Title: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
This will work no problem. I've done it at
many sites. My minimum recommended is exactly what you have.
John
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff Wang
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 9:17
Can you tell why a full routing tables is required ? What is the benefit ?
--
From: John Kaberna [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 12:37 PM
To: Jeff Wang; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for
in my experience, arouter with more than 32megs will do well with the full
internet table. Cisco recommends to use 64megs at least...
with a E1, the full internet table will took a couple minutes to download...
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.gro
Title: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
A
CCIE, experienced in the service provider market, just recently told me that a
3640 *might* be OK at first, but it would really be a strain to
keep the entire routing table. His reasoning is that 128MB RAM barely
covers the requirement
ject: RE: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for
full-BGP routing?
A
CCIE, experienced in the service provider market, just recently told me that a
3640 *might* be OK at first, but it would really be a strain to
keep the entire routing table. His reasoning is that 128MB RAM barel
> To: Jeff Wang; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP
> routing?
>
> This will work no problem. I've done it at many
> sites. My minimum
> recommended is exactly what you have.
>
> John
>
>
To: Jeff Wang ; Cisco
Groupstudy (E-mail)
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 9:13
AM
Subject: RE: Cisco 3640 grunty enough
for full-BGP routing?
A
CCIE, experienced in the service provider market, just recently told me that
a 3640 *might* be OK at first,
iginal Message -
From: Guyler, Rik [EESUS]
To: Jeff Wang ; Cisco Groupstudy (E-mail)
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 9:13 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
A CCIE, experienced in the service provider market, just recently told me
that a 3640 *might* b
ECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
About two days ago, I was reading an RFC written in 1996 (RFC 1772 or
1773..) and it talked about how the BGP database would fit into 64 mb of ram
in 1995, and all
y, September 18, 2000
4:16 PMTo: Guyler, Rik [EESUS]; Jeff Wang; Cisco Groupstudy
(E-mail)Subject: Re: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP
routing?
The BGP routing table itself takes up less than
20MB of memory last time I checked (only a couple months ago). I don't
have access
Title: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
I'll repost. This is the memory and BGP
summary from a router with the full route table.
The route table takes up less than 20 MB's.
The BGP router session is @ 39MB.
I'm not sure as to whether or not the table is
included in the session
M
> Para: John Kaberna; Cisco Groupstudy (E-mail)
> Asunto: RE: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
>
> I don't know the nuances involved, but he stated that the Internet routing
> table a year ago was over 70,000 routes and is probably closer to 90,000
> rou
e-From: Guyler, Rik [EESUS]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000
1:06 PMTo: John Kaberna; Cisco Groupstudy
(E-mail)Subject: RE: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP
routing?
I
don't know the nuances involved, but he stated that the Internet routing
ginal Message -
From: Spolidoro, Guilherme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 10:39 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
> We use Ciscos 7513 with IOS 12.05T1 and 128Mb.
>
> Today full routing means about 8
gt; -Mensaje original-
> > De:Guyler, Rik [EESUS] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Enviado el:Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:06 PM
> > Para: John Kaberna; Cisco Groupstudy (E-mail)
> > Asunto:RE: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
> >
BGP process overall uses about 71Mb.
I hope this post helps the rest of the members of the list.
-Original Message-
From: John Kaberna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 3:21 PM
To: Spolidoro, Guilherme; Cisco Groupstudy (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Cisco 3640 grun
;
To: 'John Kaberna' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco Groupstudy (E-mail)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:13 PM
Subject: RE: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
> Something I always liked on the groupstudy was the fact that unlikelly
other
> l
17 matches
Mail list logo
