Dave,
You need to contact your sales rep. The fact that you own a
subscription to Studio means you are a part of the MVLP program, and
that you have a dedicated sales rep. He or she will be able to give
you specific pricing information.
Christian
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 09:21 A
On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 01:14 AM, Jim Davis wrote:
> However when I do this (as I am) from with the parents delete() method
> (making the call sorta recursive-like) I get the error we all know and
> love: "Cannot nest CFTRANSACTIONS"
The approach I sometimes take is to have a set of compon
On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 11:07 AM, John McCosker wrote:
> is anyone aware of a CFX tag free or for purchase that will ring a
> mobile
> phone.
I have no idea if this is any help or not, but it might be worth
checking out the Java Telephony API:
http://java.sun.com/products/jtapi/index.ht
Just wanted to let people know that Macromedia recently launched the
Active Content Developer Center in order to help developers prepare for
upcoming changes in Internet Explorer. You can find the Active Content
Developer Center here:
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/activecontent/
Active Con
On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 04:41 PM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
> So I tried the inline fix and it too does not work. I know that this
> is not
> MM's fault, but I am not a member of any M$ groups.
This is certainly the right approach (assuming the tags get closed).
It is possible that you are do
On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 09:04 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:
> Of course, I'm sure that the Eolas patent dispute may put a
> damper on that real soon.
The upcoming changes in Internet Explorer have been successfully
addressed. Macromedia is very confident in our recommended solution.
Christi
On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 09:53 AM, Kevin Graeme wrote:
> An example of this is any site that wants to be accessible following
> WAI
> guidelines. According to the Web Content Accessiblity Guidelines, a
> site
> must still function with _javascript_ turned off at the browser.
Keep in mind
On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 01:04 AM, Matt Liotta wrote:
> I have an article that will be published by DevX real soon now that
> IMHO provides a much better solution than what is currently provided at
> DevNet.
Since I haven't seen this particular solution, I cannot comment on it
directly, h
On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Beer wrote:
> My livelihood comes
> from developing and delivering flash-based newsletters and promotions
> in
> e-mail. When this change goes into effect, we're either out of
> business
> or facing the loss of our primary product.
You don't have
On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 04:22 PM, Nick de Voil wrote:
> Does anyone in their right mind enable ActiveX controls in Outlook?
That's a good question. ActiveX controls are disabled in Outlook by
default. Of course, that is not a result of the upcoming changes to
Internet Explorer. The
On Feb 7, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Rick Root wrote:
> I'm sure that Macromedia realized that the vast majority of developers
> are using windows machines or have access to a Windows machine, even in
> worlds where they deploy to Linux, Solaris, etc..
That's correct. Ideally, we would release Report Bu
Hi, Cutter. Let me see if I can help:
1. It's true that each developer using the development server needs to
have his or her own DevNet subscription.
2. The scenario you mention below is definitely legitimate. One of the
advantages of the development server is that other people in the
company
On Feb 9, 2005, at 6:10 AM, Ian Winter wrote:
> Hmm, OK. I saw Steven's post when it came out. I'll go back and have a
> re-read. Would be nice to know why it didn't ship though.
I'll save some of you the Google search:
http://www.talkingtree.com/blog/index.cfm?
mode=day&day=03&month=11&year=20
For some reason, I'm not able to get the UTF8 character set to work
properly with MySQL 4.1. I'm specifying the character set when
creating my tables, but any non-latin character comes out as a question
mark. I had this working fine in previous versions of MySQL, but 4.1
isn't cooperating. C
Very close! The parameters below actually have to be included in the
JDBC URL, like this:
jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/databaseName?
useUnicode=true&characterEncoding=UTF8
(I'm using a newer driver than then one that shipped with CFMX 7.)
Thanks,
Christian
On Feb 18, 2005, at 4:28 PM, Barney
I'd definitely join and participate.
Christian
On Jan 2, 2005, at 11:23 PM, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> Actually, based on the interest people have brought up, I've got a
> general
> question for people here. If there was a list that handled SEO,
> Advertising
> and other site business things, w
On Jan 4, 2005, at 9:09 AM, Alex Sherwood wrote:
> Any idea why MACR would do this?
Macromedia is consolidating subscription programs. Right now, there is
MVLP (Macromedia Volume Licensing Program), DevNet, Studio, and
subscription programs that we have taken on through acquisitions. It's
co
On Jan 5, 2005, at 9:40 AM, Ben Rogers wrote:
> I still have yet to receive anything from Macromedia notifying me that
> program was being phased out. They have my e-mail address. They have my
> mailing address. Do they need a blood sample before they'll tell me
> what the
> heck is going on?
