Yeah...I am with you on that Dana.
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 11:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about
(and if NASA scientists are right the Thames wi
I am still stuck on how limits on greenhouse gases would harm the
environment. Amazing the things that people think up.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Ok... a medical doctor has an underlying degree in science, but I am
> certainly not
global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about
(and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)
"No consensus. Then how many qualified PhD level scientists who specialize
in the field are calling AGW fraudulent etc. Even that big list that has
been cite
"No consensus. Then how many qualified PhD level scientists who specialize
in the field are calling AGW fraudulent etc. Even that big list that has
been cited time and time again has fewer than 100 PhD level scientists are
on it. And most of those who are do not specialize in climate research.
Ma
No consensus. Then how many qualified PhD level scientists who
specialize in the field are calling AGW fraudulent etc. Even that big
list that has been cited time and time again has fewer than 100 PhD
level scientists are on it. And most of those who are do not
specialize in climate research. Man
"like the way you phrase that. Actually are you qualified to comment even?
You refer AGW to a cult. So is a general consensus of the scientific
community considered a cult now?"
I've referred to it as a cult for years and, as has been presented
repeatedly, there is not a consensus. Far from it.
like the way you phrase that. Actually are you qualified to comment
even? You refer AGW to a cult. So is a general consensus of the
scientific community considered a cult now?
What about the current consensus on Gravity, is that a cult?
What about General Relativity? Do we have a cult here?
How
"But finally - that the consequences of throwing out ALL the science and
ignoring it are so dire that we HAVE to consider action now, even if part
or all of the science is proven wrong later."
Which science? On the side of the cult of man made global warming or
against?
Anyway, if any figure
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Sam wrote:
> Yeah minus the dire and action now stuff.
>
Then we understand each other on this matter perfectly.
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.co
And are you an expert in determining the scientific consensus or again
are you just parroting the party line?
What do you want for your "settled science"? Which btw is only a term
used by extremists who keep moving the goal posts each time more data
is shown to support AGW.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 a
Yeah minus the dire and action now stuff.
.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Actually - you just agreed (in part) with my statements.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon
Actually - you just agreed (in part) with my statements.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Like a broken record.
>
> Nobody is saying throw out all the science. They're just saying it is
> not settled.
..
~|
Or
Like a broken record.
Nobody is saying throw out all the science. They're just saying it is
not settled.
.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
> - But finally - that the consequences of throwing out ALL the science
> and ignoring it are so dire that we HAVE to consider a
exactly
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Jerry Barnes
> wrote:
>
> > "So we should be pumping even MORE greenhouse gasses into the
> > atmosphere to counter the coming mini ice age?"
> >
> > Nope. Just keep an open mind and don't ac
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> "So we should be pumping even MORE greenhouse gasses into the
> atmosphere to counter the coming mini ice age?"
>
> Nope. Just keep an open mind and don't accept GW as an established fact.
> It is a theory and the science is NOT in.
>
> Q
and Plan 9...
> Beware Agenda 21
>
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldf
Beware Agenda 21
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Just a reminder about a post I wrote a year ago. If the dailymail says it,
> double check with a reputable newspaper."
>
>
> Can you point out some reputable papers? I can't seem to find any. I find
> some that claim
"Just a reminder about a post I wrote a year ago. If the dailymail says it,
double check with a reputable newspaper."
Can you point out some reputable papers? I can't seem to find any. I find
some that claim to be reputable.
J
-
Protection of the environment has become the principal tool fo
"So we should be pumping even MORE greenhouse gasses into the
atmosphere to counter
the coming mini ice age?"
Nope. Just keep an open mind and don't accept GW as an established fact.
It is a theory and the science is NOT in.
Question the motives of those on both sides of the issue.
J
-
Nin
Let me guess...a study funded by the oil industry?
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 9:51 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and
if NASA scientists are right the Thames
And here those silly glaciers are caving off chunks the size of connecticut!
They've even let themselves melt so much that the northwest passage is open for
the first time since ... Ever.
Glaciers never consider the real data.
On Jan 29, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Forget g
Just a reminder about a post I wrote a year ago. If the dailymail says
it, double check with a reputable newspaper.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/thread.cfm/threadid:31391
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need
So we should be pumping even MORE greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere to
counter the coming mini ice age?
On 29 January 2012 23:51, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA
> scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)
23 matches
Mail list logo