looks good :)
We will test it over this weekend likely...
-paris
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 14:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cf_advancedemail version 2 beta testing
Hi all,
just wanted to announce that
of
email to their servers anyways :)
-paris
-Original Message-
From: Paris Lundis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 14:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cf_advancedemail version 2 beta testing
looks good :)
We will test it over this weekend likely...
-paris
Jochem,
I just took a quick look at your tag. Nice work. I see that you write
directly to the CF spool directory and that you require the passing of the
SMTP server name to the tag (or else you try to pull this info from the
registry). Looks like this is used only to build the 'x-cf-...'
to their servers anyways :)
-paris
-Original Message-
From: Paris Lundis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 14:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cf_advancedemail version 2 beta testing
looks good :)
We will test it over this weekend likely...
-paris
Paris Lundis wrote:
something else kind of struck me when looking at your tag documentation...
you are writing to the spool directory :) good...
Yes. From there it is picked up by the default CF mail handler (dart.dll).
I was wondering if you or anyone else had looked at the actual MAIL
Jim McAtee wrote:
Jochem,
I just took a quick look at your tag. Nice work. I see that you write
directly to the CF spool directory and that you require the passing of the
SMTP server name to the tag (or else you try to pull this info from the
registry). Looks like this is used only to
Bryant Tyson wrote:
Jochem,
You know what would make this even more useful? If there was a DELAY
value somewhere in there. So when sending huge volume mailings we could
break them down into timed chunks like we were talking about last week.
So say:
VOLUME= 2
DELAY = -1
It sounds very interesting. Does the tag have any mechanism in place to
avoid conflicts with the cfmail tag, such as if they were to both execute
at the same time and attempt to write to the spool folder?
I may have to look into it writing to my own mail server spool directory
rather than the
tom muck wrote:
It sounds very interesting. Does the tag have any mechanism in place to
avoid conflicts with the cfmail tag, such as if they were to both execute
at the same time and attempt to write to the spool folder?
Documentation copy-paste:
Note to ISP's
To my knowledge this tag
9 matches
Mail list logo
