Flash has always required some effort to implement, how exactly will
adding a step to the embedding process affect their market position? Do
you really think people will chose another format than Flash because
they have to spend an extra 5 minutes to embed the movie? What's the
alternative
Wouldn't removing the Flash and remaking the feature in HTML or
_javascript_ or something else actually take MORE time than patching the
object tag to work with their already functional Flash? I would
imagine that the number of lazy folks out there who would stop using a
technology rather than
Hi all,
A while back I asked the list as to why a job would run on the wrong date.
I tried all the suggestions, but nothing worked.
So, I put an end date of Oct 2, 2003 on the original job and created a whole
new one.Today the job with the end date ran today!Is there some kind of
error in MX
Hi,
Is it possible to change the look of a dropdown selection? I want to get rid of the shaded outline. Can it be down with CSS?
If so, what are the style changes?
select name=dd style=
option..
option..
option..
option..
/select
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast
Start here...
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/dreamweaver/articles/css_forms.html
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/dreamweaver/articles/css_forms.html
-Original Message-
From: Bushy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 8:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT:
I know I can swap out which Java to use, but is it better to use the latest version (for speed's sake not so much compatibility) as opposed to the version that comes with CFMX. Just curious if I can get a little more juice out of CFMX.
Bob Everland
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
Thanks.
I've been messing with the CSS using TopStyle. I just can't seem to get the bevel look of the select dropdown to just a solid black line.
I have no problem with my input box. Just can't get the select
Can it be modified?
--Original Message Text---
From: Tangorre, Michael
Date: Fri, 24
Thanks.
I've been messing with the CSS using TopStyle. I just can't seem to get the bevel look of the select dropdown to just a solid black line.
I have no problem with my input box. Just can't get the select
Can it be modified?
--Original Message Text---
From: Tangorre, Michael
Date: Fri, 24
the custom tag is included in the application.cfm of every secure section.
I also added a cfmail to the custom tag to be sure that the section is
running.
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE:
Wouldn't removing the Flash and remaking the feature in HTML or
_javascript_ or something else actually take MORE time than patching the
object tag to work with their already functional Flash? I would
imagine that the number of lazy folks out there who would stop using a
technology rather
that's cause select's arent the same as the other form elements.they are
controlled by windows, not css when it come to the structure of them.now,
you can edit font properties, but that's about all ive been able to figure
out how to modify.
...tony
tony weeg
senior web applications architect
Well...that sucks.
Thanks
--Original Message Text---
From: Tony Weeg
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:55:36 -0400
that's cause select's arent the same as the other form elements.they are
controlled by windows, not css when it come to the structure of them.now,
you can edit font properties, but that's
Select.className{
font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12px;
color : #00;
font-weight: normal;
background: #FF;
scrollbar-base-color:White;
scrollbar-face-color:577C9E;
scrollbar-shadow-color:#E5DFBF;
scrollbar-highlight-color:#E5DFBF;
BUT NOT THE BORDER, like he was originally asking :)
...tony
tony weeg
senior web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
www.navtrak.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
I hear ya! I was just pointing out that your comment about only accessing
font properties was not correct. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: select dropdown
BUT NOT THE BORDER, like he was
Does anyone know of any programs that can run in Unix and will convert a
PDF into a text file?You can do this through the Adobe PDF program and
I found some windows based programs that look like they do this as
well.So far, I haven't seen any non-GUI programs that will do this.
Thanks in
On Friday 24 Oct 2003 14:41 pm, Steve Robison, Jr. wrote:
Does anyone know of any programs that can run in Unix and will convert a
PDF into a text file?
pdf2ps | ps2ascii
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BlueFinger Limited
If you listen carefully, you can hear the sound of my hand slapping my
head.I sound like a Merril Lynch analyst.
- Jim
Ryan Roskilly wrote:
Net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2003 were $89.9
million, compared with net revenues of $85.9 million reported in the
comparable
I didn't suggest it had anything to do with Laziness. Again, there are
sites that currently make use of Flash, but not _javascript_. If they are
required to start using _javascript_ they well decide not to use Flash.
Remember that just because using _javascript_ is no big deal to you
doesn't
IMHO, it still doesn't preclude.
Flash isn't really accessible (unless you are running Windows, and
Window-Eyes and still things are totally accessible).
