Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-12 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
love it! On May 12, 2009, at 7:07 PM, Maureen wrote: > > fixed - just for you > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox > wrote: >> >> I get another error when giving a bogus pid number in the shopping >> section. > > ~~

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-12 Thread Maureen
fixed - I had the error trap turned off so I could debug and forgot to turn it back on. On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > http://thepluginstore.com/page.cfm?page=blo > > gets me a big ol nasty error output.  Sorry, I just had to pull a Ray > Camden ~~

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-12 Thread Maureen
fixed - just for you On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > I get another error when giving a bogus pid number in the shopping > section. ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-12 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I get another error when giving a bogus pid number in the shopping section. On May 11, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Maureen wrote: > > Yep. Here is his site: http://www.electrondreams.com > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Michael Grant > wrote: >> >> Very good is worth waiting for! >> >> On Mon,

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-12 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
http://thepluginstore.com/page.cfm?page=blo gets me a big ol nasty error output. Sorry, I just had to pull a Ray Camden. On May 11, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Maureen wrote: > > Yep. Here is his site: http://www.electrondreams.com > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Michael Grant > wrote

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-12 Thread Dana
I like what you have done with the search page. I will look more later; I am on deadline for a project just now. On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Maureen wrote: > > http://thepluginstore.com/ > > I've implemented most of the changes suggested by the kind folks who > reviewed this over this weeke

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread Maureen
yeah.. the placeholders. I realized what you meant after I sent the message so I killed 'em On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:38 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote: > > I *was* seeing them on the background of the 3 images on the front page > > Not any more tho... hmmm. ~~

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
I *was* seeing them on the background of the 3 images on the front page Not any more tho... hmmm. ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive:

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread Maureen
Yep. Here is his site: http://www.electrondreams.com On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Michael Grant wrote: > > Very good is worth waiting for! > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Maureen wrote: > >> >> currently known as my son, Scott.  He's slow, but very good ~

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread Michael Grant
Very good is worth waiting for! On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Maureen wrote: > > currently known as my son, Scott. He's slow, but very good. > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Michael Grant wrote: > > > >> > >> > until the artist > > > > > > formerly known as Prince? > > ~

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread Maureen
currently known as my son, Scott. He's slow, but very good. On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Michael Grant wrote: > >> >> > until the artist > > > formerly known as Prince? ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with someth

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread Michael Grant
> > > until the artist formerly known as Prince? > > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Tony wrote: > > > > maureen, > > > > any reason the logo isnt anti-aliased? seems kinda jaggy to me. > > > > tw > > ~| Want to reach t

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread Maureen
It's just a placeholder I stuck there until the artist gets me the real one. On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Tony wrote: > > maureen, > > any reason the logo isnt anti-aliased? seems kinda jaggy to me. > > tw ~| Want to reach

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread Tony
maureen, any reason the logo isnt anti-aliased? seems kinda jaggy to me. tw On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Maureen wrote: > > http://thepluginstore.com/ > > I've implemented most of the changes suggested by the kind folks who > reviewed this over this weekend. > > If it's not too much troubl

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread Maureen
There is no pink on this site. And the purple is only on the rollovers and headers. Where are you seeing purple backgrounds? On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:22 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote: > >> Myyy eyyyes! my eyy!!! >> >> The pinkyness!!! Aie!!! > > +100! > > Tone down the pink/pur

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> Myyy eyyyes! my eyy!!! > > The pinkyness!!! Aie!!! +100! Tone down the pink/purple backgrounds. That color is nice in accents but murder in mass quantities! ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with some

Re: The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread Vivec
Myyy eyyyes! my eyy!!! The pinkyness!!! Aie!!! 2009/5/11 Maureen > > http://thepluginstore.com/ > > I've implemented most of the changes suggested by the kind folks who > reviewed this over this weekend. > > If it's not too much trouble, could you look at it again and let me >

The Plug-in Store Site Review - Take Two

2009-05-11 Thread Maureen
http://thepluginstore.com/ I've implemented most of the changes suggested by the kind folks who reviewed this over this weekend. If it's not too much trouble, could you look at it again and let me know any other suggestions. Not all the content is there yet. More concerned at this point about

