here's what many Canadians think of the relationship:
http://verydemotivational.memebase.com/2011/10/19/demotivational-posters-rule-89/?from=recMap3
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
"However, the details of the agreement remain secret and will only be
revealed once both heads of state sign the deal negating the necessary
process of public feedback and consent."
Um ? And there you have it. Another example of the government not
making laws and agreements on behalf o
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/01/06/canada-for-president.html
>
>
Only funny because it's too little too late... Canada is USA
Sorry canucks, I'm truly sorry for you all :-(
http://www.infowars.com/secret-u-
Beaver worshiping syrup guzzlers! It's funny cuz it's true.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/01/06/canada-for-president.html
>
> --
> Larry C. Lyons
> web: http://www.lyonsmorris.com/lyons
> LinkedIn: http://ww
That was awesome. Thank you.
Judah
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/01/06/canada-for-president.html
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology n
Exactly better to sell to a firm ally rather than a dubious one.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> I know it means jobs in the US and cheaper fuel cost eventually and
>> the Republicans forced it into the bill.
>>
>> What
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I know it means jobs in the US and cheaper fuel cost eventually and
> the Republicans forced it into the bill.
>
> What I don't know is why Canada would care if we have a pipeline or
> not. We would still buy oil from them it would just take us lon
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Medic wrote:
> You might need more than 32, but I bet if you sent all of your boyscouts
> and gave them stuff just out of your local gun shop you could probably
> overrun our forces. It wouldn't be the battle with the military that caused
> you trouble though, it
You might need more than 32, but I bet if you sent all of your boyscouts
and gave them stuff just out of your local gun shop you could probably
overrun our forces. It wouldn't be the battle with the military that caused
you trouble though, it would be the resistance. Canadians are not a people
tha
you know everyone thinks that, except like the taliban they're found
out to their regret.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>> your choice.
>
>
> Oh man, you really don't want ME to choose. I totally want to s
> How else do you explain such a large percantage of the
> population living within 50 miles of the US border?
When you live in the USA's hat, it's warmest near the band?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~~
I don't know about that. Canada has been prepping for an invasion for
years. How else do you explain such a large percantage of the
population living within 50 miles of the US border?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Larry C. Lyons w
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> your choice.
Oh man, you really don't want ME to choose. I totally want to see 32 boy
scouts storm Canada and win.
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthol
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> lets see energy stops, invasion starts, energy infrastructure
> destroyed. US is 3 to 10 years without half its normally available
> energy. Rest of the world starts boycotting the US, the economy tanks
> to below 2008 and great depression
lets see energy stops, invasion starts, energy infrastructure
destroyed. US is 3 to 10 years without half its normally available
energy. Rest of the world starts boycotting the US, the economy tanks
to below 2008 and great depression levels.
scenario two. Negotiation reaches an acceptable deal fo
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> I'll let you figure out what happens next.
We invade Canada using a troop of 32 Boy Scouts?
Merry Christmas! :)
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Antholog
look at how a minor boycott affected the US in 1973. Or how much gas
prices spiked 3 years ago. Now suddenly over 50% of the gas and
electricity supply is gone...
I'll let you figure out what happens next.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:33 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> I bet you a Loonie that America isn't
I bet you a Loonie that America isn't left "freezing in the dark" by
anything Canada does.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> The attitude of many I've heard in Canada lately has been if the US
> doesn't agree let the b*st*rds freeze in the dark. Remember Canada
> supplie
The attitude of many I've heard in Canada lately has been if the US
doesn't agree let the b*st*rds freeze in the dark. Remember Canada
supplies over half of the American energy supply.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Sam wrote:
>
>> I k
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Sam wrote:
> I know it means jobs in the US and cheaper fuel cost eventually and
> the Republicans forced it into the bill.
>
> What I don't know is why Canada would care if we have a pipeline or
> not. We would still buy oil from them it would just take us longe
I know it means jobs in the US and cheaper fuel cost eventually and
the Republicans forced it into the bill.
What I don't know is why Canada would care if we have a pipeline or
not. We would still buy oil from them it would just take us longer to
deliver and use it.
.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:
no I'm just disgusted by the politics of it. and given that Harper is
the US's female dog, its very surprising. Its something too important
to be a political football, and that's what the rethuglican house has
turned it into.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I was just wondering w
I was just wondering why you were so proud of the tactic.
