Sorry, they call them addicts just like anyone with a dwi is an
alcoholic by their definition. This wasn't detox it would have come
after.
This playgroup was mostly crimes committed under the influence, same
color make up as genpop but more middle class. No possession charges
unless it was a viola
I was last there in 93 and they only separated out chesters, white power
guys and rats. DUI was different because of the nature of the crime.
Addict != drug related crimes, the addict ward is a medical ward for
those with real problems, and thats not the point you were trying to
pass off a sec
I've been in County, had a dwi, lots of drugy friends and lots of CO friends.
A CO friend of mine had me moved to the addict ward even the the judge
ordered me to dwi ward, next to each other. Around 1990.
On Feb 9, 2008 10:42 AM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bull shit, you obviously haven'
Bull shit, you obviously haven't been in Nassau County correctional
since the 70s.
Or do you mean at the precincts?
Sam wrote:
> On LI than it's different. Local jail keeps addicts and drunks away
> from gen-pop in camp type large rooms with constant counseling. Been
> like that at least since t
On LI than it's different. Local jail keeps addicts and drunks away
from gen-pop in camp type large rooms with constant counseling. Been
like that at least since the 70's.
Still how many Federal drug user charges are there? What can the
president do about local laws?
On Feb 9, 2008 5:11 AM, Casey
You're an idiot :)
On Feb 8, 2008 10:27 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He also prayed before he invaded Iraq and God told him to go for it.
> That's in Plan of Attack.
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most impor
yeah but ... at least someone there is thinking about trying. So
however inadequate an improvement it may be, it is something of an
improvement.
On Feb 9, 2008 6:11 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/08, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Why add more courts to change the pr
On 2/7/08, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why add more courts to change the prisons? Don't most courts already
> let you serve in a rehab type facility? Isn't this a States issues?
It's really not the same thing. I can tell you first hand. got pushed
through that style of court when i was yo
He also prayed before he invaded Iraq and God told him to go for it.
That's in Plan of Attack.
On Feb 8, 2008 7:48 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it's not.
>
> George W. Bush stated that it's his belief that God put him here so that he
> could fight the good fight.he called it br
Well, nobody is running on legalization, Tony, and drug courts at
least make an attempt to offer treatment to people who need it rather
than just throwing them in the slammer. I'd say that is actually a
rather intelligent suggestion, and a courageous one coming from a
republican candidate for presi
I find it amusing that you are still using labels like liberal and
conservative, but you're both thinking of voting for McCain. Don't
mind me, carry on
On Feb 7, 2008 9:35 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I don't have to answer your question first, because I never decried Obam
I agree. I actually think abortion is wrong, but I believe it is more
wrong for the government to tell a woman that she *has* to have a
baby.
And Iraq -- I think everyone here knows what I think about Iraq.
On Feb 7, 2008 9:32 AM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wholeheartedly agre
Yeah, that stuff!
he's a soldier of God...even if he's obtuse about it.
On Feb 8, 2008 10:48 AM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rehashing old nonsense?
> I'm guessing your talking about this:
>
--
It was dark all around
There was frost on the ground
When the Tigers broke free
~
Rehashing old nonsense?
I'm guessing your talking about this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/13/AR2005101301688.html
George W. Bush and the G-Word
By Al Kamen
Friday, October 14, 2005; Page A17
The reemergence of the controversy that President Bush allegedly told
Pal
No, it's not.
George W. Bush stated that it's his belief that God put him here so that he
could fight the good fight.he called it bring freedom to those under
oppressive regimes.
He's on a mission from God. Those are his words, not mine.
On Feb 7, 2008 3:07 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why add more courts to change the prisons? Don't most courts already
let you serve in a rehab type facility? Isn't this a States issues?
On Feb 7, 2008 4:34 PM, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> expand drug courts?
> wtf
> sounds like a GREAT IDEA!
> sounds almost like fighting the DRUG WAR!
> wow
expand drug courts?
wtf
sounds like a GREAT IDEA!
sounds almost like fighting the DRUG WAR!
wow, i dont know anyone who is hurting for any
drug they want... and we are small town america
its even more prevalent in inner cities, wtf... what a
waste of my money.
again, go obama.
On Feb 7, 2008 3:52
That's a ridiculous comment and you know it.
On Feb 7, 2008 12:50 PM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He doesn't get his foreign policy straight from the mouth of God
>
> Now THAT is a welcome change.
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion®
That link is useless, same as saying "I can't explain why I support
him, look it up yourself."