Re: Site Review

2009-05-10 Thread Dana
so, getting back to your original request -- your tag cloud on the seach page is good. However, if there is a way to search for something that is not in that cloud, I am not seeing it. Ah, now I do. presumably you can do a simple search by ignoring some option in advanced search. But I person

Re: Site Review

2009-05-10 Thread Dana
::cough:: I have some availabilty for content-writing recent samples at fusionauthority.com /me smiles On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Maureen wrote: > > Good point. > > Could you look at the site again?  I think I got most of your > suggestions, except for the highlight on the selected ri

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Maureen
Good point. Could you look at the site again? I think I got most of your suggestions, except for the highlight on the selected right nav items. http://thepluginstore.com On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote: > > If you ever find one, don't let any other coder know. > > That is

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
If you ever find one, don't let any other coder know. That is the holy grail for all of us. You'd think with all the english, communications and marketing majors out there, that slot would not be so impossible to fill. On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Maureen wrote: > What I really need is a

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Maureen
I understand that. Just got off the phone with a client that I've been working with for more than 10 years who thinks every web page is supposed to be a squeeze page that convinces the viewer to "BUY SOMETHING RIGHT NOW". Just when I think I have him convinced to let me build a professional look

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
Yeah, well, don't take all of mine, they often conflict. I throw them out stream-of-consciousness - not all make sense. (just a warning. lol. which my designer has learned after many years of pain) On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Maureen wrote: > > I made them bold.   Trying to incorporate al

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Mark Henderson
Maureen wrote: > Re: the feature div - thanks for catching that. I copied it to make > the three blocks instead of one and forgot to change the id to class. > I really do know better. > Yeah I'm hearing you there. I know you're not finished yet but I had an idea the ID/class thing was a sim

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Maureen
I made them bold. Trying to incorporate all the suggestions. On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote: > > Either I have better lighting this late at night, or the color of the > page headers changed a little? > > Because they are working for me now. > > =) > > Might be the lack of

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
Either I have better lighting this late at night, or the color of the page headers changed a little? Because they are working for me now. =) Might be the lack of sleep. I like the change to the home page, with the grid. Very common setup, but common is often common because it works.

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Maureen
Thank you, Mark. I changed the shop page to a grid with displays of product images, and I'll be putting feature products on the main page as well, so perhaps it will look more like a store. I haven't run the validation yet, so thanks for that. I'll fix all the stuff that it found. Re: the fea

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Mark Henderson
Site Link: http://thepluginstore.com Jerry Johnson wrote: > so maybe something like > > You make sound, we make it sound good. > It's your sound, play with it. > Change your sound > Toys for noise Followed by: > Or use an analogy. Custom cars and parts. what other hobbies have > add-ons? what oth

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
Condiments for your creative tools On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote: > Or use an analogy. Custom cars and parts. what other hobbies have > add-ons? what other products let you extend their functions? > > Aftermarket addons for your creative toolbox > Extend your tools > Pimp y

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
Good plan. Stick with it. Basic structure always needs to come first. Not sure if that fancy font is better, but the size and weight is much more to my liking. As for the page titles, I want my eye to be drawn there first on each page load. Pull my eye in. So either bold that text there (which m

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
Or use an analogy. Custom cars and parts. what other hobbies have add-ons? what other products let you extend their functions? Aftermarket addons for your creative toolbox Extend your tools Pimp your stack The sweet editing suite ~~

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
Not really sure of the "group" this is targeted for, but I am picturing my brother-in-law, who has a rack of sound devices, lots of add ons for his edrums and midi boxes, and a dozen pedals for his guitars and basses. he plays with the sound. so maybe something like You make sound, we make it s

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> Thanks.  I changed the text color for the inputs back to black.  Tag > Cloud links aren't ready yet.  I'm not much of an artist so the > graphics will have to wait until I can afford to hire someone.  A > store logo is "coming soon". I'm not a big fan of sites with wild or > multiple fonts, so I

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Maureen
I have no idea what to use for a tagline, although I know I need one. Any thoughts? On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote: > > a tagline is needed. that alone could do it. ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Maureen
Thanks for all the suggestions. I'm giving some serious thought to having a section of the site for analog plugs, stomp boxes and cables - just for fun. The header that is currently the analog knobs will change with the type of plugs - I just need to get the graphics for the alternate versions.

