RE: T1 and Frame Relay Sniffers [7:61531]

2003-01-22 Thread William Pearch
1 and Frame Relay Sniffers [7:61531] Clarification below... s vermill wrote: > > William Pearch wrote: > > > > Does anyone have a recomendation for a sniffer solution to > look > >

RE: Loading IOS / OT Now [7:61413]

2003-01-21 Thread William Pearch
The BayRS does have some very cool features. My favorite was the modularity of the software - if you didn't want a feature you built your software package without it. The only way you wound up with a bloated OS was if you either needed all the bling blings or if it was loaded by someone that did

T1 and Frame Relay Sniffers [7:61531]

2003-01-21 Thread William Pearch
Does anyone have a recomendation for a sniffer solution to look at T1's, V.35, Frame Relay? Any experience with the Logix product? Bill in Anchorage Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61531&t=61531 -- FAQ, list arc

RE: Traceroute troubles [7:61247]

2003-01-16 Thread William Pearch
everything... :) Bill -Original Message- From: William Pearch Sent: Thu 1/16/2003 8:12 PM To: William Pearch; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Traceroute troubles Why does traceroute seem to have problems with the

17X0 HSRP bug [7:60197]

2003-01-02 Thread William Pearch
Those of you that have 1700 series routers in your labs, take a look at bug CSCdz64230. It had me chasing my tail a while this evening. The net net is you get a flapping link, and nearly constant hsrp state changes and spanning tree action. TTFN, Bill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.

RE: 7200 Router Questions... [7:59645]

2002-12-23 Thread William Pearch
In order to hit performance marks that are excellent with IPSec you will need not only a spiffy NPE but the PA-VAM or PA-ISA. Be aware that the PA-VAM may not work with the latest and greatest IPSec image. I picked up a 7206VXR VPN bundle from Cisco last month and the only IOS supported was 12.1(

Re: is there anyone migrating isdn backup to dsl b [7:58568]

2002-12-08 Thread William Pearch
You'll hit your three letter acroronym service level agreement real soon now (TLA SLA RSN.) -Original Message- From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" Sent: 12/4/02 12:56:52 PM To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Subject: Re: is there anyone migrating isdn backup to dsl b [7:58568] It s

RE: ONS 15454 Questions [7:55896]

2002-10-21 Thread William Pearch
Couple of notes from another 15454 user at the bottom of the email... Dre wrote: > Can it participate in an MPLS network? It probably will be able to someday. Give it about 10-20 years or so. > Does it support IP GRE, 802.1p, .q, DiffServ ? It will pass IEEE 802.1Q tagged frames. It cannot

RE: FS IBM SX GBIC's work fine with Cisco 3500 series switches [7:54933]

2002-10-05 Thread William Pearch
I can vouch for the IBM GBICs working in the 3550 switches as well. TTFN, Bill -Original Message- From: Tim Medley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: FS IBM SX GBIC's work fine with Cisco 3500 series switches [7:54929]

RE: VWIC 2MFT-T1 [7:54796]

2002-10-03 Thread William Pearch
I have been using VWIC-1MFT's and VWIC-2MFT's to connect in a data mode to WIC-1DSUs using a cross over T1 cable. When you do this, it is imperative to add the 'speed 64' portion of the channel-group if that is the base speed of the DS0. I am finding that in general, if I want something to work

RE: Which PIX to buy [7:52572]

2002-09-02 Thread William Pearch
Although I can't help with the leasing issue... If you really need speed and you are using the 6500's take a look at the new firewall blade. List is $43K a pop, but wow, talk about throughput (5 Gigs is the spec sheet.) Runs PIX OS, supports everything, yada, yada, yada, ymmv, vwpbl... Ok, so i

RE: What I mean to Cisco [7:51492]

2002-08-16 Thread William Pearch
rough those slides you realize you are outside your warranty, you should understand what's happening to you. It costs money to run a business. The pricing of their support is typically something I would not argue with. -Mark -Original Message- From: William Pearch [mailto:[EMAIL PR

OT:What I mean to Cisco [7:51492]

2002-08-15 Thread William Pearch
I've got a poorly behaving 1710 router (reboots when you log out/TACACS issue) that I'm trying to get straight with the TAC and I received this; Dear $Customer$, Thank you for contacting Cisco's Technical Assistance Center(TAC). We have recieved your request I love it when I'm a double d

RE: GBIC's - Cisco and otherwise [7:51148]

2002-08-12 Thread William Pearch
When I was learning a bit about SAN's and Fibre Channel, one of my instructors mentioned that there were only 3 manufacturers of GBICs (couple years ago, may have changed by now). I have put GBICs (no long haul stuff) obtained from Nortel, IBM, Compaq, Brocade, Cisco, and "unknown" into a 3500, a

