)
If I am wrong, please correct me.
jeongwoo
--Original Message--
From: "Kenny Sallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Padjen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cisco Mail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 7, 2000 6:39:42 PM GMT
Subjec
What are the major
differences b/w EIGRP and OSPF aside from the fact that EIGRP is Cisco's
?
for starters one major diffrence
eigrp routes desktop protocols and ospf does not (ip only)
Why would one use EIGRP over OSPF and vice-versa?
I would use ospf in a network that involves many ,many route
ot;Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Padjen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cisco Mail List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 10:51 AM
Subject: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
> Other than the general sloppiness of such an approac
orry.
> I thought that someone tried to use EIGRP and IGRP
> to out smart BGP for
> Interdomain routing..sorry again!!
>
> Gerwin
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 5:50 AM
> To: Cisco Mail List
: Gerwin Boschloo; 'Chuck Larrieu'; Cisco Mail List; Kenny Sallee
Subject: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
The idea of using a tunnel for this scares the
heeby-jeebies out of me!!! I should have noted a
'supportable' network! ;) It is a clever idea however.
--- Gerwin Boschl
ed. This is not necessarily good, by the way.
Just one opinion.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Niraj Palikhey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
Hi,
I k
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Cisco Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Kenny Sallee"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
>Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 20:50:06 -0
, 2000 5:50 AM
To: Cisco Mail List; Kenny Sallee
Subject: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
Excellent!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Kenny Sallee
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 1:49 PM
To: Gerwin Boschloo; 'Luong, David';
Excellent!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Kenny Sallee
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 1:49 PM
To: Gerwin Boschloo; 'Luong, David'; 'Robert Padjen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: EIGRP contiguous A
to
different
> AS'es therefore the AS'es should be unique.
>
> Therefore: EIGRP AS 1 IGRP AS 50 EIGRP AS 1 will not
work.
>
> Gerwin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Luong, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 1:14
From: "Gerwin Boschloo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Luong, David'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Robert Padjen'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 11:16 PM
Subject: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
> EIGRP a
ore: EIGRP AS 1 IGRP AS 50 EIGRP AS 1 will not work.
Gerwin
-Original Message-
From: Luong, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 1:14 AM
To: 'Robert Padjen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
If I remember correct, AS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
Ed, if you have a moment, can you answer a question. For the automatic
redistribution to take place, don't the two routing protocols, with the same
process i.d. have to be on the same router? Or will they do this when
adjacent? I did a quick l
n the same
AS/process? :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Edward Moss
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EIGRP contiguous AS
When EIGRP and IGRP share the same AS, redistribut
When EIGRP and IGRP share the same AS, redistribution in automatic.
However, keep in mind that EIGRP will handle VLSM, and IGRP is a classful.
As I see it, EIGRP on the left advertises routes to IGRP in the middle, and
then it would advertise classful routes to EIGRP on the right. I believe
rout
Title: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
If I remember correct, AS numbers do not have to be contiguous unless if you want automatic redistributing between EIGRP and IGRP. If you have different AS across boundaries then you will need to have to manually redistribute...
My $0.02...
David Luong, CCNA
>
>Does an EIGRP AS have to be contiguous or can it be on
>two sides of an IGRP 'AS'. I note that the use of the
>term AS is a mis-nomer for both protocols, but...
>
>For example, does:
>
>EIGRP AS 1 IGRP AS 1 EIGRP AS 1
>
>pose a problem?
I'm trying to think of an extension of
te: I have not worked with IOS releases above 11.2 so things may have
changed recently.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Robert Padjen
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EIGRP contiguous
I have an interesting question for the group, although
it is not directly related to any of the current
exams.
Does an EIGRP AS have to be contiguous or can it be on
two sides of an IGRP 'AS'. I note that the use of the
term AS is a mis-nomer for both protocols, but...
For example, does:
EIGRP
19 matches
Mail list logo
