Stephen,
We have totally relaunched our shared platform last week, which
includes an all new control panel and billing system.
Our shared CF plans (and others) have an application catalog with one
click installs of popular apps. Joomla is one of the applications
offered.
We also totally revampe
Dijk
=
So long and thanx 4 all the fish
==> Onlinebase.nl
> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:55:27 +0100
> Subject: Re: CF Hosting in Europe
> From: andy.al...@gmail.com
> To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
>
>
> Centinated (Switzerland) http://www.centinated.ch/en/
> Flint Host
Centinated (Switzerland) http://www.centinated.ch/en/
Flint Hosts (UK) http://www.flinthosts.com
And if you don't care whether they officially support CF or not,
Rackspace UK http://www.rackspace.co.uk
Andy
On 15 June 2010 00:54, Dave Hatz wrote:
>
> We have a client that is looking to expand
20, 2007 7:26 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
>
> + 1 again for Viviotech. I've been very happy with my VPS bluedragon
> account. I'm not doing much on there right now but they are very helpfull.
> The control pane
Are all the VPS accounts at Viviotech on Linux?
Are any on Windows?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 7:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
+ 1 again for Viviotech. I&#x
Hmmm... Thanks for all the responses. It seems I have some research to do...
Che
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 7:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
+ 1 again for
> rather use CF since CF is what I am more familiar with. It seems
> kind
> > of
> > > > absurd that most CF web hosts won't offer unlimited domains since
> > bandwidth
> > > > is the main thing your are paying for.
> > > >
> > > > Che
> rather use CF since CF is what I am more familiar with. It seems kind
> of
> > > absurd that most CF web hosts won't offer unlimited domains since
> bandwidth
> > > is the main thing your are paying for.
> > >
> > > Che
> > >
> >
is what I am more familiar with. It seems kind of
> > absurd that most CF web hosts won't offer unlimited domains since bandwidth
> > is the main thing your are paying for.
> >
> > Che
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Picker [mailto:[
web hosts won't offer unlimited domains since bandwidth
> is the main thing your are paying for.
>
> Che
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Picker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:21 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF Hosting
Try Viux VPS "Extended Windows + CF"
http://hosting.viux.com/services/virtual/virtual-plans.asp
Up to 30 domains, with CF, for $125/mo.
Mik
At 02:25 PM 2/19/2007, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Che Vilnonis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:13 AM
ent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:21 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
>
>
>Hi Andy,
>
>Sorry about that, I think your right. I clearly didn't think about that
>point, I'm so use to just pointing other domains at th
r with. It seems kind of
>absurd that most CF web hosts won't offer unlimited domains since bandwidth
>is the main thing your are paying for.
>
>Che
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark Picker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:21 PM
&g
ssage-
From: Mark Picker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
Hi Andy,
Sorry about that, I think your right. I clearly didn't think about that
point, I'm so use to just pointing o
ary 19, 2007 2:41 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
>
>Have you looked at hostingatoz.com? I don't know how many domain alias's
>your allowed but I recently asked for 4 additional ones and they didn't bat
>an eyelid,
Is Che asking for aliases though? It sounds more like he's got 25 individual
domains.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Picker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 2:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
Have you look
Have you looked at hostingatoz.com? I don't know how many domain alias's your
allowed but I recently asked for 4 additional ones and they didn't bat an
eyelid, didn't cost any extra. Found their support to be really quick (a few
minutes sometimes). I did have problems with their email service
> -Original Message-
> From: Che Vilnonis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:13 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
>
> I recently purchased 25 related domains and I wish to create 25 simple 3-5
> page CF web sites. Ca
Thanks, Adrian.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
If you dont need to use createobject() / any other shared hosting banned stuff,
then I would gue
I think I am safe. The theme is cars parts.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
Che,
I should have mentioned:
1)
I've not tried the go
about website content.
