I was thinking "Missionary."
On 9/14/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Q: What is George W. Bush's position on Roe v. Wade?
> >
> > A: He really doesn't care how people get out of New Orleans.
>
> --
> I don't care what Hillary Clinton says. I've seen the village and I don't
> want it raisi
Does anyone know if there are any hosts that are giving a good deal on
temporary hosting to companies whose sites are down due to Hurricane
Katrina?
My best friend is trying to recover his old company's sites. They are
a small webhost located in New Orleans and in addition to the current
connectiv
As I mentioned, it's not voluntary for crossing borders, it's
voluntary for passing certain toll bridges. It allows you to avoid the
lines where people pay the toll. Since there are lines for paying the
toll, it must be voluntary in that case.
On 7/29/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it vo
In both cases that you mentioned, the chip on bridge passes is
voluntary, so is use of bluetooth. National ID cards would be
manditory. Forcing someone to be trackable is different than allowing
someone to tracked at a given bridge or given series of bridges.
On 7/29/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTE
Let's hope they did since the London police announced that they have
had over 250 suspected-terrorists-in-the-subway incidents since 7/7
and in seven of them they almost shot someone in the head (not
counting the one where they did shoot someone in the head).
http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/?feed=T
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1711303,00.html
Won't it be interesting if it turns out that he really was wearing a
jeans jacket and used a travel pass, not wearing a bulky coat and
jumping the turnstile?
It amazes me that people fault me for wanting to wait until all the
facts are
the
place.
But seriously, that was not the point.
On 7/27/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Prolly cause denormalized isn't a word. Just add a hyphen :)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jennifer Larkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wed
Does he have defined primary keys at all? Primary keys are a huge
performance benefit. Foreign keys are probably a benefit too, but I
don't know that for sure.
The main reason that I would define it is referential integrity. You
can't be guaranteed that the VB application is flawless.
On 7/27/05,
Word spell check wants to change "denormalized" to "demoralized."
Please drive through.
--
"You can't destroy EVERYthing. Where would you sit?" The Tick
Now blogging
http://www.blivit.org/blog/index.cfm
http://www.blivit.org/mr_urc/index.cfm
~
Why does he have 80% of the culpability? Because he lived in an
apartment complex that he didn't know was under surveillance?
Because he wore a coat? Reports have now stated that he wore a coat
because 70 degrees is cold for Brazil and he would have been cold out
in that weather without a coat.
B
Here in the DC area
> I would have ran. Remember in England there many more restrictions on
> firearms. You can almost assume that if they have weapons like an HK
> etc., they are police. Here they are more likely part of some gang.
>
> On 7/25/05, Jennifer Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, well you know, being in the country on an expired passport must
be a hanging offense in Britain. Especially if you are there on an
expired visa after having been recently granted entry to the country,
there to work to get money to send home for your father's cancer
treatment.
Being in a coun
and his family and also the
> policeman that shot him. Until I hear otherwise I'll assume that the police
> identified themselves.
>
> Howie
>
> --- On Monday, July 25, 2005 11:03 AM, Jennifer Larkin scribed: ---
> >
> > We still have NO reports that state
I'd like to see how you would react if 20 armed guys some of them with
machine guns acted like they were going to kill you. You probably
wouldn't have run because that's so foreign to you, which it might not
be to a Brazillian. You probably just would have stood there and
soiled yourself.
Next you
We still have NO reports that state that the police identified
themselves as such. The official word is that the police later stated
that they confronted him and he "did not obey." Assume that maybe they
didn't identify themselves, that they walked up to him showed him a
gun and said "Hey you!" In
And you only have to be unlucky once.
Maybe you should try checking your facts before responding. Here's an
auditor amplifier that is about the same size as an iPod and it's
available to the public. I'm sure the police have better suppliers.
http://www.spyworld.com/Surveil1.htm
There are so many
The question isn't how many companies use the "technology" in
question, but who used it first. Since it has been so long and it is
so common, it may be difficult to prove prior art. While it may not
currently be new and unique, it doesn't have to be new and unique to
qualify. The patent process tak
Gee, I don't know, maybe incapacitate him? Maybe coordinate a way to
keep him out of the train station, since they should have been able to
expect such behavior out of people exiting a house that they had under
surveillance for possible terrorists? Maybe check his background when
he went into the h
anner similar to a suicide bomber.
