wrote:
>
> Does this mean CFML is or will be dying ?
>
> --
> From: "Mark Drew"
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:19 PM
> To: "cf-talk"
> Subject: Re: Adobe no longer part of the OpenCFML committee
>
>
is or will be dying ?
>
> --
> From: "Mark Drew"
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:19 PM
> To: "cf-talk"
> Subject: Re: Adobe no longer part of the OpenCFML committee
>
>>
>> Well, is Ben no
ll be dying ?
>
> --
> From: "Mark Drew"
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:19 PM
> To: "cf-talk"
> Subject: Re: Adobe no longer part of the OpenCFML committee
>
> >
> > Well, is Ben not part of it too?
> >
>
Does this mean CFML is or will be dying ?
--
From: "Mark Drew"
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:19 PM
To: "cf-talk"
Subject: Re: Adobe no longer part of the OpenCFML committee
>
> Well, is Ben not part of it too?
>
Well, is Ben not part of it too?
Just saying
MD
On 23 Jul 2010, at 17:06, Cutter (ColdFusion) wrote:
>
> http://www.adrocknaphobia.com/post.cfm/adobe-no-longer-part-of-opencfml
>
> Steve "Cutter" Blades
> Adobe Community Professional - ColdFusion
> Adobe Certified Professional
> Advanced Mac
http://www.adrocknaphobia.com/post.cfm/adobe-no-longer-part-of-opencfml
Steve "Cutter" Blades
Adobe Community Professional - ColdFusion
Adobe Certified Professional
Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
Co-Author of "Learning Ext JS"
http://www.packtpub.com/learning-ext-js/book
_
Is there an official adobe announcement that it pulled out?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Gerald Guido
> wrote:
> >>>Or support for Amazon Web services: S3 (well before Adobe did),
> >
> > My bad. Before I get a public tongue lashin
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Gerald Guido wrote:
>>>Or support for Amazon Web services: S3 (well before Adobe did),
>
> My bad. Before I get a public tongue lashing... I got Railo mixed up with
> OBD with the S3 support.
Yup, Railo introduced the concept of "resources" quite a long time a
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> I'm using the for(i=1; i <= ArrayLen(myArray); i++) syntax because i
> know it works everywhere. I would much rather use a for-in loop but
> due to the changes that Adobe made in 9.0.1, Railo and Adobe are
> temporarily incompatible. Railo
Oh yeah, and it will allow editing of tags online. That part will
probably come before anything else, and materialize pretty soon, as
I'm s tired of wanking with the dictionaries "by hand", so to
speak.
Yeah, I know last sentence sounds funny if you're "across the pond".
Byte me. :)
--
An
http://github.com/denuno/cfml.dictionary
It's just a java project right now, but the plan is to leverage it to
power a CFML application similar to quickdocs, etc., but with
different engines in mind, blah blah blah.
CFEclipse was the motivation for this... I'm in the process of
switching the wa
Link?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:40 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> Er, cfmldictionary? ;-
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Er, cfmldictionary? ;-)
:den
--
Religion is no more possible without prayer than poetry without
language, or music without atmosphere.
James Martineau
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:39 PM, denstar wrote:
> There doesn't need to be a big ceremonious board, but there does need
> to be an "official"
There doesn't need to be a big ceremonious board, but there does need
to be an "official" language spec, IMHO.
Maybe the cfdictionary project could be fleshed out... we could have a
nice list of what works like what with what... a single point of
reference type of deal...
Eh. It's a personal g
Sean made a distinction about core language functionality versus
add-ons and I think that I should have made that distinction more
strongly myself. His example of the for-in loop for arrays is a good
one. I'm writing a lot of code today looping over arrays of objects.
I'm using the for(i=1; i <= A
>>Or support for Amazon Web services: S3 (well before Adobe did),
My bad. Before I get a public tongue lashing... I got Railo mixed up with
OBD with the S3 support.
G!
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Gerald Guido wrote:
> >> and certainly not organized enough to be innovative.
>
> I guess
I don't think it is that disappointing honestly. I do think we need to
continue, as engine developers, to have a dialogue with each other.There
doesn't need to be this ceremonious board to do it. We have a discussion
group for conventional wisdom and things that need vetted could go there. We
also
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Wil Genovese wrote:
>
> If the OpenBD team claims it is not organized enough to submit ideas then
> they are most likely not organized enough to release a new version of OpenBD
> and certainly not organized enough to be innovative. This is unfortunate
> since th
>> and certainly not organized enough to be innovative.
I guess that all depends on your definition of innovative. I have been
following the OBD mailing list and (off the top of my head) could any of
these be defined as innovative?
Porting OBD to run on Google App Engine?
Or support for Amazon W
> My thoughts -
>
[SNIP]
> If the OpenBD team claims it is not organized enough to submit ideas
> then they are most likely not organized enough to release a new
> version of OpenBD and certainly not organized enough to be innovative.
> This is unfortunate since the commercial version of BlueD
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Wil Genovese wrote:
> This is most likely the problem that Sean was referring to. Being responsive
> to the community is one thing, being overly responsive is a problem. Just
> because one person asks for something and three more chime in with "me to
> ++
You seem primarily interested in defending Adobe and attacking open
source projects. I find this rather unhelpful and churlish. I was not
trying to start a political discussion at all but rather pointing out
to the community that a rather promising project has met its demise. I
would like to see a
Adobe CURRENTLY owns the ColdFusion trademark. This has not always been the
case but the trademark has always been commercially owned.
about Railo "I can honestly say that I have never seen a more responsive
project. Community suggestions are made on the mailing list, discussed, dropped
in JIR
Judahjust FYIthe OpenBD team is every bit as responsive as you
just described the Railo team
Cheers
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: br...@electricedgesystems
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Wil Genovese wrote:
>
> My thoughts -
>
> quote from Adam:
> "It is today, as it was before. Innovation and progress in CFML is driven
> exclusively by the ColdFusion community. Adobe is merely a vessel that pours
> those ideas into ColdFusion and spread CFML ad
My thoughts -
quote from Adam:
"It is today, as it was before. Innovation and progress in CFML is driven
exclusively by the ColdFusion community. Adobe is merely a vessel that pours
those ideas into ColdFusion and spread CFML advancements throughout the world.
As a community, we never needed t
I find this to be a very disappointing development. I have no insight
into the politics behind this but I can definitely say that we are a
poorer community for this choice.
http://www.adrocknaphobia.com/post.cfm/adobe-no-longer-part-of-opencfml
I looked forward to being able to write application
27 matches
Mail list logo