So if _javascript_ is turned off, Flash isn't running anyways and the
alternative comes up.
script src="">
noscript Call a meta refresh or
Ok, lets get anal. Is there anyway you can send me your Application.cfm
and your login custom tag? It's probably a bit much to post here I'm
assuming. I'll take a look and post any thoughts here.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Not to sound like I am plugging for Statistex, I am not, but it was created for handling Dynamic URLS and at $60 it is a good product.
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Web Reports
Dynamic
Yeah after viewing Statistex's evaluation version within
a shared hosting environment, looks like I will purchase
that one to use on my personal site as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/24/03 10:07AM
Not to sound like I am plugging for Statistex, I am not, but it was
created for handling Dynamic URLS
The evaluation pales compared to the full version. Easy to install and easier to use.
-Original Message-
From: Randell B Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Web Reports
Yeah after viewing Statistex's evaluation version within
a
So are you saying the full version is easier to use than the eval
version?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/24/03 10:25AM
The evaluation pales compared to the full version. Easy to install and
easier to use.
-Original Message-
From: Randell B Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October
I came across www.funnelwebcentral.com from a very similar thread on
here literally just last week.
Its free and handles query_strings.
Its a bit quirky in places, but it outputs great reports
Stephen
Eric Creese wrote:
The evaluation pales compared to the full version. Easy to install and
Just as easy, the eval does not let you configure and use the full functionality.I am trying to get them to use it at the non-profit I work instead of WEBTRENDS. But I use it for my side web biz now. Clients like it as well.
-Original Message-
From: Randell B Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL
Try the Statistex if you have not already. I think you will like it.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Moretti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Web Reports
I came across www.funnelwebcentral.com from a very similar thread on
here
I'm researching stats programs for a client and his log files are HUGE.
They have had about 5 million so far this month. I'm having trouble
finding a stats package that can handle them
-Original Message-
From: Eric Creese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:41 AM
On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 09:53 AM, Kevin Graeme wrote:
An example of this is any site that wants to be accessible following
WAI
guidelines. According to the Web Content Accessiblity Guidelines, a
site
must still function with _javascript_ turned off at the browser.
Keep in mind
You also might want to check out www.indextools.com
I use them because of the of the individual user path information and sales
conversion tracking for products.Plus the it's not based on searching Log
files so it much more accurate in determining the correct number of
visitors, page viewsetc.It
I still think Eolas is an ass.
Adam Wayne Lehman
Web Systems Developer
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 8:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:
On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 01:04 AM, Matt Liotta wrote:
I have an article that will be published by DevX real soon now that
IMHO provides a much better solution than what is currently provided at
DevNet.
Since I haven't seen this particular solution, I cannot comment on it
directly,
I'm working on a part of an application where I need to create a temporary Excel file and e-mail it to a specific user.
I've got that working, but since these are temporary files, I obviously don't want them cluttering up the server and taking up space.I thought I could just delete the file after
Good point.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 8:57 AM
Subject: RE: Macromedia sinks on sales news
IMHO, it still doesn't preclude.
Flash isn't really accessible (unless you are running
spoolenable = no
:) that is if u are using cfmx?
...tony
tony weeg
senior web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
www.navtrak.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337
-Original Message-
From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
that is, use it in the cfmail tag as an attribute.
...tony
tony weeg
senior web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
www.navtrak.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
You could always run a delete script to delete all temp files older than
say, 1 hour, every time you create a new email, should do the trick with
only a little extra load.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2003 16:06
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
no need.
spoolenable = no does the trick
...tony
tony weeg
senior web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
www.navtrak.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337
-Original Message-
From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE:
Original Message:
From: Tony Weeg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spoolenable = no
Well, that was nice and easy. Thanks!
(I just had this computer re-imaged and haven't put the CFMX-specific help/VTML files into CF Studio yet, so I didn't even think to look for new attributes from CFMX.)
Scott
If you turn off the mail spooler in the CF admin it'll work fine...if ur
doing very high volume mailings (like 1000's per hour)then you may
have to look at deleting them every so often.
Stace
_
From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 24, 2003 11:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
Matt,
When will the article appear?I am interested in seeing all the other
solutions that are available for use.
Thanks
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Macromedia sinks on sales news
On Friday 24 Oct 2003 16:28 pm, Ciliotta, Mario wrote:
When will the article appear?I am interested in seeing all the other
solutions that are available for use.
Why ?
Macromedia/MS have said this is the way it will work - you can bet that
shortly when you drop Flash into Dreamweaver, it will
I still think Eolas is an ass.
