Re: CCIE Questions...

2000-09-20 Thread Peter A van Oene
The one think working in Cisco'v favour is the fact that the lab is much more difficult than the written. The written is almost trivial with respect to the level of preparation required for the lab. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 9/17/2000 at 9:56 PM Kirk Bollinger wrote: >This

RE: Redistributing routes

2000-11-11 Thread Peter A van Oene
Achieving symmetric traffic flow in this situation will be challenging (using BGP). Without seeing your configs and getting a better feel for the network I could suggest you move toward an asymmetric scenario. Simply run HSRP into your own LAN and allow all outbound to flow out one line, and

Re: Why not supernetting?

2000-11-11 Thread Peter A van Oene
You guys must be integrators! She has a 5500 already, which although somewhat dated, should be able to provide enough horsepower to route to 600 users in 5 or 6 subnets surely. I highly expect her issue is not lack of hardware related. I expect there is a misconfiguration or faulty cabling a

Re: OSPF Totally Stubby Areas and area default-cost

2000-11-11 Thread Peter A van Oene
Totally stubby is a cisco nob that takes the concept of a stub area a step further. In a stub area, only LSA types 1 (router) 2 (network) and 3 ( summary) flow within the area. Hence, no routing information concerning prefixes outside of the OSPF domain is injected into the area. In a total

RE: OSPF Totally Stubby Areas and area default-cost

2000-11-12 Thread Peter A van Oene
ABR? >|-Area2| > >would the above layout make and area NOT stubby or totally stubby? > >Chuck > >-----Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >Peter A van Oene >Sent: Saturday, November

RE: OSPF Totally Stubby Areas and area default-cost

2000-11-12 Thread Peter A van Oene
Correction to my own post. I meant to say that the LSA type 5's flood domain wide, not just area wide. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 12/11/2000 at 12:12 PM Peter A van Oene wrote: >It actually has little to do with physical topology (noted exception of NSSA). The

Re: Flame bait.

2000-11-14 Thread Peter A van Oene
It's my experience that companies do not buy certificates, they hire people. Hard or not, simply passing tests does not imply superiority in my books. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 14/11/2000 at 8:55 AM Scott M. Trieste wrote: >Ladies and gents! > >Just a thought. But I was cu

Re: If u had to take one class

2000-08-06 Thread Peter A van Oene
Prep like normal and then take Bruce Caslow's CCIE Lab prep course, Expert CCIE Prep Class 1, or ECP1 from MentorTech. Its a little more costly than some, but will give you the scenario practise you need. Until then, read books and make routers do wierd things. Heres a link to the ECP cours

Re: Questions about BGP on routing exam

2000-08-06 Thread Peter A van Oene
I'll attack these one at a time below *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 8/6/00 at 7:10 AM Stephane Wantou Siantou wrote: >I need help with the following exam objectives: >1) Describe BGP synchronization The rule of synchronization states that no BGP router will advertise a networks

RE: If u had to take one class

2000-08-07 Thread Peter A van Oene
ting here filling out my training request form. This is not going to >help my managers ulcers > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Peter A van Oene >Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 9:32 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Cisco Prerequisites

2000-08-07 Thread Peter A van Oene
On a similar, though less lofty note, I know little about Windows outside of how to make it nice in the IP/IPX world, yet I made it through the CCIE program. Getting to Howards level is more of a lifelong battle :) *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 8/7/00 at 2:01 PM Howard C. Berk

Re: CCDP to CCIE

2000-08-09 Thread Peter A van Oene
CCDP involves some more intense study into SNA which could prove valuable on the CCIE lab/written   Other than that, it could be an afterthought.  However, prior to being ready to perform your lab (CCDP is harder than CCIE written imho) you could easily go and write your DP   Pete ***

Re: BCMSN

2000-08-10 Thread Peter A van Oene
BCMSN by Thomas, Bass and Robinson is a good course companion text that should provide excellent coverage of the material. Its from the McGraw Hill technical series *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 8/10/00 at 1:19 AM Bruce wrote: >I am taking the BCMSN in a couple of weeks. I have

Re: Radia Perlman

2000-05-20 Thread Peter A. van Oene
First off, Interconnections: Second Edition by Radia Perlman is one of the few must read texts on the market today. Not only is it incredibly informative, Radia's wit and unique perspective make it very readable. Beyond that, I would simply look for the spec's on the IEEE Std 802.1D specificati

RE: load balancing based on source address

2000-05-20 Thread Peter A. van Oene
Actually, you can't just apply a route-map to an interface. What one would do in this case is use policy based routing linked to route maps. consider the following interface e0 ip policy route-map selectout route-map selectout permit 10 match ip address 1 set ip default next-hop 205.210.220

Re: Subinterfaces on Catalyst 6509

2000-05-20 Thread Peter A. van Oene
--- Peter Van Oene Senior Systems Engineer UNIS LUMIN Inc. www.unislumin.com  

Re: Difference Between T1 & Frame relay

2000-05-22 Thread Peter A. van Oene
Briefly, T1 is a layer one specification describing a digital, point to point circuit made up of 24 64k channels, each with 8k of inband signalling. The aggregate as many has mentioned is 1.544Mb/s Frame Relay is a layer two specification describing a packet switched network. The confusion li