Thanks for the tip Jordan, I will head over to the bluedragon-interest mailing
list
jay beal wrote:
Hi Jason,
I'm not a windows guy myself, but you might try posting this message to
the bluedragon-interest mailing list. There are quite a few folks there
who use BD Free on Windows who would
There is a free version of BlueDragon, but it is intended for
non-commercial use (IE: you can't use it for anything that
makes someone
money). The thought behind that is that if someone makes money off it,
then it's only fair to give a cut to the people who made that money
possible.
I
Munson, Jacob wrote:
I suppose I should ask New Atlanta about this, but does the commercial
license apply for personal websites that have ads on them? I am making
money from my blog, but it's just peanuts. It would take me number of
years to make back the $900 licensing fee. :)
Honestly,
On Thursday 02 February 2006 14:31, Ray Champagne wrote:
This probably would have been better sent to them first, dontcha think?
How do you know I didn't ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
~|
Message:
Well, good point, I don't know. I guess what I gleaned from the
original post was that this was the first place you posted. I'm pretty
sure that others got the same vibe, but I can't speak for them.
Usually, ppl put the disclaimer that they tried to contact the webmaster
with the error, but
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 14:27, Ray Champagne wrote:
So, did you? :)
Yeah, nice me :-)
BTW, this is quite the old post at this point, isn't it? I was
surprised to see it revived!
I've been busy - just gotta go comment on that Microsoft buying Macromedia
thread and I should be all
Just so I understand better...Railo essentially
replaces
the CF server itself and processes pages, etc.,
like
the server?
Correct.
Also, I asked earlier about Railo's
pricing...Gert mentioned
that the cost for the Professional version
would be
100 euros which would handle one
... (hint, hint, Gert...)
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
I just want to give a thumbs up for Railo. I've been tinkering around
with
it since
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 7:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
They used to have a nice graphic that explained how Railo could
run. After a
quick run through the site I don't see it anywhere. I think I agree with
chirs: 1 web server document root directory.
I'll
Thanks for the explanation, Chris!
I'll have to give Railo a try!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon 6.1
Just so I understand better...Railo essentially
On Thursday 02 February 2006 00:40, Jordan Michaels wrote:
I look forward to seeing what Ralio is going for (in USD) when the new
site is up.
I look forward to the Ralio guys configuring their web site correctly.
I just died with a timeout, and told me all about their code:
Message
This probably would have been better sent to them first, dontcha think?
I mean, a site shouldn't be set up so that one can glean info from
their error messages, but I think you should let them know about the
problem before posting the info to a public forum.
Thomas Chiverton wrote:
On
(was Re: Bluedragon 6.1)
This probably would have been better sent to them first, dontcha think?
I mean, a site shouldn't be set up so that one can glean info from
their error messages, but I think you should let them know about the
problem before posting the info to a public forum
New Atlanta has always said Blue Dragon Server will always be free for
development and production. Blue Dragon JX, J2EE, and .Net are their
pay-for-play CFML products.
David McCan wrote:
Last time I looked, the free version of Blue Dragon was still available on
the New Atlanta ftp site:
It is only free for non-commercial use (non-ssl).
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 February 2006 15:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
New Atlanta has always said Blue Dragon Server will always be free for
development and production
On Thursday 02 February 2006 00:40, Jordan Michaels wrote:
I look forward to seeing what Ralio is going for (in USD) when the new
site is up.
I look forward to the Ralio guys configuring their web site correctly.
I just died with a timeout, and told me all about their code:
Message
Yeah...it eats jmuffins
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 February 2006 15:34
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Ralio (was Re: Bluedragon 6.1)
On Thursday 02 February 2006 00:40, Jordan Michaels wrote:
I look forward to seeing what Ralio
On a side, do we really need another CFML parsing engine? I mean what is the
MO here?
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 February 2006 15:19
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon 6.1
It is only free for non-commercial use (non-ssl
02, 2006 10:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon 6.1
On a side, do we really need another CFML parsing engine? I mean
what is the
MO here?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:231117
I just died with a timeout.
Hmm, you timed out...is that similar to a heart attack? I guess you
can't answer that anyway if you're dead.
-
[INFO] -- Access Manager:
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
and/or exempt from disclosure under
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 10:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon 6.1
On a side, do we really need another CFML parsing engine? I mean
what is the
MO here?
