If I use sniffer to trace,there are not any ftp packet from router to my pc.
So I think maybe there are some problem on router when execute the command.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66541&t=66528
--
FAQ, list arch
26t02#copy ftp://test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin flash:
Destination filename [c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin]?
problem is same
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66539&t=66528
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscri
Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66540&t=66540
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EM
cisco
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66538&t=66538
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VB
@q#!
chengpeng
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-03-31
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66537&t=66537
--
FAQ, list archives, an
I have a question concerning the e-sim part of the ccna test , will the CCNA
router and switch eSIM CD cover what I need to get through the eSIM part. I
am taking the recert for the ccna soon, and would like to know what to expect
thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.
Hi,
You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because
the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required
to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not se
try this command!
copy ftp://test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/c2500-i-l.113-11a.bin flash:
>I can upload IOS to ftp server,but I can't download
>26t02#copy flash:c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin ftp://test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Address or name of remote host [10.18.6.7]?
>Destination filename [c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin]?
>
Xy,
The same problem happened to my 3662 last NOV. It drove me crasy. Then I
tried to replace the SDRAM and found out I got a bad SDRAM.
Let try and I hope it helps.
Good luck,
Tu Do
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66532&t=66472
---
""Mike Martins"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yes, EBGP multihop is between different AS's, that is a different setup,
it
> must also have a way of reaching across the hops, an IGP.
nope - works just fine for iBGP as well.
>
> On a IBGP you can have a hop across ie 5 routers in a
Before adding authentication into the mix, I would remove it and start
working from the physical layer up. Which router is supposed to provide
clocking? Don't you need the "clockrate" keywork on the DCE?
Mario
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
test for mpls_newbie!!
_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66527&t=66527
ritul wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I am having one doubt regarding software compression. I had
> read on internet
> that HDLC wont support compression.
Cisco supports software compression for HDLC using the Stacker (LZS)
algorithm. Cisco doesn't support hardware compression for HDLC. See this link:
h
Han,
Was it a typo error or...
Why do you want to load C2500 IOS to a C2600 router?
IOS doesn't let you do this.
The flash was formated for C2600 already!
Tu Do
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66531&t=66528
--
FAQ, l
test for a newbie!!
_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66526&t=66526
---
I found the answer to question 2:
"It's not usually a good idea to configure logging for access list entries
that will match very large numbers of packets. Doing so will cause log files
to grow excessively large, and may cut into system performance. However,
access list log messages are rate-limit
Dear Group,
Need you help in resolving this configuration issue. Below is the setup that
I
am trying to do :-
CiscoCallManager->LAN SWITCHLAN SWITCH
| |
2 MBPS| |
""Larkin, Richard"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I note the 4-port serial interface (NM-4T) is not supported on the 2600,
but
> I recall having an older image which did list the interfaces, but I can't
> recall the image version.
>
> Does anyone know what version of IOS will support t
Aziz
How do you want to use them? As a layer 3 interface or redundant l 2 channel
or trunk?
Martijn
>-- Oorspronkelijk bericht --
>Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:48:35 GMT
>From: "Aziz Islam"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Cat 6509 Scenario - Comments please [7:66211]
>Reply-To: "Aziz Islam"
>
>
>
The current IPexpert CCIE classes are all brand new so there really
isn't anyone that can give you a review. The first instructor led class
is scheduled for next month and the first CCIE mock lab class is in
June. We also are offering a distance learning vClass.
Seeing as I'm the developer of the
I to purchased the Lucent Portmaster but I got the PM25 unit. I was able to
pick up 4 of these on EBay for $25 each (had to buy all 4) They have 3 db68
connectors similar to the ones on the Cisco 2509 or 2511. They are so
similar the Cisco octopus cable for these routers actually works on the PM25
I agree that you should know the generalities of the 700 series. I bought
one anyway off of ebay, it was only $20 for a 776M, so I wasn't out a whole
lot. the 800 is IOS so there isn't much to worry about in terms of commands.
scott
""fred barreras"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All
I can upload IOS to ftp server,but I can't download
26t02#copy flash:c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin ftp://test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address or name of remote host [10.18.6.7]?
Destination filename [c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin]?
Writing c2600-is-mz.120-21.bin
!
!!
How do you guys feel about the IPEXPERT labs in the workbook?
Has anyone tried them?, what is your thoughts on them and how is it as
compared to the real lab.
Thanks,
KB
_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 mont
I just sent the previous message about a week ago and here it mysteriously
shows up again. I did not send it again. The first sarcastic one that I sent
was plenty! I think the Groupstudy servers have brain damage.
