scheduled task save output to a network share

2014-11-12 Thread marc --
Hello, ColdFusion 10,286680 running on a Windows 2012R2 machine. I want to create a Scheduled Task. The output should be saved to a file on a network share. The network share is accessible via Windows explorer: either using the UNC notation (\\network_share) or via a mapping (F:). When I

Re: scheduled task save output to a network share

2014-11-12 Thread Russ Michaels
Are you still running cf under the system account? If so then this is why, and is also insecure. You need to run cf as a user who has access to the network share. If you are still running an out of the box install then you should also follow the lock down guide. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:15 AM,

Re: scheduled task save output to a network share

2014-11-12 Thread marc --
Are you still running cf under the system account? If so then this is why, and is also insecure. I forgot to add, CF10 is _not_ running under the local system acct - it runs as a dedicated user that has access to the share. I found a solution already: file:

cfpdf package

2014-11-12 Thread Tim Do
Has anyone had any success using pdf packages and displaying it in any browsers other than ie 8? I'm generating a pdf from cfpdf with package=yes. The pdf opens in acrobat and ie8 but not in chrome,ff and ie9 and later. Thanks in advance, Tim Sample disclaimer

Re: cfpdf package

2014-11-12 Thread Dave Watts
Has anyone had any success using pdf packages and displaying it in any browsers other than ie 8? I'm generating a pdf from cfpdf with package=yes. The pdf opens in acrobat and ie8 but not in chrome,ff and ie9 and later. I don't think the built-in PDF viewers used by most browsers will

CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Tom McNeer
Hi, I've just discovered that one of my servers, running 9.02, has been hacked. I'm not sure of the update level, because the hack is visible in the administrator and prevents its use. It's not the old h.cfm hack. I haven't been able to find any references to what I'm seeing, but I hope someone

FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Mark A Kruger
Tom, My one questions is you say that view source is identical from a hacked and non hacked server - that seems odd. There are a number of hacks that could produce results that manipulate your files by adding content. This one uses the missing file handler:

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Tom McNeer
Hi Mark, On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Mark A Kruger mkru...@cfwebtools.com wrote: My one questions is you say that view source is identical from a hacked and non hacked server - that seems odd. Extremely. That's why I mentioned it. I both looked through the source in a browser and

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Dave Watts
My one questions is you say that view source is identical from a hacked and non hacked server - that seems odd. There are a number of hacks that could produce results that manipulate your files by adding content. Not necessarily. There's no reason that content can't be injected at serve

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Dave Watts
Obviously, I still hope someone has seen a similar attack, because I'm not all that relieved that the symptom has gone away. Honestly, I would assume the worst, and do the following. Back up server settings and the source files themselves, review the server settings manually, review the source

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Claude Schnéegans
There's no reason that content can't be injected at serve time. In this case, there would be a difference in the files delivered to the visitor. IMO the hack is in the browser, not on the server. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Dave Watts
There's no reason that content can't be injected at serve time. In this case, there would be a difference in the files delivered to the visitor. IMO the hack is in the browser, not on the server. Yes, I missed the reference by the original poster about using view source. If that's the

RE: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Mark A Kruger
Claude, The idea that there's no visible indication in the view source makes me consider that as well - but why would it just appear on a login page for the cfadmin? Perhaps it looks for specific form field names and throws up the java out of date message to prey on fears of folks logging in to

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Dave Watts
The idea that there's no visible indication in the view source makes me consider that as well - but why would it just appear on a login page for the cfadmin? Perhaps it looks for specific form field names and throws up the java out of date message to prey on fears of folks logging in to

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Claude Schnéegans
but why would it just appear on a login page for the cfadmin? Who knows what may happen or not happen in some hacker's mind ? ;-) Perhaps it looks for specific form field names ... especially input fields of type PASSWORD! The hacker may be more interested in getting access to the CF

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Claude Schnéegans
One is that, while it doesn't show up in the view source for a given page, a JS library referenced in the page has been compromised to rewrite page content. Of course, this is quite possible in theory, however it would imply that the hacker has already hacked the server, and one could ask what

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Tom McNeer
I appreciate all the suggestions - and I especially appreciate when you step in, Dave. Certainly, I'm considering a clean installation. But as a followup: Dave's comment about the problem is almost certainly in the browser itself or some other piece of malware installed on the client brings up

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Tom McNeer
One more followup: whatever this is, it isn't related to CF. I jumped to the wrong conclusion. The problem reappeared when I was in the CF admin page, long after I'd logged on. But then I opened another browser and purposely asked for a local page that didn't exist. The IIS error page contained

Re: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Wil Genovese
Tom, Stop and go back to the CF Admin and check the setting for Missing Template Handler. Make sure its blank or is actually pointing to a valid missing template handler page that you setup. This blog post is why I mention that.

Re: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Pete Freitag
Most likely a virus / malware on your computer, not the server: https://www.google.com/search?q= Your+Java+version+is+outdated%2C+have+security+risks -- Pete Freitag - Adobe Community Professional http://foundeo.com/ - ColdFusion Consulting Products http://hackmycf.com - Is your ColdFusion

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Dave Watts
One is that, while it doesn't show up in the view source for a given page, a JS library referenced in the page has been compromised to rewrite page content. Of course, this is quite possible in theory, however it would imply that the hacker has already hacked the server, and one could

Re: FW: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Tom McNeer
Wil, Thanks. I'd already checked that. Mark chimed in earlier, and it's his post. Pete, Thanks. I was so concerned that the server was compromised in a way that would affect its performance as a server, I hadn't had a chance to start googling the text itself. And Dave, Thanks again. Yes,

Re: CF9.02 administrator hack

2014-11-12 Thread Wil Genovese
Tom - I missed the email that Mark sent with that same blog post (which was written by me). Mark and I tag team this stuff regularly. Wil Genovese Sr. Web Application Developer/ Systems Administrator CF Webtools www.cfwebtools.com wilg...@trunkful.com www.trunkful.com On Nov 12, 2014, at