> >
> > What do you do in this case?
> >
> > There is no good answer. The metropolitan police said it right. They
> > were incorrect and are reexamining their procedures. What do you want?
> > How many people do you want to die f
Actually, the patent isn't for emoticons themselves. It's for
substituting emoticons with images when emoticons are seen in text.
There may not be so much prior art on that, which would suck. Frankly,
this is proof that the patent system is being used to stifle
innovation.
On 7/24/05, Vivec <[EMA
It's more than an unfortunate tragedy. It's a warning. They targetted
and killed someone innocent in the name of protecting people from a
theoretical threat. And their response is "Sorry. It is an unfortunate
loss." Not even "We need to re-examine our procedures and see what
could have been done to
x27;t stop talking
about it. :)
On 7/23/05, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds exactly like a friend of mine. What's your acquaintance's name?
>
> --Ben
>
> Jennifer Larkin wrote:
> > You didn't talk to the right people. :)
> >
> > S
You didn't talk to the right people. :)
Someone I know had a booth at E3 and she came home bitching about
people only being impressed with the booths that showed movies and cut
scenes that have no reflection of game play. Her booth had actual game
play and no one was interested, so she had LOTS to
Wow. Resounding silence. I KILT THE LIST! YAY!
On 7/20/05, Jennifer Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Funny. I work with boobs every day too. What a coincidence!
> --
"You can't destroy EVERYthing. Where would you sit?" The Tick
Now for hire...
http://www.blivi
Funny. I work with boobs every day too. What a coincidence!
On 7/20/05, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You gotta like this guy :)
>
> http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45342--
"You can't destroy EVERYthing. Where would you sit?" The Tick
Now for hire...
http://www.
Dana, please read section 3 of the definition of libel.
You are accusing a man of criminal activity. He has the evidence to
legally prove otherwise.
You are accusing a judge of illegal and unethical activity. The judge
has already legally proven otherwise.
I stated my opinion. I would really lik
If you've read all of the court documents (which by the way, aren't
readily available) you would know that a single judge does not have
jurisdiction in multiple courts.
The judge did not know the guy in question before any legal
proceedings or he/she would have been legally required to dismiss
his
I'm heteroflexible.
On 7/8/05, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i like lesbians & women, i may be a little bi
--
"You can't destroy EVERYthing. Where would you sit?" The Tick
Now for hire...
http://www.blivit.org/mr_urc/index.cfm
Now blogging
http://www.blivit.org/blog/index.cfm
~
While there is a genarally accepted definition of squick, I first
encountered it when jm.jm. the space monkey defined it as "the
official sound of male masturbation."
On 7/8/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Screw you, you squick-lovin wife killer!
>
> Gruss Gott wrote:
> >>Ray wrote
d anyone but me use the term squick since that time
> with the whip and the silly putty and...um... *whistles and looks
> innocent*
>
> On 7/8/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > squick? that is a new one on me
> >
> > i like it!
> >
>
Technically, if you read the information that was recently released,
we invaded Iraq long before Bush even went to Congress for war
authorization (which he said he wouldn't use). We had already started
bombing their telecommunications systems and electric plants and other
infrastructure to pre-empt
suddenly feeling very happy that I have a security gate...
On 7/8/05, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the ratio of men-2-women isnt right for that sort of talk..
>
> > Now that I'm convinced, who's up for an orgy tonight?
--
"You can't destroy EVERYthing. Where would you sit?" The Tick
I have no problem with straight males. I seem to have a thing for
them, come to think of it.