Em
On Jan 4, 2005, at 7:49 PM, Adrocknaphobia wrote:
> Hes scheduled back in 'early Jan'.
Ed is back next week. If you don't hear anything by the end of the
week, feel free to email me personally and I'll make sure you get your
software.
Thanks,
Christian
~~
On Monday, July 14, 2003, at 07:26 PM, fred fred wrote:
> Yes, security through obscurity is a higly recommended approach with
> many software vendors.
Hence the other, more secure options listed in my last email. Raymond
mentioned a good one, as well.
Christian
~
On Monday, July 14, 2003, at 04:20 PM, Ryan Mitchell wrote:
> Christian... When will firefly (Flash MX DCK) be available on Mac OSX??
> The tech specs list only pc compatability... !!
I don't know of any plans to create a Mac installer. I think it's
possible to get it working just fine on OS X,
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 10:26 AM, Brian Ferrigno wrote:
> What I need to know is what technology I need to
> accomplish this. Can I do this without having to use
> Flash MX to generate the files?
For pretty sophisticated dynamic Flash generation, have a look at
JGenerator:
http://www.jz
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 11:06 AM, Tony Weeg wrote:
> yeah, truethis is crap tho' I have to code around a bug, that I
> know is getting fixed
> in redSky, but with no firm date on that, I have to code around
> ARG!!!
No firm date? You don't call "this summer" a firm date? :)
So
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 11:00 AM, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
> These are serious concerns about how this new 'feature' will impact if
> (when
> ?!?) it is applied to server products, and they don't seem to have been
> addressed anywhere.
Let's not get too ahead of ourselves here. Although I
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 11:24 AM, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
> Why did that last company to use this
> tech. give it up as a bad idea ?
People should know that we paid very close attention to Intuit's use of
activation, and we learned a great deal from their experience. If we
thought that
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 11:30 AM, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
> Doesn't answer the question though. There is a process in the
> background which
> runs off to MM to ask if I'm valid or not every so often. What happens
> if
> that doesn't/can not occur ?
I'm not sure how this doesn't answer y
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 11:49 AM, Jim Campbell wrote:
> What would you say Intuit did wrong that you are not doing wrong? I
> wouldn't place the onus so much on Intuit as much as on Macrovision's
> draconian software.
There are two areas of concern here:
1. The technology. Apparently th
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 12:32 PM, Jim Campbell wrote:
> Thanks for answering my question so thoroughly, I appreciate it. I
> have
> one thing to clarify, though. My experience with Macrovision is not so
> much the activation process itself - it was pretty fast and, yes, easy
> with Turbo
It looks to me like this is just a fancy way of generating a bunch of
HTML and JavaScript to give the appearance of events. When you talk
about changing something at run time, do you mean that the aspx page is
generating the JavaScript necessary to change elements in response to
events? A
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 05:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If anyone wants me too, I can also go on a nice tirade of things that
> are wrong with ASP.NET :)
Not at all! I've found this thread very interesting. I'm just trying
to figure out how ASP.NET implements an event model using
On Friday, July 18, 2003, at 08:19 AM, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
> Thanks to Chrisian too for his detailed explanation.
Sure thing. I realize now that I posted one bit of misinformation,
however. I said in a previous post that the licensing manager dies as
soon as it determines the integrity of
On Saturday, July 19, 2003, at 09:18 AM, Tim Laureska wrote:
> I have a basic yes/no survey question at a site that is not password
> protected (we'd like to keep it that way so as not discourage response)
The only way to secure a survey is to require authentication, at which
point your results
On Monday, July 21, 2003, at 11:02 AM, Bosky, Dave wrote:
> I'm using CFHTTP to grab a weather clip but it only grabs the page
> until it
> finds a degree character '°' then stops.
> Is CFHTTP a little buggy with CFMX?
Try adding the attribute charset="iso-8859-1" to the CFHTTP tag. And
yes, C
On Monday, July 21, 2003, at 01:31 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
> Ok, what is everybody's favorite date picker widget for use with
> ColdFusion?