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
a tagline is needed. that alone could do it. On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Casey Dougall wrote: > > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Maureen wrote: > >> Well, yes, more info to come.  Products to display, and content for >> all the areas.  Probably a featured image of a product on each page. >

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
The main article with the plugs on the home page does not scream "buy things". I admit it took a second to find the "shop" button. Was unclear at first what the site was selling. I thought it was selling connectors and cables (which sadly excited me. I spent 4 months once building a database of a

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Casey Dougall
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Maureen wrote: > Well, yes, more info to come. Products to display, and content for > all the areas. Probably a featured image of a product on each page. > > Not sure what else I could do to make a store > Yeah, I'm thinking about that one. Initially I would

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Maureen
Well, yes, more info to come. Products to display, and content for all the areas. Probably a featured image of a product on each page. Not sure what else I could do to make a store look like a store - open to suggestions. On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Casey Dougall wrote: > Right... No blin

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Maureen
Thanks. I changed the text color for the inputs back to black. Tag Cloud links aren't ready yet. I'm not much of an artist so the graphics will have to wait until I can afford to hire someone. A store logo is "coming soon". I'm not a big fan of sites with wild or multiple fonts, so I'll probab

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Casey Dougall
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Maureen wrote: > > I'm not sure what you mean by "also really seems like a blog not a > place to buy sell plugs." > > It's not a blog, it's a store. It has a blog so customers can discuss > the plugs. > Right... No bling as Hatton said. hehehe It looks like a

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> If any of you are around today, could you look at this site: > thepluginstore.com and give me any comments, kudos, criticisms, etc? > > Thanks in advance. Background does not extend to the bottom of the page on Sell and Learn pages. Links in tag cloud do not work (not sure if they were supposed

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Maureen
I'm not sure what you mean by "also really seems like a blog not a place to buy sell plugs." It's not a blog, it's a store. It has a blog so customers can discuss the plugs. On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Casey Dougall wrote: > > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Maureen wrote: > >> >> If any

Re: Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Casey Dougall
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Maureen wrote: > > If any of you are around today, could you look at this site: > thepluginstore.com and give me any comments, kudos, criticisms, etc? > > Thanks in advance. > Looking good. I'm not a big fan of colors, still a bit plain and also really seems like

Site Review

2009-05-09 Thread Maureen
If any of you are around today, could you look at this site: thepluginstore.com and give me any comments, kudos, criticisms, etc? Thanks in advance. ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them kn

Re: New Site Review...

2006-07-19 Thread Tony
t. > > - Neal Bailey > - www.AdvancedGraFX.com > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:13 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: New Site Review... > > np. > > one question tho... >

RE: New Site Review...

2006-07-19 Thread Neal Bailey
: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:13 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: New Site Review... np. one question tho... you dont include ff in your beta testing? tw m?user=22041.8340.5 ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80

Re: New Site Review...

2006-07-18 Thread Tony
ancedGraFX.com > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:18 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: New Site Review... > > firefox. and the break is at the bottom. > >

RE: New Site Review...

2006-07-18 Thread Neal Bailey
t: Re: New Site Review... firefox. and the break is at the bottom. screen cap here: http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/selingerizzle.jpg ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to

Re: New Site Review...

2006-07-18 Thread Tony
ll feel and function. > > - Neal Bailey > - www.AdvancedGraFX.com > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - Phone: 817-346-2635 > > > -Original Message- > From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:42 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re

RE: New Site Review...

2006-07-18 Thread Neal Bailey
4:42 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: New Site Review... you definatly need higher resolution images. maybe some one to do color correction! hmm.. what am i supposed to look at? ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly U

Re: New Site Review...