RE: polycom Video Unit [7:49882]

2002-07-27 Thread William Pearch
The Polycom Viewstations and Via-Video units use unicast UDP (RTP) traffic for data streams and unicast TCP(RTCP) traffic for signaling and control. Part of the initialization process is an agreement on what codec's are going to be used. This negotiation process is different depending on if th

RE: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]

2002-07-13 Thread William Pearch
Be wary of Gig to the desktop in Windows boxes. In most cases, PC class (non-64/66 PCI) simply can't handle it. On top of that, as Howard mentioned, the server has to be a screamer or it won't be able to keep up with the GigE either. You can get better performance with a *nix box, but if it's I

RE: Cisco Video Conferencing [7:48646]

2002-07-11 Thread William Pearch
If you are referring to the Cisco branded MCUs and h.323 Gatekeepers, yes - I use them. You can save a bit of cash in some cases by turning to the vendor of the hardware (Radvision) but the support for these products from Cisco has been first rate. The written documentation is a little slight on

RE: Cryptography and frame-relay [7:46621]

2002-06-14 Thread William Pearch
For the medical traffic that we are throwing over frame, hospitals are choosing to IPSec encrypt more and more. Is it necessary? I think it will be due to HIPPA, but that may or may not play out long run. Will it protect your data? Only from people that have the ability to intercept C-band sat

OT: Cisco 3510 Configuration [7:46668]

2002-06-14 Thread William Pearch
I'm having some difficulty with one of my 3510 MCUs. It will allow a confrence to start with a service prefix but will not allow you to provide a confrence ID. I know this is a long shot, but anyone know much about the Cisco MCUs? Otherwise, it's off to the TAC on Monday... TTFN, Bill "h.323 i

PIX VPN 'Understanding' [7:44158]

2002-05-14 Thread William Pearch
So I finnally have time to just try things. And what do I do? Try something that doesn't seem to work. I mirrored the configs from the CCO for a PIX to PIX to PIX IPSec fully meshed VPN. All seemed well, until I tried a h323 conversation between PC's behind different PIX's. This did not work.

SCEP - x.509 Certificates and IOS [7:43277]

2002-05-03 Thread William Pearch
Ok, so with all the 'gurus' out here, there must be someone that has done this before. I've gone through all the documentation I can find on Microsoft's web site and Cisco's web site looking for information on setting up a CA on Windows 2000 and having a Cisco router use SCEP to register for a cer

FR SVCs [7:40893]

2002-04-08 Thread William Pearch
Has anyone worked with FR SVC's on 7200s and 1700's? Any known issues? Love it? Hate it? Wish it came is yellow? A coworker has opened a case with the TAC regarding configuring multiple FR SVCs on a single physical interface. I was wondering if anyone else has run into the same or similar is

RE: RE: My interview story [7:40553]

2002-04-05 Thread William Pearch
When I moved back to Alaska from Omaha, I interviewed at a place that sent all of their candidates to a 'speciallist' who did personality tests. I responded well to the interview, but not the job offer. :) TTFN, Bill Pearch, GCI Telehealth Systems Manager Anchorge AK -Original Message-

1760s [7:39338]

2002-03-23 Thread William Pearch
Has anyone used the 1760 routers? Thoughts, comments, suggestions? TTFN, Bill in Anchorage [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39338&t=39338 --

Best CVoice on the west coast [7:37212]

2002-03-04 Thread William Pearch
I'm looking for information on training providers that do an excellent job of delivering the CVOICE class. I finally work for a company that wants to invest in my skill set! TIA, Bill Pearch, Anchorage AK Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37212&t=37212 ---

RE: Access List Builder [7:36015]

2002-02-20 Thread William Pearch
Funny you should ask - I was at a Cisco 'thang' today and Solsoft was demonstrating their Visual Security Policy Management product. As close as I can come to describing it is to call it Visual Basic for routers and VPNs. Kind of pricy - $15K for the small enterprise edition, but it will modify

New config maker [7:35386]

2002-02-13 Thread William Pearch
Has anyone had difficulty with the new Config Maker (v2.6)? I tried downloading it tonight and the executable reports as being corrupted. Is it me? Do they hate me? :) TTFN, Bill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35386&t=35386

RE: hiding an computer ( ip address ) using access list [7:35008]

2002-02-09 Thread William Pearch
Chiming in on the machine based filtering - Windows 2K and XP have an IPSec filter that you can configure to drop, permit or negotiate security based on IP, DNS, ect. With a little creativity, you can configure the box so it can talk to the rest of the world, but the rest of the world can't ini