This is now off topic, but I find it interesting that people consider
Eolas to some how be evil when every other software company has patents
they enforce too. What specifically is your problem with Eolas? They
have offered to license their patent to Microsoft,
I have a meeting at Microsoft's PDC on Monday that will determine the
publish date, so I won't know till then.
Matt Liotta
President CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
(888) 408-0900 x901
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User
Thomas Chiverton wrote:
On Friday 24 Oct 2003 16:28 pm, Ciliotta, Mario wrote:
When will the article appear?I am interested in seeing all the other
solutions that are available for use.
Why ?
Macromedia/MS have said this is the way it will work - you can bet that
shortly when you drop
I think the problem is that we have all gone down a road, so far so long,
and now they have dipped their finger in a still pool, one that we all loved
to swim in, cause we thought we were swimming the right way, now we have to
switch gears and adapt practices and methods that have been ingrained
Why ?
Macromedia/MS have said this is the way it will work - you can bet that
shortly when you drop Flash into Dreamweaver, it will use this style
of code.
What's the point of going off doing you're own think, with no gurantee
it'll
(continue) to work ? I may not trust MS, but I do trust
hahahahahahahahahaaa... like the analogy!
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2003 16:42
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT (was Re: Macromedia sinks on sales news)
I think the problem is that we have all gone down a road, so far
so long,
and
On Friday 24 Oct 2003 16:41 pm, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Some of us need solutions that are XHTML compliant.
Does XHTML not allow _javascript_ tags or something ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BlueFinger Limited
Underwood
On Friday 24 Oct 2003 16:38 pm, Matt Liotta wrote:
certainly playing fair.
If they were only concerned with their IP rights, they'd have sued years ago,
and would currently be sueing more than just Microsoft.
As it is, it looks to me like a money grab.
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion
Thomas Chiverton wrote:
On Friday 24 Oct 2003 16:41 pm, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Some of us need solutions that are XHTML compliant.
Does XHTML not allow _javascript_ tags or something ?
It does not allow solutions that use embed.
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
On Friday 24 Oct 2003 16:42 pm, Matt Liotta wrote:
While that is certainly one perspective, I find it perplexing. Why
would you assume that another solution would not be of interest?
I haven't yet seen any other method that has the blessing of the people
rewriting the effected web browser,
what an analogy... it is Friday. You win best email of the day.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT (was Re: Macromedia sinks on sales news)
I think the problem is that we have all gone down a
If they were only concerned with their IP rights, they'd have sued
years ago,
and would currently be sueing more than just Microsoft.
As it is, it looks to me like a money grab.
Which is just plain good business currently. If you don't like it, talk
to your representative about changing the
It does not allow solutions that use embed.
I also believe HTML 4 (XHTML transitional) has deprecated embed.
Matt Liotta
President CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
(888) 408-0900 x901
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User
Matt Liotta wrote:
It does not allow solutions that use embed.
I also believe HTML 4 (XHTML transitional) has deprecated embed.
Correct. And even before the active content changes were required
this was a problem for those of us who have clients that demand
standard compliance.
Jochem
I'm more than a little worried about this change.My livelihood comes
from developing and delivering flash-based newsletters and promotions in
e-mail.When this change goes into effect, we're either out of business
or facing the loss of our primary product.
I've seen no workarounds that will allow
Matt,
If he was suing Netscape Apple I'd think differently. However he's
only targeting MS.
Adam Wayne Lehman
Web Systems Developer
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Jeff Beer wrote:
I'm more than a little worried about this change.My livelihood comes
from developing and delivering flash-based newsletters and promotions in
e-mail.When this change goes into effect, we're either out of business
or facing the loss of our primary product.
I've seen no
Why would you not be able to use the workaround already put forward?I haven't paid a huge amount of attention as it doesn't effect any of my past of near future work.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Beer
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:03 AM
Subject: Eolas patent
I've seen no workarounds that will allow us to embed flash
in an HTML e-mail message - scripting is out. This is a
huge bummer.
Why would you not be able to use the workaround already put
forward?I haven't paid a huge amount of attention as it
doesn't effect any of my past of near
This is now off topic, but I find it interesting that people
consider Eolas to some how be evil when every other software
company has patents they enforce too. What specifically is
your problem with Eolas?
Common business practices are often considered unethical (especially by
people who
If he was suing Netscape Apple I'd think differently. However he's
only targeting MS.
It is standard practice to sue the big fish first before suing any
other infringers. Again, Eolas is currently playing fair. Whether or
not we like, they did get the patent and are allowed to enforce it.
