http://yfrog.com/h7iwzemj
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:34 AM, denstar wrote:
>
> LOL! Our President FREAKING ROCKS!
>
> I don't care if it is all a clever ploy. It's funny.
>
> And laughing, like farting, is good for the heart.
>
> :D
~
LOL! Our President FREAKING ROCKS!
I don't care if it is all a clever ploy. It's funny.
And laughing, like farting, is good for the heart.
:Den
--
I am no longer sure of anything. If I satiate my desires, I sin but I
deliver myself from them; if I refuse to satisfy them, they infect the
who
Loved OBama's skit at the Correspondent's dinner :-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9mzJhvC-8E&feature=player_embedded
And here is Seth Meyer's
http://youtu.be/f2TCAG5W_O8 Part 1
http://youtu.be/9mDfkVQYBYk Part 2
Funny stuff.
~
Sam wrote:
>
> The secrecy of not releasing the long form under the guise of it being
> a law despite the fact that it's long been ignored. The fact that they
> now have to deny everyone the ability to receive the long form to
> protect Obama.
Have you informed the Hawaiian officials who made th
That's very small of you but expected.
The secrecy of not releasing the long form under the guise of it being
a law despite the fact that it's long been ignored. The fact that they
now have to deny everyone the ability to receive the long form to
protect Obama. Why did he wait three years if he h
What secrecy? I suspect you're all about anything that denigrates
those you disagree with, even if you know it's not true.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> He was born in Hawaii
>
> I'm all about the secrecy.
>
> .
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> Just t
What secrecy?
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 07:48 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
He was born in Hawaii
I'm all about the secrecy.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Ma
He was born in Hawaii
I'm all about the secrecy.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, is it your opinion that Barack Obama was not born in
> Hawaii and that the birth certificate released by the White House is a
> forgery?
>
~~
Just to clarify, is it your opinion that Barack Obama was not born in
Hawaii and that the birth certificate released by the White House is a
forgery?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> One of those long-form documents was obtained from Hawaii as recently
> as March 15, 2011, by a H
precisely.
Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate.
On Apr 29, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> White guilt?
>
> .
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
>>
>> over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate
>> around black people to prove by some display
In May, 2001 we still had sodomy laws on the books that were long ignored.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292053
One of those long-form documents was obtained from Hawaii as recently
as March 15, 2011, by a Hawaii native who was willing to have a
redacted version revealed for this report. That was j
On 4/29/2011 3:15 PM, Sam wrote:
> I was correcting his statement you moron.
> It wasn't a longstanding law, it was a new law created less than two
> weeks ago to justify not releasing the long form.
May 15, 2001 is two weeks ago! That might explain a lot about this
conversation!!!
http://hawa
More like Gruss who thinks blacks are inferior but likes one black guy
because a professor he liked told him he would save the world.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Tony Weeg wrote:
>>
>> over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate
>> arou
White guilt?
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
>
> over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate around
> black people to prove by some display that they are "down", when all too
> often it's as hollow an attempt as they are at life.
>
> Sent from my
I was correcting his statement you moron.
It wasn't a longstanding law, it was a new law created less than two
weeks ago to justify not releasing the long form. Now the law is
moot.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> No they didn't.
>>
>> They made a new
em is down.
ice is whack.
trump is a joke.
Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate.
On Apr 29, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Tony Weeg wrote:
>>
>> over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate
>> around black people to prove by some display that they are "down
Tony Weeg wrote:
>
> over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate around
> black people to prove by some display that they are "down", when all too
> often it's as hollow an attempt as they are at life.
>
Like Donald Trump saying he's, "a good friend of the blacks" an
over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate around
black people to prove by some display that they are "down", when all too often
it's as hollow an attempt as they are at life.
Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate.
On Apr 29, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
Sam wrote:
>
> No they didn't.
>
> They made a new rule 11 days ago stating they would no longer have the
> long form available. I wonder why?
Because the State of Hawaii and every other state, city, county who
made any rule or procedure change regarding identity documentation in
last 2 weeks is
>
> > > I assume you have in mind political actions that have no other logical
> > > explanations besides religious favoritism?
> >
> > While his (failed) attempts at appeasement is directed towards those
> > of a certain religion and/or cultural background, I don't assume it's
> > tied to any act
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Michael Dinowitz <
mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
>
> > I assume you have in mind political actions that have no other logical
> > explanations besides religious favoritism?
>
> While his (failed) attempts at appeasement is directed towards those
> of a certai
> I assume you have in mind political actions that have no other logical
> explanations besides religious favoritism?
While his (failed) attempts at appeasement is directed towards those
of a certain religion and/or cultural background, I don't assume it's
tied to any actual belief or understandi
Pure coincidence.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:12 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Michael Dinowitz <
> mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I can but I'm going to avoid injecting his political actions via a
>> certain country into this discussion.
