones
> can be tossed out by a judge with a summary judgement.
Huh...ok.
This story still smells funny thoughif this guy really was her rapist,
how come he was free?
Uh...i thought the law only applied to frivolous lawsuits? This lawsuit was
obviously not of that sort, so she won't be forced to pay anything, right?
This link you sent said she MIGHT be forced to pay...what exactly does that
"might" mean?
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@th
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:59 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
> For the world's sake, I hope and pray that you are right. Sadly, I
> don't think you are.
>
Yeah i know. Mention the work "nukes" and everyone flips out like its 1962
all over again.
Look, is it good that Iran got nukes (or will get
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> According to a RAND Corp researcher, Iran can produce a bomb within two
> months:
>
> http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4078778,00.html
>
> So what happens next, folks?
>
Nothing.
Absolutely nothing.
This is a big "so what"
I wasn't sure about the Medicare question, also the percentage of fat
people...but 1 in 4 seemed about right :)
Got 11 out of 11.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I got 11 out of 11 but I'd quibble about the Medicare answer as the money
> that comes in, by and large, ge
Implored one commenter on the Chinese online forum 'Mop': "Please send me to
the U.S. so I can suffer, too."
That's hilarious.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Chris Stoner wrote:
>
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20110601/wl_time/httpnewsfeedtimecom20110601northkoreaoneofthehappiestplacesone
All circumstantial:
- Her daughter suddenly goes missing, but her mom doesn't tell anyone
- A month later the little girls' grandma finally realizes something is
wrong and calls the cops
- Mom claims she'd been looking for the little girl herself, but boyfriends
and roomates say that she'd spent
Implored one commenter on the Chinese online forum 'Mop': “Please send me to
the U.S. so I can suffer, too.
That's hilarious.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> North Korea released the results of a new study indicating the happiest
> places on earth.
>
> Here's the top 5
1 - 100 of 5593 matches
Mail list logo