~|
Message: http
-
From: Aaron Roberson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 11:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
Multiple CFML engines can become problematic when their creators begin
to introduce a plethora of new proprietary tags and lack support for
common tags
You're right, they should have set up better error messages,
but there isn't anything really useful that you can glean
from this error message...
That's not entirely true. The error message indicates file paths, and that
they're using JDBC and MySQL. That's none of our business, and along
That is kind of an interesting approach
A small CF engine for one website. I can see some people may be
interested in this approach.
Yves
On 2/2/06, Gert Franz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you're right,
We sell only J2EE versions running on any Java Application server. The
biggest
The problem I see with this is that I'm able to run
as many sites as I want with Adobe's CF Professional version
with a central administrative interface for about $1250
($750 or so upgrade)...if I go to Railo's Enterprise
version to run many websites, then I'm paying around $2000...
What, then,
...
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Information leakage (was: RE: Ralio (was Re: Bluedragon 6.1))
You're right, they should have set up better error messages,
but there isn't anything
Thanks for the further explanation, Gert...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Gert Franz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: AW: Bluedragon 6.1
As i mentioned in a post before.
If you use CFMX you can not separate Webs from
I want to set up a cheap CF server, in a commercial enviorment, though
the [internal] site won't acutally be generating any money. under the
new 6.2 licence this will break the licence agreement
On 31/01/06, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Jarrett wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody have a
Jarrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 11:41
An: CF-Talk
Betreff: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
I want to set up a cheap CF server, in a commercial enviorment, though
the [internal] site won't acutally be generating any money. under the
new 6.2 licence this will break
Germany
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andy Jarrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 16:42
An: CF-Talk
Betreff: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
Cheers Gert. Im downloading now. My only hold up is that it seems to be
in beta still and im looking for a fully fledged
Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.railo.ch
Meet us at CeBIT 2006
Hall 3, Stand D39
March 09-15, 2006
Hannover Germany
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andy Jarrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 16:42
An: CF-Talk
Betreff: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
Cheers Gert
Meet us at CeBIT 2006
Hall 3, Stand D39
March 09-15, 2006
Hannover Germany
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andy Jarrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 16:42
An: CF-Talk
Betreff: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
Cheers Gert. Im downloading now. My only hold up
Cheers Gert, I've been playing around and it looks good.
To echo's Rick's comments, when you say one web, is that one website
or one web server?
Also will the community edition be allowed to be used for commercial
purposes (keeping within the one datasource rule?)
Cheers
Andy J
On 01/02/06,
PROTECTED]
location=switzerland function=railo core developer
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andy Jarrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 11:41
An: CF-Talk
Betreff: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
I want to set up a cheap CF server, in a commercial enviorment, though
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 11:41
An: CF-Talk
Betreff: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
I want to set up a cheap CF server, in a commercial enviorment, though
the [internal] site won't acutally be generating any money. under the
new 6.2 licence this will break the licence agreement
name=Gert Franz from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
location=switzerland function=railo core developer
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andy Jarrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 11:41
An: CF-Talk
Betreff: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
I want to set up a cheap CF
Last time I looked, the free version of Blue Dragon was still available on the
New Atlanta ftp site:
ftp://ftp.newatlanta.com
For how long?
David
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:231065
Archives:
Andy Jarrett wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody have a copy of BD 6.1 (the free edition) which they could
let me download please?
Technically speaking, that would be illegal because you cannot
redistribute the free edition.
That being said, why would you want 6.1? Many bugs.
Rick
Thanks Casey. I will check it out. I also found this last night:
http://www.ignitefusion.com/default.htm
I submitted a post to the New Atlanta list as Charlie requested.
David
Sorry to add to an already blunted topic but for those who wish to get
rid of licencing agreements... please
has, i.e. only xx number of
IP's can access it, or perhaps restrict it to local LAN IP's. or some other
solution altogether.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: charles arehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 January 2006 05:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change
No, Tony. I
Hi there,
And the free version could still be used to non-commercial use?
Yves
On 1/22/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, Tony. I wasn't saying that the free version wasn't getting updates. I was
only saying that one who wanted to use it for commercial use could continue
to
Anyone else feel that we're somehow going in circles? :-) Yes, Yves, you
certainly may. Nothing has changed about the use of the free Server edition for
non-commercial use.
