RE: NAT pool timeout [7:21206]

2001-09-26 Thread Schneider, Matt
On a cisco router you can set the lease time by going into config t, and then into the dhcp pool name and issue the command lease 0-365 days, I think the default lease time is 1 day. -Original Message- From: Quadri, Habeeb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001

Re: Other Groups [7:21115]

2001-09-26 Thread Brian Whalen
I would also add the lists on http://puck.nether.net. There are juniper and cisco lists there.. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, EA Louie wrote: there are a few others...Brainbuzz actually has quite a few- here are 2 examples Cisco

Re: Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread Patrick
Hmm... Refurbished screws. Times ARE tough, aren't they. I need to look into purchasing some refurbished rubber bands and paper clips for the office. John Neiberger wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Sorry, this really struck me as funny and I didn't have anyone

Re: Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Good thing it's only $0.05! ;-) At that price you wouldn't feel like you got screwed, so to speak. Priscilla At 04:30 PM 9/26/01, John Neiberger wrote: Sorry, this really struck me as funny and I didn't have anyone else to share it with.I'm hoping that this--while not hilarious--will give

Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Wayne Wenthin
I am currently using this command on many routers ranging in ios from 10.2 (yeah I know but its a couple a hundred miles away) to 12.2. Without it our customers (we are an ISP) cannot reach the DHCP servers. It must work outside of the dialup only arena. At 01:09 PM 9/26/2001, khramov

Re: Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread John Neiberger
Exactly! I also like the fact that it's refurbished. I firmly believe we throw away way too many perfectly good screws that could be recycled. John Priscilla Oppenheimer 9/26/01 2:57:42 PM Good thing it's only $0.05! ;-) At that price you wouldn't feel like you got screwed, so to speak.

OT: NT DHCP Clients receive incorrect Subnet Masks and No [7:21218]

2001-09-26 Thread Christopher Supino
All, This is off-topic, but I have been up against this issue with one of our customers for quite awhile, and I am accessing any avenue possible to get it solved. We have a customer that is running a distributed NT domain. The topolgy is as follows: Core location: Core Switch/Router is Alcatel

RE: Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
That is actually pretty funny... Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ???

Re: Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread Tom Lisa
Thank goodness there wasn't any image. :) Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy John Neiberger wrote: Sorry, this really struck me as funny and I didn't have anyone else to share it with.I'm hoping that this--while not

RE: Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread Dennis Laganiere
Except for the $4.95 shipping and handling... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Way OT but pretty funny [7:21210] Good thing it's only $0.05! ;-) At

Re: Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread hal9001
Regrettably its my old screw, the wife returned it as non-functioning and got her money back. Karl - Original Message - From: Ole Drews Jensen To: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:26 PM Subject: RE: Way OT but pretty funny [7:21210] That is actually pretty funny... Ole

RE: Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Carter
Violent Femmes Why can't I get..Just one Screw? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Way OT but pretty funny [7:21210] Sorry, this really struck

RE: NT DHCP Clients receive incorrect Subnet Masks and No [7:21222]

2001-09-26 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
It sounds to me like the workstations that suffer from this problem have access to more than one DHCP server, and that one of them are configured with wrong subnet information. Also, check to see if the configured scopes are large enough for all clients. You might have a DHCP server running on

RE: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]

2001-09-26 Thread Tribavan Raina
Dear Santosh,. You dont have to do anything much just define a ip forwader command on the l3 interface where your clients are conncted for each subnet and ip helper-address Ip add of PDC ip helper-address IP add of BDC. Repeat these commands for each interfaces(virtual/physical) which are

which layer BGP,RIP ,OSPF work on [7:21226]

2001-09-26 Thread Tribavan Raina
Hi all.. The answers which we got for this question were wrong.I consulted the CISCO PRESS BOOK JEFF DOYLE ROUTING TCP/IP 1)RIP,BGP ARE AT APPLICATION LAYER ,PAGE 31 CHAPTER GUESS 1OR 2. 2)OSPF AT TRANSPORT. Any reasonings.. regds Tribavan Raina Network Consultant TechTonics Group

RE: Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread Bob Johnson
Hopefully no one from management will have read about the screws or. I'm just waiting for the new memo To: All Engineering Staff Re: IP Packets It has come to managements attention that we are continually paying for new packets with our Internet feed. This is a substantial cost and must be

RE: How config changes logged? [7:20968]

2001-09-26 Thread Shahram Esfahani
Jenny, You are correct in that with TACACS, the username will be shown in the log. Shahram -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How config changes