>>
>
> I assume y
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Michael Dinowitz <
mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
>
> I can but I'm going to avoid injecting his political actions via a
> certain country into this discussion.
>
I assume you have in mind political actions that have no other logical
explanations besides rel
I can but I'm going to avoid injecting his political actions via a
certain country into this discussion.
> Can you provide some examples of Obama showing religious favoritism? I
> honestly can't think of a single episode that would lead me to believe
> Obama favors Muslims over Christians or Jews
> They're white.
He's not white to certain groups of Whites, Blacks, Arabs, or
statisticians. To them he's a Jew (no matter his actual religious
affiliation).
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Ad
Funny...can't find a single reference to this on a site that isn't a right
wing nutjob site...so I calling bullsit on this...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of paper
No they didn't.
They made a new rule 11 days ago stating they would no longer have the
long form available. I wonder why?
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> No they didn't. Hawaii made an exception for Obama, as they said, to put to
> rest this crap as the constant re
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Obama seems to favor Muslims of Christian and definitely over Jews.
>
> Doesn't make him a secret Muslim, but makes one wonder why.
>
>
Can you provide some examples of Obama showing religious favoritism? I
honestly can't think of a single episode
Obama seems to favor Muslims of Christian and definitely over Jews.
Doesn't make him a secret Muslim, but makes one wonder why.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The criticism of Bush being an evangelical is because he implied a lot of
> policies that favored evangel
But only one state certified him. That means the DNC did not vet him at all.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The government vets candidates to ensure eligibility. Once he showed his
> birth certificate, it should have ended. 2 years later when he shows the
> long f
They're white. So call it reverse racism if you must.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Wanting to see Bush's military records when he did leave his NG Unit to work
> for one of his father's buddies campaign...yes, we have a right to know when
> he is claiming to be a
> If I point out the flaws in your position without questioning your
> right to have a position, I'm questioning your policies.
There is no question as to the right to a position. The question is
what the difference is between position and character is.
> If I call you a fool or question your bir
> From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:07 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Eric Roberts <
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Chris Stoner wrote:
>
> Never argue with bat-shit crazy.
>
>
It's fun to take them out and toy with them every now and again though.a
lark on a Friday afternoon :)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldf
Never argue with bat-shit crazy.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:09 PM, G Money wrote:
>
>
> Let me guess.RACISM!
>
> If "keeping my head in the sand" means I don't get to make baseless leaps
> that fly in the face of basic logical argument structure to further my
> ideological opinions.then
Please...
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:07 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
&
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> You just keep that head of your buried in the sand G. Why is it that none
> of this has ever come up before...not even with Clinton. But all of a
> sudden, we have a black president and the nutballs com
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> The point is that they were persecuted as being un-American and unpatriotic
> for criticizing Bush...something that Sam claimed was ok to do prior to
> Obama. What happened to them is exactly what Sam is
We should...it doesn't belong there
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:59 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Eric Roberts
]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:52 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> The criticism of Bush being an evangelical is because he implied a lot
> o
Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:40 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Remember what happened to the Dixie Chicks
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> The criticism of Bush being an evangelical is because he implied a lot of
> policies that favored evangelical Christianity. Obama, on the other hand
> isn't a Muslim...it has become a substitute for the
2011 08:54 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
He's the only one. Everyone else that asked for a copy got the long form.
Weird that huh?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> Funny thing is
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> The criticism of Bush being an evangelical is because he implied a lot of
> policies that favored evangelical Christianity. Obama, on the other hand
> isn't a Muslim...it has become a substitute for the
April 29, 2011 07:46 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> If I label you a secret Muslim who has no right to an opinion on
> American policy and is trying to destroy this country. then that woul
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 07:43 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
You assume asking to prove his eligibility is racist.
I'm thinking qualifying for a job is the first most important step.
.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ma
t: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> They aren't criticizing the President's policy. They are smearing his
> character, and denying his citizenship and religion.
I see, so you changed the scope to include
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Remember what happened to the Dixie Chicks?
>
Nothing "happened" to the DC's...they did it to themselves. If you are a
singer, and you choose to make politics part of your shtick, then you have
to be w
Once he posted his birth certificate 2 years ago, they crossed that line...
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:40 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
Where'
Under Bush if you did you were unpatriotic and un-American...so that is a
bunch of bullshit. Remember what happened to the Dixie Chicks?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Sam wrote:
> Um, criticizing the President's policy was always acceptable and
> expected until Obama became president. Now
"the problem with america is the black people are immediately pulling the
race
card with ANYTHING obama. once the race card is pulled, my ears close
down."
Amen. It's the boy who cried wolf syndrome. If it ever does happen, will
anyone actually notice.