Adrian
On 19/02/07, Che Vilnonis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm. I'll have to check them out. Thanks, Adrian.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:26 AM
> To: CF
Hmmm. I'll have to check them out. Thanks, Adrian.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
If you dont need to use createobject() / any other s
If you dont need to use createobject() / any other shared hosting banned
stuff, then I would guess that godaddy are very hard to beat on pricing.
https://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/hosting/shared.asp
(click on Compare Plans-Linux)
Seems like you can have unlimited websites / 1000 GB transfer a month
Andy, there's gotta be a CF host out there that only charges on bandwidth,
not the number of domains. Anyone else know of any?
~Ché
-Original Message-
From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting Que
Where are your servers located?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting Question... 25+ domains with one account.
I can do that .. i dont charge extra per domain.;
my cost factors are
I just registered with Gearhost. They allow 8 domains in the account level
I'm at (level 3).
http://www.gearhost.com/hosting/shared/
The highest account offers 20 domains.
-Original Message-
From: Che Vilnonis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 8:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
I can do that .. i dont charge extra per domain.;
my cost factors are disk space and bandwidth everything else is
unlimited (meaning have as many as you need, fitting inside the
bandwidth and disk space limits).
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Deve
http://www.fusionlink.com/ ck'em out
On 3/27/06, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HostMySite provides access to the account root, serving web content
> from a folder under that.
>
> For your $27.95 you could get 4GB of space and 60GB of bandwidth.
>
> http://www.hostmysite.com/hosting
HostMySite provides access to the account root, serving web content
from a folder under that.
For your $27.95 you could get 4GB of space and 60GB of bandwidth.
http://www.hostmysite.com/hosting/builder/
On 3/28/06, Coldfusion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been around and around fighting fo
I have been around and around fighting for a potential client on this
Issue and they are dead set there is no directory access outside the
root web folder.
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF
You're serious about this? are you sure you didn't just setup your default
dreamweaver site to show from www/
I took a look at the hosting plan and of course there is nothing there about
this except the following. They allow you to host unlimited Microsoft Access
Databases on your site. Are they re
; -Original Message-
> From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 1:10 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF Hosting w/access above root folder
>
> >>The only thing thats missing is access to a folder above
> my webroot
> so I can
>>The only thing thats missing is access to a folder above my webroot
so I can store docs outside of my site for security.
The is a way to get around this problem:
- store your docs in a special directory, but change the name to
whatever.cfm
- save the true name and type in your database.
- put
I can do that for you. My standard packages dont cater for that big a site
but that doesnt mean i couldnt do it. I can configure a package for you
however you like .
And I think its almost essential ot have access to a level above the web
root, for teh very purpose you're talking about.
And
Does anyone know of a CFhost provider that has access to folder above the
clients webroot and offer cfdirectory and cffile along with high storage and
bandwidth?
I have a site with CFDynamics and they have all you request, with their
49.95/month plan. Their less expensive plans do restrict cff
Oh, and they've always proven themselves to be very good about keeping up with
version updates. They are using MX7 and sql 2005.
> I'm a big fan of Dantor.com. I know for a fact you have access above
> your web root. as for the space and bandwidth, they have different
> packages, most of them
I'm a big fan of Dantor.com. I know for a fact you have access above your web
root. as for the space and bandwidth, they have different packages, most of
them below the $27 you're spending now. I've been using them for projects for
about 6 years...stable, responsive, nicely priced.
And as contr
Ok, I'll keep that in mind. Right now I am happy with Xtreme Hosting,
but if they go belly up (or if my needs outgrow them), I'll check out
HMS.
> -Original Message-
> From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 9:49 PM
> To: CF-
rowser.com/
From: "Munson, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 7:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
I am talking about CF hosting on Linux. Their cheapest package for that
is $20/mo, which I agree is a decent price. But I currently am paying
$3.50/m
TECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 1:34 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CF Hosting
>
> 2gb of space, their award winning 24x7 365 support, free
> domain name & 2 free months with yearly payment for $14.95 a
> month is too steep for you??
