On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Partly to blame are the the difficulties adopting in our country. It is a
> shame that it is easier and cheaper to adopt a child from China or Africa
> than it is in your own country.
We have lost our collective minds
~~~
"One of the documentaries I am working on is about children who die in
foster care. Horror stories in almost every state. Some days after I edit
the footage, I cry from the sheer inhumanity of some of these so called
foster parents - who starve, burn, beat and neglect the children placed in
thei
> or that kids are obese because of the crap foods they eat, and they
> eat those crap foods because that is what food corporations tell them
> to eat and tell their parents to buy for their kids with endless
> advertising on television. thirty years ago this problem did not
> exist, it was create
Found it, it's called Asian Flush:
http://www.wisegeek.com/do-people-of-asian-descent-have-difficulty-metabolizing-alcohol.htm
Applies to saki too.
.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> Ding.
> And saki can be potent stuff...
> On Jul 14, 2011 6:09 PM, "Maureen" wrot
Flushing is usually caused by a burst of insulin being released into
the system when the alcohol hits the blood stream.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I don't think there is an increased allergy to alcohol amongst Asians.
> Perhaps you're thinking of the skin flushing?
I don't think there is an increased allergy to alcohol amongst Asians.
Perhaps you're thinking of the skin flushing? That is due to a
deficiency in an enzyme but as far as I'm aware, I don't think it is
indicative of any other real issues with alcohol, it just happens to
flush their skin.
On Thu,
Ding.
And saki can be potent stuff...
On Jul 14, 2011 6:09 PM, "Maureen" wrote:
>
> Probably an allergy to grain alcohol, as they seem to tolerate rice
> based products with no problems. Lots of people can't handle grains
> and hops.
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>>
Probably an allergy to grain alcohol, as they seem to tolerate rice
based products with no problems. Lots of people can't handle grains
and hops.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> I don't know, that's a great question for a proper scientist to
> investigate. If you think a
I don't know, that's a great question for a proper scientist to
investigate. If you think about the path of human migration out of
Africa into the Middle East, then India, north into Central Asia and
west into East Asia, and from Central Asia to Europe across the bitter
cold forests of Siberia and
sick. society.
our civilization is collapsing before our eyes.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> One of the documentaries I am working on is about children who die in
> foster care. Horror stories in almost every state. Some days after I
> edit the footage, I cry from the sh
One of the documentaries I am working on is about children who die in
foster care. Horror stories in almost every state. Some days after I
edit the footage, I cry from the sheer inhumanity of some of these so
called foster parents - who starve, burn, beat and neglect the
children placed in their
I read way back that something like 40 - 50% of Asians are allergic to
alcohol. Is that because their ancestors didn't build up a tolerance
or is that why they didn't?
.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> Wow, can't make this stuff up:
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Sam wrote:
> I bought a yogurt the other day that said no added sugar. It tasted
> like shit so I read the label and it was loaded with artificial
> sweetener. :\
>
>
I eat junk food or anything thrown at me, and I weigh about 165lb. Sitting
here working on my co
I bought a yogurt the other day that said no added sugar. It tasted
like shit so I read the label and it was loaded with artificial
sweetener. :\
.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:44 PM, G Money wrote:
>
>> Deliberate attempts to engineer to
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:03 PM, G Money wrote:
> We are getting way off track here.
>
> Attempt to refocus:
> - Article said SF is going to ban happy meals
> - You say good, they've been lying and cheating and drugging us to make us
> fat
> - I say that seems more the fault of the parents
> - No
Wow, can't make this stuff up:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8638241/Westerners-programmed-to-eat-junk-food.html
I always knew there was a reason I liked beer and nachos. Makes
perfect sense, doesn't it? I have always assumed that something like
this was the case, and I assume tha
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:44 PM, G Money wrote:
> Deliberate attempts to engineer toxic substances into the product? This is
> news to me. What are you talking about here?
>
It's miss conceptions all over the place. As an example, diet soda is
seriously bad for you.
Aspartame, (half of which
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> They put toxins in the plants via genetic engineering. Helps the
> plants fight disease and predators. What they don't tell you is that
> the toxins affect you, too. They might claim that whatever the toxin
> is doesn't affect humans. That
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
>>
>> When there is specific evidence of lying, hiding the truth, deliberate
>> attempts to engineer toxic substances into the product...yeah, that's
>> culpability.
>
>
> Deliberate atte
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> When there is specific evidence of lying, hiding the truth, deliberate
> attempts to engineer toxic substances into the product...yeah, that's
> culpability.
Deliberate attempts to engineer toxic substances into the product? This is
new
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:55 AM, G Money wrote:
> So?
>
> There are millions of people/companies etc. out there who are creating and
> pushing things that are bad for you, me and our children. Micky D's shows
> you the fat and calorie content of all their food. Everything's out in the
> open for
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> We could go for billboards and a campaign of shame instead...
>
> http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20059263-10391704.html
>
>
Mehif the kid and his parents don't mind the shame, go for it.
It's better than telling fattie he
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Gotta half disagree with you there, G. I do agree that there is a
> pussification of the American parent but it is without a doubt also
> the fault of food corporations and their lapdogs at the FDA and Ag
> departement. They've conspired
We could go for billboards and a campaign of shame instead...
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20059263-10391704.html
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anth
"or that kids are obese because of the crap foods they eat, and they eat
those crap foods because that is what food corporations tell them to eat and
tell their parents to buy for their kids with endless advertising on
television. thirty years ago this problem did not exist, it was created by
the
mes into play is one incident 10 years ago in New
>> Mexico.
>>
>> I agree that the guy at Harvard is a jerk and he's wrong. It has
>> little or nothing to do with "govt could be coming for your kids"
>> though.
>>
>> Judah
>>
>> O
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:38 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> This is NOT the fault of food corporations or any of that crap...this is a
> result of the pussification of the American parent.
Gotta half disagree with you there, G. I do agree that there is a
pussification of the American parent but it is w
ico.
>
> I agree that the guy at Harvard is a jerk and he's wrong. It has
> little or nothing to do with "govt could be coming for your kids"
> though.
>
> Judah
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
> >
> >
> http://abcnews
"This is NOT the fault of food corporations or any of that crap...this is a
result of the pussification of the American parent."
Don't worry. Various governments are stepping in to protect parents from
themselves.
San Francisco bans Happy Meals:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/nov/02/business/
f them disagree with the jerk at Harvard. The only place
"government" comes into play is one incident 10 years ago in New
Mexico.
I agree that the guy at Harvard is a jerk and he's wrong. It has
little or nothing to do with "govt could be coming for your kids"
though.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> or that kids are obese because of the crap foods they eat, and they
> eat those crap foods because that is what food corporations tell them
> to eat and tell their parents to buy for their kids with endless
> advertising on television. thir
or that kids are obese because of the crap foods they eat, and they
eat those crap foods because that is what food corporations tell them
to eat and tell their parents to buy for their kids with endless
advertising on television. thirty years ago this problem did not
exist, it was created by the f
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> I guess the "expert" forgot about the genetic component that is
> present in some obesity cases
This country needs some genetic diversity STAT!
-Cameron
...
~|
Order t
I guess the "expert" forgot about the genetic component that is
present in some obesity cases
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/Health/childhood-obesity-call-parents-lose-custody/story?id=14068280
>
> What a turd this guy is. Anyone who knows anything
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/childhood-obesity-call-parents-lose-custody/story?id=14068280
What a turd this guy is. Anyone who knows anything about foster care
knows that taking children from their parents should be the absolute
last resort, not a remedy for weight gain. Bureaucrats at CPS in
Hou
35 matches
Mail list logo
