when I took the exam I had several questions on ISDN and alot on x.25, I
did receive a couple on 700 series but not to many.
-Original Message-
From: John McCartney
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/6/2002 5:07 PM
Subject: BCRAN question [7:37481]
I'd like to ask those that have passed the
there are enough questions about the 700 part of the
couse book, you need to know what is taught...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R1 won't do anything if you disconnect its fa0/0 interface. Due to split
horizon and the fact that it's the only interface configured, it doesn't
have anyone to update.
Also, R2 probably doesn't notice a problem. I bet its Ethernet interface on
that side is still up. (If you were using
All,
The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test
yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on Passing
the CCIE Lab! this morning.
I was the only person taking the lab test in Halifax yesterday. I was told
that there was another person scheduled
OK, I'm going to break the NDA.
Not much on the 700's except for very basic stuff. It doesn't go into any
detail on the 700 commands, so don't worry too much about them. Concentrate
more on other stuff.
Did I really break the NDA? No, but I just wanted some people out there to
poop their pants
Jerry,
Check the code revisions on your Watchguard products. The SOHO units are
specified by Watchguard at 500Kbits/sec of 3DES throughput. See if
Watchguard support has anything to say with a specific question about that.
Sometimes Watchguard is really on the stick. Sometimes they
Doesn't matter. Just find a testing center that gives you some privacy when
you take the exam (like dividers between the computers). Also, make sure the
testing area doesn't have any distractions (like people walking into the
testing area all the time, people talking outside the testing area,
When I added a network 154.1.1.0 to router r1 pinged it and shut it down
this is what r3 did:
r3#debug ip routing
IP routing debugging is on
r3#
05:25:49: RT: del 154.1.0.0 via 193.1.1.1, rip metric [120/2]
05:25:49: RT: delete network route to 154.1.0.0
I have ethernet connections from r1 to
Congratulations!
George Zhang All,
The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test
yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on
Passing
the CCIE Lab! this morning.
I was the only person taking the lab test in Halifax yesterday. I was
told
that
I set this up really quick and had it working. Here is my setup:
R1R2
R1 has a loopback w/ address 10.1.1.1 and is using the serial to get to R2.
After the connection was up and working, I shut down the loopback on R1 and
immediately got the following (due to the triggered update as
Actually, you SAY you can use break, but the reference to break in regards
to the config-register means break while the router is running which is
very dangerous since anyone with access to the console of the router could
inadvertently pass the break sequence and cause all routing to cease.
Did you think you passed when you left the lab? Congratulations!!
-Original Message-
From: Ocsic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
Congratulations!
George Zhang All,
The title says it all. I
I'm taking the Routing Beta tomorrow. Is it really 3 hours instead of 1 hour
or do I have wrong information??? I may have to call them in the AM but
would appreciate it if someone can tell me if they know.
Thanks
Tarek
Message Posted at:
At 06:27 PM 3/6/02, Jerry P. wrote:
When I added a network 154.1.1.0 to router r1 pinged it and shut it down
this is what r3 did:
r3#debug ip routing
IP routing debugging is on
r3#
05:25:49: RT: del 154.1.0.0 via 193.1.1.1, rip metric [120/2]
05:25:49: RT: delete network route to 154.1.0.0
Did
George, you are an inspiration to us all. Thanks for the description of
your journey and congratulations!
Rik
-Original Message-
From: George Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
All,
The title
Can you enable debug ip routing on R2? We're trying to see if the route
goes into holddown. (At least I think that's what the problem is. The route
doesn't go into holddown on his network, it just gets deleted.)
The easiest way to see this is with debug ip routing. You can also see more
info
It will do the job nicely. No FEC for your lab, but do you really need it?
-Original Message-
From: Ronald James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE Starter amp;amp; Lab Equipment [7:37312]
Is Catalyst 5000 with
I would use a supervisor 3 if I had my wish...
and a RSM for intervlan routing and mls.