I'm guessing it's because it's against the US.
.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Fine Sam, then when is the US going to stop doing that? Or is it a
> case of do what I say not as I do. There is a long history
Fine Sam, then when is the US going to stop doing that? Or is it a
case of do what I say not as I do. There is a long history of the US
meddling in internal affairs of both Canada and Mexico as well as
other countries in the Americas. Harper was just stating the case.
Canada can sell the oil far m
ROFLMAO
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Milo Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:05 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Canada says it will sell oil to the Chinese if Keystone XL is
not built
No. That's just shrinkage from the cold. honest.
O
No. That's just shrinkage from the cold. honest.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> The US has tried that for over 200 years. And mostly have been suffering
> from "ED" from the start.
>
> On Tuesday, December 20, 2011, Eric Roberts <
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com>
>
The US has tried that for over 200 years. And mostly have been suffering
from "ED" from the start.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Fuck canada...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:43 AM
Fuck canada...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:43 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Canada says it will sell oil to the Chinese if Keystone XL is not
built
Essentially Harper is telling the US screw you:
http://edmon
Currently the extraction methods use a lot of water and does produce a
fair amount of green house gases. That's where the real issue comes
in. And it needs to be solved and soon. Oil companies are now starting
to look at the oil shale deposits in the US. The methods to extract
oil from the Tar San
This would only effect new shipments of oil, I believe, since the
pipeline isn't built yet. If Canada is threatening to change their
current arrangements then that would obviously have a much bigger
impact.
Looks like Canada is still our number one supplier of oil but we
produce over half our oil
I think its a pretty big deal as, IIRC, we get most of our oil from
Canada. I imagine it will affect gas prices here.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Given that the Republicans in Congress are intent of forcing a 60 day
> decision on the pipeline and there are no envir
Given that the Republicans in Congress are intent of forcing a 60 day
decision on the pipeline and there are no environmental impact
statements done on the alternate route, it simply means that the State
Department will have to deny the permit. Then Canada will sell to to
China and we'll go on our
There is no way to mitigate that.
We need to find sustainable sources of energy other than Oil, that's the
only way.
Fusion. We need Fusion. 0_0
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusi
Telling a country how they should vote is playing politics.
.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> more like being pissed off at the politics. Besides China is willing
> to pay more.
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like blackmail.
>>
~~
Me, I'm just recognizing the reality. Harper said they will sell to
the Chinese if the US doesn't get off its collective rear end. The oil
will be sold, it just depends on who is the buyer. If the Chinese then
it will go through the TransCanada pipeline to BC and then to China.
I'd rather see it
So you are staunchly with the Republicans on this issue?
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> more like being pissed off at the politics. Besides China is willing
> to pay more.
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Sam wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like blackmail.
> >
> > .
> >
more like being pissed off at the politics. Besides China is willing
to pay more.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Sounds like blackmail.
>
> .
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote:
>>
>> The current plans have it going over the Ogallala Aquifer. TransCa
Sounds like blackmail.
.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> The current plans have it going over the Ogallala Aquifer. TransCan
> has already said that they'd reroute the pipeline as needed to avoid
> it. That said, Canada would probably make a lot more selling the oil
The current plans have it going over the Ogallala Aquifer. TransCan
has already said that they'd reroute the pipeline as needed to avoid
it. That said, Canada would probably make a lot more selling the oil
to China than the US. A lot of people I know back in Canada are now
saying saying let the US
...and the US is more environmentally careful/friendly than Canada? Seems
the holdup is environmental studies that need to be completed for the
pipeline which from the article appears to stretch from Canada to the US
Gulf of Mexico?
I didn't realize Canada was so environmentally careless.
-Came
Good for Canadians. DMCA is nothing more than a naked attempt to
protect a dying business model.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Like some kind of [0]B-movie [1]horror
> [2]series, the latest attempt to revise Canada's copyright law and
> introduce DMCA-like provisions, [3]Bill
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Medic wrote:
> Time to cull the herd.
>
Stockpile those MRE's, water and ammunition...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dino
[mailto:ks...@gckschools.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:16 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Canada debates public health care model
>Gonna be an interesting century of that there can be no doubt.