/charlie
Hi there,
And the free version could still be used to non-commercial use?
Yves
On 1/22/06, charles arehart
: charles arehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 January 2006 05:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change
No, Tony. I wasn't saying that the free version wasn't getting updates. I
was only saying that one who wanted to use it for commercial use could
continue to use the 6.1 edition
-
From: charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change
Russ, we do already do that. :-) Again, I feel we're going in circles. The
note you quote below was a response by Tony to one where I had
PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com
- Original Message -
From: charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change
Sorry, but it is hard to keep up with all the posts on this list.
-Original Message-
From: charles arehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 January 2006 15:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change
Russ, we do already do that. :-) Again, I feel we're going in circles
Thanks..
That is what I thought this thread just kind of confused me I guess...
;-)
Yves
On 1/22/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else feel that we're somehow going in circles? :-) Yes, Yves, you
certainly may. Nothing has changed about the use of the free Server
Sorry to add to an already blunted topic but for those who wish to get
rid of licencing agreements... please check out my previous question
on this crap.
http://houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/messages.cfm/forumid:4/threadid:43959
Someone must be using Coral Web
Really I can't fault New Atlanta for wanting to make money from results
of their hard work, but pretending this is a clarification of the
original intent when they originally sung free for production use to
the heavens; as often as they could at the time -- as I'm sure most
people do remember
Guys, all those links that have been pointed to are from the 6.1 release of BD.
As has been noted by others, the license agreements has simply changed (like
someone said, any company can and does do at times). The change was as of the
6.2 release. As someone else said, if you still have a 6.1
Hi Charlie,
Thank you for being straight and for mentioning that people could continue to
use the earlier version according to its license. As I mentioned, I called the
New Atlanta sales person who indicated that the change was a clarification of
what had always been the intent, which made me
Great post Charlie, Looking forward to seeing what you guys have in
store for the CF community. BD only makes this a stronger platform.
--
--mattRobertson--
Janitor, MSB Web Systems
http://mysecretbase.com
~|
Message:
so the free version will stay at its current development point
and stop? and newer updated versions are going to cost money?
or will the free version be privvy to the upgrades that you make in
the sever codebase?
tony
On 1/21/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, all those links
No, Tony. I wasn't saying that the free version wasn't getting updates. I was
only saying that one who wanted to use it for commercial use could continue to
use the 6.1 edition (without updates, of course).
On the other hand, yes, the free version has always been updated just like the
other
I called New Atlanta and asked about this. I was told that this current
license change was just a 'clarification' of what was always their intent.
New Atlanta is certainly free to change the license for BD as they wish, I
would just prefer they said that was what they were doing. Something
AHA! Thanks - it appears my recollection wasn't too bad after all:
So the bottom line is if you're running a server just for your own
organization's applications, you can use the free Server edition. We
want to help CFML developers fend off the free alternatives like
PHP, ASP, and JSP. As we say
Just a couple of other things here. Apparently I can't spell after all, I meant
covered. Also, I generally like BD and think it is a worthy competitor to
CFMX. I don't know about the licensing issues, but from a technology standpoint
it seems good. I don't own stock in New Atlanta or anything,
Yes Bluedragon does do this with the .net version
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 January 2006 16:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon vs. ColdFusion 6/7
I am no expert on BD but I thought BD.NET did this? Where can information
on Railo
That's what I thought too - my recollection is that it could be
deployed for serving your own commercial app, but not for hosting
other people's apps (an ISP couldn't install it, for example).
Perhaps my memory is getting worse.
On 1/20/06, David McCan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone I work
David McCan wrote:
Someone I work with noticed a change in the wording of the BlueDragon free
edition license. The license for 6.2 says ...license to download, install
and use BlueDragon Server on a single Server machine for development, testing
and deployment purposes. The 6.2.1 license
I believe that the free version was always intended for non-commercial use.
I think I actually question Charlie A about it many moons ago
Yves
On 1/19/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I thought too - my recollection is that it could be
deployed for serving your own
not to change the topic, but how is BD's newest build in comparison
with cfmx7 these days?
tw
On 1/19/06, Yves Arsenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that the free version was always intended for non-commercial use.
I think I actually question Charlie A about it many moons ago
I haven't tried the new build...
I seem to remember seeing new features. from the older build.. but
I'm not sure...
Man, I'm tired.