2006-07-18 Thread Paul Ihrig
you definatly need higher resolution images. maybe some one to do color correction! hmm.. what am i supposed to look at? ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion infor

RE: New Site Review...

2006-07-18 Thread Neal Bailey
EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone: 817-346-2635 -Original Message- From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:41 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: New Site Review... great stuff tho... the bottom section of the graphics seem to break and there is a space between.

Re: New Site Review...

2006-07-18 Thread Tony
all the urls yet. It's > fixed now. > > Man that's funny. > > - Neal Bailey > - www.AdvancedGraFX.com > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - Phone: 817-346-2635 > > > -Original Message- > From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, Jul

RE: New Site Review...

2006-07-18 Thread Neal Bailey
- From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:10 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: New Site Review... When I ran a search for "crotchless panties", it errored out and sent me to another siteblissful essencefrom there I found a candle that wo

Re: New Site Review...

2006-07-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
When I ran a search for "crotchless panties", it errored out and sent me to another siteblissful essencefrom there I found a candle that would remove the dirty thoughts from my mind and take me to a better place. On 7/18/06, Neal Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone. > > Not

New Site Review...

2006-07-18 Thread Neal Bailey
Hello everyone. Not sure if you guys do Site Reviews around here but I was wondering if you could give a little feedback on my site. Be careful It's not very work-safe. Well I think it's work-safe but may not be appropriate if someone is behind you. I have to use an alternate domain name

Re: site review

2006-05-10 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
On 5/9/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to hear you what you think about > http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/demo/eduroam.nl/ Loads in PocketPC PocketIE (Windows Mobile Edition 2003, HP iPaq). There is a broken image in the blue bar under the "Eduroam" logo. The

Re: site review

2006-05-10 Thread Jochem van Dieten
** Private ** wrote: > looks like i would expect it to look on a phone. > scrunched, crappy, not good, but thats just > the nature of phones. The important thing is that they can read the content. Whether the colors look nice and the image is smooth is really not important. > anyway, i use this

Re: site review

2006-05-10 Thread Tony
looks like i would expect it to look on a phone. scrunched, crappy, not good, but thats just the nature of phones. anyway, i use this to determine a phone in one of my new little beta apps... are you doing the same kinda thing to change the layout, jochem? tw On 5/9/06, Jochem van

Re: site review

2006-05-09 Thread Jochem van Dieten
** Private ** wrote: > looks like crap in lynx. Lynx on which device? It looks as well as may be expected in Lynx in Putty on my PDA. Jochem ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:206405 Archives: http://ww

Re: site review

2006-05-09 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
looks like crap in lynx. woo hoo! I finally got to say that to Jochem. On 5/9/06, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry if you get this twice, but I don't see the first try in the > archives. > > > I would like to hear you what you think about > http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl

site review

2006-05-09 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Sorry if you get this twice, but I don't see the first try in the archives. I would like to hear you what you think about http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/demo/eduroam.nl/ I am especially interested in the usability with mobile devices. I have tested it with the IE on a Windows PPC and wit

Re: Site Review Time Again

2006-04-24 Thread Jillian Koskie
I just reviewed all. >Hey folks, it's time for me to beg for more site reviews for my Web >Scripting & Authoring students. I have 13 sites that need reviews for >a grade. Your comments were a good source of insight for the last >batch you reviewed and I sincerely appreciate your assistance. Thi

Re: Site Review Time Again

2006-04-23 Thread Tony
18 just didnt do one? wtf? tw ps. funny that my first site was for a band... maybe that person is destined for web geekness after all! On 4/23/06, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Those were a few of the stand outs. Thank god some of the people that put > > ZERO effort into the

Re: Site Review Time Again

2006-04-23 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> Those were a few of the stand outs. Thank god some of the people that put > ZERO effort into them aren't out there for sight of those not in the > industry :) The scary thing is that there are 13 sites in the review list this time... and 31 students between two classes. ~~~