>
>On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:42 -0400, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>> J
Oh it gets be
Given that Canada has little or no federal deficit in comparison to
the US and has weather the financial crisis much better than most of
the rest of the industrialized countries, I think the comparison to
such lame ducks is incorrect. If anything the US and Japan will go
under long before Canada w
"Gonna be an interesting century indeed."
Shotguns are great for home defense.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Arch
>Gonna be an interesting century of that there can be no doubt.
>
>On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:42 -0400, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>> J
Oh it gets better. On top of nations self destructing due to screw ups by
politicians we're gonna be out of oil long before the end of this century. We
get to figure ou
Gonna be an interesting century of that there can be no doubt.
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:42 -0400, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> J
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Din
"next Portugal, then Spain and Italy, then Britain, US, Canada, Japan, and
every other industrialized nation"
Frightening, isn't it?
"we're on the road to self-destruction and our political class has no idea
how to keep it from happening."
Ahh, but to they know how they got here? Obviously no
Time to cull the herd.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> >
> > "and so we see how civilizations self-destruct..."
> >
> > See Greece.
>
> next Portugal, then Spain and Italy, then Britain, US, Canada, Japan,
> and ev
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "and so we see how civilizations self-destruct..."
>
> See Greece.
next Portugal, then Spain and Italy, then Britain, US, Canada, Japan,
and every other industrialized nation. we're on the road to
self-destruction and our political class ha
"and so we see how civilizations self-destruct..."
See Greece.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www
and so we see how civilizations self-destruct...
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:58 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
>
> So yes, the problem is in the usage - based on the Robin Hood
> mentality of the planners at the time, there are too many users and
> not enough providers. Personally the failure is
>> The problem isn't the healthcare system. The problem is that people aren't
>> having as many kids. Too many old people. Not enough young people.
>> Disproportionate streams mean there's more leaving the kitty than is coming
>> in. The number of children couples have has been in decline for 50 y
No no wait...
Are the two of your Serious??? you have to be kidding!
On 2 June 2010 10:06, Medic wrote:
>> Is this a serious post, or are you just kidding?
>
> Is *THIS* a serious post or are *YOU* just kidding?
~|
Order the A
>
> Is this a serious post, or are you just kidding?
>
Is *THIS* a serious post or are *YOU* just kidding?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/143027
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> The problem isn't the healthcare system. The problem is that people aren't
> having as many kids. Too many old people. Not enough young people.
> Disproportionate streams mean there's more leaving the kitty than is coming
> in. The number of child
The problem isn't the healthcare system. The problem is that people aren't
having as many kids. Too many old people. Not enough young people.
Disproportionate streams mean there's more leaving the kitty than is coming
in. The number of children couples have has been in decline for 50 years. In
Can
Coming soon to a democratic republic near you:
Soaring costs force Canada to reassess health model
Pressured by an aging population and the need to rein in budget deficits,
Canada's provinces are taking tough measures to curb healthcare costs, a
trend that could erode the principles of the popula
More importantly they were about beer I thought.
On 12/1/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The very earliest writings from the Mesopotamian cradle of
> civilization were accounting related.
>
> On 12/1/05, Wayne Putterill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We didn't evolve with wallets, an
> Brian wrote:
> So Gruss...
>
> Do you live in the city or country?
Burbs if you call that country (although I'm 5 minutes from corn
fields), but up until last summer, both.
> How much is gas there?
Well I think paid $2.20/gal for 93oct last time I filled up. Pretty good!
> Did you vote for
> After that it's where are you from, family questions, do I live in a
> city or the country, what that's like, how much is wine, gas, or milk,
> did I vote for Bush, do I agree with Iraq, did America invade Iraq for
> oil, etc, etc.
>
So Gruss...
Do you live in the city or country?
How much
> Wayne wrote:
> The problem arises when we are taught by the culture we live in that
> to achieve happiness we need to accumulate as many material
> possessions as possible
I completely agree and I also agree with the correlation between money
and happiness. I'm saying that this is not the fault
> Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "What Do You Do" is a standard question taught to start a
> conversation. You will find this anywhere in the world.
>
Not in my experience. I travel internationally frequently and the
only time I'm ever asked "what do I do" outside of America is if I'm
with bu
True, for counting sheep.