But if you reads through some of it he claims inequality in voting
similar to the 50's. What is he talking about and what can a president
do? He wants to overturn a Supreme Court decision, how can he do
He doesn't get his foreign policy straight from the mouth of God
Now THAT is a welcome change.
On Feb 7, 2008 2:43 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> McCain supports the war and knows nothing about economics.
> How is that a good change?
>
--
It was dark all around
There was frost on the gro
McCain supports the war and knows nothing about economics.
How is that a good change?
On Feb 7, 2008 6:28 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2008 7:55 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Maybe. i don't necessarily believe that the Republicans are in a position to
> take the el
Why do you think it's a federal issue?
What is the constitutional imperative?
Not the court, you.
- Original Message -
From: "Erika L. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MAD
and im sure someone will say what personal gain
i can still remember that FNCKFACE saying... "heh, he tried to kill my daddy"
wrongo dongo captain stupid.
not with my tax dollars.
enough is enough.
On Feb 7, 2008 12:12 PM, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you surround yourself, as preside
On Feb 7, 2008 11:51 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yeah but Bush had his written out on a bar napkin, not sure if that
> counts.
>
hey now, some of the best plans ever devised have been concocted in
bars..
--
It was dark all around
There was frost on the ground
When the Tig
That's funny.
Casey Dougall wrote:
> On 2/7/08, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Bottom line is, they all have plans. Every past candidate has, every
>> current candidate does, and every future candidate will.
>>
>
>
> Yeah but Bush had his written out on a bar napkin, not sur
On 2/7/08, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bottom line is, they all have plans. Every past candidate has, every
> current candidate does, and every future candidate will.
Yeah but Bush had his written out on a bar napkin, not sure if that counts.
So see? We all have our tactics.
As far as what his plans are, rather than me cut and paste links to his
site, go there for yourself and see. http://www.johnmccain.com.
Bottom line is, they all have plans. Every past candidate has, every
current candidate does, and every future candidate will.
I don't have to answer your question first, because I never decried Obama's
pie in the sky rhetoric, and I never used that as a reason that i was going
to vote for McCain.
I agree with you that Obama talks in generalitiesbut YOU made it clear
that you would vote for McCain because he DOE
Actually I do know who my congressman is. I didn't vote for him though.
And yes, you are right and this is what I wanted to hear. Congress
writes legislation to get things done, not the president. Any candidate
can have ideas, they can even say how they are going to implement these
ideas in gr
Hey, that's exactly what I'm holding on to. The inability thus far to change
that. :) Still a concern.
On 2/7/08, Billy Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Republicans have held the presidency for 13 of the 25 years since Roe v.
> Wade and it is in no more danger of being overturned now than in 197
the hysteria if you want, but McCain's court appointments would be
more akin to Breyer than to Allito.
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:33 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
I wholehear
> Ahh, another liberal tactic. Answer a question with a question.
Ahh, another conservative tactic. :-) Start the discussion by asking
"what's your position" without presenting one.
> Answer mine first.
Asked and answered:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:25
you surround yourself, as president, with key points of contact, YOUR CABINET.
new ones. ones that work, and do things with the AMERICAN PEOPLE in mind
rather than PERSONAL GAIN.
all i can say about this.
On Feb 7, 2008 12:01 PM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/08, Bruce Sorge
On 2/7/08, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All I want to know is, *how* is he going to get things done if he does
> not have contacts in high places? Not *what* he wants to change. I am
> sure I can go to his home page and read all about the pie in the sky
> hopes he has. I want specifi
I wholeheartedly agree with you on those issues.
ANY talk about overturning Roe vs. Wade has my whole insides churning
and churning and churning. I *do* doubt it will happen, but I really
can't stand the thought of someone trying. Gah.
On 2/7/08, Shawna Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mysel
"(3.) Getting things done as president requires getting the nation
behind you first, then pressuring congress with your public support.
Obama is hands-down the most inspiring candidate and therefore will be
able to most easily get that pressure."
Thank you, Gruss. I was floundering around trying t
> All I want to know is, *how* is he going to get things done if he does
> not have contacts in high places?
It's called a mandate.
With enough support from "The People" (you know, all us folks)
Congress will get the message.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that w
> Bruce wrote:
> So you would rather not vote for someone who is going to honestly tell
> you how he will get things done? You want someone who is vague in his
> ideas? Obama talks about hope and change. Well, I hope I win the lottery
> someday, but if I hope in one hand and shit in the other
Well
So ignore my posts. Trust me, I won't lose any sleep over it.