>
> ~Dave the
> Well just because windows tells you something, doesn't mean
> you have to trust it. I know that patches are probably not 100%
> installed if you don't reboot, but a lot of times microsoft
> likes you to reboot for no good reason. Simply because they
> don't 'trust' most windows users to follo
on windows.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 9:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
> We do have an experienced windows sysadmin... Namely me...
OK. Don't take this personally, but you're the s
> We do have an experienced windows sysadmin... Namely me...
OK. Don't take this personally, but you're the same person who said you
didn't know whether patches were applied, right? You don't know about
automated patching solutions? You don't know what services can or can't be
turned off on a prod
due to the fact that a lot of problems
exist in the core windows components, things that cannot be disabled.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 8:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
> But a well configured linux
> But a well configured linux server that is properly updated
> will stand up to 99% of whats out there.
So will a well-configured Windows server.
> And the fact that linux doesn't require you to reboot
> everytime that you do updates (and updates can be done
> totally automatically through up2
> It's true that explorer is only loaded when somebody is
> logged in. However, the GUI and a bunch of other (some
> very unnessesary services for a server) are always running.
Windows Explorer IS the GUI. As for unnecessary services, you can turn all
but nine of them off on Windows 2000. Again,
ginal Message-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 4:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
Well the reason these servers got hacked is cozz the sysadmins thought
"linux is hackproof and virus proof and doesn't need a firewall or antivirus
software&q
and one server running
MS SQL. This way I can have the best of both worlds.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 3:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
Thedesktop is only loaded if the machine is logged in at the desk
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 November 2005 21:08
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
It's true that explorer is only loaded when somebody is logged in. However,
the GUI and a bunch of other (some very unnessesary services for a server)
are always running.
Now, you mentioned in your previo
and one server running
MS SQL. This way I can have the best of both worlds.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 3:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
Thedesktop is only loaded if the machine is logged in at the desktop
and thus takes a few seconds to come up.
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 November 2005 05:11
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
That is ridiculous... the GUI is always loaded, and while it might not be
active 100% of the time while you're not logg
> That is ridiculous... the GUI is always loaded, and while it
> might not be active 100% of the time while you're not logged
> in, it gets loaded when windows boots up and stays loaded
> taking up memory and some cpu cycles.
The truth is somewhere between what you and Snake said. Part of the G
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 November 2005 15:23
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting
>>Linux is just a lighter OS, that's a lot more stable then windows, with a
lot more features.
. but a lot less applicatio
>>Linux is just a lighter OS, that's a lot more stable then windows,
with a lot more features.
but a lot less applications running on it :-(
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send an
.com/
From: "Munson, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 9:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
I looked at HMS, and their prices are a bit steep for me. I'm sure they
are well worth it, but I just wish they had a lower end
s...
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 6:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
The GUI is only loaded when you login to windows. If your not logged in, it
isn't loaded.
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mail
The GUI is only loaded when you login to windows. If your not logged in, it
isn't loaded.
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2005 18:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
The bandwidth consumption doesn't matter. As has been said many
Not personally, but I have read a fair amount of arguments on windows vs
linux, and I haven't read and linux claims that are not possible on windows
now.
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2005 18:16
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Ho
> The bandwidth consumption doesn't matter. As has been said
> many times, any
> pc, with any os can pretty much saturate the bandwidth serving static
> content.
>
> Now, when hosting CF sites, I would guess Linux to be better,
> because linux
> overall uses resources better (CPU, RAM, etc).
mes, which cause
windows to consume a lot more CPU and RAM, thus cutting down on performance.
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 1:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
Have you done comparisons with Linux?
>
Have you done comparisons with Linux?
> -Original Message-
> From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 11:08 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CF Hosting
>
> It was true in the past, but with win2k3 it's not.
>
> For a
to do similar.
