Hi Priscilla,
Your suspicion is 100% correct: the flow mask is signaled from the router
(RP) to the switch (SE) via the MLSP protocol.
Take care,
Kennedy
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> With Multilayer Switching (MLS), how does the MLS Switch
> (MLS-SE) know that the router (MLS-RP) has an a
Anyone lease equipment? Best prices, ebay?
Anyone have examples of a good home lab equipment list?
Should I spend the extra couple grand on 2 3550s?
How many of the routers should be 26XX?
Should I purchase a set based switch?
Timothy T. Lewis CCNP, CCDP, MCDBA, MCSE (2000)
1771 We
Hi Priscilla,
Quoting Multilayer Switching Companion Guide on p. 340...
MLS creates flows based on access lists configured on the MLS-RP...the
MLS-SE handles standard and extended access list PERMIT traffic...Route
topology changes and the addition or modification of access lists are
reflected in t
S! ALL!
Here's my experience with trying to pass VLANS over Aeronet 350
bridges...this ties into this thread because we ran into issues when we
tried to link bridges...
glossary: trunk = "switchport mode trunk" with ALL VLANS allowed. 802.1q
encapsulation.
I run a single DS1 into an office park.
Very good explanation Priscilla. Thanks!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66466&t=66461
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure viol
I was just reading about UDLD and it said if its not enabled on both ends,
it may not work correctly. I think you'd be taking a chance enabling UDLD on
an access port. Some CATOS switches have the errdisable function enabled by
default. When we installed our first few 6509's, ports were being disab
Charlie Wehner wrote:
>
> Will UDLD prevent duplex mismatches from occurring on end user
> devices? (Disabling a ports that are detected to be mismatched)
Cisco's Unidirectional Link Detection protocol requires the two ends of the
link to send UDLD messages to each other. An end-user device woul
A friend of mine and I had a discussion on this topic. 2 PIX LAN-LAN
VPN. He
said that by default, VPN will terminate in 24 hours if no traffic. When
bringing VPN up, the first packet always gets lost. Is this true?
Thanks.
Yoshi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=
With Multilayer Switching (MLS), how does the MLS Switch (MLS-SE) know that
the router (MLS-RP) has an access list? In other words, how does the switch
know that it should use a destination flow mask, a destination-source flow
mask, or a full-flow mask? The access list, afterall, is on the router,
Will UDLD prevent duplex mismatches from occurring on end user devices?
(Disabling a ports that are detected to be mismatched)
Or does UDLD only work between switches?
Thanks in Advance
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66461&t=66461
Does anyone know if there is a way to obtain the ASET labs apart from being
a Cisco partner ?
Thx.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66460&t=66460
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.co
On 27 Mar 2003 at 21:53, XY HIEN LE wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question that need to be clarified regarding the metric of
> EIGRP summary metric:
> The metric of EIGRP summarized route derived from the component route
> that has the biggest or smallest metric?
> Any clarification on this matter is mu
S! ALL!
The desired result is to allow only the default route to be sent to a
neighbor in AS2.
First way I did it:
router bgp 1
nei 192.168.100.10 remote-as 2
nei 192.168.100.10 default-originate
nei 192.168.100.10 distribute-list 1 out
access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0
access-list 1 deny any
Sec
XY,
I would think that the metrics of the summarized routes do NOT affect the
summary route because the summary route originates on the router doing the
summarization. Therfore it would be advertised "clean" to the next router,
i.e. using only the default EIGRP metrics. So a router 3 hops away fro
Mario,
The first part looks exactly right to me. You have used a
class-map/access-list duple to ID the traffic to be affected, put it into a
policy-map that defines the action to be taken, and then assigned it to an
interface via the service-policy statement. Exactly correct. You win the CAR
:)
I
I had the same model and the same problem in 2001. I was doing prettyt much
the same setup also, however I had PAT in use. For some reason (which was
reoslved with an IOS upgrade), the box would die but luckily I would get a
dump at that time of the memory etc. I got onto the TAC and they had a new
Thomas Larus wrote:
>
> I don't think we can stress enough how important the
> speed/duplex mismatch
> and autonegotiation problems are. If you are having a LAN
> problem, this is
> one of the first things you should consider. The interesting
> thing thing
> about duplex mismatch errors is that
S! ALL,
I have been to the Cisco Press site but I cannot find them there. It looks
like both books have been updated to newer editions. Does anyone have these
errata files? I have found that without these errata files the lab exercises
are near to useless due to the printing (and err..umm..just pl
Real world I had to deal with this to add 'legacy' Motorola equipment
attached to a larger Cisco network. The business unit never bought the OSPF
license for the Motorolas.