Bruce
Jerry Johnson wrote:
> Is there any statement a person can make that makes me less likely to
> take anything they say seriously.
>
> It is exactly this rhetoric that makes me turn off all talk radio, and
> most news stations, and
All I want to know is, *how* is he going to get things done if he does
not have contacts in high places? Not *what* he wants to change. I am
sure I can go to his home page and read all about the pie in the sky
hopes he has. I want specifics as to how he is going to do it.
Bruce
Shawna Hampton
ursday, February 07, 2008 10:07 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
>
> Ahh, another liberal tactic.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get t
You could just vote for the Green Party or Libertarian candidate. Just look
for names that you have never heard of.
"More than likely, I'll be forced to once again abstain from voting because
I just can't bring myself to choose between two equal evils. Unless there's
a viable third-party candid
Bruce, is there anything specific you want to know about Obama's plans?
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Sorge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:07 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
Ahh, another liberal tactic. Answer a question w
just can't bring myself to choose between two equal evils. Unless there's a
viable third-party candidate who appears. Then at least I could walk out of
there feeling less dirty.
-Original Message-
From: Billy Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 9:20 AM
T
Ahh, another liberal tactic. Answer a question with a question.
Answer mine first.
Bruce
On Feb 7, 2008 7:52 AM, G Money wrote:
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Fre
On Feb 7, 2008 9:44 AM, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now don't get me wrong, I am all for change. Over the last couple of
> years I have become disenfranchised with the entire bush regime and I
> want change. I believe that McCain, although soft on some issues, will
> be the man to get
So you would rather not vote for someone who is going to honestly tell
you how he will get things done? You want someone who is vague in his
ideas? Obama talks about hope and change. Well, I hope I win the lottery
someday, but if I hope in one hand and shit in the other, I am pretty
sure which
If the race is Hillary vs. McCain, I'll vote for McCain. If the race is
Obama vs. McCain, I'll vote for Obama.
I won't vote for Hillary because I really don't want to see Bill Clinton in
the White House again.
> It's a fight for the independent vote, in my opinion. Obama supporters
> will vote
change for the sake of change is my #1 priority.
and that to me is anything but the old regime boys
and i consider mccain part of that.
if you remember in one of the debates, one of the key
points he used for why he was most prepared was
that he had contacts and friends in high places in washingto
On Feb 7, 2008 7:55 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You gotta see one of these two or Edwards on the ticket to have a chance
> against the Republicans. If the belief is that Republicans are in a
> position
> to take the election, you will not see a Obama / Hillary or vise versa
> ti
On 2/7/08, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2008 7:55 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> It's a fight for the independent vote, in my opinion. Obama supporters
> will
> vote for Hillary if she gets the nomination, and Hillary supporters will
> do
> the same for Oba
hillary mentioned it as a poss.
obama said "im still running for president, btw"
id think it would be cool...
On Feb 7, 2008 8:55 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/08, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 7, 2008 7:34 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrot
On 2/7/08, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2008 7:34 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah this is going to be tight. There was a bunch of talk yesterday on
> > our
> > local NPR of a possable Hillary/Obama or Obama/Hillery Ticket.
> >
>
> I really don't see th
On Feb 7, 2008 7:34 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yeah this is going to be tight. There was a bunch of talk yesterday on
> our
> local NPR of a possable Hillary/Obama or Obama/Hillery Ticket.
>
I really don't see that happening, do you?
--
It was dark all around
There was fros
On 2/7/08, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> CBS news last night had their current delegate projection at:
>
> 1,006 for Hillary
> 935 for Obama
Yeah this is going to be tight. There was a bunch of talk yesterday on our
local NPR of a possable Hillary/Obama or Obama/Hillery Ticket.
~
CBS news last night had their current delegate projection at:
1,006 for Hillary
935 for Obama
A virtual tie.
On Feb 6, 2008 8:29 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> correction to previous comments, New Mexico apportions its delegates.
> One candidate has 12 and the other 13 currently, I forge
correction to previous comments, New Mexico apportions its delegates.
One candidate has 12 and the other 13 currently, I forget which is
which. But yes, that last delegate will depend on the provisional
ballots.
On 2/6/08, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/6/08, Vivec <[EMAIL
On 2/6/08, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I understand now.
> Votes are like trees. If you are trying to build a forest.
> If you have more trees than you have forests, then at
> that point the pollsters will probably say that you win.