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2005 14:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
I looked at HMS, and their prices are a bit steep for me. I'm sure they are
well worth it, but I just wish they had a lower end product wit
Gordon Bennet! I see what you mean - $3.50 per month for a basic Linux
plan with CF. That does take some beating...
On 11/23/05, Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at HMS, and their prices are a bit steep for me. I'm sure they
> are well worth it, but I just wish they had a lower
er 22, 2005 6:52 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF Hosting
>
> host my site goes above and beyond any host i have ever used,
> I will never use anyone else again, period!
> Getting my own dedicated server there in a month or so :)
>
> and a big hehe at "winblows"
ie :)
http://explorerdestroyer.com/
http://www.killbillsbrowser.com/
From: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 8:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting
I add a voice for HMS (Smarterlinux). When I looked for hosts, Lin
I add a voice for HMS (Smarterlinux). When I looked for hosts, Linux
was one of my criteria, even though my desktop is Windblows.
On 11/22/05, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's true... even though our servers are running windows, the only reason is
> that our apps need sql server. If I were
n't want to leave if possible. If I was a new
customer, I would've just looked at the website, seen that they don't offer
linux hosting and let my fingers do the walking...
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1
> Most of the web may be run of flinux server, but to date we
> have NEVER, NOT
> ONCE, had someone ask if we do Linux CF hosting.
There is a very good reason for that. You have a website. And from
your website it is obvious you don't do Linux. I heard about you guys
from someone a couple of w
and as we only do CF, not
PHP, then why bother.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2005 16:15
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
Very good points, Ken. However, for a hosting business, it is not hard to
find a few Linux experts and
ssage-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2005 15:29
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
> Never, we don't do linux as we are a windows house.
> The majority of people use windows anyway, especially for CF.
I'll grant that most CF users use Window
Office.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 9:54 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF Hosting
>
> There is, obviously, a point in the life of a business where
> it has the
> ability to branch
Feel free to turn them towards me. =]
Cheers,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 21, 2005 10:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting
Still, sometimes it's more economically efficient to turn customers away
than it is to
There is, obviously, a point in the life of a business where it has the
ability to branch out and explore other options. However, the problem
comes when they try to do this before they're ready. Sometimes people
try to move beyond their efficiencies before they've got a strong enough
financial
(even though I am a
Nintendo fan). I think it was well worth it for Microsoft expand their
horizons.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 9:01 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF Hosting
>
> Still, someti
94.35535% of stats are made up on the spot
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2005 16:04
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
Of course the surveys only capture external facing web servers (they
aren't hacking
le of capturing. If I remember my stats classes right, A
larger sample means a more accurate prediction.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 8:39 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CF Hosting
&g
Still, sometimes it's more economically efficient to turn customers away
than it is to offer something you won't be able to support as well.
Sometimes it's very well worth it to concentrate on your areas of
efficiency. If 10 potential customers approach me to build them an
ecommerce app tomorro
, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2005 15:47
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
The survey sample for November was 74,291,241. And yes, Netcraft tries
to sample EVERY web server on the planet. They run a global web spider
once a month, similar to google/yahoo. If you follow the
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 8:26 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CF Hosting
>
> How on earth could they come back with that? There is not
> founding to this.
>
> Did t
ample?
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2005 15:29
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
> Never, we don't do linux as we are a windows house.
> The majority of people use windows anyway, especially for CF.
I'll grant t
> Never, we don't do linux as we are a windows house.
> The majority of people use windows anyway, especially for CF.
I'll grant that most CF users use Windows, and even that most people use
Windows. But in web servers it is a slim margin. Netcraft reports that
~71% of web servers run apache:
h
couple of quirks here and there (I.E., I don't think they have robust
> error messages enabled in the CF servers), but you can't beat the
> price.
I remember Ben saying robust error messages shouldn't be enabled on a
production server anyway.
Will
~
Or bugger that and contact Mike Kear at AFPWebworks. Have been "using" him for
years and quite satisfied considering we are both in Australia and the servers
are in the USofA.