> Would like something simple and straightforward to add to a web form,
> allowing the user to click on a calendar date and have the date added
> to a
> fiel
On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Charlie Griefer wrote:
> That effectively negates the advantage of including the server
> software in
> the subscription for us, if I'm understanding correctly
Your part time developers could always use development servers when
they need to and your full
On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Charlie Griefer wrote:
> The 'part timers' wouldn't have the benefits of using any of the DevNet
> tools. We'll likely set them up with UltraEdit as an IDE. They are
> mostly
> DBA's that we're trying to cross-train to help ease the Web team's
> current
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 07:53 AM, John McCosker wrote:
> What I took from it was there will be an updater 4 for current
> versions of
> MX,
> that have had outstanding bugs and have been fixed during the Red Sky
> beta
> test,
> which I think is leading to the new realease of MX, and upd
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Bryan Stevenson wrote:
> Perhaps you know whether or not MM partners will get Red Sky for free
> as
> well as part of the software we get as partners?
I imagine you will. All you need is a valid license key to make it
work. I'll double-check, though.
On Wednesday, July 2, 2003, at 11:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> So I'm trying to find out the validity of the statement and what he
> means,
> but I'm having a hard time finding any kind of documentation on
> Macromedia's
> site and we don't have a support agreement with them.
What kinds o
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 05:21 PM, Nate Nelson wrote:
> Could anyone suggest a decent bug tracking tool?
I'm using Bugzilla now which is ok. I decided to give something new a
chance after years of using GNU GNATS
(http://www.gnu.org/software/gnats/gnats.html). I will mostly likely
swi
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 09:10 AM, Rich Z wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I grabbed the DRK4 files this past weekend and noticed that RSS
> Untangle
> required Red Sky (or the 1.4 JVM). I'm sort of surprised Macromedia
> would put out a DRK that isn't even supported on the current CFMX
> release. Any id
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 09:06 AM, Critz wrote:
> server 1: installed, run admin logged in fine, created a
> poll, but when it goes to show the
> poll on the left hand side of the page it goes for a bit (like
> it's retrieving data...) then
> shows: "We are sorry. An Erro
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 10:42 AM, Massimo Foti wrote:
>> Have you used Flash
>> Remoting since Updater 3? I seem to remember Updater 3 turning Flash
>> Remoting off by default, at least for the J2EE version of CFMX.
>
> Yes, check ID 49829 here:
>
> http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfus
Steve Erat posted this on another list last night. I don't have
Homesite+ (no Mac version), so I can't test it out, but it seems to
relate to your problem:
--
I've installed both of these updates into my Homesite+ root and F1 on
cfapplication does show 6.1-specific information including log
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 07:39 AM, DURETTE, STEVEN J (AIT) wrote:
> That sounds like you afre trying to get us to ask what's next!
Come on, guys! Take some time to enjoy what we just got! :)
Christian
~|
Archives: http:
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 07:45 PM, Peter Tilbrook wrote:
> This is all well and good but they don't mention the fact that each
> instance
> is a full install of CF taking up disk space and approximately 100Mb of
> memory per instance.
As Ben already stated, each instance uses more like 5
The best way to think about Log4CF is as a more advanced tag.
It's main features include:
- Seamless integration into the CF admin and existing log reader.
- Ability to specify log messages as the body of the tag rather than
the attribute.
- Ability to set applications' "log level" which ind
The Pollster application from DRK 4 uses Flash Remoting. You can find
examples here:
http://www.macromedia.com/go/cantrell
http://www.macromedia.com/go/mchambers
Christian
On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 05:29 PM, Mike Kear wrote:
> I'm preparing a proposal for an entertainment industry site,
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 03:27 AM, Margrit John wrote:
> I would like to have two applications of Mozilla open on the same
> machine and login on each application with a seperate user.
I just wrote about this last week in a post entitled "Separating
Sessions from Cookies":
http://www.mar
If you would like to condense your arguments again, you can pass a
struct into Java just fine. Just handle it as a java.util.Hashtable.
You can also handle ColdFusion arrays as java.util.Vectors.
http://www.markme.com/cantrell/archives/002763.cfm
Christian
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 02:3
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 11:51 AM, Patricia G. L. Hall wrote:
> I've seen you talk about the ini way of doing things before and I
> thought
> it was an interesteing way to carry on. I'm pretty sure you've
> mentioned
> ini on your blog, but have you ever blogged its use specifically?
I a
Thanks for posting this URL, Massimo. Rob, let me know if you have
questions.
Christian
On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 07:54 AM, Massimo Foti wrote:
>> I am thinking of subscribing to Devnet Pro in the next month or so. I
>> understand that i should get the upgrades to MX 2004 as part of Dev
On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 09:52 AM, Angel Stewart wrote:
> I thought the purpose of Marketing a new product was to keep existing
> clients and gain new buyers for a product.
Marketing is about awareness. Given a budget, the goal is to get as
many of the right people aware of your product
301 - 353 of 353 matches
Mail list logo