I am not speaking out against money - it's a very good method of
abstracting the barter system, but it isn't an intrinsic part of our
nature. We invented it, and systems for using and generating it, but
maybe we should view it as a work in progress rather than a done deal
I think the driving force behind all our actions is a desire to be
happy, whatever need or want that you feel 'greedy' for will boil down
to you thinking it will make you happy.
The problem arises when we are taught by the culture we live in that
to achieve happiness we need to accumulate as many
"What Do You Do" is a standard question taught to start a
conversation. You will find this anywhere in the world.
It tells you immediately the position of the individual, gives you an
idea as to their status and possible wealth, and thus whether they are
worth talking to or not, or simply gives yo
>"Government Failure in Canada, 1997-2004: A Survey of Reports from
>the Auditor General," again by the Fraser Institute, details extensive
>waste, misrepresentation, red tape, incompetence, program failure,
>self-service and self-dealing in the Canadian government. The report
>concludes that:
The very earliest writings from the Mesopotamian cradle of
civilization were accounting related.
On 12/1/05, Wayne Putterill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We didn't evolve with wallets, and not everyone is obsessed with
> grabbing as much money as they can.
> Sam wrote:
> Maybe even French :)
>
LOL! Well ... he is french looking I suppose.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid
> Dana wrote:
> Paris is a great city, sorry. Lived there for hmm, three years I
> think. Plus another year in the far suburbs (Chantilly) and a few
> months in the Loire Valley.
>
Also lived there (just outside, St. Cloud), and I totally agree.
Once, about 2 years ago, I was rushing to the airpo
y"
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: Canada pwned
> > Ray wrote:
> > The perception of New Yorkers is that they are loud and boorish.
>
> I saw this NY comedian here in MN that made the following observation:
>
> I was walkin down dis street an&#x
Maybe that's how they got the bad rap :)
On 12/1/05, Dana wrote:
> Paris is a great city, sorry. Lived there for hmm, three years I
> think. Plus another year in the far suburbs (Chantilly) and a few
> months in the Loire Valley.
>
~
Maybe people in NY didn't like him :)
Professional beggars will start by asking directions and then give you
some sob story about how they need money for an operation or a cab.
Or they could have been tourists he was asking, we have a lot of them.
Maybe even French :)
On 12/1/05, Gruss Gott wrot
Paris is a great city, sorry. Lived there for hmm, three years I
think. Plus another year in the far suburbs (Chantilly) and a few
months in the Loire Valley.
On 12/1/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They don't like anybody, ever been there?
>
> On 12/1/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> >
> > Why's that
gee, what's not to like.
On 12/1/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > Anyway, I'd love to live in Paris for a month or two if it weren't for
> > all those French people. :)
> >
>
> Why's that? Do you find that they don't like you?
>
>
Stepping over drunks is so common who has time to see if they're
breathing, and I rarely kick them, clean shoes and all that
On 12/1/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> I saw this NY comedian here in MN that made the following observation:
>
> I was walkin down dis street an' a guy had a freakin hard attack.
Also depends on the neighborhood. A lot of subcultures in NY don't
like Americans so you run into all kinds. And if you're in Times
Square or the Hard Rock Cafe they're mostly tourists.:)
On 12/1/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > Ray wrote:
> > Neither do New Yorkers.
> >
>
> Now there's a place where I'
> Sam wrote:
> We quickly tell them how to get where they're going and move on, some
> think that's rude but hey, I'm busy and there are a lot of tourists
>
My cousin was lost in Manhatten and NOBODY would stop to give him
directions he ended up having to take a cab 6 blocks. A buddy
explained t
I knew that. We're used to the image. I once worked with a guy from
way upstate NY and he always bragged that when he left NY people hated
him until he would explain he was from the country part. Then they
liked him. He had no friends at work.
I think Trump is number two in most hated in NY, he th
> Wayne wrote:
> We didn't evolve with wallets, and not everyone is obsessed with
> grabbing as much money as they can.
>
Ah, but we did evolve with GREED!
Why you're wrong about capitalism is because it does something that no
other socio-economic system has done before: it takes a fundamentall
Exactly. Looking it from a behavioral psych approach, money is a
strong motivator, but not the only one. If it were, then you would not
see such stuff as observational learning, advertising wouldn't work.
Most religions would not exist.