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ronald James
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL
did you try doing an nslookup?
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: Re: strange problem [7:37359]
if you have layer 3 connectivity, as you mentioned,
you can ping ip addresses on
If you are ebay shopping, you can get a 3810 for cheaper than the 2600's or
3600's.
Use this Ebay search (no quotes)
+cisco (3810,mc3810) -nokia -singer -att -att
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL
The portfast command does not turn STP off. The following is from CCO:
Cisco added a feature named portfast or fast-start, which means the STP
for this port will assume that the port is not part of a loop and will
immediately
move to the forwarding state, without going through the blocking,
Again, just a minor correction.
Portfast DOES NOT disable STP on the port.
It just causes the port to go from disabled to forwarding
as soon as the link is sensed by the port. STP still is
active on the said port. So when a loop is detected after
the port is set to forwarding, STP will change the
It does not actually disable spanning tree. PortFast causes a port to enter
the forwarding state immediately, bypassing the listening and learning
states. Spanning tree is still enabled and able detect loops.
Fears
-Original Message-
From: Elijah Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Portfast does not disable spanning tree, it allows the port to
go into forwarding a lot faster than the usual 50-70 seconds. WE run
portfast on all our production switches and it will still disable a
port if a loop is detected.
It should only be used for host on the network, since other switch
Hello,
Is anyone out there running Cisco 4006's with the new Sup III? If so what
has been your experience with them?
We are interested in using a pair of them as distribution switches with L3
capabilities to run OSPF. I know the 4000's had problems with this before so
I was wondering if the
be careful what you wish for..
better the devil you know than the devil you don't. ;-
I'm convinced the Cat 3920 was there just to screw with people. Now that
there are lots of practice racks, not to mention a very good software
simulator, Cisco will just go find some other piece of junk to
Congratulations George!!
Thanks for sharing with us the path you took to get CCIE. Many of us would
benefit from your experience.
I wasn't sure which CCIE training should I go for. Based on your input, I am
going to ask my Company to get me to the NMC class. Did you take both the
NMC 1 2 or
How about a duplicate MAC address or IP address?
sam sneed 03/06/02 04:04PM
This makes no sense.
kaushalender wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi group,
In early post of mine.I have mentioned a problem of my customer who is
not able to browse .Than i took a
Hi,
Today only I came to know that HSRP uses the following MAC address on all
media except Token Ring:
.0c07.ac** (where ** is the HSRP group number)
No wonder why I saw non unique mac addresses on cisco boxes.
Now my problem is that I am working on an application which assumes that
each
I'm sure MPLS over ATM will be more than enough of a horror to fill the void
that Token Ring coulf potentially leave behind... =(
- Original Message -
From: Chuck
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422]
be careful
George,
Way to go. I guess we were good partners for each other at NMC-1!
Congratulations.
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Sr. Network Engineer
Magnacom Technologies
140 N. Rt. 303
Valley Cottage, NY 10989
845-267-4000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great Job, Congrats!!
Thanks for sharing...!!
George Zhang wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
All,
The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test
yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on
Passing
the CCIE Lab! this
Here is the debug:
00:04:10: RT: metric change to 10.0.0.0 via 192.1.1.1, rip metric [120/1]
new metric [120/-1]
00:04:10: RT: delete route to 10.0.0.0 via 192.1.1.1, rip metric
[120/4294967295
]
00:04:10: RT: no routes to 10.0.0.0, entering holddown
As soon as this happened, the route
Also, make sure you are looking at the debug at R3. R1 won't show this same
info..
Scott H. wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Here is the debug:
00:04:10: RT: metric change to 10.0.0.0 via 192.1.1.1, rip metric [120/1]
new metric [120/-1]
00:04:10: RT:
Many congrats!!!
Nadeem
=
George Zhang wrote:
All,
The title says it all. I took my first attempt at the CCIE lab test
yesterday (March 5) in Halifax and received the Congratulations on Passing
the CCIE Lab! this morning.
