as long as we're on the subject of DHCP, I'm wondering if someone can point
me to a reference giving the specifics of the DHCP option numbers ( without
pointing me to The DHCP Handbook, which I don't have time to read right
now ) I ran a cross a situation where I needed to understand some of the
my question was the design itself - why are there firewalls at all these
branches if this is an internal network? firewalls generally would be placed
at network edges? Is this a VPN solution?
otherwise, if this is an issue of placing security zones throughout a
corporate network, I would make
It depends on if you are using NAT or PAT. The default timeout for dynamic
NAT translations (not using overload) is 24 hours and can be adjusted:
router(config)#ip nat translation timeout
If you are using PAT (overload), then you have to deal with other timeout
settings. If you execute:
wouldn't be the first time Doyle said something incorrect in his book. ;-
sorry, I'm not trying to pick a fight with you in particular. I've been
round the block more than once at various voice volumes with people on this
list about what layer this and that operates at. I've also been round the
au contraire, mon ami, the OSI model is VERY important. If you don't
understand it, how will you know when that guy selling the layer 4-layer 7
switch is lying? ;-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
dre
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001
xtocid2845011
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21251]
Hello all,
I have 128 KBPS leased line between 2 routers and I
Please decode the statement.
lol :)
Mukul
sam adams wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
xtocid2845011
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can
hey, Cil, I'm wondering about the TTL's. I was doing some tech review for
someone, and in the course of that reviewed some sniffer traces. OSPF was
showing TTL's of 255. the traces were presented to me because I had asked
about virtual link TTL's, which speculatively speaking would have to be
The firewalls are for the internet and the intranet. At the moment I
thinking of using statics on the outside of internet firewall and possible
using RIPv2 for the inside. For the intranet I'm considering using RIP on
both sides, but statics haven't been ruled out for either firewall
regards
interesting phenomenon, one which makes no sense to me. sorry, I don't have
configs or traces, so I hope my word is good here.
Practicing authentication of various kinds. RIPv2.
R1R2-R3
the authentication key chain and key strings are different on the R1-R2 link
than on the
hello all
any bidy has an idea what does it mean by need-11
the router is suffereing form no buffer
Buffer elements:
437 in free list (500 max allowed)
475 hits, 0 misses, 0 created
Small buffers, 104 bytes (total 60, permanent 60):
60 in free list (20 min, 150 max allowed)
hello all
any bidy has an idea what does it mean by need-11
the router is suffereing form no buffer
Buffer elements:
437 in free list (500 max allowed)
475 hits, 0 misses, 0 created
Small buffers, 104 bytes (total 60, permanent 60):
60 in free list (20 min, 150 max allowed)
62 hits, 0
Hi group,
I have set CAR on one of my sub-interfaces on my 3661 router, the problem is
that it only limits the OUTPUT packets. Here are my configs:
interface FastEthernet0/0.3
description 32/128 kbps test
encapsulation isl 3
ip address 213.217.37.245 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip
Good morning All
i have a small issue here of which i need your experience am new to pix
firewall and am runing ver 5.3
i need to set up an access list to allow TFTP, FTP, only inside. is this
correct? **marked
access-list acl_inside permit tcp 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.19.22.0
255.255.255.0 eq
Please help. I am a bit confused with the following:
Summary type 3 LSA's are generated by the ABR for every network and
propogated across area 0. When one of these networks goes down the ABR will
send an update summary LSA to all it's areas ??? If this is the case does
this mean that all SPF
my appologies.
i always presumed it worked in the same way as unix-HA...
thanks for the correction
steve
From: Kent Hundley
Reply-To: Kent Hundley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: policy route [7:21044]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:52:32 -0400
Stephen,
Your statement is incorrect.
Any comments?!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21274t=21116
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
with my new found knowledge on this subject...
why don`t you load share your HSRP by using the
standby preempt and standby track commands..then simply connect the other
ethernet interface to the other switch running HSRP ...job done...
~BTW I THINK.i`m not sure
List???
CU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would say the PIX will gain a lot of market share because of the
501 and 506. You can't get a Checkpoint box that will run on a
decent box for the prices of the 501 and 506. Some may disagree on
that. But, there's no reason not to get both Cisco
I created an order, and they actually give you free shipping and a 15%
discount off your order or screws!!!
-Original Message-
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Way OT but pretty funny
No, Chris, the routers receiving a type-3 LSA do NOT need to recalculate
the SPF algorithm. The key to understanding this is to realize that the
routers within an area have complete knowledge of the topology of the
area. In order to get to any destination in a different area, they must go
This is way off track but someone might have an idea.
I want to set up a test lab for dial up internet
access. from the isp side.
I want up to be able to cope with 100+ users dialing
in at any one time, using standard 56k uk lines.
Telco lines are not a problem, what i want to know is
what do
Group,
I have a problem with a certain vlan on our network. The problem goes
something like this...
I have a vlan105 interface created on a cat 6509. The primary ip address is
x.x.105.254. The interface has secondary addresses of x.x.155.254,
x.x.156.254 and x.x.157.254.
Servers on this
23 matches
Mail list logo
