Michael L. Williams
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2002 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
Actually, if you're running Native IOS on your 6500s (which many HUGE
corporations are now doing because of how redundancy is handled and besides
it's like ha
Actually, if you're running Native IOS on your 6500s (which many HUGE
corporations are now doing because of how redundancy is handled and besides
it's like having a 280+port router =), then there is really a minimal
differents in the 6500 and 3550 commands. They're both IOS, so no
diff..
As
> ... The only thing I don't like
> is that MPLS may be in the new lab, and that's not a technology that's
> really taken off yet.
Well, certain technologies that are being removed, like say IPX NLSP, didn't
exactly take the world by storm either. So you could say that you're simply
replacing on
ried about PIX 506 commands vs PIX 535s but
rather 65xx commands vs the 3550.
Theo
"Mark Odette II"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/14/2002 12:36 AM
Please respond to "Mark Odette II"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: Not on;y is
I bet you that the new lab's format/blueprint will resemble the new CCIE
beta's blueprint. I'm pretty sure the announcement will be made at the
Networkers CCIE power-session in San Diego in 2 weeks. So, it doesn't sound
easier, but at least the topics are up-to-date. The only thing I don't like
. Ridder"
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 06/13/2002 11:00 AM
> Please respond to "Steven A. Ridder"
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject:Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
>
>
> I'm an idiot.
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Larry Letterman
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
you have some good points
However we have 35 + buildings in our campus and I have
almost as many 350
Theo
"Larry Letterman"
06/13/2002 02:33 PM
To: ,
cc:
Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
and why are you so distraught about no IDS..?
other than the fact we all know your big on security.
Its a basic l2/l3 switch for the lan switch
"Larry Letterman"
06/13/2002 02:33 PM
To: ,
cc:
Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
and why are you so distraught about no IDS..?
other than the fact we all know your big on security.
Its a basic l2/l3 switch for the lan switching pa
quot;
>Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
>Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:24:24 -0400
>
>Dream of many 3550s..
>
>Question: Maybe I am an Idiot or something but why are they using the
>3550? I ju
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
I don't know about this thing.
What is the real throughput I wonder.
It says 24Gbbs switching fabric but I can't find a p
t;
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 06/13/2002 12:14 PM
> Please respond to "Mark Odette II"
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
>
>
> The 3550 running the Enhanced image of IOS is a layer
dette II"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/13/2002 12:14 PM
Please respond to "Mark Odette II"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
The 3550 running the Enhanced image of IOS is a layer 3 switch with 24
or 48 po
Whether this is good or bad news for candidates is difficult to say. The
real question is what they are going to replace it with. I always saw those
removed topics as "gimme" points. For example now they could start asking
super-funky voice or ATM questions. Or they could accelerate the move t
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
Dream of many 3550s..
Question: Maybe I am an Idiot or something but why are they using the
3550? I just don't understand. I thought they shoud use the 6506 or
something like that not a lower model. Can someone clarify thi
"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/13/2002 11:00 AM
Please respond to "Steven A. Ridder"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
I'm an idiot. I see someone else already posted it.
I'm going to bed then.
I'm an idiot. I see someone else already posted it.
I'm going to bed then.
Steve
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Right from Cisco's mouth: NO MORE IPX, TOKEN RING, OR CatOS!
>
> "CCIE candidates should note changes to the technical
Right from Cisco's mouth: NO MORE IPX, TOKEN RING, OR CatOS!
"CCIE candidates should note changes to the technical content and equipment
in the lab exam. Effective October 1st, 2002, candidates will no longer be
tested in the areas of IGRP, Token Ring, Token Ring Switching, or IPX. Note:
DLS
18 matches
Mail list logo