RE: Site Review Time Again

2006-04-23 Thread Loathe
atton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 11:45 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Site Review Time Again On 4/23/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some are really good, some should be failed. I should have also mentioned that some of the students decid

Re: Site Review Time Again

2006-04-23 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
On 4/23/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some are really good, some should be failed. I should have also mentioned that some of the students decided to use this project to actually create sites that friends and/or family members have been asking them to. The band site and the web hosting s

RE: Site Review Time Again

2006-04-23 Thread Loathe
il 23, 2006 10:53 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Site Review Time Again > If you're interested in participating simply go to > http://chumphrey.guardian-web.com/ I should mention that a few of the student sites work only in Internet Explorer. I did *not* make cross-browser compatabili

Re: Site Review Time Again

2006-04-23 Thread Tony
i just finished reviewing all. tw On 4/23/06, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you're interested in participating simply go to > > http://chumphrey.guardian-web.com/ > > I should mention that a few of the student sites work only in Internet > Explorer. I did *not* make cross-

Re: Site Review Time Again

2006-04-23 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> If you're interested in participating simply go to > http://chumphrey.guardian-web.com/ I should mention that a few of the student sites work only in Internet Explorer. I did *not* make cross-browser compatability a requirement so I cannot count off for that (haven't even mentioned it, actually

Site Review Time Again

2006-04-23 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
Hey folks, it's time for me to beg for more site reviews for my Web Scripting & Authoring students. I have 13 sites that need reviews for a grade. Your comments were a good source of insight for the last batch you reviewed and I sincerely appreciate your assistance. This time your numerical rati

RE: Site Review

2006-03-30 Thread Adkins, Randy
LOL.. Damn typos... Got to hate them -Original Message- From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 8:51 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Site Review You keep fucking up the addresses, and I keep thinking it's me, damn you Dr. Akins, let the fat just b

RE: Site Review

2006-03-30 Thread Loathe
The color blind guy says the first one. -- Timothy Heald Analyst, Architect, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: 202-228-8372 C: 703-300-3911 -Original Message- From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:20 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Site Review

RE: Site Review

2006-03-30 Thread Loathe
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:20 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Site Review Sorry actual links: http://www.wilkinsonplastering.com (first one) http://www.wilkinsonplastering.com/test/index.htm http://www.wilkinsonplastering.comm/test/index.html -Original Message- From: Adkins,

Re: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Tony
4:50 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Site Review > > I like the first one best. > > Are you 'mindkeeper'? If so --a while back I bought your file manager for a > client and customized it for their Intranet. What a great product!! Well > done! > > >S

RE: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Ian Skinner
Actually is it all CSS. No TABLEs, TD, or such. -Original Message- From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:56 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Site Review I must admit when I took a peek at the code, I was a bit surprised at the amount of HTML

RE: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Coldfusion
Actually is it all CSS. No TABLEs, TD, or such. -Original Message- From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:56 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Site Review I must admit when I took a peek at the code, I was a bit surprised at the amount of HTML used

RE: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Coldfusion
Thank you very much. Yes. Mindkeeper is mine. I do greatly appreciate the comments. -Original Message- From: Jillian Koskie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:50 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Site Review I like the first one best. Are you 'mindkeeper&

RE: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Ian Skinner
I must admit when I took a peek at the code, I was a bit surprised at the amount of HTML used to create the page! -- Ian Skinner Web Programmer BloodSource www.BloodSource.org Sacramento, CA - | 1 | | - Binary Soduko | | | - "C code. C code run. Run

Re: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
x.html > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:15 PM > >To: CF-Community > >Subject: Site Review > > > >ok now it is my turn to toss something out: > > > >Here is

Re: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Jillian Koskie
ilkinsonplastering.com/test/index.htm > >http://www.wilkinsonplastering.comm/test/index.html > >-Original Message- >From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:15 PM >To: CF-Community >Subject: Site Review > >ok now it is my

Re: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Jerry Johnson
rom: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:15 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Site Review > > ok now it is my turn to toss something out: > > Here is a site I am working on and well I was told the first one was a > bit boring on the colors