On 7/8/05, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jennifer Larkin wrote:
> > squicks me. I mean, except in cases where the beast involved can speak
> > English and gives informed
As do you since you used the word perpetrate. Bestiality seriously
squicks me. I mean, except in cases where the beast involved can speak
English and gives informed consent. Then it's ok.
On 7/8/05, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see that you still discrimate against those who perpetr
Welcome to California! We have muffins.
On 7/8/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You know... after reading all of these posts for these many years,
> everyone's finally convinced me to become a liberal polyamorous homosexual
> pot smoking wife killing atheist republican.
--
"You can
So THAT's where you're storing the bodies! Somebody call the cops!
On 7/8/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh shi
>
> /me dons body armor, inserts ceramic plates, wraps self in fireproof
> blanket, and climbs down into the fallout shelter.
--
"You can't destroy EVERYthing. Where
Unfortunately, it can be very difficult to convict someone of domestic
abuse. But to accuse a judge of ignoring evidence "because [he] is
such a nice guy" is really out of line. It is particularly out of line
because it's wasn't a single judge who found the testimony in question
to be not believabl
Then I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are
capable of being logical, even if you refuse to be logical in this
case.
On 7/7/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume yer joking
>
> cya monday.
>
> > OK, well then let's prosec
>
> Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS)
> 14026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 300
> Chantilly, VA 20151
> Phone: (703) 995-1737
> Fax: (703) 834-5527
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Larkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, Jul
OK, well then let's prosecute Jodie Foster for the attempted
assassination of Ronald Reagan. I mean, it was done in her name. By
your logic John Hinkley IS Jodie Foster.
On 7/7/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "associated with Al Qaeda" is all there is to being Al Qaeda. The
> organization itsel
No, there are not a few safe conclusions that you can draw from that.
I've already seen a 20 minute dissertation on that not only is that
group not Al Qaeda, but that this does not have the telltale signs of
an Al Qaeda attack.
If you commit fraud, does that mean that Martha Stewart did it?
On 7/
Again with the blaming Al Qaeda. The official findings are that the
evidence points to a group "associated with Al Qaeda." I'm "associated
with" all of you. "Associated with" means basically nothing. I'm not
saying that Al Qaeda isn't bad; I'm just saying that you should be
accurate when laying bla
I've been watching CNN for an hour. Al-Queda has NOT taken
responsibility for this attack.
There are a lot of groups that have a similar name and who have
adopted A-Queda as a part of their name. In this case, the exact
English name of the group that has claimed responsibility has never
been heard
GEH! Somebody's having a worse travel experience than me! At least my
stuff arrived with me, even if we were both an hour and a half later
(and an hour and a half after the last flight into that airport).
I hope The Curse of Jennifer is not spreading
On 6/29/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Me too! The ACLU rocks.
On 6/27/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I'm glad we have a organization like the ACLU who is taking
> these cases (10 commandments) to court.
>
> While I know some of you think the ACLU isn't all good (I'm still
> undecided), in this case they were.
I'm under the impression that prisoners aren't allowed to vote.
We aren't talking about a constitutional guarantee of a right and even
some of those rights are taken away if you are guilty of a crime.
"Freedom of the press" doesn't mean "to do whatever the heck they
want." They do get in trouble
It say the court rejected the appeal of the reporters.
I'm not sure if the appeal applied to people who committed a crime by
speaking to the reporters about this or if this applies more broadly.
I'm hoping that they saw this as an exceptional case, which is well
within the bounds of reason. In th
And here I thought this was going to be a comparison of NASCAR and the
F1 key. DOes that make me really girly or really geeky?
On 6/26/05, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: "Adam Haskell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For all you people out there that say NASCAR only knows how to turn
>
And Fox news is pretty damn funny if you can keep from destroying your TV.
On 6/24/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the point is that the Daily Show does a better job of covering
> news than the news. But I'm guessing you already knew that.
>
>
>
> On 6/24/05, Sam <[EMAIL P
It's only been like three and a half years. :) But I saw muffins
mentioned and I was forced to subscribe.
On 6/24/05, Erika L Walker-Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jennifer!!!
>
>
> Hiya!