:-(
I need loud music or something!
Yves
On 1/19/06, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not to change the topic, but how is BD's newest build in comparison
David,
I suggest you start a thread on the BlueDragon Interest list and see
what the folks at New Atlanta say about this.
-Aaron
On 1/19/06, Yves Arsenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't tried the new build...
I seem to remember seeing new features. from the older build.. but
I'm
James Holmes wrote:
my recollection is that it could be deployed for serving your own
commercial app, but not for hosting other people's apps (an ISP
couldn't install it, for example).
The Installation Guide says the following in section 2.1:
BlueDragon Server is free for non-commercial
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Roberson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change
James Holmes wrote:
my recollection is that it could be deployed for serving your own
commercial app, but not for hosting
Aaron,
I hate to say it, but I think I would even consider paying the extra
$400 knowing that a reputable company such as Adobe is standing behind
ColdFusion MX 7. I don't like the fact that Adobe is moving my
Macromedia MVLP license to an AOO (Adobe Open Options) license, so I
am investigating
Hi Aaron,
why don't you give Railo a try. Railo is nearly fully compatible with MX 6.1
and has some features neither of the two other products has. One of these is
separating different webs into different coldfusion-contexts. This means, that
you have two administrators for two different webs
I am no expert on BD but I thought BD.NET did this? Where can information
on Railo be found online?
On 1/18/06, Gert Franz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Aaron,
why don't you give Railo a try. Railo is nearly fully compatible with MX
6.1 and has some features neither of the two other products
i found some brief Railo information on www.railo.ch - nothing much
though...don't think it's even a v1 product yet..
yes, BlueDragon.NET for sure gives you an administrator per IIS
virtual server...
jb.
On 1/18/06, Aaron Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am no expert on BD but I thought BD.NET
I think your general questions have been convered. I would add that I have been
tinkering with BD recently and so far I have found it does an admirable job at
most stuff. The index and search stuff lacks Verity's full feature set, but I
haven't seen it bomb out and behave badly like Verity,
Hi Aaron,
I'm not from NewAtlanta, but seeing as my company is a BlueDragon
Certified web host I am quite familiar with their software. You might
consider re-posting this message to the BlueDragon mailing list and
seeing if you don't get a better response.
I've responded to your message in-line
Jordan,
Thanks for your reply, I am not soliciting feedback from the folks at
New Atlanta alone. I really value the developer community's input and
would like to hear from more developers. From a BlueDragon web hosting
companies perspective, your feedback is very appreciated.
I would like to
I have no expereince with Blue Dragon, but logically
speaking, if CF has all the features that you want and
need, and BD is lacking features, why go with the copyt
when you can get the original at the same price?
Eric
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:23:49 -0800
Aaron Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric,
I hate to say it, but I think I would even consider paying the extra
$400 knowing that a reputable company such as Adobe is standing behind
ColdFusion MX 7. I don't like the fact that Adobe is moving my
Macromedia MVLP license to an AOO (Adobe Open Options) license, so I
am investigating
On 1/17/06, Jordan Michaels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. Is ServletExec comparable to enterprise J2EE servers?
As far as I know, yes. ServletExec is one of NewAtlanta's flagship
products - I'd imagine it'd be roughly comparable to most J2EE servers
available.
ServetExec supports JSP and the
]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon 6.2/.NET Released!
Thanks, but that price is correct. BlueDragon.NET is considered an
enterprise level product, and is priced the same as BlueDragon/J2EE at
$8,999.00 for a 4-CPU server. For reference, a 4-CPU license
Gordon Bennett! Could they not just have Buy two get 25% off or something
similar! :OD
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 March 2005 11:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon 6.2/.NET Released!
I think purchasing 2 CFMX 7 Enterprise licenses (4 CPUs
applied to the
retail price.
http://www.macromedia.com/buy/volume_license/vlo/
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon 6.2/.NET Released!
Thanks, but that price
Hi Vince,
Congrats! Looks like you have a comma in the wrong place for the
price of the 4-cpu .NET server product.
v/r,
Jeff
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:27:18 -0500, Vince Bonfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New Atlanta is pleased to announce the final release of BlueDragon 6.2,
which is
editions).
BlueDragon Server JX (Java-based) is $899.00 per server, regardless of the
number of CPUs. Maybe that's what you were thinking of?
