Any idea how you sign up?
Lorenzo
""Dennis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
92h1gv$593$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:92h1gv$593$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
| http://www.cisco.com/networkers/
|
|
| ""Jack Yu"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
| 92geur$qr3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:92geur$qr3$[EMAIL PR
How would this work if NAT were in place? We're thinking about doing
something similar where we have our ISP-managed router passing
default-network information from outside, through the PIX, and to the
inside. Any thoughts?
Lorenzo
""Omar Baceski"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL
I know there was a post about the 2948G-L3 a while back, but I missed it.
I'm having problems connecting the L3 switch to a plain 2948G switch. Maybe
someone can share some experience...
I'm trying to use the L3 version of the 2948G with a plain old 2948G and I'm
having problems with dot1q VLANs
Hmmm. I figured that a bridge group was the router equivalent of a VLAN on
a switch, which is to say that it creates a broadcast domain that spans
multiple interfaces. This is why I put each subinterface on the trunk port
in a different bridge group - I figured doing this would allow me to then
I think a host table is typically parsed from top to bottom, so your name is
being resolved as soon as the first entry is read, which explains why you
were successful when you rearranged the IP addresses. Even a DNS server
will give you an IP address that's down if there are multiple IP addresses
Try ADTRAN or KENTROX.
""Rob Mattews"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
| Hallo,
|
| I'm looking for manufacturers of E1 CSU/DSU's.
|
| Can anyone recommend any ?
|
| Rob
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|
The main purpose is so that you can route between two LAN segments.
""Khwaja N"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8n179k$1du$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8n179k$1du$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
| What is the main purpose of having 2 LAN ports in a Router?
| Please reply to
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
| _
I'm quite sure I'm doing something wrong. I'm going to clear the configs on
both the L3 and the 2948G and take it step-by-step. I'll let you know where
I made the mistake.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
>From: "Rampley, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: 'Loren
No. ;-)
"Larry Osei-Kwaku" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
| Is groupstudy down ?
|
| Larry
|
| __
| Do You Yahoo!?
| Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
| http://invites.yahoo.com/
|
|
Transit traffic is traffic that enters and exits your network without its
destination being on your network. As an example, if my company uses two
different ISPs and I'm using BGP, it is possible - without the proper
precautions - that traffic between the two ISPs will use my internal
network as
I think if you want to completely reset the switch configuration you can
type the following:
clear config all
I'm not sure it'll work on a 2924 because I'm not familiar with them, but it
certainly works on a 2948G.
Give it a try, but be aware that on the 2948G, this literally resets the
running
Try setting the broadcast threshold.
""Dost"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8ol0dp$99n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8ol0dp$99n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
| Hello everyone:
|
| We got 2 catalyst 5500 serving 1500 nodes. We got old WANG system which
| sends all protocol traffic including banyan, netbui
I have ripped a PIX apart and it is a Pentium PC with a flash device for
storage. Oh, it also has a floppy drive, which must be why it's so
expensive ;-) Actually, Cisco is perfectly happy to overcharge for parts
that you could find elsewhere. One such example is RAM: Cisco charges
$1200 for t
You may remember that a while back I was asking questions about using the
BVI interface on a 2948G-L3. I got a ton of great feedback from the group,
and as a result I am now successfully testing the 2948G-L3. My question now
is as follows:
I will be connecting the 2948G-L3 to a plain 'ol 2948G.
VTP, so maybe that's where I'm confused.
Lorenzo
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "Lorenzo Montezemolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Masaru Umetsu"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: VTP Domain Name
>Date: Thu, 31 Aug
It uses Intel NICs.
""Craig Johnson"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
| In my experience, as long as you use identical hardware (NIC's,
motherboard)
| and use the PIX flash card, I see no reason why it wouldn't work just
fine.
| The ones I've wor
You may remember that a while back I was asking questions about using the
BVI interface on a 2948G-L3. I got a ton of great feedback from the group,
and as a result I am now successfully testing the 2948G-L3. My question now
is as follows:
I will be connecting the 2948G-L3 to a plain 'ol 2948G.
NetXRay is now (maybe always was) a Network Associates product. Try going
to nai.com and see what you can find there. I think I've used it and it's
almost exactly like Sniffer.
hth,
Lorenzo
""FRS"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8p2rsb$rou$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p2rsb$rou$[EMAIL PROTE
I think you must mean bottleneck, and not collision. In a switch, the
collision domain is restricted to the NIC and the port it is connected to -
there is no collision between ports. In full duplex, there is no collision
because there is a direct circuit between send on the NIC, receive on the
s
I've posted this a few times and haven't gotten a response. Maybe someone
will pick it up on the third try...
You may remember that a while back I was asking questions about using the
BVI interface on a 2948G-L3. I got a ton of great feedback from the group,
and as a result I am now successfull
20 matches
Mail list logo
