hi all,
anyone know whether MPLS-size MTUs are supported on the 29XX/35XX-XL
switches? and if so, from what IOS revision?
thnx
-andy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34464&t=34464
--
FAQ, list archives, and sub
seems like a good time to meet up, for those who would like, will be there,
etc.
maybe see whether we can snag a meeting roomn for an hour or so .. ? - maybe
we can grab HCB and/or other players...
any comments, ideas, etc. welcome
be nice, and maybe I can organize... ;-)
let me know
-a
M
hey,
anyone found a decent UK BT DSL solution?
what I am looking for is some kind of hardware firewall solution for the
(aaauugh!!) USB connection you get (unless you have less sense than money -
ie business enet presentation)
I have looked at the linix solution, which doesn't really do if for
hi all,
right, bit of an odd one maybe...
i am in a situation whereby i have a a datacentre architecture with
mixed-vendor (cisco/foundry) kit. i have multiple cisco 6509s as
distribution-layer, and a pair of foundry BigIrons as core (dual trunk
uplinks, etc.). can i run pVLANs on the dist-lay
Boy6872 wrote on July 22, 2001 at 10:47 PM:
> Way to go, Chuck.
> Keep the wankers in check and maintain the CCIE merit and validity!
> Rob H. CCNP, CCDP, CCIE WR
>
WR - wassat then? WAN Routing?
if it is "Written", as I suspect since I don't see a #, then the irony is
obviously lost on you
A
why don't people take Juniper questions to the Juniper
> Groupstudy
> news group? I know for a fact that a number of folks within Juniper lurk
on
> that newsgroup but not on the Cisco one.
>
>
> -Julian
>
>
> ""Andy Harding"" wrote in messa
** excuse the change of email and name - just changed provider
on a Juniper:
[edit protocols ospf]
root@router# show
export type-5-suppress;
area 0.0.0.10 {
area-range 172.16.0.0/16;
}
[edit policy-options]
root@router# show
policy-statement type-5-suppress {
term area-0-suppress {
** excuse the change of address/name - have migrated between providers.
DSL now :-)
Nnanna,
thanks for the reply - I'm pretty certain that this is a solution to a
different problem. If you look closely at the text, what is being achieved
is avoiding additional hops within an area by having non
something that would facinate me would be a show of hands relating to who is
with which AS, and maybe where else they had been in their illustrious past?
personally I have been 8372/8220, and am now 2914
Andy
ps - info for identification, not representation
Message Posted at:
http://www.gro
PLEASE
Enough!!
set up your own mail-list if need be, but please quit with this nonsense on
this *CISCO* *NETWORKING* mail-list
Paul - any chance you can filter this thread out?
thanks
Andy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6844&t=6844
--
as we seem to be getting more IS-IS stuff on the list, maybe someone could
help me out here.
I am having real trouble seeing how IS-IS areas and levels fit together. As
far as I can make out the numbering of areas is arbitary, and all L2 routers
should be in the same area, with the L1/L2 and the
ginal Message -
From: "LandCai"
To: "Andy Harding"
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 3:51 AM
Subject: Re: Terminal Server [7:3939]
> Hi, Dear Andy,
>
> Could you let me know if this CAB-SS-232-MT is terminated into RJ45
connector? Because serveral my router and swit
if you really only have a switch and a router then you could get away with
the WIC-2TA/S with two CAB-SS-232-MT cables and a pair of standard console
cables. If you just want to console from the router to the switch the use
the AUX port with a standard console cable.
mid-range would be the 4-por
made sense this time ;-)
regards
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "EA Louie"
To: "Andy Harding" ;
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: Route metrics on broadcast networks [7:3308]
> see these pages:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/
bit of a teaser I have been thinking about for a while, and haven't really
been able to get clear in my mind:
how do routing protocols calculate metrics on broadcast networks where the
metric may be different between different neighbors?
As an example, say you have a core router with a GE downli
transit means where traffic from a direct BGP peer is not destined for your
AS - ie it transits your AS to go somewhere else. this is common between
service providers, but ISP customers will typically take their upstream as
transit, but the ISP not use the customer as transit
hth
Andy
- Or
Peter,
you need the confreg to be 0x2102 -
see:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_1600.html
also on the 36X0s you can do a tftpdnld and
drap an image off a tftp server from the rommon mode (damn sight quicker than
xmodem'ing it) - need to set up the ip details first tho
HTH
bit shaky on this, but here goes...
there is a standard - G.703/704 - it's not just a cisco thing
T/S 0 is used for signalling, the remaining 31 channels (1-31) are used for
data - hence the 1,984kb/s bandwidth rather than the 2,048 you might expect.
Under a cisco E1 you would configure a virtua
Daryn,
you don't say which switch you can't ping from the server
do you have a vlan interface (as opposed to a vlan) defined in the 2924
switch? by default the IOS will only create an interface for vlan 1, and
will only let you have one interface live at one time - a bit like having
the sc0
'fraid not - what I normally do for this sort of stuff is copy and paste to
a text editor, and stick a "no" in front of each entry, then copy-paste back in
- especially good for large access-lists (although remember to put a "no
access-list xxx" in front of the paste back.