_javascript_ is NOT the only way you can embed content, in fact, it's
probably the most convoluted way. In the time it takes you to write the
_javascript_ you could run your URL through a Base64 converter and
slightly modify your object call to use Base64 encoded data and be
done with it. It still
Ding, ding, ding! There's the correct answer!
If this was about protecting intellectual property all of the browser
vendors would be in the same boat, however they're not. Microsoft was
targeted because they have the deepest pockets and the lion's share of
the browser market.
I personally
Joshua Miller wrote:
_javascript_ is NOT the only way you can embed content, in fact, it's
probably the most convoluted way. In the time it takes you to write the
_javascript_ you could run your URL through a Base64 converter and
slightly modify your object call to use Base64 encoded data and
Joshua Miller wrote:
If this was about protecting intellectual property all of the browser
vendors would be in the same boat, however they're not.
It is not and it was never about protecting intellectual
property. It is about the exploitation of intellectual property
to earn money.
Common business practices are often considered unethical (especially by
people who don't benefit from those practices); what people are
allowed to
do by law is not necessarily the same as what they should do.
While that may be true, it would seem to me then that it is actually
the law that
I would imagine that Macromedia probably will consider this option, but
in the short-run they're putting together a fix for what currently
exists.
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 12:37, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Joshua Miller wrote:
_javascript_ is NOT the only way you can embed content, in fact, it's
If this was about protecting intellectual property all of the browser
vendors would be in the same boat, however they're not. Microsoft was
targeted because they have the deepest pockets and the lion's share of
the browser market.
Again, Eolas is following the standard patent litigation
You are correct. But Flash movies still require embed tags to
work properly. If that is a no-go, you can't use Flash until
Macromedia comes up with a Flash Player that can be invoked in an
XHTML compliant way. I was hoping that Macromedia would come with
a solution that solved both the Active
_javascript_ is NOT the only way you can embed content, in fact, it's
probably the most convoluted way. In the time it takes you to write the
_javascript_ you could run your URL through a Base64 converter and
slightly modify your object call to use Base64 encoded data and be
done with it. It
Hi All,
Sorry for the repost... but I can't believe that nobody out there has
any info...
Does anyone here have any experience with CFMX6.1 and clustering? I'm
looking to load balance two T1 connections across 2-4 CFMX boxes. But
before I go and recommend to my clients that this is the way
Matt Liotta wrote:
You are correct. But Flash movies still require embed tags to
work properly. If that is a no-go, you can't use Flash until
Macromedia comes up with a Flash Player that can be invoked in an
XHTML compliant way. I was hoping that Macromedia would come with
a solution that solved
Dave Watts wrote:
Common business practices are often considered unethical (especially by
people who don't benefit from those practices); what people are allowed to
do by law is not necessarily the same as what they should do.
Eolas doesn't actually produce anything. To the best of my
If you use one object tag that is compatible with most browsers, it will
disable the automatic updating of the Flash Player in IE.If you use
nested object tags, IE will show two copies of the Flash movie.
Matt Liotta wrote:
You are correct. But Flash movies still require embed tags to
I have been down this road before and believe me I am still lost in the
woods.
Here is some links I have found; maybe one of them will help you decide.
http://activestat.softerra.com/
http://awstats.sourceforge.net/
http://cpcecomm.com/
http://know-it.com/webtrak.htm
I just set up a clustered arrangement, but I'm on Linux, so I won't be of
much assistance.We didn't cluster the CF servers directly, but rather just
used a load balancer (actually a pair) in front to delegate each request to
one of the CF servers.I'm not sure what clustering the CF servers
Dave is correct - scripting is out for e-mail messages - way too many
variables to test for and manage, assuming you can even test. We've
developed a way to allow the code to 'gracefully degrade' from fully
scripted embedding of the OBJECT tag, to showing a standard jpg image,
that works on almost
Barney,
So did you purchase an piece of NLB hardware to run in front of your
boxes or are you using a Linux box to do that?Perhaps you could share
with all of us a few more details of your setup?
All I'm really after is the ability to set up four boxes... all running
the exact same thing...
Generally speaking, the newer versions of sun's java are better than the
older versions. CFMX 6.0 comes with version 1.3.1, and CFMX 6.1 comes with
version 1.4.2, currently the latest version. If you haven't upgraded to 6.1,
I highly recommend it. If you have, you already have the latest version,
We played around with clustercats...it is on the CFMX CD (I think) and
there is a download on Macromedia's site where you can get it.