Re: which layer BGP,RIP ,OSPF work on [7:21226]

2001-09-26 Thread dre
The OSI model clearly needs to be replaced by something else. It is by far the most abused/misused way of describing networking concepts and ideas. If the OSI model helps you plan/design, install, support/administer any network idea/concept/technology -- all the better. If you spend your waking

Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
OK, so I tried it. The ip dhcp-server command didn't do anything on my network, which is mostly Ethernet LANs. What good is it? ;-) I had to use ip helper-address on the interface where the client resides. With that command, the DHCP messages got forwarded, whether I had ip dhcp-sever

RE: How config changes logged? [7:20968]

2001-09-26 Thread Dwayne Saunders
If you create a local username and the configure the line or console port to login local you router will log the user name as well 1w1d: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by dwaynes on vty0 (192.168.x.x) D'Wayne Saunders -Original Message- From: Shahram Esfahani [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
That memo would, of course, be on refurbished letterhead. I did a search on the word screw on Dell's site. Came up with 38 matches. All refurbished. I guess the US economy **IS** in dire straits when you can't buy a new screw anymore. Personally, I'm tempted to order ONE refurbished screw.

RE: CCIE-Security Written [7:21140]

2001-09-26 Thread Robin Nicholson
I've been thinking about going for the CQS security since I work with PIX and VPNs. Have you taken those exams? BTW: I'm still working on the CCNP requirements, so I'm quite a bit behind you. Robin Nicholson Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21233t=21140

Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Brian
Yeah I always thought the helper address command was the way to get a whole bunch of nonroutable junk forwarded. Bri - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:03 PM Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051] OK, so I tried it. The ip

Re: which layer BGP,RIP ,OSPF work on [7:21226]

2001-09-26 Thread Mark Morenz
The OSI model is relatively important (why else would questions about it routinely become the longest threads?). My whole argument for them is this: Models are just learning tools. When people learn biology, they don't *start* by learning how things work, they *start* by learning the major

Re: Is following CCIE written book list enough? [7:21107]

2001-09-26 Thread Brad Ellis
Caslow is probably the best choice of the bunch for the CCIE Written. The book is really good. I used it quite a bit in my studies. Halabi's book was crucial for the lab exam. -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco: www.optsys.net Frank Shen wrote in

Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 05:14 PM 9/26/01, Brian wrote: Yeah I always thought the helper address command was the way to get a whole bunch of nonroutable junk forwarded. It gets a bunch of UDP broadcasts forwarded. I figured out the ip dhcp-server command. It's not a replacement for ip helper-address. It's for

Re: which layer BGP,RIP ,OSPF work on [7:21226]

2001-09-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
It's not just a model, though. It's also a set of ISO documents. These arguments would be like if we said something about Ethernet that was different from what the IEEE 802.3 documents state, or something about TCP/IP that was different from the RFCs. Howard has actually read the ISO

RE: which layer BGP,RIP ,OSPF work on [7:21226]

2001-09-26 Thread Tribavan Raina
My intention of creating this thread again was just to clarify things as some of us concluded that BGP,RIP,OSPF are at network layer. Why I quoted the stuff in capital and if it hurt some of the members ,I am sorry but it was just to highlight that this is given in Cisco Press book and whose

OT: LAB swap procedure [7:21241]

2001-09-26 Thread Omer Ehsan Dar
Hi all, Just wanted to know what is the lab swap procedure. I know that I have to release the date and someone has to take that date but How do I get a date. do I get that persons date or can I get a new date? thanks in advance Omer Message Posted at:

RE: which layer BGP,RIP ,OSPF work on [7:21226]

2001-09-26 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
Very simple answer. The one thing that's always stressed with respect to the OSI model is that many protocols were developed prior to the OSI model being published. TCP/IP is one of those protocol suites. The OSI model serves as a guide for understanding how protocols work, or for how to

Re: Cisco Equipment [7:21127]

2001-09-26 Thread Stephen Skinner
Hi www.network-sol.com very big europe secondhand reseller or ebay are quite good... HTH steve From: Derek Gaff Reply-To: Derek Gaff To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Equipment [7:21127] Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:41:55 -0400 Hello all I have being reading the posts that have being

RE: Cisco NP-1FE and MC3810 $500/ea [7:20574]

2001-09-26 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
Neal, perhaps PayPal is the cause of your problems. If you're selling to international bidders that haven't yet signed up for PayPal, it's almost impossible for the buyer to be able to send any reasonable amount of money within a short time period. PayPal verifies international bidders by

Re: Why Cisco and not ...........!!! [7:19933]

