Is this correct for the output of 'sh ip ospf database
network' ?
It appears to be displaying both 'Router Links' and
'Network Links'.
Phil.
SNIP
Table 9. Detailed Network Entries in an LSDB
LS age: 1245
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
LS Type: Router Links
Link State ID:
Just reading Layer 2 Switching and Bridging by Leigh
Anne Chisholm.
Cut-Through
Since the port does not wait to receive the CRC at
the end 'if/of' the frame, it cannot determine the
integrity of the data received
Happy with that.
Cut-through switches CAN perform a CRC check as the
frame
Just reading Layer 2 Switching and Bridging by Leigh
Anne Chisholm.
Leigh Anne can answer with exactly what she had in mind, but let me
make some observations.
Cut-Through
Since the port does not wait to receive the CRC at
the end 'if/of' the frame, it cannot determine the
integrity of the
This means that although the switch cannot prevent the forwarding of invalid
frames since it begins forwarding prior to verifying the checksum, it can
keep track of the number of errored frames since it does eventually verify
the checksum. In other words, unlike store and forward switches who
).
-- Leigh Anne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Phil Barker
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 4:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Certificationzone White Paper ? [7:16354]
Just reading Layer 2 Switching and Bridging by Leigh
Anne Chisholm
Agreed and I would add a comment. A lot of people assume that cut-through
means that the bits have whipped through and disappeared. Actually, Cisco
switches buffer frames regardless of switching mode. This means that the
switch can calculate the CRC, as you say, and keep track of bad CRC
I'm having trouble with the equation referenced on
page 5 (A4) concerning the metric calculation.
Ref Don Dettmore.
If this equation is correct as it stands and
K2=K4=K5=0
Then the Right Side of the equation will be 0, which
when multiplied by whatever on the left side will
equal 0. i.e metric
Think of it this way
The only K values that are set to 1 are K1 and K3
which are Bandwidth and Delay. If all other values are
set to 0, then the metric calculation in Eigrp will be
dependent on the values of Bandwidth and Delay which
is a truth in Eigrp world.
To cut a long story short.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Phil Barker
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:59 AM
To: cisco GroupStudy
Subject: CertificationZone White Paper EIGRP ?
I'm having trouble with the equation referenced on
page 5 (A4) concerning the metric calculation
blic/103/eigrp1.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Phil Barker
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:59 AM
To: cisco GroupStudy
Subject: CertificationZone White Paper EIGRP ?
I'm having trouble with the equation refere
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Phil Barker
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:59 AM
To: cisco GroupStudy
Subject: CertificationZone White Paper EIGRP ?
I'm having trouble with the equation referenced on
page 5 (A4) concerning the metric c
/eigrp1.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Phil Barker
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:59 AM
To: cisco GroupStudy
Subject: CertificationZone White Paper EIGRP ?
I'm having trouble with the equation referenced on
pag
Formulae?
You been going to night school again? :-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: CertificationZone White Paper EIGRP
--INDIA.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 10:19 AM
Subject: RE: CertificationZone White Paper EIGRP ?
Formulae?
You been going to night school again? :-
Chuck
---
Invalid printf Syntax...aborted compilation...missing semi-colon :)
-Original Message-
From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 10:02 AM
To: Jean-Michel Roberts
Cc: cisco GroupStudy
Subject: RANT: CertificationZone White Paper (Frame Relay) ???
While
Hi Phil,
It should be bits instead of bytes!!
Rgds,
Ramesh
CCNA
Phil Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I don't think my last post got through so I'm
sending again.
My previous Question relates to page 3 of this paper
by David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Phil
Barker
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 7:19 AM
To: cisco GroupStudy
Subject:CertificationZone White Paper (Frame Relay) ???
Hi,
I don't think my last post got through so I'm
sending again.
My
paper... can you pls mail
it to me.
I've got some other FR documents... (quite good). Do
you want me to mail
them to you?
Cheers,
J-M
-Original Message-
From: Phil Barker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 June 2000 16:19
To: cisco GroupStudy
Subject: CertificationZone
Hi,
I don't think my last post got through so I'm
sending again.
My previous Question relates to page 3 of this paper
by David Wolsefer.
Under the heading of framing formats he refers to an
8 byte flags field and a 16 byte address field. I'm
pretty certain this should be bits but don't
Did you get the whitepaper? I have a copy...
Nathan
Eugene Chandler wrote:
Hello all,
Does any have the white paper entitled
"CCIE Bridging", that appeared in the
January 2000 Certificationzone?
If so, may I get you to email me a copy.
Thank you very much.
Eugene C.
[EMAIL
Hello all,
Does any have the white paper entitled
"CCIE Bridging", that appeared in the
January 2000 Certificationzone?
If so, may I get you to email me a copy.
Thank you very much.
Eugene C.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get Your
Hello all,
Does any have the white paper entitled
"CCIE Bridging", that appeared in the
January 2000 Certificationzone?
If so, may I get you to email me a copy.
Thank you very much.
Eugene C.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get Your
22 matches
Mail list logo