I was the only person taking the lab test in Halifax
Congratulation George Zhang !
Juli Hato
CCNP, CCDP
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37516t=37490
Here is the scenerio: 2 Catalyst 1912 switches connected with 100 Mbits port
and set up for trunking. 6 Vlans set up on both swithes, 2 ports to a VLAN.
2 workstations 10.0.4.10/22 10.0.4.11/22. If wkstA and WkstB are in same
VLAN on same switch they can ping. If wkstA and WkstB are in same VLAN
Kelly,
Thanks so much for getting back to me. However, I still have a few areas
that I'm a bit confused about. Please see comments in-line.
Thanks so much again :-)
Best Regards,
Hunt Lee
Kelly Cobean wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hunt,
The purpose
Yup, that's what I see too. He doesn't see entering holddown.
Here's what he sees according to a previous message from him:
r3#debug ip routing
IP routing debugging is on
r3#
05:25:49: RT: del 154.1.0.0 via 193.1.1.1, rip metric [120/2]
05:25:49: RT: delete network route to 154.1.0.0
154.1.0.0
Hello, anybody here had successfully implemented Authorization (AAA) on
TCPX.25 translation? I've managed to do Authentication but not
Authorization. Please assist...
TIA
Cecil
Scenario
-
1. User initiates tcp session to target device (telnet to network element,
say a remote IOS
Hello everybody,
I know this doesn`t have much to do with Cisco,
but if anyone would like to share his/her knowledge,
I would be very grateful.
Has anyone worked with Riverstone RS3000 before?
I have set up OSPF backbone area on RS 3000,
ospf create area backbone
Then I wanted all the ports to
Michael Witte wrote:
second switch they can ping. Now here is where it gets weird. If you move
one of the worksations out of the VLAN on a single switch they can't
ping(expected). If you are on seperate switches but in the same VLAN and
ping 10.0.4.11 -t , then move the workstation to
I haven't used both but I had to reply. I had set up a CheckPoint
SecuRemote VPN, the VPN package that came with CP 2000 on a Nokia box
and I have to say, it's not worth the hassle. CP tossed in the VPN
component as a selling point so they could say, Hey our firewall does
it all. I should
yes, along the line you mentioned, the new sup-II/MSFC-2
will only have 16 hsrp groups available...which means the
groups will have to be re-used...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
I tried to set up default IP addressing for my dial up users on a 3640
router. I used a pool of three IP addresses for three lines. The Async group
range has Six ports, but only three have active lines.
Things were fine till the first three users connected. A strange thing was
happening after
Hi.. Sorry some more questions.
1)I found although there are 5 module in my switch, when I do sh flash,
only one binary flash file appear. Which module does the belong to?
2)How to see the flash code file for other module. I found I can only go to
the RSM by typing session 4 and find out the
I've worked with the 3000 concentrator but not with the Checkpoint. The
3000 is very user friendly and easy to use. You have to do minor
configuration via console and then you're off with the web interface which
is very simple to use. I can't make a recommendation for which you should
buy but
Hi
1. This software file belongs to the supervisor which controls all the other
modules
2. You will not be able to go to the ethernet cards. These all use the sup
software.
3. Not too sure about the redundant sup. I guess that you should have the
same ocmmands there as well
-Original
Dear all
At last it is my turn to write this email, I've got my number at my fourth
attemp in Brussel last Monday
I was not a very active member of this group (sorry for that), but I've
learned a lot of things from you all.
I thank you all for the help and the answers you gave me.
My advise for
See Inline:
Hi.. Sorry some more questions.
1)I found although there are 5 module in my switch, when I do sh flash,
only one binary flash file appear. Which module does the belong to?
The files in flash belong to the supervisor module. Each 5000/6000 series
switch needs
at least 1 supervisor
101 - 150 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
