On 16/08/07, Herman Robak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> ... Adam would not be able to fix this in a reasonable timeframe, even if
> he was given an exhaustive TODO list. Neither will we, unless a lot
> of the underlying code is redone to support all the stuff that an NLE
> and compositor of th
On 2007-08-16 00:49, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> Kevin Brosius wrote:
> > On 2007-08-15 17:36, Christian Thaeter wrote:
...
> > I think you won't get much feedback from the older core developers since
> > these goals are so large and you haven't tackled a smaller piece of Cin
> > first.
> I have d
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:49:39 +0200, mark carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 16:37 +0800, Martin Ellison wrote:
Could you explain this more? svn allows branching, so why not just
create as many development branches as required and work there?
I do not know git, so could
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 16:37 +0800, Martin Ellison wrote:
>
> Could you explain this more? svn allows branching, so why not just
> create as many development branches as required and work there?
git allows a project to be forked easily, whereas svn is geared towards
central command. svn requires
ok, I've found http://git.or.cz/course/svn.html.
On 16/08/07, mark carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 16:37 +0800, Martin Ellison wrote:
> >
> > Could you explain this more? svn allows branching, so why not just
> > create as many development branches as required and work
Martin Ellison wrote:
>
> Could you explain this more? svn allows branching, so why not just
> create as many development branches as required and work there?
>
> I do not know git, so could you please explain what git has over svn?
> (Not intended as an attack).
I am out of office today.
In sh
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 16:37 +0800, Martin Ellison wrote:
>
> Could you explain this more? svn allows branching, so why not just
> create as many development branches as required and work there?
>
> I do not know git, so could you please explain what git has over svn?
> (Not intended as an attack
Could you explain this more? svn allows branching, so why not just create as
many development branches as required and work there?
I do not know git, so could you please explain what git has over svn? (Not
intended as an attack).
On 16/08/07, Christian Thaeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
>
Kevin Brosius wrote:
> On 2007-08-15 17:36, Christian Thaeter wrote:
>> This my maybe arguable view how to hive Cinelerra CV out of its
>> develoment stall:
>>
>> 1) Change the focus of CinelerraCV
>> 2) Stop using SVN
>> 3) Make releases
>> 4) Make tracking HV less important
>
> I've been pretty
mark carter wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 19:36 +0200, Christian Thaeter wrote:
>> 2) Stop using SVN
>
> I just saw a YouTube vid by Linus who is talking about git:
> http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
>
>
>> Even if commit access is generously handled to people who ask, it's
>> still a
On 2007-08-15 17:36, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> This my maybe arguable view how to hive Cinelerra CV out of its
> develoment stall:
>
> 1) Change the focus of CinelerraCV
> 2) Stop using SVN
> 3) Make releases
> 4) Make tracking HV less important
I've been pretty silent on these issues so far, no
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 19:36 +0200, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> 2) Stop using SVN
I just saw a YouTube vid by Linus who is talking about git:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
> Even if commit access is generously handled to people who ask, it's
> still a big blocker as I explained earlier
On Wed, 2007-15-08 at 21:20 +0300, Mikko Huhtala wrote:
> Christian Thaeter writes:
> > This my maybe arguable view how to hive Cinelerra CV out of its
> > develoment stall:
> >
> > 1) Change the focus of CinelerraCV
> [ ... ]
> > 2) Stop using SVN
> [ ... ]
> > 3) Make releases
> [ ... ]
>
Christian Thaeter writes:
> This my maybe arguable view how to hive Cinelerra CV out of its
> develoment stall:
>
> 1) Change the focus of CinelerraCV
[ ... ]
> 2) Stop using SVN
[ ... ]
> 3) Make releases
[ ... ]
> 4) Make tracking HV less important
Hear hear. I've been reading this threa
This my maybe arguable view how to hive Cinelerra CV out of its
develoment stall:
1) Change the focus of CinelerraCV
Currently CVs goal is repackaging the HV version and fixing bugs.
But a real community version should acknowledge progress and new
features which are contributed by the community.
15 matches
Mail list logo