>
>
> I'll answer your email in a bit!
>
>
> Cheers,
> Erika
>
>
>
>
~
gt; ;)
>
> -Cameron
>
> On 6/24/05, Jennifer Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have muffins. MUFFINS!
> >
> > Have we done a C Funited roll call yet? Me. Next?
> > --
> > "disassemble -- that means not tell the truth." USA President Ge
d with natural sweeteners. Got any
> honey cinnamon apple muffins?
>
> On 6/24/05, Jennifer Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have muffins. MUFFINS!
> >
> > Have we done a C Funited roll call yet? Me. Next?
> > --
> > "disassemble -- that mea
;
> tw
>
> On 6/24/05, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jennifer Larkin wrote:
> > > I have muffins. MUFFINS!
> >
> > Yum! I want one!
> >
> > > Have we done a C Funited roll call yet? Me. Next?
> >
> > Not me. :-(
>
"last
work day before I go to C Funited."
I'm gonna sing the Doom Song now!
http://www.thedoomsong.com
On 6/24/05, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jennifer Larkin wrote:
> > I have muffins. MUFFINS!
>
> Yum! I want one!
>
> > Have w
I have muffins. MUFFINS!
Have we done a C Funited roll call yet? Me. Next?
--
"disassemble -- that means not tell the truth." USA President George W. Bush
Now blogging
http://www.blivit.org/blog/index.cfm
http://www.blivit.org/mr_urc/index.cfm?sectionid=2
~~~
At 09:22 AM 11/2/01 -0400, you wrote:
>After issuing those warnings this week, they are issuing MORE for next
>week.
>
>Why don't the goddamned idiots just declare a flipping state of
>emergency and put people "On The Alert" for the rest of the damned
>year!?
But Gel, dear, they did. Only they de
Not me, man.
"The Employed and the Independent Contractors"
At 03:10 PM 11/1/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Anonymous?
>Why Anonymous?
>
>Why are peeples being anonny musses?
>
>*peeks at the list*
>
>Come on..who are they? Who are they?
>:)
>
>I like The Young And The Blue Screens ^_^
>
>-Gel
>
>
>-O
No coughing on Gel or his muffins!
Besides, it's non-communicable between humans.
It's probably nothing to worry about. Any white powder would be reported
and handled this way even if it turns out to be make-up, talcum powder, or
a cleanser, any of which are white powders commonly found spille
You got something against nuts?
I'm a macadamia. Cover me in chocolate and fork over the cash!
It's been one of those weeks
As for the DreamWeaver question, keep complaining and find some appropriate
people to complain to (some are here already) and maybe your suggestion
will make enough
Russel Madere wrote:
>
> Actually, time spent designing the application, regardless if it is meetings
> or telephone conversations should be billable. I personally will also bill
> for travel time if it excessive (more than an hour, through heavy traffic,
> etc) if the travel is at the insistanc
Hal Helms wrote:
> I understand that we all take on less than ideal clients at times, but this
> would be a red flag to me. Either the client is trying to get something for
> nothing or simply doesn't understand much. Either way, I would be very
> careful.
I agree. I get the idea that if this is
Sandra Clark wrote:
>
> I am converting from a straight contract to an hourly contract for one of my
> projects.
>
> I have just received an email from the person and I quote:
>
>
> 4) Telephone conversations, discussions, and meetings (within reason) that
> are required for the contractor to
"Guy J. McDowell" wrote:
> I see some things that to me are strange.
>
> "Junior CF Developer - Must have B.Sc. 3 years CF experience yadda
> yadda"
I've noticed that too. Some jobs I've looked at say "Sr. ColdFusion
Developer. Must have at least one year ColdFusion and HTML" but it has a
salary
Michael Kerin wrote:
>
> I completely disagree with Alexandre's opinion of Intermedia. I find his
> statements to be completely inaccurate.
>
> Intermedia allows you to host multiple domains under a single account using
> domain aliasing. Their shared server price structure is quite competitiv
64 matches
Mail list logo