Shawn K.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kaminski, Shawn G [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTEC
1. Yes, they will work.
2. Depending on the failure you have. If it involves any circuitry on the
supervisor itself, the whole module will be disabled.
Aurelian Georgescu
-Original Message-
From: Aziz Islam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
I am using a Lucent Portmaster PM25 for the management of my Cisco Routers
and switches in my home lab. I picked up a used unit on EBay for about $50
including shipping and the cables to use for connectivity (The Cisco Octo
cable that are used with the 2511 routers work fine with the Portmaster).
Y
Aziz Islam wrote:
> Folks,
> I have two Cat 6509's with two Supervisor-1A-2GE, MSFC, and PFC cards. I
> just want to know if the two Gigabit Ethernet ports on each Supervisor work
> independently of which Supervisor is active.
Yes the uplinks on the inactive sup are functional.
>
> 1.I me
When the sups are working correctly, all gig ports are able to
be used. If the sup fails, the ports may or may not work, depending on the
failure...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: Aziz Islam
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28,
if you mean like a 2511? an access server to allow you to telnet into all
your routers and not keep switching the console cables around?
well you could buy a 2511 (or 2512 for token ring) to do the job, it has 16
ports. the problem with this is that you'll pay a premium on ebay for it. an
alternat
""Tim Champion"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values)
> which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest,
> lowest or average value for the entire route?
>
> Also if anyone could point me to
Did this ever work? Does it work with HDLC?
Notice that O in the debug output? That means Output. In a working
environment, you would also see I for input.
Very strange indeed, but the best advice is to start troubleshooting at the
bottom of the OSI model.
Let us know. Now you got us curious. :-
Two quick questions:
I've configured an access-list to only permit certain tcp and udp ports
above 1024. At the end of the access-list I have the following commands:
access-list 101 deny tcp any any log
access-list 101 deny udp any any log
access-list 101 deny ip any any log
Question 1: Do I e
Try to put the FastEthernet module in a different slot, with 7200 some you
have to be very careful which slot you use for different modules...
Juan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Xy Hien Le
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 6:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
??? There is no IP in the payload of an icmp echo or echo-reply packet so
what would NAT modify? I'm gonna hafta lab this up and see it in action I
suppose. One good thing about working Sundays... plenty o' time to play ;)
Charles
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Yes, EBGP multihop is between different AS's, that is a different setup, it
must also have a way of reaching across the hops, an IGP.
On a IBGP you can have a hop across ie 5 routers in a IBGP peering session.
As long as the IGP can reach the other peer it will work. Also, the full
mesh requiremen
I would have been interested, however, with less than 29 days until my first
attempt in RTP, and a new project looming with work, I don't think I can
work in any extra time. If I tank too badly on the Lab, I'll let you know,
and maybe we can work something out prior to my second attempt. Good luc
I note the 4-port serial interface (NM-4T) is not supported on the 2600, but
I recall having an older image which did list the interfaces, but I can't
recall the image version.
Does anyone know what version of IOS will support this module?
Rik
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>
> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > All,
> >
> > Please can someone clear this up for me, if you have the time.
> >
> > IBGP peers do not have to be physically connected to one
> another, as long
> as
> > an IGP (most preferably) is running between t
I have swapped the FastEthernet modules of both routers and still NO
WORK
If I remove the FastEthernet from the TROUBLED router and install it in
another identical model router with identical IOS and both worked just
fine Could be hardware problem with the chassis (it is a 7206
chassis)
Yes, I have see this behavior many times and the key answer give it enough
time,
the problem is if you start making changes and still it does not works
because frame
needs time be on sync, normally what I do is configure it and keep making
other configurations
and them come back to it and the link
I have a working config now so you will be pleased to know that 6.3 can
do NAT-T although as a point of note there is currently no pdm available
for 6.3 ( except a fairly crippled beta) it is disable by default and
can be enabled with the command isakmp nat-traversal
seems to work fine :-)
Chris
Where is the clock rate ?
I suppose both serials are connected back to back ?
Then do a show controller serial 0 and see which one has the dce V35 or X21.
Then put clock rate 64000 for example !!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66512&t=66486
-
To me everything seems well configured plus Xy says he has been
troubleshooting for one month now.
I would suggest that you upgrade the IOS on this particular router.
Also, does it happens the same if you ping from the other router ?
Regards.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/re
Would be nice to hear if anyone has encountered similars problem and has any
ideas how to get past some of the sometimes animal behaviour of frame-relay.