~
i trust tim russert and his opinions.
tw
On Feb 6, 2008 1:54 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow. I must be totally oblivious or completely niave on all things
> political, because I do not get that from Fox News at all. It's on almost
> all day here, every day. (I think Shepard
I understand now.
Votes are like trees. If you are trying to build a forest.
If you have more trees than you have forests, then at
that point the pollsters will probably say that you win.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the
So absolutely glad I do not watch TV. Every time I start to weaken and am about
to order cable, you guys remind me of what I'm missing.
>> <*snicker*>
>>
>> OMG ... those commercials are SO annoying ...
>
>Are the 'Boots' Williams commercials still running?
>
>--
>will
>
>"If my life weren't fu
When I first read that, I read "numb" ...
Ocassionally, I mute the TV, and listen to tunes. Depends on my mood. I go
through phases ...
On 2/6/08, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Listening / Watching all that news will make you go dumb!
>
> Turn into some live Drum & Bass and Old Sk
It's all perception, in my opinion.
If you are firmly in favor of someone, you will tend to remember the
negatives that are said about that person, even if an equal number of
positive things were said.
On Feb 6, 2008 12:54 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow. I must be totally o
On 2/6/08, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wow. I must be totally oblivious or completely niave on all things
> political, because I do not get that from Fox News at all. It's on almost
> all day here, every day. (I think Shepard is hysterical )
Listening / Watching all that ne
Wow. I must be totally oblivious or completely niave on all things
political, because I do not get that from Fox News at all. It's on almost
all day here, every day. (I think Shepard is hysterical )
In any case, they literally just had a segment on how people are
underestimating Hillary and th
Most major media is anti Hillary pro Obama and McCain.
Once McCain gets the nod then he'll be in the cross hairs because they
think he's easy to beat no base.
On Feb 6, 2008 10:25 AM, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 4:02 AM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I do und
On Feb 6, 2008 4:02 AM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I do understand is that the media seems to be very skewed toward Clinton.
It depend on which media you are watching. CBS, for instances, ran a
rerun of one of their shows the night before the primary with lots of
references to the Bi
I am one of them. I thought I was extreme right but after reviewing my
take on a lot of issues a while back I have come to the realization that
I am more of a centrist conservative rather than right-wing extremist,
which is why I am in the McCain camp. And I love watching the right-wing
extremi
Hmmm ... not familiar with those so I imagine they're not ...
-Original Message-
From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 11:02 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
Are the 'Boots' Williams commercials still run
Hap Hazard, Big Bob, Sonny (under the Platte City water tower), The Watson's
Girl, Rachel from Carpet Corneri used to watch way too much TV.
On Feb 6, 2008 10:59 AM, Shawna Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I moved here in 2002 and it's been the same guy since then, so yes
> probably
>
Yes, this thread has taken a crazy turn to annoying commercials for local
small businesses on KC-area TV
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 11:01 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
is that what that's
> <*snicker*>
>
> OMG ... those commercials are SO annoying ...
Are the 'Boots' Williams commercials still running?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~~
y 06, 2008 10:40 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
>
> I guess people are just fed up with Bush and the republicans and we
> are going to have record turnout all around...
>
>
> And I'm sorry but I have to do it...
>
>
> Su
I moved here in 2002 and it's been the same guy since then, so yes probably
Him and the Big Bob's carpet guy ... sheesh
-Original Message-
From: J.J. Merrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MAD
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > <*snicker*>
> >
> > OMG ... those commercials are SO annoying ...
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: J.J. Merrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:40 AM
> > To: CF-Community
Republicans are turning out in record numbers as well, and they are voting
for the centrist McCain. Rush, Ann Coulter, et al are on the verge of
epileptic seizures over it, but Republicans overall are tired of the right
wing of the party being in control.
On Feb 6, 2008 8:39 AM, J.J. Merrick wrot
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:40 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
>
> I guess people are just fed up with Bush and the republicans and we
> are going to have record turnout all around...
>
>
> And
<*snicker*>
OMG ... those commercials are SO annoying ...
-Original Message-
From: J.J. Merrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:40 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
I guess people are just fed up with Bush and the republicans
I guess people are just fed up with Bush and the republicans and we
are going to have record turnout all around...
And I'm sorry but I have to do it...
Sunflower dodge in lathe!
hahahaha sorry :-)
J.J.
On 2/6/08, Shawna Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My husband an
C. 27616
> (919) 874-6229 (home)
> (703) 220-2835 (cell)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:49 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
>
> check ya numbers boys...