2001-09-26 Thread Bradley Lowry
I've been doing Cisco for a few years at large clients, and recently took on a Nortel client. If you want a lot of hand-holding Nortel is not the choice. On the other hand, if you are able to get your support from some other source, the Nortel equipment is drastically cheaper and the backplanes

Re: Fastethernet failover [7:21177]

2001-09-26 Thread David C Prall
I'd start looking at IRB. David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com - Original Message - From: Steve Smith To: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:43 PM Subject: Fastethernet failover [7:21177] Hey gang this may sound strange but it was just a thought. I have a

Re: Cisco Equipment [7:21127]

2001-09-26 Thread Jason
What ever you do , do NOT get from IQSale.com , Grandstore or Hitek in USA. If you have a problem, they will drag their feet and ignore you. I'm still waiting for a refund they promised more than 4 months ago. I have emails from many other people with the same problems Jason Derek Gaff

Re: content service switch 11500? [7:21112]

2001-09-26 Thread Clayton Price
The CSS's have a firewall load balancing feature. You weould need one in front of the firewalls and one behind them. You also may not use nat on the pix's. There are some sample configs on ciscos website. Wilson, Bradley wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This

RE: CCIE-Security Written [7:21140]

2001-09-26 Thread Paul Jin
The word out on the street is that Brad Ellis here on the forum is going to start studying for it... Can u confirm brad? also, for those that are going to start on some security specialization, which do you guys think will be more in demand - Pix side or the Checkpoint side??? Message Posted

RE: which layer BGP,RIP ,OSPF work on [7:21226]

2001-09-26 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
My intention of creating this thread again was just to clarify things as some of us concluded that BGP,RIP,OSPF are at network layer. Why I quoted the stuff in capital and if it hurt some of the members ,I am sorry but it was just to highlight that this is given in Cisco Press book and whose

Re: which layer BGP,RIP ,OSPF work on [7:21226]

2001-09-26 Thread Nigel Taylor
Howard, Is this from your upcoming book for ISPs? Can you provide a name/title and when we can expect to see it on shelves. TIA Nigel . - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz To: Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 12:16 AM Subject: RE: which layer BGP,RIP ,OSPF

invalid magic number in 2600 [7:21249]

2001-09-26 Thread Alejandro Pelaez
I can't boot a 2600 router, I get the message 'invalid magic number' in flash. Ive tried changing the config register but it didn't work. Please if you know how to fix this answer to [EMAIL PROTECTED] please (if you want to answer to the newsgroup you can too, but please i prefer the email

Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21251]

2001-09-26 Thread balasaheb/ware/Smcentre/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all, I have 128 KBPS leased line between 2 routers and I want to enhance the performance of the same using one more leased line . Can anyboby suggest me whether is there any command which will make these 2 lines to work as 1 logical line as is the case with etherchannel ? Thanks in

RE: invalid magic number in 2600 [7:21249]

2001-09-26 Thread Ryan Ngai Hon Kong
Similar problem here when using new FLASH which is not formatted. Try this, go to ROMMON and do the TFTP download from ROMMON. After reboot should solve the problem. Good luck. Ryan -Original Message- From: Alejandro Pelaez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001

which layer BGP,RIP ,OSPF work on [7:21226]

2001-09-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have taken the quote rather out of context. On page 31, Doyle is discussing the TCP/IP protocol layers, and how they (roughly) correspond to the OSI stack. When he refers to BGP and RIP being at the application layer, he is referring to the TCP/IP application layer, which corresponds to the

RE: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21254]

2001-09-26 Thread Farhan Ahmed
ppp multilink but u need to change the encapsulation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21251] Hello all, I have 128 KBPS

RE: invalid magic number in 2600 [7:21249]

2001-09-26 Thread Farhan Ahmed
try to erase flash and put the ios again send the dump of yr screen -Original Message- From: Alejandro Pelaez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: invalid magic number in 2600 [7:21249] I can't boot a 2600 router, I get

RE: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Farhan Ahmed
i remember the only command i ut on the cisco router is peer default ip address dhcp and enable the ip helper address -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]

Re: CID 3.0 Exam [7:21200]

2001-09-26 Thread George Murphy CCNP, CCDP
Zahid, I used Ciscopress and Boson #2 and #1. Also Priscilla's Top Down Network Design is great... Good Luck Zahid Hassan wrote: Hi All, I would appreciate any suggestions/tips on CID 3.0 exam. I will be taking the exam next week and am using mainly the CCO for preparation. Any input

<    1   2