RE: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Ian Skinner
Ok now that I have seen all three. (There is still a typo, an extra "m" in .comm in the third link) I would say I liked the addition of the contrasting color, and preferred the second one the most. The white background for the text just seemed cleaner. -- Ian Skinner Web Program

RE: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Ian Skinner
Only the first link worked for me. I'm not a color guy. They seem fine to me, if a bit monochrome. But I was a bit put off for some reason by the repeat links on the bottom that exactly mirrored the top menu. Since the top menu is not, at least currently, images. Nor does the page scroll sin

RE: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Adkins, Randy
-Community Subject: Site Review ok now it is my turn to toss something out: Here is a site I am working on and well I was told the first one was a bit boring on the colors and since the business is located in Florida, I need to use Sunny, beach, tropical type colors. Any suggestions? Here are three

RE: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Adkins, Randy
I am only seeking advice on the colors.. I know I will change the color of the text to flow, but looking at the other colors primarily. -Original Message- From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:15 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Site Review ok

Re: Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Jerry Johnson
The second and third link are bad for me (404 errors) On 3/29/06, Adkins, Randy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok now it is my turn to toss something out: > > Here is a site I am working on and well I was told the first > one was a bit boring on the colors and since the business is > located in Flor

Site Review

2006-03-29 Thread Adkins, Randy
ok now it is my turn to toss something out: Here is a site I am working on and well I was told the first one was a bit boring on the colors and since the business is located in Florida, I need to use Sunny, beach, tropical type colors. Any suggestions? Here are three color layouts, some have va

Re: Site Review

2005-11-01 Thread Maureen
I tried to send the screen shot to your [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it bounced. Email? On 11/1/05, Coldfusion Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Tony. This is my first site done using CSS. > There is only one section where I had problems using CSS > for tabulated data so I had to break down

RE: Site Review

2005-11-01 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > either way, dope site. esp. like the flash in the middle... > the green flash. I don't like the computer tower in the flash it looks out of place to me. ~| Find out how CFTicket

Re: Site Review

2005-11-01 Thread Tony
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:07 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Site Review > > > > I like the new one a lot. > > > > I love the hybrid flash-html, everything fits together very, very well. > > &

RE: Site Review

2005-11-01 Thread Coldfusion Developer
: Sunday, October 30, 2005 3:10 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Site Review yes, VERY nice site man. tony On 10/30/05, Coldfusion Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks to everyone for their comments!! > > > -Original Message- > From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: Site Review

2005-10-31 Thread Tony
yes, VERY nice site man. tony On 10/30/05, Coldfusion Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks to everyone for their comments!! > > > -Original Message- > From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:07 PM > To: CF-Community

RE: Site Review

2005-10-30 Thread Coldfusion Developer
Thanks to everyone for their comments!! -Original Message- From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:07 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Site Review I like the new one a lot. I love the hybrid flash-html, everything fits together very, very well. Cheers

Re: Site Review

2005-10-30 Thread Vivec
I like the new one a lot. I love the hybrid flash-html, everything fits together very, very well. Cheers! On 10/28/05, Coldfusion Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok since I sit back and only join in at times, hopefully > you can give me your opinion on this site. > > OLD SITE: > http://ww

Re: Site Review

2005-10-30 Thread Maureen
I like the design of the new site better, although the graphic takes up a lot of valuable real estate. Also, in Netspace, the three books at the bottom of the page (basic design, advanced design, e-commerce plan) overlap the previous paragraph and do not display entire content of the box. I have

Re: Site Review

2005-10-28 Thread Dana
er typo, I meant typo, honest... Dana On 10/28/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > only have time for a quick look, but yes, the new site is better. I like > the graphic (why green though) > A couple of nits I should probably pick, > You spell website and web site, you should probably

Re: Site Review

2005-10-28 Thread Dana
only have time for a quick look, but yes, the new site is better. I like the graphic (why green though) A couple of nits I should probably pick, You spell website and web site, you should probably pick one or the other Advantages in *Some advanatages of having a web site*: you also have this

  1   2   >