Setting up a frame-relay cloud; Router A needs to connect to Router B, DLCIs
are given. Disable inverse-arp and install frame-relay map statemen
A practise that is becoming quite common is running BGP on the edges of an
AS only. It is a waste for a router in the core to have a full internet
table. The Core could then comprise of ie MPLS which would optimize the
traffic flows.
I cannot remember which book I used but when I was studying for t
The safest way I have come across is to create a vpngroup with a single IP
pool address and then allow telnet from that address only. You will need a
vpn client of course. the sample config is available on CCO, or contact me
offline for my version.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ismail Al
Last time I looked you could not do NAT-T on a PIX with 6.3 software. Only
VPN Gateways can handle it. Next gen of software should be able to do it sez
the great god Cisco. I have been looking forward to this for some time as I
install both PIX and VPN all the time.
Cheers,
Steve
-Original M
I've not seen any replies yet, but forgive me if I'm covering old ground.
You can't (as far as I know) telnet to the outside interface.
You can however (with a DES license (Free)) permit SSH to the outside
interface, then use something like Putty or SecureCRT to access it.
Or I suppose you could a
saunders1m wrote:
>
> Thanks for your help gents, im sure though i am missing
> something here as i
> have tried everything though i still seem to be missing
> something! Any
> further ideas would be great & im stuck for moment!!
>
> Here is my both configs & the #show int s0
> When using deb
You can change Ethernet encapsulation if you're using VLANs, i.e. to ISL or
801.1q. You can also change encapsulation if you're using Novell NetWare,
since Novell supports 4 different encpsulations.
But with IP, you can't change the encapsulation. IP is essentially always
Ethernet II, although a r
Thanks for your help gents, im sure though i am missing something here as i
have tried everything though i still seem to be missing something! Any
further ideas would be great & im stuck for moment!!
Here is my both configs & the #show int s0
When using debug ppp neg i get the following
R10-1
saunders1m wrote:
>
> I have 2 routers connected back to back via a DTE - DCE
> crossover cable and
Does it work with HDLC encapsulation? That would prove that there's no
physical layer problem.
> i am trying to establish a ppp connection though i can't seem
> to make the
> connection and when i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> As far as I am aware, the 1st packet in the flow has to be L3
> switched. A
> router just does not send an enable packet back to the SE if it
> fails an
> ACL. In terms of the telnet, FTP scenarios, I assume that the
> flow does not
> matter at the SE, cause the pack
Hi,
Below is a reply I posted to someone else with a similar question:
Hi,
I have not passed the Lab yet. My date is in June. Below is a home lab that
I have assembled. It all depends on how much you can afford to spend. With
this equipment I can do the CCbootcamp, IPexpert, Hello and Routopia la
saunders1m wrote:
> I have 2 routers connected back to back via a DTE - DCE crossover cable and
> i am trying to establish a ppp connection though i can't seem to make the
> connection and when i try using debug ppp authentication i get:
>
> 01:57:10: Se0 PPP: Treating connection as a dedicated li
Ken,
Technically speaking, even eBGP has the ability to peer with
neighbors that aren't directly connected. Typically, eBGP peers will have
diect physical connectivity, whereas iBGP peers are part of the same AS, as
long as a route/path exist to that peer, connectivity shouldn't be a
probl
Try debug ppp neg instead. If there is an issue before authentication takes
place then you won't see anything.
The config seems correct, could you paste a show interface serial 0 of both
routers ?
Regards.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66494&t=66486
--
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All,
>
> Please can someone clear this up for me, if you have the time.
>
> IBGP peers do not have to be physically connected to one another, as long
as
> an IGP (most preferably) is running between them.
nope. direct connect is preferred, but nope - don'
I hate to say what the problem appears to be.
think summarization :- wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Chuck,
> My first thought is what does the "sh ip bgp for the
> routes that does not show up in BGP indicate.
>
> I believe there is a requirement not to disable "sync" whic
Thanks!!! This is why I LOVE this list. You can ask a question that only a
few hundred people in the whole world could answer really well, and one of
them will answer.
Tom Larus
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thomas Larus wrote:
> >
> > I don't think we can
Matt,
That's correct. Think about authentication in terms of cisco's 3
tier design model;
Core(WAN)
Distribution(Routed/Switched)
Access(User)
This is why you get the message you noted.
> 01:57:10: Se0 PPP: Treating connection as a dedicated line
The use of authentication within ppp,
My two cents
Another thing that is very important and critical with redistribution is the
metric being used in both directions...