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Again, a CCIE practice lab -
R5 - the task calls fo
Willy.
Wow!! you teach the BGP and MPLS courses!! Where???
Awesome!!
I've just begun my MPLS study which will be the last exam for the
CCIP...Then I am going to head back to study for the CCIE Lab which I
will take once Mr. Solie comes out with his PSV II ..
When Mr. Solie ?? :-
Try this http://home.attbi.com/~blaga/Written.htm
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66451&t=66450
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclos
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Larry Letterman
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 1:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Console management [7:66405]
I have a lab with a 2511 and the older ones dont need an octal
cable..they
have 16 RJ por
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cisco Nuts
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP exam in prep. for the CCIE Lab!! [7:66432]
Hello,The new BGP exam(beta) for the CCIP exam is a great one (imho) in
prep. fo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: allowing telnet to the outside pix interface [7:66433]
Hi all
How can I let peoples outside the pix firewall to telnet my outside Pix
firewall IP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott Roberts
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 5:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Console management [7:66405]
I should warn you about my last response regarding the 'Digi
portserver', I
had to make my ow
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael W. Oliver
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 12:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Console management [7:66405]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+--- On Friday, March 28, 2003 22:01, O
I don't think we can stress enough how important the speed/duplex mismatch
and autonegotiation problems are. If you are having a LAN problem, this is
one of the first things you should consider. The interesting thing thing
about duplex mismatch errors is that things can seem like they are working
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Speed Duplex Talk again [7:66402]
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206 wrote:
>
> Well said, John. I guess we'll still be see
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Speed Duplex Talk again [7:66402]
Well said, John. I guess we'll still be seeing a lot of these until the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SPAN on 2948G [7:66403]
Here's the command structure:
set span {_mod/src_ports | src_vlan | sc0} dest_mod
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 1:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Solie Lab Solutions [7:66349]
>In case anyone was wondering, there is a set of solutions for the
>Solie
CCIE Practice labs ( just the big ones at
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Console management [7:66405]
Yes. The 2511 can also be used. Though, you need an octal cable (8-async
lin
I passed the CCNP last week and I wanted to start studying for the CCIE
"written" this weekend. I have looked at various WebPages including cisco and
groupstudy. The amount of material for the test is amazing, so I'm at a lost
here, especially with so many books.
Does anyone have any suggestions
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 6:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Console management [7:66405]
I'm using a Cisco 2509-RJ. You can control up to 8 devices on it's async
port
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kazan, Naim
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 8:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Console management [7:66405]
I take it that either the 2509 or 2511 will work for me.
-Original Message-
From: Orl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SPAN on 2948G [7:66403]
I would presume that the "2948G" you mentioned is the L2-only model. The
Catalyst
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: EIGRP route to IGRP table [7:66391]
On R4, go to OSPF router config and use summary-address.
Like so:
ro
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multicasting Test Plan [7:66326]
Hmm.. For software, you can get a demo copy of Cisco's IP/TV. It's a
wor
Hello,The new BGP exam(beta) for the CCIP exam is a great one (imho) in
prep. for the actual CCIE Lab.It really tests your skill and deep
understanding of your BGP knowledge..133 questions in 250 minutes
(slightly less than 2 minutes per question), which I think was not
enough.Diagrams
Hi all
How can I let peoples outside the pix firewall to telnet my outside Pix
firewall IP address which is 212.121.211.123 ?
---212.121.211.123(515E-PIX)-10.1.1.1--
I have PIX Firewall Version 6.1(4).
Regards,
Ismail Al-Shelh
Message Posted at:
htt
Anyone interested?
Timothy T. Lewis CCNP, CCDP, MCDBA, MCSE (2000)
1771 West Mason Morrow Rd.
Lebanon, OH 45036
X
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66431&t=66431
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
NLI ( b..o..o..t..c..a..m..p.. lab 8 ) redistribution of OSPF and BGP
I checked CCO and the "answer" key
everything "appears" to be correct.
So why is it that half my OSPF routes do not show up in the BGP table???
*> 137.20.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
* i137.20.40.16/28
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66429&t=66382
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
43 matches
Mail list logo
