7;t see any
> advantage. Lotus notes has horrible email formatting.
>
> tom
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Allred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 8:41 AM
> Sub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OE is much better than Netscape if you have different mailboxes which
you want to send mail from using different from lines/sigs and you don't
want to have to keep leaving the program and coming back in under a new
profile, etc. OE's filtering is some
mbeat.com>cc:
Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject
lines
09/21/2000 09:05
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
> I'm afraid I missed any early complaints or discussions that caused Michael
> to feel we needed [CF-Talk] in the subject
I'm afraid I missed any early complaints or discussions that caused Michael
to feel we needed [CF-Talk] in the subject line at all. I use a Notes
Client at work, so I have no sorting capabilities there at all and p--s
poor filtering. I use Netscape at home, and my filters work fine on the To:
and
stray messages. So what is the big deal? jees!
>LOL!
>
>-Mark :o)
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 2:25 PM
>Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
>
>
all near the same place. At the end I have
>to
> > > look for it, why bother.
> > >
> > > Robert Everland III
> > > Web Developer
> > > Dixon Ticonderoga
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[E
y, September 20, 2000 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
> Some list servers alter the "To" field of the email to make it consistent.
> If the "To:" field always said "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" then filtering
is
> a snap...
>
> Howie
>
> -
--Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 4:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
Would a special header line for filtering be better for people? My results
from this is that:
prefix blocks t
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
> Would a special header line for filtering be better for people? My results
> from this is that:
> prefix blocks the subject, obscures it and gets really monotonous
> s
ook for it, why bother.
> >
> > Robert Everland III
> > Web Developer
> > Dixon Ticonderoga
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 12:53 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROT
k for it, why bother.
>
> Robert Everland III
> Web Developer
> Dixon Ticonderoga
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 12:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject line
(... continuation of using the to: address for mail filtering ...
and of course in my case ... the from address ... heh heh
From: Dan Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [CF-Talk] OT:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 09:55:54 -0700
In Outlook the [cf-talk] works well -- if there is the worry about off-topic
messages being filtered, you can include in the rule an "except if sent
directly to me".
Dan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
From: "Jennifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's not as easy to filter based on incoming email address. I am doing
that
> in at least two ways for each houseoffusion list that I'm on (one filter
> for
From: "Jennifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's not as easy to filter based on incoming email address. I am doing that
> in at least two ways for each houseoffusion list that I'm on (one filter
> for ct-talk and one for cftalk because that does happen) and I still get
> messages that are unfilt
rely see [CF-TALK].
>
>Robert Everland III
>Web Developer
>Dixon Ticonderoga
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 8:57 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
>
al Message-
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
It serves a purpose for thos wishing to sort mail based on the subject
line...
Howie
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Ev
It serves a purpose for thos wishing to sort mail based on the subject
line...
Howie
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Everland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 8:40 AM
Subject: RE: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
&g
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 12:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
This was an experiment based on many emails that I've received asking for
it. On the whole, I don't l
I agree that the [CF-Talk] is annoying, useless in terms of content, and
I really wish it were gone.
I find it much easier to filter based on the address to which people
are sending the mail. That way when someone emails me a private message in
reply to something I sent to the mailing list, it d
Yes, having it on the end is a good compromise. Outta site Outta mind!
-Mark :o)
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
> This was an expe
This was an experiment based on many emails that I've received asking for
it. On the whole, I don't like it and others seem not to as well. In the
morning I'll switch over to having it at the end and see how that works.
This should satisfy everyone. As usual, comments are appreciated. :)
> My po
een on do this.
Bob Everland
-Original Message-
From: Rob Keniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 9:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
on 20/9/2000 10:09 AM, pan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Agreed - this particular ta
My point exactly.
Not to gripe, or anything, but couldn't it be put at the END where it has less
visual significance to the reader, but is still picked up by filters?
How about it, M.D.?
pan wrote:
>
> From: "David Cummins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > How come I'm receiving al
on 20/9/2000 10:09 AM, pan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Agreed - this particular tag '[CF-Talk]' makes the subject line hard to read.
> The list of current subject headers take on a numbing sameness when ALL
> are prefixed witht the same tag.
I also find the new addition to the subject line red
: [CF-Talk] OT: Subject lines
It is a common practice on most list servers. It makes it easier for
people to filter messages in email programs.
At 09:10 AM 9/20/00 +1200, you wrote:
>Hey guys,
>
>How come I'm receiving all this mail with subject lines starting with
>"[CF
From: "David Cummins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey guys,
>
> How come I'm receiving all this mail with subject lines starting with
> "[CF-Talk]"? Is this a new list policy? Its just that it adds little
information
> content, and means I'm less likely to see enough of the real subject line to
be
>
> How come I'm receiving all this mail with subject lines starting with
> "[CF-Talk]"? Is this a new list policy? Its just that it adds
> little information
> content, and means I'm less likely to see enough of the real
> subject line to be
> bothered opening the email.
>
> I mean it would be OK i
At 09:10 AM 9/20/00 +1200, you wrote:
>Hey guys,
>
>How come I'm receiving all this mail with subject lines starting with
>"[CF-Talk]"? Is this a new list policy? Its just that it adds little
>information
>content, and means I'm less likely to see enough of the real subject line
>to be
>bothered
It is a common practice on most list servers. It makes it easier for
people to filter messages in email programs.
At 09:10 AM 9/20/00 +1200, you wrote:
>Hey guys,
>
>How come I'm receiving all this mail with subject lines starting with
>"[CF-Talk]"? Is this a new list policy? Its just that it
Hey guys,
How come I'm receiving all this mail with subject lines starting with
"[CF-Talk]"? Is this a new list policy? Its just that it adds little information
content, and means I'm less likely to see enough of the real subject line to be
bothered opening the email.
I mean it would be OK if it
32 matches
Mail list logo