"If you say anything about 'redistribu
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> We don't let labels bother us. How do you sleep knowing all those
> labeled people are out there?
>
I lock my doors.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amaz
He's the only one. Everyone else that asked for a copy got the long form.
Weird that huh?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> Funny thing is this isn't even a real copy, it's got seven layers. But
>> if they ask to see the real one we start all over.
>> Nob
Sam wrote:
>
> Funny thing is this isn't even a real copy, it's got seven layers. But
> if they ask to see the real one we start all over.
> Nobody will have the guts to be branded a racist again by asking for proof.
>
Good, because that's exactly what this is. It's a shameless
humiliation mean
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:04 AM, G Money wrote:
>
>> Not at all, just pointing out the silliness of labeling it racist.
>>
>
> I agree, it's not racist, it's partisan politicsbut in this day and age,
> i'm not sure the latter is much different than the former.
> The fact that Obama is perce
OK, I just watched it. Why why why.
What an idiot.
Did someone slam Obama against a wall and beat him? Or did they just
think it odd that for the first time in history only
one state certified that he's qualified to be president?
The first time a president was asked for papers? Every president
pr
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Not at all, just pointing out the silliness of labeling it racist.
>
I agree, it's not racist, it's partisan politicsbut in this day and age,
i'm not sure the latter is much different than the former.
The fact that Obama is perceived as a lib
The focus of the original post was specifically on proving
eligibility,the BIrthers who said he was not a citizen and therefore
should not have been in the Whitehouse, and most recently DOnald
Trumps latest assertions which were grabbing so much airtime.
Obama provided ALL LEGALLY REQUIRED DOCUME
Not at all, just pointing out the silliness of labeling it racist.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:49 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Sam wrote:
>
>> Didn't so many people say that about Bush substituting Muslim with
>> Evangelical?
>>
>
> Are you suggesting that makes it r
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Sam wrote:
> Didn't so many people say that about Bush substituting Muslim with
> Evangelical?
>
Are you suggesting that makes it right? Because they did it too?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> If I label you a secret Muslim who has no right to an opinion on
> American policy and is trying to destroy this country. then that would
> be racist.
Didn't so many people say that about Bush substituting Muslim with Evangelical?
.
~
You assume asking to prove his eligibility is racist.
I'm thinking qualifying for a job is the first most important step.
.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> You assume much about why they support him. Perhaps they support him
> because they actually agree with his policies,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> They aren't criticizing the President's policy. They are smearing his
> character, and denying his citizenship and religion.
I see, so you changed the scope to include only those that question
his natural born status.
What about the folks that
If I point out the flaws in your position without questioning your
right to have a position, I'm questioning your policies.
If I call you a fool or question your birth status because I disagree
with your position, I'm attacking your character.
If I label you a secret Muslim who has no right to a
Where's the line between policy and character? If he's a fool on a matter of
diplomacy, which is it?
They aren't criticizing the President's policy. They are smearing his
> character, and denying his citizenship and religion.
>
~~
You assume much about why they support him. Perhaps they support him
because they actually agree with his policies, or perhaps only because
they so strongly disagreed with his predecessor.
That being said, I will agree with you that IF the only reason they
support him is because is he black (or
They aren't criticizing the President's policy. They are smearing his
character, and denying his citizenship and religion.
Once again, you are ignoring what I said and substituting your spin
and rhetoric.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Maureen
EGGFUCKINGZACKLY!
and what's even crazier, to me of course, is that the most highly uninformed
friends of mine who are otherwise intelligent black people, but have
ZERO clue on his
policies, blindly support him. and i see this with people i do not know, but do
the same thing.
when these people
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
>
>> I love Obama, what's that make me?
> Gay?
>
Actually I'm super disappointed with Obama. I was just giving Sam a
freebie. I figured I owed it to him after he took a second shot at
the Exxon thing.
LOL
up vote.
like
.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
>> I love Obama, what's that make me?
> Gay?
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430
> I love Obama, what's that make me?
Gay?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/m
He's light skinned. Would you have loved his daddy?
.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> Yet you still think people that don't love Obama are racists.
>>
>
> I love Obama, what's that make me?
>
~
Sam wrote:
>
> Yet you still think people that don't love Obama are racists.
>
I love Obama, what's that make me?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> This is actually NOT what is happening. What happens is that any time
> a legitimate case of racism is pointed out, the person doing the
> pointing is accused of "playing the race card". It's a convenient
> attempt to shut down opposition, muc
$8,675,309
Let's talk
.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> It's all smoke and mirrors to get you to not look at the real economic
>> numbers.
>>
>
> Post those "real economic numbers" for us.
>
AP says the funniest things.
.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I certainly don't know anyone who has money burning holes in their
> pockets...either literally or figuaratively...