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Fleitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon
of CPUs. Maybe that's what you were thinking of?
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Fleitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon 6.2/.NET Released!
Hi Vince,
Congrats! Looks like you have a comma
: Re: BlueDragon 6.2/.NET Released!
Hi Vince,
Congrats! Looks like you have a comma in the wrong place for
the price of the 4-cpu .NET server product.
v/r,
Jeff
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:27:18 -0500, Vince Bonfanti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New Atlanta is pleased to announce
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon 6.2/.NET Released!
On the site
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/product_info/pricing.cfm
I noticed it just now too...
Yves
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:28:06 -0500, Vince Bonfanti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but that price
The price is listed as 1,2599. It looks better as 12,599.
Aaron
- Original Message -
From: Vince Bonfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 12:28 PM
Subject: RE: BlueDragon 6.2/.NET Released!
Thanks, but that price is correct
We've addressed some, but not all of these issues, so it's still best to
avoid using reserved keywords as variable names. To quote from the CFMX 6.1
documentation:
The following list indicates words you must not use for ColdFusion
variables, user-defined function names, or custom tag names.
Incidentally, CFMX 6.1 and 7 both handle the example I posted fine :)
Paul
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with
Hi Paul,
To whom did you send the emails at New Atlanta?
I'd recommend posting this to the BlueDragon-Interest mailing list, which
has a much higher concentration of BlueDragon users than CF-Talk:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/archive_search/index
..cfm
Also, if
Hi Vince,
I'd recommend posting this to the BlueDragon-Interest mailing list
Will do
Also, if you're running BD 6.1, did you install the latest hotfix?
Some of the other things I'm doing don't work without the hotfixes so yes
I'm fully patched..
Better, yet try BD 6.2
Hmmm I'll take a
I'm not concerned about implementation details as a developer, I'm
concerned about API and funcctionality. In this example, I believe the
actcual CFMX cfsearch/cfcollection supports the search of pdfs and word
documents, and the usage of additional languages other than english,
,whereas it
At 04:01 AM 11/5/2004, you wrote:
Subject: Bluedragon Server
From: Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:46:38 -0600
Thread:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm/method=messagesthreadid=36359forumid=4#183454
I'm not concerned about implementation details as a
I assume you're running BD 6.1? If so, apply the latest hotfix:
ftp://ftp.newatlanta.com/public/bluedragon/6_1/hotfix/Sept_2004
This is fixed in the BD 6.2 beta, and we're also planning an update to the
web site soon to put hotfixes on the downloads page.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta
u need to have your host enable it for u
just went through that
-- Original Message --
From: Vince Bonfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:04:05 -0500
I assume you're running BD 6.1? If so, apply the latest hotfix:
yes sir. I am. Thanks I'll update it.
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:04:05 -0500, Vince Bonfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume you're running BD 6.1? If so, apply the latest hotfix:
ftp://ftp.newatlanta.com/public/bluedragon/6_1/hotfix/Sept_2004
This is fixed in the BD 6.2 beta, and we're
--- Gert Franz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well generally you are right, but who allways writes variables.name or
something like that.
I do. No unscoped variables in my code.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
I did the hotfix update...
this line confuses me a tad:
- edit the StartBlueDragon.bat file, changing the string BlueDragonServer.jar
to BlueDragonServerJX.jar
only reason i say it confuses me.. is... there is an instance of
ServerJX.jar already in the classpath... along with
What about Railo or IgniteFusion? Does anyone know much about these two cfml engines?
Are they up to the task, or a step behind CFMX and Bluedragon?
Railo: http://www.railo.ch/en/index.cfm
IgniteFusion: http://www.ignitefusion.com/
They are still behind, but I truly hope they become powerful enough to
form competition for Macromedia. For us, the developers, such
competition is always good. :)
Micha Schopman
Software Engineer
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort
I got the impression from the IgniteFusion site that their product is a cgi-based app
server, as opposed to java-based like all other cfml engines these days.
Anyone know if this is true or not?
Outside of that, both IgniteFusion and Railo look really intriguing. They lack
support for some
No that's not true, you can load jar and java classes it's just not as
straightforward as simply adding them to the class path. See Spike's
article on loading jars.
Cheers
G
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:40:53 -0400, Ryan Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well Tom, at this point I guess my primary
101 - 200 of 483 matches
Mail list logo