>
>
s legislature thinks twice about
> not funding primary voting in the future.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shawna Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:54 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
>
>
&g
, 2008 8:54 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
My husband and I got to our caucus location at 6 pm (line forms 6 pm,
registration begins 6:30, caucus starts at 7 ... so they thought).
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8
>
> SSTWebworks
> 4405 Oakshyre Way
> Raleigh, NC. 27616
> (919) 874-6229 (home)
> (703) 220-2835 (cell)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:49 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Super Tues
Have not seen that but I suspect they are a) overly optimistic and b)
overlooking the provisional ballots, not to mention the people who
voted on scrap of paper. Provisional ballots are usually ignored but
when there are 8000 of them and the gap is only a hundred some votes
statewide
On 2/6/08
2008 9:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
check ya numbers boys...
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8358.html
On Feb 6, 2008 9:42 AM, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Problem: the only thing that matters is Delegates,
> Hillary has more, un
While it is true that Obama took more states than Hillary, she took
states that are delegate rich, most importantly California, which has
the most delegates. I think that we will have to wait until the post 2-5
states vote. And even then I really don't see a clear front runner for
the Dems. My
Well I was just reporting what the wires are saying, but you are there
so I would be more willing to believe you than the news.
Well I am happy to report that California also had some of the highest
voter turnout yesterday, even more than a general election. Hopefully
this is true of all states
That was a pretty awesome recount Shawna ... you should be blogging it ;)
On 2/6/08, Shawna Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> All in all, another experience I won't ever forget.
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is th
My husband and I got to our caucus location at 6 pm (line forms 6 pm,
registration begins 6:30, caucus starts at 7 ... so they thought).
It was held in a small church in downtown Olathe. When we pulled up there
was a line but not much of one (we thought).
As we stood there the line started stretc
> --
> Scott Stewart
> ColdFusion Developer
>
> SSTWebworks
> 4405 Oakshyre Way
> Raleigh, NC. 27616
> (919) 874-6229 (home)
> (703) 220-2835 (cell)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:32
ewart
> > ColdFusion Developer
> >
> > SSTWebworks
> > 4405 Oakshyre Way
> > Raleigh, NC. 27616
> > (919) 874-6229 (home)
> > (703) 220-2835 (cell)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wed
day, February 06, 2008 9:32 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
>
> obama is gettin plenty of coverage here, from what i can see
> and took a bunch of states last night, more than clinton, and
> i truly think at the end of the day, it will be mccain vs.
> Scott wrote:
> Problem: the only thing that matters is Delegates,
> Hillary has more, unless Obama can make up the difference he won't win.
>
True, but keep in mind that approx 20% of the ~2100 needed to win are
"super delegates" who are not elected by individual voters that can
change their min
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:32 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Super Tuesday MADNESS!
obama is gettin plenty of coverage here, from what i can see
and took a bunch of states last night, more than clinton, and
i truly think at the end of the day, it will be
ch-check out my melody...
anyone that can rock rakim in a political thread... well, rak's in my book
On 2/6/08, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Follow the Leader Rakim would say!
>
> "Follow the Leader is the title, theme, task
> Now ya know, you don't have to ask
> Rap is Rhythm And P
> Bruce wrote:
> The current delegate count is:
>
> Hillary: 845
> Obama: 765
>
So, Vivec, the first Dem nominee to ~2100 delegates wins. That means
the good news for Clinton is that she's ahead in the race, but the bad
news is that she didn't come even close to a decisive victory and that
means
obama is gettin plenty of coverage here, from what i can see
and took a bunch of states last night, more than clinton, and
i truly think at the end of the day, it will be mccain vs. obama
and obama winning.
my prediction, you can set it in stone.
tw
On 2/6/08, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this is true
On 2/6/08, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I do understand is that the media seems to be very skewed toward Clinton.
>
> You are hearing more about her than about Obama in news reports that
> I've seen recently,
> and in articles I've read on the internet.
>
> Which means that
midday? You sweet silly fool you. It took us over a month to produce a
result in the general election. But yes, lat I heard, four of the more
remote counties had not reported at all and a couple of large
precincts in the metropolitan area were not done counting. For some
reason there was only one v
Go to YouTube and find an Obama victory speech, Gel. Listen to it.
You'll be hooked.
On Feb 6, 2008 6:02 AM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I do understand is that the media seems to be very skewed toward
> Clinton.
>
> You are hearing more about her than about Obama in news reports tha
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
