Re: 100mb Ethernet over Type 1 ... [7:4897]

Cisco and Enterasys now have some nerd knobs to allow for Type 1 usage where it detects lookbacks in this scenario and shuts the port down to eliminate the flood of traffic. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 David McGlumphy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ye

Re: CCIE #7354 - for Jeff McCoy [7:3998]

them for it that is just the nature of their priorities. As far as the relationship between Ctron and Cisco...there is none. That got nuked years ago. I ought to know I worked for them until a few weeks ago. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 Q wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">new

Re: OSPF Router ID

1) Set RouterID using the Router-ID command 2) Highest Loopback IP address 3) If no Loopback then the Highest ACTIVE IP address Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 ""Vincent"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 9ak9oe$d1n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9ak9oe$d1n$[EMAIL PROTE

Re: OSPF Router ID

I believe Howard is stating in p.1 that if you have multiple loopback interfaces the highest addressed interface is chosen. Not secondaries. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "Oleg Mazurov" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... "How

Re: OSPF Router ID

Delete your loopback, reload the router and tell us how well your virtual links work. :) -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "Oleg Mazurov" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:

Re: Gigabit ethernet distance limitation (off topic )

. This is standard in the gigabit arena. Here is a URL. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/7202/fru/10901gbc.htm -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "Mohamed Heeba" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 91B200CBBEC3D111992A00805F31E6CB880880@MINAMAIL">news:91B200CBBEC3D111992A

Re: [Re: Gigabit ethernet distance limitation (off topic )]

Check the distances at the URL below. These are the same specs that enterasys uses. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/7202/fru/10901gbc.htm 62.5 micro gets 275 meters over SX and 550 over LX with the mode conditioning patch cord. Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 - Original

Re: OSPF over FR - stop me before my head starts bleeding

Why not any DR/BDR? The default network type for multipoint is NBMA which forms adjacencies. What we need here is a dump of the show ip ospf neigh and show ip ospf int commands. I am guessing it is that the hub is not the designated router. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 ""F

Re: ccie exam fee

Cisco has not increased these prices for years. I don't blame Cisco at all. They just increase the lab significantly also. It will not lower the demand or backlog for the lab exam. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 ""Lim Jit Cheng"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EM

Re: Building crossover cable

ATM back to back is usually pins 1,2 and 7,8 crossed. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 ""Donald B Johnson Jr"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 005901c0ab39$7d576920$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:005901c0ab39$7d576920$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... is it possible to connect enha

Re: 2500 series e0 fullduplex?

100 Mb FE still falls under CSMA/CD rules especially when using a Fast Ethernet Hub that doesn't support Full duplex. There can and will be collisions at 100Mb Fast Ethernet in a shared environment. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "SAIF" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL

Re: Cisco 4000 / 4000M

No a 4000 can have 8MB of flash in them as I have 4 of them in my basement with 8MB each. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "Ed Green" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message E86F2607CCD3D311864F00805F8568C801DE2A27@Rizzo3">news:E86F2607CCD3D311864F00805F8568C801DE2A27@Rizzo3...

Re: How good are 4000s for the lab?

fine though. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "Francisco Muniz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I see many on ebay, some cheaper than 2500s. And you can mix and match interfaces. I'm trying to make a good lab for around $6000 (about

Re: Anyone Recommend ATM Books ?

The Dyson and Pildush books are very good. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "Phil Barker" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Group, I am currently faced with the unsavoury prospect of expanding an ATM LAN to a WAN enviro

Re: strange switching behaviours

to another local segment router. The reply comes back via a different route. Then the SAT times out before the arp cache and before you know it you have unicast flooding. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 ""Deloso, Elmer G (WPNSTA Yorktown)"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EM

Re: OSPF Process ID

Autonomous Systems are not part of the OSPF protocol. It only functions as a process id local to the router. This way you can actually run two different OSPF autonomous systems separate from each other. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Rip 2 and VLSM Does rip 2 support VLSM

yes -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does Rip 2 support VLSM?? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report mi

Re: OSPF Process ID

The PID can be the same for both. The OSPF PID is of local signifigance only while the EIGRP PID is system wide. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "Ya Wen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, group: Will this a potential prob

Re: wrong subnet

Looks legal to me. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 ""Dennis Ighomereho"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... hello everyone, someone has just given me an IP address to use which i think the subnet is wrong or know is wr

Re: wrong subnet

How is it not correct? The subnet would be 10.1.244.0 with an address range of 10.1.244.1-10.1.245.254 with a broadcast address of 10.1.245.255. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "Natasha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... It may

Re: wrong subnet

. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "Natasha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ok, Ok UNCLE lol We're all still friends right? True the gateway can be any node but in my limited experience I've personally haven't seen it any oth

Re: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....

If using a multipoint FR interface IS-IS will not work. Create a tunnel between the two routers. Works for me! - Original Message - From: Nigel Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cisco Group Study [EMAIL PROTECTED]; CCIE_Lab Group Study [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 3:11

Re: ISIS over frame-relay troubles.....

Unfortunately the LAB doesn't always give you the option. - Original Message - From: Kevin Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Eric Fairfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nigel Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco Group Study [EMAIL PROTECTED]; CCIE_Lab Group Study [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday

Re: what is wire-speed?

Yes the numbers are based upon 64 byte packets. All vendors do this for the numbers game. You gotta love marketing. "Kenneth Lorenzo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8ph51t$413$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8ph51t$413$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... wire-speed meaning it's processed almost as fast as it

Re: CCIE Lab Question

You also get the CD to do searches. I have been told know the CD well as the book takes too long to page through. "Ty Bindrup" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... 1. Has Cisco standardized on which versions of IOS will be in the lab? If so, is

Re: Secondary IP address

A big draw back is how protocols like OSPF deal with secondaries. OSPF treats a secondary like a stub network and will never form adjacencies on the secondary subnet. "Rampley, Jim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You get the benefit of being

Re: new version of 802.1q?

TED]">news:01a401bfcf28$864e67b0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... spot on - draft available at: ftp://p8021:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/8021/s-drafts/d4/802-1s-d4.pdf don't know about spanning forest tho...;-) cheers Andy - Original Message - From: Eric Fairfie

Re: CCIE Lab Mailing List?!?!?

I am having the same problem. I have resent the message three times with no luck. Scott Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... For those of you who are members of the lab mailing listhow long did you have to wait before you started