Wellthat is what the book says. Try it out on your own lab and you will
see that a Route-reflector client does not have to be directly connected to
the Route-reflector for it to work. Just tried it in my home lab and it
works, the client is 3 routers away.
Message Posted at:
A practise that is becoming quite common is running BGP on the edges of an
AS only. It is a waste for a router in the core to have a full internet
table. The Core could then comprise of ie MPLS which would optimize the
traffic flows.
I cannot remember which book I used but when I was studying for
Would be nice to hear if anyone has encountered similars problem and has any
ideas how to get past some of the sometimes animal behaviour of frame-relay.
Setting up a frame-relay cloud; Router A needs to connect to Router B, DLCIs
are given. Disable inverse-arp and install frame-relay map
Yes, EBGP multihop is between different AS's, that is a different setup, it
must also have a way of reaching across the hops, an IGP.
On a IBGP you can have a hop across ie 5 routers in a IBGP peering session.
As long as the IGP can reach the other peer it will work. Also, the full
mesh
Check how many vty's you have first.
For instance my 2500's have 4 (so line vty 0 4 - is correct)
The 26xx had 133 and the 3550 has 15
I hope this is it, otherwise I am mistaken as well.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57614t=57574
It is an addition/feature to the backup interface command
use a map-class under atm/fr or isdn
Side A
map-class *frame-relay etc* *name*
frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode reply
Side B
map-class *frame-relay etc* *name*
frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode request
note -- Side B is the
Hi
Can anyone direct me please;
I have taken other's lead on this group's posts in contacting Cisco directly
to obtain a boot prom (in this instance for a MC3810). So I phone Cisco and
land up, as directed, by the credit card purchases department. A very
friendly but puzzled person (maybe his
And dare I say, I wish I had this much info a few weeks ago. I did not
realise that to upgrade the memory you MUST replace the bootprom otherwise
the router will not recognize the ram. The min requirement for a VOIP image
is 16/64, no less, you rightly say James.
Message Posted at:
Without reading it, going on memory - it is saying the redistribute only the
routes specified or required (maybe will affect IBGP later etc), deny all
else.
One of the things that those labs require is to use a route-map or a
distribute list out/in (depending on the igp)for redistribution. It's up
Try checking the gateway IP address on both workstations
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55940t=55767
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
You will need at least one 2620/21 with a Fastethernet port for ISL/.1Q
trunking. The 2500's can do anything a 2600 can besides voice and ATM, but
you can also use a MC3810 for voice which looks like a 2500 (With 16F/64D
you can get a MC3810 image that does VOIP instead of only L2 ie VOFR)
A 2520
looks like a source problem, try pinging with extended commands. Use a IP
address that is participating in the routing protocol.
ie, if you ping an IP address in a foreign AS the router will most likely
use the IP address of the IGP, if that IP add is not participating in BGP it
will not be
Thanks for a candid reply.
I will admit that it is easy to 'create' ambiguity when it is not there. I
have heard from someone that says that a 3550 is already in the lab, thus my
question is half answered. I am sure this is not an infringement on the NDA.
3550's are selling fast on ebay, I know
I did not read your first post correctly, apologies.
You say you are using static routes? Any default gateways/routes?
Give us the router configs
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55712t=55701
--
FAQ, list archives,
A UTP cable has eight wires (one day with we will use them all). An ethernet
connection uses 4 wires (pins 1,2,3,6) at the moment CDDI (1,2,7,8 I think).
All a cable splitter does is it saves you running two seperate cables to a
destination, it uses the spare 4 wires and makes an extra cable
The 'actual' encap (trunk) is Gig, not .1q or ISL if I am correct
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55716t=55664
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
line 1 16
no exec
transport input all
This is sufficient, I have had similar problems at one stage but not to that
extent
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55721t=55715
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Hi everybody. I was wondering if I could get some clarity on this issue.
Cisco says:
'Between September 1, 2002 and November 4th, 2002 all CCIE labs will replace
the current Catalyst 5000 switches with Catalyst 3550 switches. However, the
only switching features tested during this time will be
Hi
A DLSW backup peer question if anyone would care to clarify this:
|(BACKUP)R2|
R1 R3
|(primary)|
I have this DLSW scenario:
R1 can reach R3 via the primary path. I have made my IP routing
so that R1 can reach r2 and r2 can reach r3 on the back up path,
but R1 cannot reach R3
Ignore the subject.
I checked, on R1 I get full reachability to R3's ethernet network via R2. It
is just an interesting observation that no actual connection is active when
I enter 'sh dlsw peer' on R3 but in fact it is peering with the backup peer.
On R1 I see a Netbios name that sits behind R3
Your dialer map statements must have 'broadcast'
ie dialer map ip 1.1.1.3 broadcast 8358683
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54314t=54276
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Halabi's
Internet Routing Architectures vol. 2
Dont leave home without it, about the best so far. 55$
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54264t=54262
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
no, there is only one image that can run MPLS on 25xx's and it was not
developed for release, it is used only internally in Cisco.
25xx were not designed for MPLS.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54266t=54246
--
Hi
Simple question, enabling IPX on a router: ipx routing x.x.x
I want to use say 2.2.2 as the router ID. Problem is after I type this
address and show run the router has taken one of the interface's Mac
addresses as the router IPX ID. Is there something I am missing here? (I am
using ver
Robert
I understand all that - when I type in 'ipx routing ie 5.5.5' on another
router (with no other configs) and sh run gives me
ipx routing 0005.0005.0005
which is what I want.
I am asking why does it do this and is there a way around this?
I dont like IPX, but the lab beckons me...
Priscilla
Thanks for that. Years in IP and I am clueless about IPX. Reason why I was
using my own x.x.x was for a easy number to remember for the frame relay map
statements on opposite ends. (I looked at practise labs - that is what they
wuz using)
I am still befuddled why on one router it takes
The version of IOS I am using is about the same as the lab (how reassuring).
I used my old frame relay switch still running and spluttering 11.3
enterprise and it likes it when I type IPX routing a.a.a - do a show run and
there she is: ipx routing 000a.000a.000a - like an old faithfull...
The
I got the IPX network going between all routers, over frame relay etc etc no
problem. On the frame-relay map statements (opposite sides) I mapped to the
IPX/MAC address that the router had elected. Everything works, no worries. I
am not doing anything different, all routers were running default
28 matches
Mail list logo