>
~|
Order the Adobe C
Nice post but I don't think globalization is doing as much damage as
the policy is.
The jobs lost can be easily replaced with new ones if the environment
welcomes it.
.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> Of course he's a Democrat. He'll never survive Iowa. I wonder if he
>
Progressives say the funniest things
:p
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> It doesn't matter if he is a democrat or a republican...he is an idiot.
> Unlike you guys, we don't march lockstep with the party line...
>
This is actually NOT what is happening. What happens is that any time
a legitimate case of racism is pointed out, the person doing the
pointing is accused of "playing the race card". It's a convenient
attempt to shut down opposition, much the same as labeling anyone who
points out a conspiracy i
Wait... Sam is black? But he loves Rush Limbaugh.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
> >
> > 1) One German (Mexican) named Gruss Gott
>
> I didn't say *everyone* of your race was genetically inferior, Sam, just
> you.
>
> But I'm also leaving room open for nurtu
Robert Munn wrote:
>
> That's why it's ultimately going to fail.
>
>
Uh huh. Things that are unsustainable cannot be sustained.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1
Sam wrote:
>
> It's all smoke and mirrors to get you to not look at the real economic
> numbers.
>
Post those "real economic numbers" for us.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-
Of course he's a Democrat. He'll never survive Iowa. I wonder if he
thinks he can actually win the nomination or if he has his same old
agenda - self-promotion.
Spending is not the issue, it is a symptom of a much larger, global
problem that is now the elephant in the room in US political
discour
I certainly don't know anyone who has money burning holes in their
pockets...either literally or figuaratively...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 03:48 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was R
showing of papers by Obama was Racist
You do realize Trump is a Democrat?
The issue is the spending and everyone want's to pretend it's something
else.
It's all smoke and mirrors to get you to not look at the real economic
numbers.
.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Robert Munn wro
If you say anything about "redistribution of wealth" you'll get called
a socialist, communist and fascist, fyi.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> FYI, this is why the Republicans are in big trouble next year:
>
> http://money.cnn.com/2011/04/27/news/companies/walmart_ceo_co
An just yesterday the AP put out a story about how well the economy
has recovered and money is just burning holes in peoples pockets so
they need to spend like it's four years ago.
Or something like that.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> FYI, this is why the Republicans
FYI, this is why the Republicans are in big trouble next year:
http://money.cnn.com/2011/04/27/news/companies/walmart_ceo_consumers_under_pressure/index.htm
Walmart says their customers are running out of money sooner in the
month. If the economy goes south this year because of inflation,
Walmar
You do realize Trump is a Democrat?
The issue is the spending and everyone want's to pretend it's something else.
It's all smoke and mirrors to get you to not look at the real economic numbers.
.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> The fact that the Republicans can't find
To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
>
>
> I've got a reference to a friar (no pun intended) in the 1500's using the
> term "long pig".
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
>
>>
>&g
That is if he could remember where he was...or who he was for that matter
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 03:25 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
The fact that the
The fact that the Republicans can't find anything better to latch onto
shows just how weak their 2012 candidates are. Let's face it, if it
was Ronald Reagan on stage, he would be talking about what we're going
to do moving forward, not about this idiotic records issue.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:4
Is that a whole friar?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 02:51 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
I've got a reference to a friar (no pun intended) in the 1
I've got a reference to a friar (no pun intended) in the 1500's using the
term "long pig".
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
>
> On 4/28/2011 11:56 AM, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> > For those more anthropological in mindset, longpork was the term used for
> > white missionaries
On 4/28/2011 11:56 AM, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> For those more anthropological in mindset, longpork was the term used for
> white missionaries who were eaten by cannibals a few centuries ago.
I don't know which came first, but I have also heard the long pork
euphemism in documentaries about sai
hahaha
I am going to find a way to work that into one of my anthropological
fieldwork papers this summer.
> For those more anthropological in mindset, longpork was the term used for
> white missionaries who were eaten by cannibals a few centuries ago. Yes,
> they were the other white meat.
~~~
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> "Are you saying that people are not tasty animals? Long pork, anyone?"
>
> depends on your perspective (and no I don't want to know how long your
> pork is) :)
>
Only my wife and tailor know for sure. ;)
For those more anthropological in
"Are you saying that people are not tasty animals? Long pork, anyone?"
depends on your perspective (and no I don't want to know how long your
pork is) :)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
>>
>> " Hm. I know I'm a racist as I hold humans over animals (and pita
>> members
>
> " Hm. I know I'm a racist as I hold humans over animals (and pita
> members)."
> No that would make you a Specieist, and it's PETA as in People Eating
> Tasty Animals
>
Are you saying that people are not tasty animals? Long pork, anyone?
>
> "Well, except for that Plato thing but he's dead s
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