We tested in on Windows 2003 Web Edition without anything in front.
Worked pretty well, if we killed one server, the other would take over
with very little loss
I know it's not the best method as you said, but how are you doing the
DNS failover? I'd be interested as we're trying to devise a long term
plan for balancing two servers but right now they're in different
physical locations and I need a quick, short-term solution.
Thanks
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at
Generally speaking, the newer versions of sun's java are better than the
older versions. CFMX 6.0 comes with version 1.3.1, and CFMX 6.1 comes with
version 1.4.2, currently the latest version. If you haven't upgraded to
6.1,
I highly recommend it. If you have, you already have the latest version,
At 12:22 PM 10/24/03 -0400, Matt Liotta wrote:
It is standard practice to sue the big fish first before suing any
other infringers. Again, Eolas is currently playing fair. Whether or
not we like, they did get the patent and are allowed to enforce it.
I don't think that being an ass has anything
Since there's nothing we can do about it, we just have to use the
workaround and hope that Eolas goes belly up.
Alternatively, you could get mad at the patent system instead and work
to change that instead of wasting time on the latest company exploiting
it.
Matt Liotta
President CEO
I still consider myself to be somewhat inexperienced when it comes to
creating/using complex data types, so please forgive my ignorance.
In the following bit of code:
cfscript
for (i=1; i LTE 4; i = i+1) {
variables.testStruct[i] = structNew();
}
/cfscript
cfdump var=#variables# /
I expected
Here's a much more fleshed out description of the setup.
Everything's running Linux.Right now we have 6 machines, two load
balancers, two web/CF servers, and two DB servers.The DB servers also
handle uploaded files, as they need to be served from any of the web
servers.Each web server has an NFS
Joshua,
The client currently uses a company called TZO (http://www.tzo.com)
In reality though if you have control over your own DNS you can do this
pretty easily... all it really is is a fast refreshing DNS zone.For
example, if you set your zone records to expire every 20 min... you
could
cfscript
for (i=1; i LTE 4; i = i+1) {
variables.testStruct#i#= structNew();
}
/cfscript
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:54 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: I need some enlightenment...
I still consider myself to be somewhat
Fail-over and load balancing are two different beasts in my mind.
Currently we've got a load balancer (set to sticky sessions) in front of
an Apache cluster (2) which each have the JRun connector installed. Each
request is routed to a JRun instance in round-robin fashion (default).
While this
You mean you wanted to do something like:
cfloop index=i from=1 to=4
cfset testStruct#i# = structNew()
/cfloop
4 different structures
or
cfset testStruct = arrayNew(1)
cfloop index=i from=1 to=4
cfset testStruct[i] = structNew()
/cfloop
array of 4 structs
or
cfset testStruct = structNew()
cfscript
for (i=1; i lte 4; i=i+1) {
Variables['testStruct'i]=structNew();
}
/cfscript
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:54 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: I need some enlightenment...
I still consider myself to be somewhat
variables.testStruct#i#= structNew();
or
variables.[testStruct#i#]= structNew();
or
variables.testStruct[i]= structNew();
will do it, depending on what exactly you're trying to do.I think you want
one of the first two (which do the same thing).I prefer the second, as
it's more readable, IMO.
try something like
cfscript
for (i=1; i LTE 4; i = i+1) {
variables[testStruct i] = structNew();
}
/cfscript
HTH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 18:54
To: CF-Talk
Subject: I need some
A, I see, ok that's a pretty good idea actually. Other than being
slightly slower than load balancing it's not a bad idea.
I can't imagine a server being down for 20 minutes though, my boss would
have shot me long before the DNS picked up for the other box.
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 13:56,
Sandy,
I tried your code and replaced the brackets around the i with pound signs
and I got an error.
Thanks for the suggestion,
Nate
Quoting Sandy Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
cfscript
for (i=1; i LTE 4; i = i+1) {
variables.testStruct#i#= structNew();
}
/cfscript
_
From: [EMAIL
Shouldn't this Eolas stuff be OT?
I know Flash and CF are nicely integrated, but this is CF-Talk. It's hard
enough to filter through the amount of mail on this list - OT posts should
be marked as such to help us find the CF stuff, at least. I don't use
Flash, or anything affected by the Eolas
variables.testStruct#i#= structNew();
or
variables.[testStruct#i#]= structNew();
or
variables.testStruct[i]= structNew();
or
variables.testStruct.put(i, StructNew();
Matt Liotta
President CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
(888) 408-0900 x901
[Todays
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