Money is a motivator. One of many, but its not THE motivator
> Ray wrote:
> The perception of New Yorkers is that they are loud and boorish.
I saw this NY comedian here in MN that made the following observation:
I was walkin down dis street an' a guy had a freakin hard attack.
'bout 4 people formed some kind of medical unit - they was givin' im
CPR, calli
We didn't evolve with wallets, and not everyone is obsessed with
grabbing as much money as they can.
On 12/1/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are other ways of viewing success, look at Bhutan and their
> > commitment to 'gross national happiness' for example. Personally I
> > think that
Culture is probably the best word to use I suppose.
On 12/1/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not really sure what you mean by this. By "country" do you mean government?
> Or citizens? Or?
>
> I live on a quiet street in middle America where the main concerns are
> what's the weather doing, w
> Ray wrote:
> Neither do New Yorkers.
>
Now there's a place where I've met a lot of impolite people. Although
if we're comparing cities New York has gotten better while Chicago has
gotten worse. Los Angeles is on it's own planet - you can't even
compare.
~~~
Sorry, Sam, that wasn't a shot at you, more like a sarcastic poke at
NYC. I forgot the smiley at the end.
The perception of New Yorkers is that they are loud and boorish. At
least, that's what I've learned from Donald Trump and The Apprentice. :)
Sam wrote:
> Come on that's not true.
> We do
> Sam wrote:
> They don't like anybody, ever been there?
>
Many times per year. Some of my best friends are French. In fact I
can honestly say that I've never met a single impolite Frenchman or
woman and that includes the panhandlers. In fact the most offensive
time I've had in France was due
Come on that's not true.
We don't like NJ but have nothing against the people that live there :)
Otherwise we just don't hang around and chat with every tourist
looking for directions.
We quickly tell them how to get where they're going and move on, some
think that's rude but hey, I'm busy and ther
Neither do New Yorkers.
Sam wrote:
> They don't like anybody, ever been there?
>
> On 12/1/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
>>Why's that? Do you find that they don't like you?
>>
>
>
>
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion H
They don't like anybody, ever been there?
On 12/1/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Why's that? Do you find that they don't like you?
>
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www
That's the problem with France, it's full of French people.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:36 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Canada pwned
> Sam wrote:
> Anyway, I'd love to live in Paris for
> Sam wrote:
> Anyway, I'd love to live in Paris for a month or two if it weren't for
> all those French people. :)
>
Why's that? Do you find that they don't like you?
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and
+1 on this write-up Gruss.
I work every day with people in this guy's position.
> He's not rich and he probably won't be. He has an apartment in town
> and a small car. But he's also got all the latest games, computers,
> toys, etc and plenty of time to play them. He never worries about his
>
You know we have unions, government and teaching jobs here that do
pretty much the same thing. Except without all the vacation, which is
why we're a more productive culture.
I thought the European countries were cracking down on all excessive
vacations? Here we have sick days but you're only suppos
Like the Kansas board of education.
On 12/1/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess i'm biased to anything that's been good too me..which explains
> my rampant nationalism :)
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your comp
I guess i'm biased to anything that's been good too me..which explains
my rampant nationalism :)
>
> Most people, though, are biased to where they grew up.
>
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer su
> Brian wrote:
> I guess that's what makes
> it so hard for me to agree with the idea that this place sucks :)
>
I wouldn't say it sucks here, I just prefer it in Europe for
lifestyle. That being said, the business opportunities here far
exceed Europe, at least in my experience. So, if you want
> Sam wrote:
> France has had an unemployment rate of 10% for over a decade, Germany
> is now close to 12%.
I think there're depths to those numbers that you're missing, but,
either way, there is more unemployment, yup.
That's why it's a middle class dream (not a low class dream). In
France, for
>
> I know why for me (these are my perceptions of course):
>
I agree with all of your perceptions Grussbut you know what, none of
them have made my life here miserable. I set my own pace of "capitalism"
that works for mei drive my non-bmw car without worrying about my pariah
status...I
France has had an unemployment rate of 10% for over a decade, Germany
is now close to 12%. Half of those stay unemployed for at least a
year.
Too relaxed for me :)
On 12/1/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> I know why for me (these are my perceptions of course):
>
> 1.) America has a culture of work. Go to
1 - 100 of 374 matches
Mail list logo
