I believe Howard is stating in p.1 that if you have multiple loopback
interfaces the highest addressed interface is chosen. Not secondaries.
--
Eric Fairfield
CCIE #6413
"Oleg Mazurov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
> >
> > > > The latter is wrong. The order of selection is:
> > >>
> > >> 1. Numerically highest IP addresss on a loopback interface, when
> > >> there are multiple loopback addresses.
> > >>
> > >> 2. IP address on the loopback address when only a single loopback
> > >>is defined.
> > >>
> > >> 3. Numerically highest IP address on an active physical (or
> > >>logical other than
> > >> loopback address)--active as in no shutdown
> > >
> > >I have a strong feeling that p.2 doesn't make any sense.
> >
> > Point 2 should read "on the loopback interface" Is that your concern?
> >
>
> When only a single loopback interface is defined, it's address is the
> highest of available loopback addresses, right?
>
> BTW, p.1 is wrong for ciscos. When multiple IP addresses are defined on
> a loopback interface, OSPF takes only primary address of it and ignores
> the secondaries.
>
> /felis
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