Email him a [EMAIL PROTECTED] and discuss your requirements as I am sure he
will be able to assist.
Regards,
PT
Manage
Never, we don't do linux as we are a windows house.
The majority of people use windows anyway, especially for CF.
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2005 21:07
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
Ok, but when are you going to ha
Ok, but when are you going to have CF/Linux hosting? ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:51 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CF Hosting
>
> True, but u can contact those people and check if they
: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 November 2005 23:30
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
> Why on earth would I do that, when I can just ask here? :P Seriously
> though, yeah thanks for the tip. His initial link to CF ISP's though,
> returns a broken link. After
That's true of course, as you said.
But that's why I look out for the one or 2 bad reviews. If they're just one
liners I ignore them. But if the one bad review covers almost a page, then I
pay attention and if there are like 50 1-liner good reviews after that saying
"this hosting site rocks",
I remember your lists from when I first started programming in CF.
They are a great resource, and it's wonderful that you still keep them, it even
serves as somewhat of a historical archive for CF in a way.
It's great how you provide user reviews and feedback, that way we can know some
of the "d
BTW, that list is hoster maintained. But if you do find dad links, please
let me know (off-list) and I'll kill them. Thanks.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Ali Awan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 5:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting
Why on
> Why on earth would I do that, when I can just ask here? :P
> Seriously though, yeah thanks for the tip. His initial link
> to CF ISP's though, returns a broken link. After that, he
> has a pretty extensive list of over 600 companies, I don't
> know how up to date it is. A couple of the comp
here, CFMx Hosting doesn't have a single bad review :-)
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 16 November 2005 18:09
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: CF Hosting
>
>For one, you don't have access to the CF Admin, but I didn&
, CFDIRECTORY
Up to 10 domains, 99 sub-domains.
Use of MS Access, SQL Server, or MySQL Server
All at a nice price :-)
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
> Why not have a look
> Why not have a look at www.forta.com for the reviews of hosts.
> We do quite well on here, CFMx Hosting doesn't have a single
> bad review :-)
Good idea. Last I tried Ben's app it didn't work on Firefox/Linux. But
today I'm on windows, and it works.
I can't remember, are you with CrystalTech
Why would you prefer not to use ftp? And is this a linux or a windows box?
-Original Message-
From: Mik Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 2:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Hosting
I'm moving off them at this time since I've partnered up
Why not have a look at www.forta.com for the reviews of hosts.
We do quite well on here, CFMx Hosting doesn't have a single bad review :-)
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 November 2005 18:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
For one
> I had used Viux for a couple of years under their shared hosting plan
> (up to 20 sites for a flat-rate of $75/mo) when I found a client who
> paid me enough in maintenance that I could afford a co-located
> solution and got my own box. Not the most robust of servers, it was
> still mine alon
Jordan,
At the moment I'm slowly moving my sites off to my new situation. So
Viux will be gone soon.
And I get to keep the box. It'll get mailed to me once everything's off.
Mik
At 02:05 PM 11/16/2005, Jordan Michaels wrote:
>Mik Muller wrote:
>
> >I had used Viux for a couple of years un
I'm moving off them at this time since I've partnered up with some
folks and we're ramping up my software. We chose Savvis and got a cranking box.
My main problem now is trying to upload very large files and I'm not
finding any solutions except FTP, which I'd really preder not to do.
There has
Mik Muller wrote:
>I had used Viux for a couple of years under their shared hosting plan
>(up to 20 sites for a flat-rate of $75/mo) when I found a client who
>paid me enough in maintenance that I could afford a co-located
>solution and got my own box. Not the most robust of servers, it was
>s
Mike,
Viux was also one of the hosting companies I was researching.
They seem to have a good pricing plan too.
A reason that Xtreme hosting sounded good to me was the unlimited SQL Server
Databases.
Thanks for the info though.
I'd rather get my own server and play around with it, but then I don
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