Andy
Mark <[EM
Along the same daft lines
what are the chances of getting a groupstudy search engine based on bgp
regexps? maybe something like:
sh groupstudy msg regexp _Howard C Berkowitz_
sh groupstudy msg regexp ^Radia Perlman$
just have to avoid discussions on private peering
must get out a lit
Is there any way of specifying OSPF neighbors
statically? I know of the method whereby you specify neighbors on
NBMA-multipoint-type networks, but I want to specify a list of neighbors to form
adjacencies with and barr all others. I have had a look and the only way I
can find of doing this
don't know for certin, but a way back I had a knackered flash and I think on
this level of router you can get around this type of thing by formatting the
flash (maybe...) or try partitioning it, then de-partitioning it. If all
else fails then replace it - not a huge amount of money
HTH
Andy
---
Hi all,
strange problem for y'all...
I have a problem whereby a down circuit does not
necessarily "down" an interface (via ATM switch - am using OAM but not
foolproof). Is there some way that I can enable a L3 keepalive without
running a global IGP (bear in mind that this is between my c
much nicer:
ftp://ftp.3com.com/pub/utilbin/win32/3cd209.zip
include tftp client and server, ftp server and SYSLOG (so useful you would
not believe it till you try it).
sorry to stray off the Cisco line but this is so cool...
Andy
- Original Message -
From: Deepak Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECT
Yup - just tftp upload the sucker
no problems - the Enterprise s/w is better than that of the original
2900XL-series switches - ie supports trunking - nice little switch to
partner with your cat5-alike, play around with vlan STP priorities on the
dual 100-base uplinks, permit different vlans on t
Good stuff, always concerned about the security of my posters...
Andy
- Original Message -
From: Makarand Yerawadekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 8:38 AM
Subject: Free Poster:Security, From Lucent
>
> Check the URL
>
>
http://www.lucent-net
switch=bridge (multiport in ASIC) = transparent, MAC address learning-type
thing, hence
broadcast > all switches (with that VLAN)
unicast > switch with attached MAC address
proviso:
first packet of unicast stream to unknown MAC > broadcast (to determine
attached switch)
maybe a little after th
Try any of the Looking Glasses, suggest:
http://nitrous.digex.net/
this is basically a remote shell (rsh) into an IXP/NAP Cisco router which
lets you do a little more than it seems - try doing "reg ^$" from
the BGP radio button and you'll see any routes originated from your AS, etc,
etc.
check
June 05, 2000 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: new version of 802.1q?
I believe 802.1s is the standards group working
on Spanning Forest (per vlan stp)
"Andy Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message 01f801bfce8a$c41bace0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:01f801bfc
search on "password recovery 2924XL"
or
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/10.html
or
Catalyst 2900XL and 3500XL Password Recovery
Unplug the power cord from the back of the switch.
While holding down the "Mode" button, reconnect the power cord to the
switch. You can release the "Mode" butt
> access-list <100-199> permit tcp
> host range 20 21
> access-list <100-199> permit tcp any host eq 80
>
> you can use any extended access-list # (100-199) - extended for
> source/destination/traffic-type - permit 20 and 21 (ftp and ftp-data) for
> your address space, and permit www/http (
> Don,
>
> what Cisco are telling you is rubbish - if you have the exact same configs
> on both MSFCs then nothing will work - you can't have the same IP
addresses
> on the physical cards, same priorities, both with/without preempt, etc...
>
> I run 6509s with MSFCs with 100+ HSRP sessions per
> try hiring staff with IS-IS experience...;-)
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 6:08 PM
> Subject: OSPF vs ISIS
>
>
> > It looks to me that everybody prefers OSPF in our
> > company, just wondering any rea
> thought that it was 2 hex characters- hence the hex reverse of each nibble
> in Ethernet to Token Ring bridging conversion
>
> failing that a sub-byte portion of a multi-byte string for manipulation of
> some kind?
>
> someone put me straight please...
>
> Andy
> - Original Message -
> F
I work for a european ISP as a network engineer and get this kind of cr*p
all the time
If you are SERIOUS about redundancy the go get an AS# and some PI (Provider
Independant) space from ARIN, etc - multi-home with two ISPs, take a full
routing table, advertise your own routes, AS#, etc. ie take
have been having (semi) argument at work about
dot1q versus ISL
my understanding is that dot 1q runs one instance
of spanning tree per trunk, rather than per vlan as ISL does - hence if one VLAN
is blocking then dot1q disables the entire trunk
A collegue of mine reckons that dot 1q now do
not a real useful reply Gerwin...
certain schenarios call for this technology - mainly for legacy IBM-type
networking (in my experience) - SNA and the like. I don't have a whole lot
of experience doing this in a LAN environment but have done a bunch of DLSw+
stuff.
Also here is DECNet, LAT, Net
Anyone interested in a Catalyst 2901 for lab
study?
"Classic" Catalyst command line as per Cat
5000/5500, 600/6500. Supervisor I with 2 X 100-base-T/MII, line card with
12 X 10/100-base-T. Supports VLANs, ISL, trunking, FEC, etc.
Great lab switch - sad to sell but have 6509s with
MSFC
39 matches
Mail list logo