Juan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Nigel Taylor
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sisco wrote:
> we've inserted a VIP4-80 RM7000 controller on 7507 router but it doesnt
> recognize the GE Port (GBIC)..pls see show version and show diag
The PA-GE is only supported in the 7100 and 7200VXR. For a 7500, you
need to get a GEIP or GEIP+.
Regards,
As far as I am aware, the 1st packet in the flow has to be L3 switched. A
router just does not send an enable packet back to the SE if it fails an
ACL. In terms of the telnet, FTP scenarios, I assume that the flow does not
matter at the SE, cause the packet processing at the router justs denies i
All,
Please can someone clear this up for me, if you have the time.
IBGP peers do not have to be physically connected to one another, as long as
an IGP (most preferably) is running between them.
On page 128 (paragraph 1) of the Routing TCP/IP Volume 2 book, it says the
following about route refl
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66487&t=66487
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [E
try to change it to full-duplex.:)
""Xy Hien Le"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have an issue that took me almost a month and still not figure out
what's
> the problem?
>
> I can ping out to a connected router (fastethernet or any type of
interfaces)
> and can only ping the local
I have 2 routers connected back to back via a DTE - DCE crossover cable and
i am trying to establish a ppp connection though i can't seem to make the
connection and when i try using debug ppp authentication i get:
01:57:10: Se0 PPP: Treating connection as a dedicated line
Is my config right???
R
Hi Brian,
Yes it does work. I have lab tested the above and it produces the desired
results(In theory it worked for me, but since I had my lab set up, curiosity
got the better of me..). I would, if I had the choice :D, choose number 1.
Cheers
Raj
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.c
Hi all,
we've inserted a VIP4-80 RM7000 controller on 7507 router but it doesnt
recognize the GE Port (GBIC)..pls see show version and show diag
Thanks!
---
7507Core>sh versi
Load for five secs: 26%/25
Hi all,
Can anyone give me some information on how much
bridging is asked in the new CCIE Routing and
Switching written exam?
Thanks,
Imran.
=
Imran Moin
Network Engineering and Operations
University of Colorado, Boulder
CCNA, CCNP (switching)
___
How to configure the privilege of secondary IP?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66481&t=66481
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclos
Try adding
ip routing
To the config.
AFAIK, in some versions of IOS this is not on by default.
HTH
Dom Stocqueler
CTO SysDom Technologies
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Xy Hien Le
Sent: 30 March 2003 08:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
J B wrote:
> Encapsulation by default is ARPA.
> Can this be changed?
Yes, it can (try 'encap ?' in interface config mode), but you don't need
to fiddle with that if you don't *know* you do.
Regards,
Marco.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.co
Encapsulation by default is ARPA.
Can this be changed?
JB
J B wrote:
>
> I wonder about the encapsulation type for the interface?
>
> JB
>
>
> Xy Hien Le wrote:
> >
> > I have an issue that took me almost a month and still not
> > figure out what's
> > the problem?
> >
> > I can ping out to a
Xy Hien Le wrote:
> 00:28:14: IP: s=1.1.1.2 (local), d=1.1.1.1 (FastEthernet3/0), len 100,
> encapsulation failed
Might this be the problem:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/ping_traceroute.html#addres_pro
What does a 'show ip arp 1.1.1.1' show on the box that has IP address
1.1.1.2 (and vi
I wonder about the encapsulation type for the interface?
JB
Xy Hien Le wrote:
>
> I have an issue that took me almost a month and still not
> figure out what's
> the problem?
>
> I can ping out to a connected router (fastethernet or any type
> of interfaces)
> and can only ping the local inter
Type in ping, press return and follow the on screen prompts. This will allow
you to use ping in extended mode to specify the source address or interface.
Steve Wilson
Network Engineer
-Original Message-
From: Peter P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 11:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Encapsulation failed appears because of arp failing. Try debug arp and
please could you paste show int f3/0 instead of show ip int fa3/0 ?
Regards.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66478&t=66472
--
FAQ, list archives
Chuck,
My first thought is what does the "sh ip bgp for the
routes that does not show up in BGP indicate.
I believe there is a requirement not to disable "sync" which suggest that
the routes not being added to the BGP, isn't sync'd with the IGP. Does any
of this have route informati
I have an issue that took me almost a month and still not figure out what's
the problem?
I can ping out to a connected router (fastethernet or any type of interfaces)
and can only ping the local interface.
For example, if I connect this router FastEthernet F3/0 to another router
FastEthernet 4/0.
82 matches
Mail list logo
